* state: port KV and Tombstone tables to new pattern
* go fmt'ed
* handle wildcards for tombstones
* Fix graveyard ent vs oss
* fix oss compilation error
* add partition to tombstones and kv state store indexes
* refactor to use `indexWithEnterpriseIndexable`
* partition kvs indexID table
* add `partitionedIndexEntryName` in oss for test purpose
* Apply suggestions from code review
Co-authored-by: Chris S. Kim <ckim@hashicorp.com>
Co-authored-by: R.B. Boyer <4903+rboyer@users.noreply.github.com>
* add `singleValueID` implementation assertions
* remove entmeta reference from oss
Co-authored-by: R.B. Boyer <4903+rboyer@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Daniel Nephin <dnephin@hashicorp.com>
Co-authored-by: Chris S. Kim <ckim@hashicorp.com>
Co-authored-by: R.B. Boyer <4903+rboyer@users.noreply.github.com>
These two fields do not appear to be used anywhere. We use the structs.ACLPolicy ID in the
ACLResolver cache, but the acl.Policy ID and revision are not used.
* Support Vault Namespaces explicitly in CA config
If there is a Namespace entry included in the Vault CA configuration,
set it as the Vault Namespace on the Vault client
Currently the only way to support Vault namespaces in the Consul CA
config is by doing one of the following:
1) Set the VAULT_NAMESPACE environment variable which will be picked up
by the Vault API client
2) Prefix all Vault paths with the namespace
Neither of these are super pleasant. The first requires direct access
and modification to the Consul runtime environment. It's possible and
expected, not super pleasant.
The second requires more indepth knowledge of Vault and how it uses
Namespaces and could be confusing for anyone without that context. It
also infers that it is not supported
* Add changelog
* Remove fmt.Fprint calls
* Make comment clearer
* Add next consul version to website docs
* Add new test for default configuration
* go mod tidy
* Add skip if vault not present
* Tweak changelog text
* Remove some usage of md5 from the system
OSS side of https://github.com/hashicorp/consul-enterprise/pull/1253
This is a potential security issue because an attacker could conceivably manipulate inputs to cause persistence files to collide, effectively deleting the persistence file for one of the colliding elements.
Signed-off-by: Mark Anderson <manderson@hashicorp.com>
Port of: Ensure we check intention service prefix permissions for per service (#11270)
Previously, when showing some action buttons for 'per service intentions' we used a global 'can I do something with any intention' permission to decide whether to show a certain button or not. If a user has a token that does not have 'global' intention permissions, but does have intention permissions on one or more specific services (for example via service / service_prefix), this meant that we did not show them certain buttons required to create/edit the intentions for this specific service.
This PR adds that extra permissions check so we now check the intentions permissions per service instead of using the 'global' "can I edit intentions" question/request.
**Notes:**
- If a HTML button is `disabled` this means tippy.js doesn't adopt the
popover properly and subsequently hide it from the user, so aswell as
just disabling the button so you can't active the popover, we also don't
even put the popover on the page
- If `ability.item` or `ability.item.Resources` are empty then assume no access
**We don't try to disable service > right hand side intention actions here**
Whether you can create intentions for a service depends on the
_destination_ of the intention you would like to create. For the
topology view going from the LHS to the center, this is straightforwards
as we only need to know the permissions for the central service, as when
you are going from the LHS to the center, the center is the
_destination_.
When going from the center to the RHS the _destination[s]_ are on the
RHS. This means we need to know the permissions for potentially 1000s of
services all in one go in order to know when to show a button or not.
We can't realistically discover the permissions for service > RHS
services as we'd have either make a HTTP request per right hand service,
or potentially make an incredibly large POST request for all the
potentially 1000s of services on the right hand side (more preferable to
1000s of HTTP requests).
Therefore for the moment at least we keep the old functionality (thin client)
for the middle to RHS here. If you do go to click on the button and you
don't have permissions to update the intention you will still not be
able to update it, only you won't know this until you click the button
(at which point you'll get a UI visible 403 error)
Note: We reversed the conditional here between 1.10 and 1.11
So this make 100% sense that the port is different here to 1.11
* docs: consul-k8s uninstall with namespace
Uninstall with namespace
* change release name to consul in uninstall
* Update website/content/docs/k8s/operations/uninstall.mdx
Co-authored-by: trujillo-adam <47586768+trujillo-adam@users.noreply.github.com>
* add --create-namespace command to install for custom values file
Co-authored-by: trujillo-adam <47586768+trujillo-adam@users.noreply.github.com>
The Consul UI topology view has an icon with the text
"Configure metrics dashboard" that links to this page. Add a notice at
the top of the page that links them directly to the relevant section.
Previously we had "Open metrics Dashboard" and "Configure metrics
dashboard" in the topology cards and then we had "Open Dashboard" in the
top nav when the dashboard was configured.
Now we use "Open dashboard" and "Configure dashboard".
This change was made for consistency in wording and casing. In addition,
the dashboard could be used for metrics but also other dashboards so
there's no need to scope it only to metrics. Also the config is:
```hcl
ui_config {
dashboard_url_templates
}
```
Which does not mention metrics
The UpstreamConfig.Defaults field does not support setting Name or
Namespace because the purpose is to apply defaults to all upstreams.
I think this was just missed in the docs since those fields would
error if set under Defaults.
i.e. this is not supported:
```
UpstreamConfig {
Defaults {
Name = "foo"
Namespace = "bar"
# Defaults config here
}
}
```
* add root_cert_ttl option for consul connect, vault ca providers
Signed-off-by: FFMMM <FFMMM@users.noreply.github.com>
* Apply suggestions from code review
Co-authored-by: Chris S. Kim <ckim@hashicorp.com>
* add changelog, pr feedback
Signed-off-by: FFMMM <FFMMM@users.noreply.github.com>
* Update .changelog/11428.txt, more docs
Co-authored-by: Daniel Nephin <dnephin@hashicorp.com>
* Update website/content/docs/agent/options.mdx
Co-authored-by: Kyle Havlovitz <kylehav@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Chris S. Kim <ckim@hashicorp.com>
Co-authored-by: Daniel Nephin <dnephin@hashicorp.com>
Co-authored-by: Kyle Havlovitz <kylehav@gmail.com>
This will behave the way we handle SNI and SPIFFE IDs, where the default
partition is excluded.
Excluding the default ensures that don't attempt to compare default.dc2
to dc2 in OSS.
Karl Cardenas