pyo3/guide/src/function.md

93 lines
3.4 KiB
Markdown
Raw Normal View History

# Python Function
PyO3 supports two ways to define a function in python. Both require registering
the function to a [module](./module.md)
One way is defining the function in the module definition.
```rust
use pyo3::prelude::*;
2018-11-12 21:28:45 +00:00
#[pymodule]
fn rust2py(py: Python, m: &PyModule) -> PyResult<()> {
// Note that the `#[pyfn()]` annotation automatically converts the arguments from
// Python objects to Rust values; and the Rust return value back into a Python object.
#[pyfn(m, "sum_as_string")]
2018-05-05 13:50:04 +00:00
fn sum_as_string_py(_py: Python, a:i64, b:i64) -> PyResult<String> {
Ok(format!("{}", a + b).to_string())
}
Ok(())
}
# fn main() {}
```
The other is annotating a function with `#[pyfunction]` and then adding it
2018-11-12 21:25:45 +00:00
to the module using the `add_wrapped_to_module!` macro, which takes the module
as first parameter, the function name as second and an instance of `Python`
as third.
```rust
use pyo3::prelude::*;
2019-02-01 13:01:18 +00:00
use pyo3::wrap_pyfunction;
2018-05-05 13:50:04 +00:00
#[pyfunction]
fn double(x: usize) -> usize {
x * 2
}
2018-11-12 21:28:45 +00:00
#[pymodule]
fn module_with_functions(py: Python, m: &PyModule) -> PyResult<()> {
2019-02-01 13:01:18 +00:00
m.add_wrapped(wrap_pyfunction!(double)).unwrap();
Ok(())
}
# fn main() {}
```
2018-08-04 17:55:15 +00:00
2018-12-07 14:22:40 +00:00
### Making the function signature available to Python
In order to make the function signature available to Python to be retrieved via
`inspect.signature`, simply make sure the first line of your doc-string is
formatted like in the example below. Please note that the new-line after the
`--` is mandatory. The `/` signifies the end of positional only arguments. This
is not a feature of this library in particular, but the general format used by
CPython for annotating signatures of built-in functions. Function signatures for
built-ins are new in Python 3 — in Python 2, it is simply considered to be part
of the doc-string.
```rust
/// add(a, b, /)
/// --
///
/// This function adds two unsigned 64-bit integers.
#[pyfunction]
fn add(a: u64, b: u64) -> u64 {
a + b
}
```
When annotated like this, signatures are also correctly displayed in IPython.
```
>>> pyo3_test.add?
Signature: pyo3_test.add(a, b, /)
Docstring: This function adds two unsigned 64-bit integers.
Type: builtin_function_or_method
```
2018-08-04 17:55:15 +00:00
## Closures
Currently, there are no conversions between `Fn`s in rust and callables in python. This would definitely be possible and very useful, so contributions are welcome. In the meantime, you can do the following:
### Calling a python function in rust
2019-02-23 17:01:22 +00:00
You can use `ObjectProtocol::is_callable` to check if you got a callable, which is true for functions (including lambdas), methods and objects with a `__call__` method. You can call the object with `ObjectProtocol::call` with the args as first parameter and the kwargs (or `None`) as second parameter. There are also `ObjectProtocol::call0` with no args and `ObjectProtocol::call1` with only the args.
2018-08-04 17:55:15 +00:00
### Calling rust `Fn`s in python
2019-02-01 13:01:18 +00:00
If you have a static function, you can expose it with `#[pyfunction]` and use `wrap_pyfunction!` to get the corresponding `PyObject`. For dynamic functions, e.g. lambda and functions that were passed as arguments, you must put them in some kind of owned container, e.g. a box. (Long-Term a special container similar to wasm-bindgen's `Closure` should take care of that). You can than use a `#[pyclass]` struct with that container as field as a way to pass the function over the ffi-barrier. You can even make that class callable with `__call__` so it looks like a function in python code.
2018-08-04 17:55:15 +00:00