* Add HTTP challenge validator
This will attempt to safely validate HTTP challenges, following a
limited number of redirects and timing out after too much time has
passed.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Scheel <alex.scheel@hashicorp.com>
* Add test for ValidateKeyAuthorization
Signed-off-by: Alexander Scheel <alex.scheel@hashicorp.com>
* Add test cases for ValidateHTTP01Challenge
Signed-off-by: Alexander Scheel <alex.scheel@hashicorp.com>
* Add token to HTTP challenge
Signed-off-by: Alexander Scheel <alex.scheel@hashicorp.com>
---------
Signed-off-by: Alexander Scheel <alex.scheel@hashicorp.com>
* Update userpass.mdx
vault write auth/userpass/users/mitchellh password=foo policies=admins
in the path "userpass" is actually a path, if custom path is defined, custom path need to used, instead of userpass.
* Add extra description
---------
Co-authored-by: Yoko Hyakuna <yoko@hashicorp.com>
* Remove extraneous certificate from OCSP response
Since the issuer used to sign the certificate also signs the OCSP
response, no additional information is added by sending the issuer again
in the certs field of the BasicOCSPResponse structure. Removing it saves
bytes and avoids confusing Go-based OCSP verifiers which cannot handle
the cert issuer being duplicated in the certs field.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Scheel <alex.scheel@hashicorp.com>
* Add changelog entry
Signed-off-by: Alexander Scheel <alex.scheel@hashicorp.com>
---------
Signed-off-by: Alexander Scheel <alex.scheel@hashicorp.com>
* Add fix for Go x/crypto/ocsp failure case
When calling ocsp.ParseRequest(req, issue) with a non-nil issuer on a
ocsp request which _unknowingly_ contains an entry in the
BasicOCSPResponse's certs field, Go incorrectly assumes that the issuer
is a direct parent of the _first_ certificate in the certs field,
discarding the rest.
As documented in the Go issue, this is not a valid assumption and thus
causes OCSP verification to fail in Vault with an error like:
> bad OCSP signature: crypto/rsa: verification error
which ultimately leads to a cert auth login error of:
> no chain matching all constraints could be found for this login certificate
We address this by using the unsafe issuer=nil argument, taking on the
task of validating the OCSP response's signature as best we can in the
absence of full chain information on either side (both the trusted
certificate whose OCSP response we're verifying and the lack of any
additional certs the OCSP responder may have sent).
See also: https://github.com/golang/go/issues/59641
Signed-off-by: Alexander Scheel <alex.scheel@hashicorp.com>
* Add test case with Vault PKI
Signed-off-by: Alexander Scheel <alex.scheel@hashicorp.com>
* Add changelog entry
Signed-off-by: Alexander Scheel <alex.scheel@hashicorp.com>
---------
Signed-off-by: Alexander Scheel <alex.scheel@hashicorp.com>
- Add a helper function that can accept the final API path along with
the pattern function for an ACME api definition and generate the
various flavors for the given API
* Move all ACME wrappers into a dedicated go file
- Make it easier to figure out where the various wrappers for
ACME exist by locating them inside a dedicated go file instead
of spread out across the various path_acme_xxx files.
* Add missing copyright headers to PKI files
* Implement ACME new-order API
- This is a very rough draft for the new order ACME API
* Add ACME order list API
* Implement ACME Get order API
* Misc order related fixes
- Filter authorizations in GetOrders for valid
- Validate notBefore and notAfter dates make sense
- Add <order>/cert URL path to order response if set to valid
* Return account status within err authorized, if the account key verified
* add max_entry_size to sanitized config output
* add changelog entry
* add test parallelism
* add inmem test case
* use named struct fields for TestSysConfigState_Sanitized cases
* updates clients config view for census reporting
* adds changelog entry
* fixes issue with modal staying open and error not showing on clients config save failure
* adds min retention months to clients config model and form validation
* revert STS lease changes, now create a lease for STS credentials but keep the ttl
Co-authored-by: Calvin Leung Huang <1883212+calvn@users.noreply.github.com>
The previous strategy for provisioning infrastructure targets was to use
the cheapest instances that could reliably perform as Vault cluster
nodes. With this change we introduce a new model for target node
infrastructure. We've replaced on-demand instances for a spot
fleet. While the spot price fluctuates based on dynamic pricing,
capacity, region, instance type, and platform, cost savings for our
most common combinations range between 20-70%.
This change only includes spot fleet targets for Vault clusters.
We'll be updating our Consul backend bidding in another PR.
* Create a new `vault_cluster` module that handles installation,
configuration, initializing, and unsealing Vault clusters.
* Create a `target_ec2_instances` module that can provision a group of
instances on-demand.
* Create a `target_ec2_spot_fleet` module that can bid on a fleet of
spot instances.
* Extend every Enos scenario to utilize the spot fleet target acquisition
strategy and the `vault_cluster` module.
* Update our Enos CI modules to handle both the `aws-nuke` permissions
and also the privileges to provision spot fleets.
* Only use us-east-1 and us-west-2 in our scenario matrices as costs are
lower than us-west-1.
Signed-off-by: Ryan Cragun <me@ryan.ec>
* Distinguish POST-as-GET from POST-with-empty-body
Signed-off-by: Alexander Scheel <alex.scheel@hashicorp.com>
* Add ACME authorization, identifier, and challenge types
Signed-off-by: Alexander Scheel <alex.scheel@hashicorp.com>
* Add ability to load and save authorizations
Signed-off-by: Alexander Scheel <alex.scheel@hashicorp.com>
* Add ACME authorizations path handling
This supports two methods: a fetch handler over the authorization, to
expose the underlying challenges, and a deactivate handler to revoke
the authorization and mark its challenges invalid.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Scheel <alex.scheel@hashicorp.com>
* Add ACME challenge path handling
These paths kick off processing and validation of the challenge by the
ACME client.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Scheel <alex.scheel@hashicorp.com>
---------
Signed-off-by: Alexander Scheel <alex.scheel@hashicorp.com>
* Use a UUID for ACME kid instead of a key fingerprint
* PR feedback
- Calculate thumbprint within CreateAccount instead of passing it in
- Reorder writes within CreateAccount to now write out thumbprint entry
first as we can easily recover/overwrite it if we fail mid-way
- Change back LoadAccount in acme to return an error if it fails to
lookup the entry
* Clearify comment within ACME CreateAccount
* Rework ACME workflow test to leverage Golang's ACME client library
- Instead of testing manually, leverage the Golang ACME library
to test against our implementation from the unit tests.
* Add tests for new-account and misc fixes
- Set and return the account status for registration
- Add handlers for the account/ api/updates
- Switch acme/ to cluster local storage
- Disable terms of service checks for now as we don't set the url
* PR feedback
- Implement account deactivation
- Create separate account update handler, to not mix account creation
logic
- Add kid field to account update definition
- Add support to update contact details on an existing account
Robert