Looks like something got munged at some point. Not sure how it slipped in, but my best guess is that because TestTxn_Apply_ACLDeny is marked flaky we didn't block merge because it failed.
Signed-off-by: Mark Anderson <manderson@hashicorp.com>
* mogify needed pbcommon structs
* mogify needed pbconnect structs
* fix compilation errors and make config_translate_test pass
* add missing file
* remove redundant oss func declaration
* fix EnterpriseMeta to copy the right data for enterprise
* rename pbcommon package to pbcommongogo
* regenerate proto and mog files
* add missing mog files
* add pbcommon package
* pbcommon no mog
* fix enterprise meta code generation
* fix enterprise meta code generation (pbcommongogo)
* fix mog generation for gogo
* use `protoc-go-inject-tag` to inject tags
* rename proto package
* pbcommon no mog
* use `protoc-go-inject-tag` to inject tags
* add non gogo proto to make file
* fix proto get
This extends the acl.AllowAuthorizer with source of authority information.
The next step is to unify the AllowAuthorizer and ACLResolveResult structures; that will be done in a separate PR.
Part of #12481
Signed-off-by: Mark Anderson <manderson@hashicorp.com>
Introduces the capability to configure TLS differently for Consul's
listeners/ports (i.e. HTTPS, gRPC, and the internal multiplexed RPC
port) which is useful in scenarios where you may want the HTTPS or
gRPC interfaces to present a certificate signed by a well-known/public
CA, rather than the certificate used for internal communication which
must have a SAN in the form `server.<dc>.consul`.
Give the user a hint that they might be doing something wrong if their GET
request has a non-empty body, which can easily happen using curl's
--data-urlencode if specifying request type via "--request GET" rather than
"--get". See https://github.com/hashicorp/consul/issues/11471.
[Docs] Agent configuration hierarchy - This PR reorganizes the Consul agent configuration documentation. CLI configuration options and configuration file options are now on separate pages. Additionally, options have been grouped into related categories. The goal is to make the content more consumable and navigable from the TOC menu.
This commit moves our in-app LockSessions code into an external 'app', which can theoretically be side-loaded but for now it just makes for good isolation/code hygiene.
Functionally, there is kind of one change here, and that is we only show the 'Lock Session' tab if you have permissions to see them. Currently as our UI authorization endpoint needs to be changed slightly to suit our usecase, you will always have permissions to see Lock Sessions as we hardcode the session:read to true (obvs this is a frontend thing, not a backend thing), so it doesn't really change anything from a user perspective.
Also added very bare docs while I was here.
Small note here, ideally we need to add the each individual tab depending on whether an 'app' is enabled or not instead of just permissions, ideally it would be done totally from The Outside rather than a can based conditional on the inside, just something else to be thinking about for the future.
Currently the config_entry.go subsystem delegates authorization decisions via the ConfigEntry interface CanRead and CanWrite code. Unfortunately this returns a true/false value and loses the details of the source.
This is not helpful, especially since it the config subsystem can be more complex to understand, since it covers so many domains.
This refactors CanRead/CanWrite to return a structured error message (PermissionDenied or the like) with more details about the reason for denial.
Part of #12241
Signed-off-by: Mark Anderson <manderson@hashicorp.com>
Eric Haberkorn