open-vault/website/source/guides/upgrading/upgrade-to-0.6.4.html.md

layout	page_title	sidebar_current	description
guides	Upgrading to Vault 0.6.4 - Guides	guides-upgrading-to-0.6.4	This page contains the list of deprecations and important or breaking changes for Vault 0.6.4. Please read it carefully.

Overview

This page contains the list of deprecations and important or breaking changes for Vault 0.6.4. Please read it carefully.

Note: both of these are security sensitive changes.

Changes to default Policy Addition Rules for auth/token/create

An issue was reported indicating that in some cases, the stated behavior of the default policy being added to tokens unless specifically requested could lead to a privilege escalation scenario if the parent token did not itself have the default policy. In most cases (e.g. using the default default policy) the escalated privileges are unlikely to be dangerous, but this behavior is undesired.

As such, we have modified the rules around default in a few ways when creating tokens using this endpoint:

1. If a token creation request does not specify desired policies, the parent's policies will be used (as normal) but default will not be automatically added, so the child token will only have default if the parent does
2. If a token creation request specifies desired policies, default will be added automatically if and only if the parent token has default
3. If the parent token has sudo capability on the token creation endpoint, default is always added; since sudo capability on this endpoint allows adding any policy, this is not privilege escalation with respect to the parent token-holder
4. When using token store roles, default is always added to the list of child token policies unless default is contained in disallowed_policies

Regardless of provenance, if a token being created has the default policy and no_default_policy has been set true for the request, the default policy will be stripped from the final set of policies.

Many Users Should Run auth/token/tidy

While investigating a report of accessor entries not being removed correctly from Vault's data store, a security issue was discovered: if limited use-count tokens are being used and expire due to the use-count dropping to zero (rather than due to the token's TTL expiring or the token being explicitly revoked), several pieces of Vault's token revocation logic would not be properly run. This included cleaning up the associated accessor entry from the data store, but more importantly, included the logic used to immediately expire leases associated with the token.

These leases would not live forever; they would still be expired when their TTL ran out. This limits the severity of this issue, but it is still a potentially serious bug depending on each particular operational scenario.

To mitigate this issue we have taken the following steps:

1. Updated the token revocation logic to be more resilient to failures that can happen as it performs its various steps; the revocation will now properly only be considered successful if no error has occurred. In addition, the token entry will remain in the data store (but not be usable for performing Vault functions) until all aspects of revocation report success, allowing future revocation requests to succeed if the underlying cause of the failure has been addressed.

2. Added a function auth/token/tidy that can both clean up the leaked accessor entries and expire the leases associated with those accessors' tokens.

In most cases, running auth/token/tidy should expire all outstanding leases that were generated by these revoked limited-use-count tokens.

If you are both using limited-use-count tokens and you are using them to issue leased secrets, you should consider upgrading to 0.6.4 and running the auth/token/tidy endpoint immediately. Please note that running this function involves a lot of requests to the data store, so plan load accordingly.

Note: response wrapping tokens do not allow generating leases but have still been subject to leaking the accessor entries, so if you have been a heavy user of response wrapping you should still consider running the tidy function.