--- layout: docs page_title: Integrated Storage description: Learn about the integrated raft storage in Vault. --- # Integrated Storage Vault supports a number of storage options for the durable storage of Vault's information. As of Vault 1.4 an Integrated Storage option is offered. This storage backend does not rely on any third party systems, implements high availability semantics, supports Enterprise Replication features, and provides backup/restore workflows. The option stores Vault's data on the server's filesystem and uses a consensus protocol to replicate data to each server in the cluster. More information on the internals of Integrated Storage can be found in the [Integrated Storage internals documentation](/docs/internals/integrated-storage/). Additionally, the [Configuration](/docs/configuration/storage/raft/) docs can help in configuring Vault to use Integrated Storage. The sections below go into various details on how to operate Vault with Integrated Storage. ## Server-to-Server Communication Once nodes are joined to one another they begin to communicate using mTLS over Vault's cluster port. The cluster port defaults to `8201`. The TLS information is exchanged at join time and is rotated on a cadence. A requirement for Integrated Storage is that the [`cluster_addr`](/docs/concepts/ha#per-node-cluster-address) configuration option is set. This allows Vault to assign an address to the node ID at join time. ## Cluster Membership This section will outline how to bootstrap and manage a cluster of Vault nodes running Integrated Storage. Integrated Storage is bootstrapped during the [initialization process](https://learn.hashicorp.com/vault/getting-started/deploy#initializing-the-vault), and results in a cluster of size 1. Depending on the [desired deployment size](/docs/internals/integrated-storage/#deployment-table), nodes can be joined to the active Vault node. ### Joining Nodes Joining is the process of taking an uninitialized Vault node and making it a member of an existing cluster. In order to authenticate the new node to the cluster it must use the same seal mechanism. If using a Auto Unseal the node must be configured to use the same KMS provider and Key as the cluster it's attempting to join. If using a Shamir seal the unseal keys must be provided to the new node before the join process can complete. Once a node has successfully joined, data from the active node can begin to replicate to it. Once a node has been joined it cannot be re-joined to a different cluster. You can either join the node automatically via the config file or manually through the API (both methods described below). When joining a node, the API address of the leader node must be used. We recommend setting the [`api_addr`](/docs/concepts/ha#direct-access) configuration option on all nodes to make joining simpler. #### `retry_join` Configuration This method enables setting one, or more, target leader nodes in the config file. When an uninitialized Vault server starts up it will attempt to join each potential leader that is defined, retrying until successful. When one of the specified leaders become active this node will successfully join. When using Shamir seal, the joined nodes will still need to be unsealed manually. When using Auto Unseal the node will be able to join and unseal automatically. An example [`retry_join`](/docs/configuration/storage/raft#retry_join-stanza) config can be seen below: ```hcl storage "raft" { path = "/var/raft/" node_id = "node3" retry_join { leader_api_addr = "https://node1.vault.local:8200" } retry_join { leader_api_addr = "https://node2.vault.local:8200" } } ``` Note, in each [`retry_join`](/docs/configuration/storage/raft#retry_join-stanza) stanza, you may provide a single [`leader_api_addr`](/docs/configuration/storage/raft#leader_api_addr) or [`auto_join`](/docs/configuration/storage/raft#auto_join) value. When a cloud [`auto_join`](/docs/configuration/storage/raft#auto_join) configuration value is provided, Vault will use [go-discover](https://github.com/hashicorp/go-discover) to automatically attempt to discover and resolve potential Raft leader addresses. See the go-discover [README](https://github.com/hashicorp/go-discover/blob/master/README.md) for details on the format of the [`auto_join`](/docs/configuration/storage/raft#auto_join) value. ```hcl storage "raft" { path = "/var/raft/" node_id = "node3" retry_join { auto_join = "provider=aws region=eu-west-1 tag_key=vault tag_value=... access_key_id=... secret_access_key=..." } } ``` By default, Vault will attempt to reach discovered peers using HTTPS and port 8200. Operators may override these through the [`auto_join_scheme`](/docs/configuration/storage/raft#auto_join_scheme) and [`auto_join_port`](/docs/configuration/storage/raft#auto_join_port) fields respectively. ```hcl storage "raft" { path = "/var/raft/" node_id = "node3" retry_join { auto_join = "provider=aws region=eu-west-1 tag_key=vault tag_value=... access_key_id=... secret_access_key=..." auto_join_scheme = "http" auto_join_port = 8201 } } ``` #### Join from the CLI Alternatively you can use the [`join` CLI command](/docs/commands/operator/raft/#join) or the API to join a node. The active node's API address will need to be specified: ```shell-session $ vault operator raft join https://node1.vault.local:8200 ``` #### Non-Voting Nodes (Enterprise Only) Nodes that are joined to a cluster can be specified as non-voters. A non-voting node has all of Vault's data replicated to it, but does not contribute to the quorum count. This can be used in conjunction with [Performance Standby](/docs/enterprise/performance-standby/) nodes to add read scalability to a cluster in cases where a high volume of reads to servers are needed. ```shell-session $ vault operator raft join -non-voter https://node1.vault.local:8200 ``` ### Removing Peers Removing a peer node is a necessary step when you no longer want the node in the cluster. This could happen if the node is rotated for a new one, the hostname permanently changes and can no longer be accessed, you're attempting to shrink the size of the cluster, or for many other reasons. Removing the peer will ensure the cluster stays at the desired size, and that quorum is maintained. To remove the peer you can issue a [`remove-peer`](/docs/commands/operator/raft#remove-peer) command and provide the node ID you wish to remove: ```shell-session $ vault operator raft remove-peer node1 Peer removed successfully! ``` ### Listing Peers To see the current peer set for the cluster you can issue a [`list-peers`](/docs/commands/operator/raft#list-peers) command. All the voting nodes that are listed here contribute to the quorum and a majority must be alive for Integrated Storage to continue to operate. ```shell-session $ vault operator raft list-peers Node Address State Voter ---- ------- ----- ----- node1 node1.vault.local:8201 follower true node2 node2.vault.local:8201 follower true node3 node3.vault.local:8201 leader true ``` ## Integrated Storage and TLS We've glossed over some details in the above sections on bootstrapping clusters. The instructions are sufficient for most cases, but some users have run into problems when using auto-join and TLS in conjunction with things like auto-scaling. The issue is that [go-discover](https://github.com/hashicorp/go-discover) on most platforms returns IPs (not hostnames), and because the IPs aren't knowable in advance, the TLS certificates used to secure the Vault API port don't contain these IPs in their IP SANs. ### Vault networking recap Before we explore solutions to this problem, let's recapitulate how Vault nodes speak to one another. Vault exposes two TCP ports: [the API port](/docs/configuration#api_addr) and [the cluster port](/docs/configuration#cluster_addr). The API port is where clients send their Vault HTTP requests. For a single-node Vault cluster you don't worry about a cluster port as it won't be used. When you have multiple nodes, you also need a cluster port. This is used by Vault nodes to issue RPCs to one another, e.g. to forward requests from a standby node to the active node, or when Raft is in use, to handle leader election and replication of stored data. The cluster port is secured using a TLS certificate that the Vault active node generates internally. It's clear how this can work when not using integrated storage: every node has at least read access to storage, so once the active node has persisted the certificate, the standby nodes can fetch it, and all agree on how cluster traffic should be encrypted. It's less clear how this works with Integrated Storage, as there is a chicken and egg problem. Nodes don't have a shared view of storage until the raft cluster has been formed, but we're trying to form the raft cluster! To solve this problem, a Vault node must speak to another Vault node using the API port instead of the cluster port. This is currently the only situation in which OSS Vault does this (Vault Enterprise also does something similar when setting up replication.) - `node2` wants to join the cluster, so issues challenge API request to existing member `node1` - `node1` replies to challenge request with (1) an encrypted random UUID and (2) seal config - `node2` must decrypt UUID using seal; if using auto-unseal can do it directly, if using Shamir must wait for user to provide enough unseal keys to perform decryption - `node2` sends decrypted UUID back to `node1` using answer API - `node1` sees `node2` can be trusted (since it has seal access) and replies with a bootstrap package which includes the cluster TLS certificate and private key - `node2` gets sent a raft snapshot over the cluster port After this procedure the new node will never again send traffic to the API port. All subsequent inter-node communication will use the cluster port. ![Raft Join Process](/img/raft-join-detailed.png) ### Assisted raft join techniques The simplest option is to do it by hand: issue [`raft join`](/docs/commands/operator/raft#join) commands specifying the explicit names or IPs of the nodes to join to. In this section we look at other TLS-compatible options that lend themselves more to automation. #### Autojoin with TLS servername As of Vault 1.6.2, the simplest option might be to specify a [`leader_tls_servername`](/docs/configuration/storage/raft#leader_tls_servername) in the [`retry_join`](/docs/configuration/storage/raft#retry_join-stanza) stanza which matches a [DNS SAN](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Subject_Alternative_Name) in the certificate. Note that names in a certificate's DNS SAN don't actually have to be registered in a DNS server. Your nodes may have no names found in DNS, while still using certificate(s) that contain this shared `servername` in their DNS SANs. #### Autojoin but constrain CIDR, list all possible IPs in certificate If all the vault node IPs are assigned from a small subnet, e.g. a `/28`, it becomes practical to put all the IPs that exist in that subnet into the IP SANs of the TLS certificate the nodes will share. The drawback here is that the cluster may someday outgrow the CIDR and changing it may be a pain. For similar reasons this solution may be impractical when using non-voting nodes and dynamically scaling clusters. #### Load balancer instead of autojoin Most Vault instances are going to have a load balancer (LB) between clients and the Vault nodes. In that case, the LB knows how to route traffic to working Vault nodes, and there's no need for auto-join: we can just use [`retry_join`](/docs/configuration/storage/raft#retry_join-stanza) with the LB address as the target. One potential issue here: some users want a public facing LB for clients to connect to Vault, but aren't comfortable with Vault internal traffic egressing from the internal network it normally runs on. ## Outage Recovery ### Quorum Maintained This section outlines the steps to take when a single server or multiple servers are in a failed state but quorum is still maintained. This means the remaining alive servers are still operational, can elect a leader, and are able to process write requests. If the failed server is recoverable, the best option is to bring it back online and have it reconnect to the cluster with the same host address. This will return the cluster to a fully healthy state. If this is impractical, you need to remove the failed server. Usually, you can issue a [`remove-peer`](/docs/commands/operator/raft#remove-peer) command to remove the failed server if it's still a member of the cluster. If the [`remove-peer`](/docs/commands/operator/raft#remove-peer) command isn't possible or you'd rather manually re-write the cluster membership a [`raft/peers.json`](#manual-recovery-using-peers-json) file can be written to the configured data directory. ### Quorum Lost In the event that multiple servers are lost, causing a loss of quorum and a complete outage, partial recovery is still possible. If the failed servers are recoverable, the best option is to bring them back online and have them reconnect to the cluster using the same host addresses. This will return the cluster to a fully healthy state. If the failed servers are not recoverable, partial recovery is possible using data on the remaining servers in the cluster. There may be data loss in this situation because multiple servers were lost, so information about what's committed could be incomplete. The recovery process implicitly commits all outstanding Raft log entries, so it's also possible to commit data that was uncommitted before the failure. See the section below on manual recovery using [`peers.json`](#manual-recovery-using-peers-json) for details of the recovery procedure. You include only the remaining servers in the [`peers.json`](#manual-recovery-using-peers-json) recovery file. The cluster should be able to elect a leader once the remaining servers are all restarted with an identical [`peers.json`](#manual-recovery-using-peers-json) configuration. Any servers you introduce later can be fresh with totally clean data directories and joined using Vault's join command. In extreme cases, it should be possible to recover with just a single remaining server by starting that single server with itself as the only peer in the [`peers.json`](#manual-recovery-using-peers-json) recovery file. ### Manual Recovery Using peers.json Using `raft/peers.json` for recovery can cause uncommitted Raft log entries to be implicitly committed, so this should only be used after an outage where no other option is available to recover a lost server. Make sure you don't have any automated processes that will put the peers file in place on a periodic basis. To begin, stop all remaining servers. The next step is to go to the [configured data path](/docs/configuration/storage/raft/#path) of each Vault server. Inside that directory, there will be a `raft/` sub-directory. We need to create a `raft/peers.json` file. The file should be formatted as a JSON array containing the node ID, `address:port`, and suffrage information of each Vault server you wish to be in the cluster: ```json [ { "id": "node1", "address": "node1.vault.local:8201", "non_voter": false }, { "id": "node2", "address": "node2.vault.local:8201", "non_voter": false }, { "id": "node3", "address": "node3.vault.local:8201", "non_voter": false } ] ``` - `id` `(string: )` - Specifies the node ID of the server. This can be found in the config file, or inside the `node-id` file in the server's data directory if it was auto-generated. - `address` `(string: )` - Specifies the host and port of the server. The port is the server's cluster port. - `non_voter` `(bool: )` - This controls whether the server is a non-voter. If omitted, it will default to false, which is typical for most clusters. This is an enterprise only feature. Create entries for all servers. You must confirm that servers you do not include here have indeed failed and will not later rejoin the cluster. Ensure that this file is the same across all remaining server nodes. At this point, you can restart all the remaining servers. The cluster should be in an operable state again. One of the nodes should claim leadership and become active. ### Other Recovery Methods For other, non-quorum related recovery [Vault's recovery](/docs/concepts/recovery-mode/) mode can be used.