# This workflow checks that there is either a 'pr/no-changelog' label applied to a PR # or there is a changelog/.txt file associated with a PR for a changelog entry name: Check Changelog on: pull_request: types: [opened, synchronize, labeled, unlabeled] # Runs on PRs to main branches: - main jobs: # checks that a changelog entry is present for a PR changelog-check: # If there a `pr/no-changelog` label we ignore this check if: "!contains(github.event.pull_request.labels.*.name, 'pr/no-changelog')" runs-on: ubuntu-latest steps: - uses: actions/checkout@v2 with: ref: ${{ github.event.pull_request.head.sha }} fetch-depth: 0 # by default the checkout action doesn't checkout all branches - name: Check for changelog entry in diff run: | # check if there is a diff in the changelog directory changelog_files=$(git --no-pager diff --name-only HEAD "$(git merge-base HEAD "origin/${{ github.event.pull_request.base.ref }}")" -- changelog/${{ github.event.pull_request.number }}.txt) # If we do not find a file matching the PR # in changelog/, we fail the check if [ -z "$changelog_files" ]; then echo "Did not find a changelog entry named ${{ github.event.pull_request.number }}.txt" echo "If your changelog file is correct, skip this check with the 'pr/no-changelog' label" echo "Reference - https://github.com/hashicorp/vault/pull/10363 and https://github.com/hashicorp/vault/pull/11894" exit 1 elif grep -q ':enhancement$' $changelog_files; then # "Enhancement is not a valid type of changelog entry, but it's a common mistake. echo "Found invalid type (enhancement) in changelog - did you mean improvement?" exit 1 elif grep -q ':bugs$' $changelog_files; then echo "Found invalid type (bugs) in changelog - did you mean bug?" exit 1 elif ! grep -q '```release-note:' $changelog_files; then # People often make changelog files like ```changelog:, which is incorrect. echo "Changelog file did not contain 'release-note' heading - check formatting." exit 1 else echo "Found changelog entry in PR!" fi