This changeset adds new architecture internals documents to the contributing guide. These are intentionally here and not on the public-facing website because the material is not required for operators and includes a lot of diagrams that we can cheaply maintain with mermaid syntax but would involve art assets to have up on the main site that would become quickly out of date as code changes happen and be extremely expensive to maintain. However, these should be suitable to use as points of conversation with expert end users. Included: * A description of Evaluation triggers and expected counts, with examples. * A description of Evaluation states and implicit states. This is taken from an internal document in our team wiki. * A description of how writing the State Store works. This is taken from a diagram I put together a few months ago for internal education purposes. * A description of Evaluation lifecycle, from registration to running Allocations. This is mostly lifted from @lgfa29's amazing mega-diagram, but broken into digestible chunks and without multi-region deployments, which I'd like to cover in a future doc. Also includes adding Deployments to our public-facing glossary. Co-authored-by: Luiz Aoqui <luiz@hashicorp.com> Co-authored-by: Michael Schurter <mschurter@hashicorp.com> Co-authored-by: Seth Hoenig <shoenig@duck.com>
13 KiB
Architecture: Evaluations into Allocations
The Scheduling Concepts docs provide an overview of how the scheduling process works. This document is intended to go a bit deeper than those docs and walk thru the lifecycle of an Evaluation from job registration to running Allocations on the clients. The process can be broken into 4 parts:
Note that in all the diagrams below, writing to the State Store is considered
atomic. This means the Nomad leader has replicated to all the followers, and all
the servers have applied the raft log entry to their local FSM. So long as
raftApply
returns without an error, we have a guarantee that all servers will
be able to retrieve the entry from their state store at some point in the
future.
Job Registration
Creating or updating a Job is a synchronous API operation. By the time the response has returned to the API consumer, the Job and an Evaluation for that Job have been written to the state store of the server nodes.
- Note: parameterized or periodic batch jobs don't create an Evaluation at registration, only once dispatched.
- Note: The scheduler is very fast! This means that once the CLI gets a response it can immediately start making queries to get information about the next steps.
- Note: This workflow is different for Multi-Region Deployments (found in Nomad Enterprise). That will be documented separately.
The diagram below shows this initial synchronous phase. Note here that there's no scheduling happening yet, so no Allocation (or Deployment) has been created.
sequenceDiagram
participant user as User
participant cli as CLI
participant httpAPI as HTTP API
participant leaderRpc as Leader RPC
participant stateStore as State Store
user ->> cli: nomad job run
activate cli
cli ->> httpAPI: Create Job API
httpAPI ->> leaderRpc: Job.Register
activate leaderRpc
leaderRpc ->> stateStore: write Job
activate stateStore
stateStore -->> leaderRpc: ok
deactivate stateStore
leaderRpc ->> stateStore: write Evaluation
activate stateStore
stateStore -->> leaderRpc: ok
Note right of stateStore: EvalBroker.Enqueue
Note right of stateStore: (see Scheduling below)
deactivate stateStore
leaderRpc -->> httpAPI: Job.Register response
deactivate leaderRpc
httpAPI -->> cli: Create Job response
deactivate cli
Scheduling
A long-lived goroutine on the Nomad leader called the Eval Broker maintains a
queue of Evaluations previously written to the state store and enqueued via the
EvalBroker.Enqueue
method. (When a leader transition occurs, the leader
queries all the Evaluations in the state store and enqueues them in its new Eval
Broker.)
Scheduler workers are long-lived goroutines running on all server
nodes. Typically this will be one per core on followers and 1/4 that number on
the leader. The workers poll for Evaluations from the Eval Broker with the
Eval.Dequeue
RPC. Once a worker has an evaluation, it instantiates a scheduler
for that evaluation (of type service
, system
, sysbatch
, batch
, or
core
).
Because a worker is running one scheduler at a time, Nomad's documentation often refers to "workers" and "schedulers" interchangeably, but the worker is the long-lived goroutine and the scheduler is the struct that contains the code and state around processing a single evaluation. The scheduler mutates itself and is thrown away once the evaluation is processed.
The scheduler takes a snapshot of that server node's state store so that it has a constant current view of the cluster state. The scheduler executes 3 main steps:
- Reconcile: compare the cluster state and job specification to determine what changes need to be made -- starting or stopping Allocations. The scheduler creates new Allocations in this step. But note that these Allocations are not yet persisted to the state store.
- Feasibility Check: For each Allocation it needs, the scheduler iterates over
Nodes until it finds up to 2 Nodes that match the Allocation's resource requirements
and constraints.
- Note: for system jobs or jobs with with
spread
blocks, the scheduler has to check all Nodes.
- Note: for system jobs or jobs with with
- Scoring: For each feasible node, the scheduler ranks them and picks the one with the highest score.
If the job is a service
job, the scheduler will also create (or update) a
Deployment. When the scheduler determines the number of Allocations to create,
it examine the job's update
block. Only the number of Allocations needed
to complete the next phase of the update will be created in a given
allocation. The Deployment is used by the deployment watcher (see below) to
monitor the health of allocations and create new Evaluations to continue the
update.
If the scheduler cannot place all Allocations, it will create a new Evaluation
in the blocked
state and submit it to the leader. The Eval Broker will
re-enque that Evaluation once cluster state has changed. (This process is the
first green box in the sequence diagram below.)
Once the scheduler has completed processing the Evaluation, if there are Allocations (and possibly a Deployment) to update, it will submit this work as a Plan to the leader. The leader needs to validate this plan and serialize it:
- The scheduler took a snapshot of cluster state at the start of its work, so that state may have changed in the meantime.
- Schedulers run concurrently across the cluster, so they may generate conflicting plans (particularly on heavily-packed clusters).
The leader processes the plan in the plan applier. If the plan is valid, the
plan applier will write the Allocations (and Deployment) update to the state
store. If not, it will reject the plan and the scheduler will try to create a
new plan with a refreshed state. If the scheduler fails to submit a valid plan
too many times it submits a blocked
Evaluation that is triggered by
max-plan-attempts
type. (The plan submit process is the second green box in
the sequence diagram below.)
Once the scheduler has a response from the leader, it will tell the Eval Broker to Ack the Evaluation (if it successfully submitted the plan) or Nack the Evaluation (if it failed to do so) so that another scheduler can try processing it.
The diagram below shows the scheduling phase, including submitting plans to the planner. Note that at the end of this phase, Allocations (and Deployment) have been persisted to the state store.
sequenceDiagram
participant leaderRpc as Leader RPC
participant stateStore as State Store
participant planner as Planner
participant broker as Eval Broker
participant sched as Scheduler
leaderRpc ->> stateStore: write Evaluation (see above)
stateStore ->> broker: EvalBroker.Enqueue
activate broker
broker -->> broker: enqueue eval
broker -->> stateStore: ok
deactivate broker
sched ->> broker: Eval.Dequeue (blocks until work available)
activate sched
broker -->> sched: Evaluation
sched ->> stateStore: query to get job and cluster state
stateStore -->> sched: results
sched -->> sched: Reconcile (how many allocs are needed?)
deactivate sched
alt
Note right of sched: Needs new allocs
activate sched
sched -->> sched: create Allocations
sched -->> sched: create Deployment (service jobs)
Note left of sched: for Deployments, only 1 "batch" of Allocs will get created for each Eval
sched -->> sched: Feasibility Check
Note left of sched: iterate over Nodes to find a placement for each Alloc
sched -->> sched: Ranking
Note left of sched: pick best option for each Alloc
%% start rect highlight for blocked eval
rect rgb(213, 246, 234)
Note left of sched: Not enough room! (But we can submit a partial plan)
sched ->> leaderRpc: Eval.Upsert (blocked)
activate leaderRpc
leaderRpc ->> stateStore: write Evaluation
activate stateStore
stateStore -->> leaderRpc: ok
deactivate stateStore
leaderRpc --> sched: ok
deactivate leaderRpc
end
%% end rect highlight for blocked eval
%% start rect highlight for planner
rect rgb(213, 246, 234)
Note over sched, planner: Note: scheduler snapshot may be stale state relative to leader so it's serialized by plan applier
sched ->> planner: Plan.Submit (Allocations + Deployment)
planner -->> planner: is plan still valid?
Note right of planner: Plan is valid
activate planner
planner ->> leaderRpc: Allocations.Upsert + Deployment.Upsert
activate leaderRpc
leaderRpc ->> stateStore: write Allocations and Deployment
activate stateStore
stateStore -->> leaderRpc: ok
deactivate stateStore
leaderRpc -->> planner: ok
deactivate leaderRpc
planner -->> sched: ok
deactivate planner
end
%% end rect highlight for planner
sched -->> sched: retry on failure, if exceed max attempts will Eval.Nack
else
end
sched ->> broker: Eval.Ack (Eval.Nack if failed)
activate broker
broker ->> stateStore: complete Evaluation
activate stateStore
stateStore -->> broker: ok
deactivate stateStore
broker -->> sched: ok
deactivate broker
deactivate sched
Deployment Watcher
As noted under Scheduling above, a Deployment is created for service jobs. A deployment watcher runs on the leader. Its job is to watch the state of Allocations being placed for a given job version and to emit new Evaluations so that more Allocations for that job can be created.
The "deployments watcher" (plural) makes a blocking query for Deployments and spins up a new "deployment watcher" (singular) for each one. That goroutine will live until its Deployment is complete or failed.
The deployment watcher makes blocking queries on Allocation health and its own
Deployment (which can be canceled or paused by a user). When there's a change in
any of those states, it compares the current state against the update
block and the timers it maintains for min_healthy_time
, healthy_deadline
,
and progress_deadline
. It then updates the Deployment state and creates a new
Evaluation if the current step of the update is complete.
The diagram below shows deployments from a high level. Note that Deployments do not themselves create Allocations -- they create Evaluations and then the schedulers process those as they do normally.
sequenceDiagram
participant leaderRpc as Leader RPC
participant stateStore as State Store
participant dw as Deployment Watcher
dw ->> stateStore: blocking query for new Deployments
activate dw
stateStore -->> dw: new Deployment
dw -->> dw: start watcher
dw ->> stateStore: blocking query for Allocation health
stateStore -->> dw: Allocation health updates
dw ->> dw: next step?
Note right of dw: Update state and create evaluations for next batch...
Note right of dw: Or fail the Deployment and update state
dw ->> leaderRpc: Deployment.Upsert + Evaluation.Upsert
activate leaderRpc
leaderRpc ->> stateStore: write Deployment and Evaluations
activate stateStore
stateStore -->> leaderRpc: ok
deactivate stateStore
leaderRpc -->> dw: ok
deactivate leaderRpc
deactivate dw
Client Allocs
Once the plan applier has persisted Allocations to the state store (with an
associated Node ID), they become available to get placed on the client. Clients
pull new allocations (and changes to allocations), so a new allocation will be
in the pending
state until it's been pulled down by a Client and the
allocation has been instantiated.
Once the Allocation is running and healthy, the Client will send a
Node.UpdateAlloc
RPC back to the server so that info can be persisted in the
state store. This is the allocation health data the Deployment Watcher is
querying for above.
sequenceDiagram
participant followerRpc as Follower RPC
participant stateStore as State Store
participant client as Client
participant allocrunner as Allocation Runner
client ->> followerRpc: Alloc.GetAllocs RPC
activate client
Note right of client: this query can be stale
followerRpc ->> stateStore: query for Allocations
activate followerRpc
activate stateStore
stateStore -->> followerRpc: Allocations
deactivate stateStore
followerRpc -->> client: Allocations
deactivate followerRpc
client ->> allocrunner: Create or update allocation runners
client ->> followerRpc: Node.UpdateAlloc
Note right of followerRpc: will be forwarded to leader
deactivate client