* List tidy parameters in one place
Signed-off-by: Alexander Scheel <alex.scheel@hashicorp.com>
* Add new tidy status outputs
Signed-off-by: Alexander Scheel <alex.scheel@hashicorp.com>
* Add docs on new tidy parameters
Signed-off-by: Alexander Scheel <alex.scheel@hashicorp.com>
---------
Signed-off-by: Alexander Scheel <alex.scheel@hashicorp.com>
* allow_forwarding_via_token syntax update
the example syntax used for `allow_forwarding_via_token` marks the option as an array when it does not need to be, this updates the format on the page to be a code block and removes the square braces
* another update to `allow_forwarding_via_token` syntax
* Add ability to clean up host keys for dynamic keys
This adds a new endpoint, tidy/dynamic-keys that removes any stale host
keys still present on the mount. This does not clean up any pending
dynamic key leases and will not remove these keys from systems with
authorized hosts entries created by Vault.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Scheel <alex.scheel@hashicorp.com>
* Add documentation
Signed-off-by: Alexander Scheel <alex.scheel@hashicorp.com>
* Add changelog entry
Signed-off-by: Alexander Scheel <alex.scheel@hashicorp.com>
---------
Signed-off-by: Alexander Scheel <alex.scheel@hashicorp.com>
* Remove dynamic keys from SSH Secrets Engine
This removes the functionality of Vault creating keys and adding them to
the authorized keys file on hosts.
This functionality has been deprecated since Vault version 0.7.2.
The preferred alternative is to use the SSH CA method, which also allows
key generation but places limits on TTL and doesn't require Vault reach
out to provision each key on the specified host, making it much more
secure.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Scheel <alex.scheel@hashicorp.com>
* Remove dynamic ssh references from documentation
Signed-off-by: Alexander Scheel <alex.scheel@hashicorp.com>
* Add changelog entry
Signed-off-by: Alexander Scheel <alex.scheel@hashicorp.com>
* Remove dynamic key secret type entirely
Signed-off-by: Alexander Scheel <alex.scheel@hashicorp.com>
* Clarify changelog language
Signed-off-by: Alexander Scheel <alex.scheel@hashicorp.com>
* Add removal notice to the website
Signed-off-by: Alexander Scheel <alex.scheel@hashicorp.com>
---------
Signed-off-by: Alexander Scheel <alex.scheel@hashicorp.com>
* Update integrated-storage.mdx
The quorum paragraph shall also be updated with the table:
instead of:
"A Raft cluster of 3 nodes can tolerate a single node failure while a cluster
of 5 can tolerate 2 node failures. The recommended configuration is to either
run 3 or 5 Vault servers per cluster."
shall be:
"A Raft cluster of 3 nodes can tolerate a single node failure while a cluster
of 5 can tolerate 2 node failures. The recommended configuration is to either
run 5 or 7 Vault servers per cluster."
* Give an explicit node recommendation
---------
Co-authored-by: Yoko Hyakuna <yoko@hashicorp.com>
* Add Redirect for Plugin Portal -> Integration Library
* Remove Plugin Portal page & update sidebar
* Replace the Plugin Portal link to point Vault Integrations (#18897)
* Replace the Plugin Portal link to point Vault Integrations
* Update website/content/docs/partnerships.mdx
Co-authored-by: Brandon Romano <brandon@hashicorp.com>
---------
Co-authored-by: Brandon Romano <brandon@hashicorp.com>
---------
Co-authored-by: Yoko Hyakuna <yoko@hashicorp.com>
* Clarify error on due to unsupported EC key bits
Signed-off-by: Alexander Scheel <alex.scheel@hashicorp.com>
* Remove documentation about unsupported EC/224
Resolves: #18843
Signed-off-by: Alexander Scheel <alex.scheel@hashicorp.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexander Scheel <alex.scheel@hashicorp.com>
* The fields.
* UserID set, add to certificate
* Changelog.
* Fix test (set default).
* Add UserID constant to certutil, revert extension changes
Signed-off-by: Alexander Scheel <alex.scheel@hashicorp.com>
* Add user_ids as field for leaf signing
Presumably, this isn't necessary for CAs, given that CAs probably don't
have a user ID corresponding to them.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Scheel <alex.scheel@hashicorp.com>
* Support setting multiple user_ids in Subject
Signed-off-by: Alexander Scheel <alex.scheel@hashicorp.com>
* Allow any User ID with sign-verbatim
Signed-off-by: Alexander Scheel <alex.scheel@hashicorp.com>
* Add tests for User IDs in PKI
Signed-off-by: Alexander Scheel <alex.scheel@hashicorp.com>
* Add docs about user_ids, allowed_user_ids
Signed-off-by: Alexander Scheel <alex.scheel@hashicorp.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexander Scheel <alex.scheel@hashicorp.com>
Co-authored-by: Alexander Scheel <alex.scheel@hashicorp.com>
* Parallel migration (#18815)
* flagParallel sanity check
* Attempt to use ErrGroups
* Updated docs
* Allow 'start' and 'max-parallel' together
* parallel flag renamed to max-parallel
* tests for start + parallel
* Removed permit pool
* Updated docs to make it clearer that a high setting might not be honored based on storage backend setting
* System dependent max int size
* Default max-parallel 1 => 10
* Test folder/paths updated
Co-authored-by: Tomasz Pawelczak <10206601+gites@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Mike Palmiotto <mike.palmiotto@hashicorp.com>
* change indentation leve of cas field
* change formatting for cas_required
Co-authored-by: Yoko Hyakuna <yoko@hashicorp.com>
Co-authored-by: Yoko Hyakuna <yoko@hashicorp.com>
* docs/oidc: change user type recommendation for Google workspace integration
* Update website/content/docs/auth/jwt/oidc-providers/google.mdx
Co-authored-by: Calvin Leung Huang <1883212+calvn@users.noreply.github.com>
This PR relates to a feature request logged through HashiCorp commercial
support.
Vault lacks pagination in its APIs. As a result, certain list operations
can return **very** large responses. The user's chosen audit sinks may
experience difficulty consuming audit records that swell to tens of
megabytes of JSON.
In our case, one of the systems consuming audit log data could not cope,
and failed.
The responses of list operations are typically not very interesting, as
they are mostly lists of keys, or, even when they include a "key_info"
field, are not returning confidential information. They become even less
interesting once HMAC-ed by the audit system.
Some example Vault "list" operations that are prone to becoming very
large in an active Vault installation are:
auth/token/accessors/
identity/entity/id/
identity/entity-alias/id/
pki/certs/
In response, I've coded a new option that can be applied to audit
backends, `elide_list_responses`. When enabled, response data is elided
from audit logs, only when the operation type is "list".
For added safety, the elision only applies to the "keys" and "key_info"
fields within the response data - these are conventionally the only
fields present in a list response - see logical.ListResponse, and
logical.ListResponseWithInfo. However, other fields are technically
possible if a plugin author writes unusual code, and these will be
preserved in the audit log even with this option enabled.
The elision replaces the values of the "keys" and "key_info" fields with
an integer count of the number of entries. This allows even the elided
audit logs to still be useful for answering questions like "Was any data
returned?" or "How many records were listed?".
* add core state lockd eadlock detection config option v2
* add changelog
* split out NewTestCluster function to maintain build flag
* replace long func with constant
* remove line
* rename file, and move where detect deadlock flag is set
* Allow tidy to backup legacy CA bundles
With the new tidy_move_legacy_ca_bundle option, we'll use tidy to move
the legacy CA bundle from /config/ca_bundle to /config/ca_bundle.bak.
This does two things:
1. Removes ca_bundle from the hot-path of initialization after initial
migration has completed. Because this entry is seal wrapped, this
may result in performance improvements.
2. Allows recovery of this value in the event of some other failure
with migration.
Notably, this cannot occur during migration in the unlikely (and largely
unsupported) case that the operator immediately downgrades to Vault
<1.11.x. Thus, we reuse issuer_safety_buffer; while potentially long,
tidy can always be run manually with a shorter buffer (and only this
flag) to manually move the bundle if necessary.
In the event of needing to recover or undo this operation, it is
sufficient to use sys/raw to read the backed up value and subsequently
write it to its old path (/config/ca_bundle).
The new entry remains seal wrapped, but otherwise isn't used within the
code and so has better performance characteristics.
Performing a fat deletion (DELETE /root) will again remove the backup
like the old legacy bundle, preserving its wipe characteristics.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Scheel <alex.scheel@hashicorp.com>
* Add changelog
Signed-off-by: Alexander Scheel <alex.scheel@hashicorp.com>
* Add documentation about new tidy parameter
Signed-off-by: Alexander Scheel <alex.scheel@hashicorp.com>
* Add tests for migration scenarios
Signed-off-by: Alexander Scheel <alex.scheel@hashicorp.com>
* Clean up time comparisons
Signed-off-by: Alexander Scheel <alex.scheel@hashicorp.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexander Scheel <alex.scheel@hashicorp.com>
* Add documentation on vault pki health-check
Signed-off-by: Alexander Scheel <alex.scheel@hashicorp.com>
* Refer users to online docs
Signed-off-by: Alexander Scheel <alex.scheel@hashicorp.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexander Scheel <alex.scheel@hashicorp.com>
* Add documentation for KMIP features implemented in 1.13
* Add release version for key format types
* Fix syntax
* Add supported hashing algorithms and padding methods
* Fix formatting
* Add nit picks from review feedback
* Update command/agent.go
* Attempt to only reload log level and certs
* Mimicked 'server' test for cert reload in 'agent'
Co-authored-by: Nick Cabatoff <ncabatoff@hashicorp.com>
Left out the `c.config` tweak that meant changes to lots of lines of code within the `Run` function of Agent command. :)
* Add cluster_aia_path templating variable
Per discussion with maxb, allow using a non-Vault distribution point
which may use an insecure transport for RFC 5280 compliance.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Scheel <alex.scheel@hashicorp.com>
* Address feedback from Max
Co-authored-by: Max Bowsher <maxbowsher@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexander Scheel <alex.scheel@hashicorp.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexander Scheel <alex.scheel@hashicorp.com>
Co-authored-by: Max Bowsher <maxbowsher@gmail.com>
* VAULT-12491 Add docs for group policy config
* VAULT-12491 typo
* VAULT-12491 typo
* VAULT-12491 Update language a bit
* VAULT-12491 Update language a bit
* VAULT-12491 Update language a bit
* Update integrated-storage.mdx
The old paragraph "The recommended deployment is either 3 or 5 servers." should match the "Minimums & Scaling" purpose from below.
It also reaffirms that, in a PRODUCTION environment, a number of 5 nodes are the minimum requirement.
A rewording is also necessary: "The recommended deployment consists in a minimum of 5 or more of servers that are odd in their total (5, 7, etc)."
* Update website/content/docs/internals/integrated-storage.mdx
Co-authored-by: Yoko Hyakuna <yoko@hashicorp.com>
Co-authored-by: Yoko Hyakuna <yoko@hashicorp.com>
