Seal keys can be rotated. When this happens, the barrier and recovery
keys should be re-encrypted with the new seal key. This change
automatically re-encrypts the barrier and recovery keys with the latest
seal key on the active node during the 'postUnseal' phase.
* sys: add host-info endpoint, add client API method
* remove old commented handler
* add http tests, fix bugs
* query all partitions for disk usage
* fix Timestamp decoding
* add comments for clarification
* dont append a nil entry on disk usage query error
* remove HostInfo from the sdk api
We can use Logical().Read(...) to query this endpoint since the payload is contained with the data object. All warnings are preserved under Secret.Warnings.
* ensure that we're testing failure case against a standby node
* add and use TestWaitStandby to ensure core is on standby
* remove TestWaitStandby
* respond with local-only error
* move HostInfo into its own helper package
* fix imports; use new no-forward handler
* add cpu times to collection
* emit clearer multierrors/warnings by collection type
* add comments on HostInfo fields
The OIDC Discovery standard requires the response_types_supported field
to be returned in the .well-known/openid-configuration response.
Also, the AWS IAM OIDC consumer won't accept Vault as an identity
provider without this field.
Based on examples in the OIDC Core documentation, it appears Vault
supports only the `id_token` flow, and thus that is the only value that
makes sense to be set in this field. See:
https://openid.net/specs/openid-connect-core-1_0.html#AuthorizationExamples
* default to token auth method
* pass in selectedValue to the AuthForm
* adjust when and if tasks are called so there's no race condition with wrapped_token query param
* add some tests for wrapped_token
* adjust redirect_to behavior so that it also works with the logout route and the wrapped_token query param
* fix linting
* secrets/aws: Support permissions boundaries on iam_user creds
This allows configuring Vault to attach a permissions boundary policy to
IAM users that it creates, configured on a per-Vault-role basis.
* Fix indentation of policy in docs
Use spaces instead of tabs
* sys/pprof: add pprof routes to the system backend
* sys/pprof: add pprof paths to handler with local-only check
* fix trailing slash on pprof index endpoint
* use new no-forward handler on pprof
* go mod tidy
* add pprof external tests
* disallow streaming requests to exceed DefaultMaxRequestDuration
* add max request duration test
A Vault Enterprise Pro customer in Japan has tried to get Vault DR replication working using Google Cloud Storage.
They were frustrated to learn that GCS may not have support for transactional updates which has resulted in a lot of wasted time.
The complaint was that this was not clear from our documentation.
This note may help customers to understand sooner that not all highly available backends support transactional updates.
Chris Hoffman