43 lines
1.3 KiB
Markdown
43 lines
1.3 KiB
Markdown
# CONTRIBUTING GUIDELINE
|
|
|
|
1. [Luke, use the search](#luke-use-the-search)
|
|
2. [You have a problem](#you-have-a-problem)
|
|
3. [You have a solution](#you-have-a-solution)
|
|
|
|
**BONUS:** [You have free time to volunteer](#you-have-free-time-to-volunteer)
|
|
|
|
## LUKE, USE THE SEARCH
|
|
|
|
May the experiences of other people be with you
|
|
|
|
|
|
## YOU HAVE A PROBLEM
|
|
|
|
See point 1, then look at FAQ or Troubleshooting wiki pages (first we'll have to make them)
|
|
|
|
|
|
## YOU HAVE A SOLUTION
|
|
|
|
See point 1, then go ahead (unless your solution is yet another theme)
|
|
|
|
|
|
## YOU HAVE FREE TIME TO VOLUNTEER
|
|
|
|
Cool! Please have a look at the list below to understand how oh-my-zsh categorizes its issues.
|
|
|
|
Classification of issues and
|
|
|
|
- Bugs, which may be:
|
|
- Specific of zsh \*
|
|
- Regressions, in which we should summon the author of the offending commit once it is located
|
|
|
|
- Feature requests
|
|
|
|
- Helpdesk, which may be:
|
|
- Specific of zsh \*
|
|
- Everything else
|
|
|
|
\* In the case of bugs, I see the benefit in going through the trouble of responding to that. After all, oh-my-zsh should be the missing link that makes zsh perfect, and hunting down an upstream bug can lead to a submitted PR.
|
|
In the case of helpdesk, minimal response should be done. That is, provide a link to the wiki with the relevant information, or
|
|
add it to the FAQ of the wiki and point to it afterwards.
|