* Remove extraneous certificate from OCSP response
Since the issuer used to sign the certificate also signs the OCSP
response, no additional information is added by sending the issuer again
in the certs field of the BasicOCSPResponse structure. Removing it saves
bytes and avoids confusing Go-based OCSP verifiers which cannot handle
the cert issuer being duplicated in the certs field.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Scheel <alex.scheel@hashicorp.com>
* Add changelog entry
Signed-off-by: Alexander Scheel <alex.scheel@hashicorp.com>
---------
Signed-off-by: Alexander Scheel <alex.scheel@hashicorp.com>
* Add fix for Go x/crypto/ocsp failure case
When calling ocsp.ParseRequest(req, issue) with a non-nil issuer on a
ocsp request which _unknowingly_ contains an entry in the
BasicOCSPResponse's certs field, Go incorrectly assumes that the issuer
is a direct parent of the _first_ certificate in the certs field,
discarding the rest.
As documented in the Go issue, this is not a valid assumption and thus
causes OCSP verification to fail in Vault with an error like:
> bad OCSP signature: crypto/rsa: verification error
which ultimately leads to a cert auth login error of:
> no chain matching all constraints could be found for this login certificate
We address this by using the unsafe issuer=nil argument, taking on the
task of validating the OCSP response's signature as best we can in the
absence of full chain information on either side (both the trusted
certificate whose OCSP response we're verifying and the lack of any
additional certs the OCSP responder may have sent).
See also: https://github.com/golang/go/issues/59641
Signed-off-by: Alexander Scheel <alex.scheel@hashicorp.com>
* Add test case with Vault PKI
Signed-off-by: Alexander Scheel <alex.scheel@hashicorp.com>
* Add changelog entry
Signed-off-by: Alexander Scheel <alex.scheel@hashicorp.com>
---------
Signed-off-by: Alexander Scheel <alex.scheel@hashicorp.com>
- Add a helper function that can accept the final API path along with
the pattern function for an ACME api definition and generate the
various flavors for the given API
* Move all ACME wrappers into a dedicated go file
- Make it easier to figure out where the various wrappers for
ACME exist by locating them inside a dedicated go file instead
of spread out across the various path_acme_xxx files.
* Add missing copyright headers to PKI files
* Implement ACME new-order API
- This is a very rough draft for the new order ACME API
* Add ACME order list API
* Implement ACME Get order API
* Misc order related fixes
- Filter authorizations in GetOrders for valid
- Validate notBefore and notAfter dates make sense
- Add <order>/cert URL path to order response if set to valid
* Return account status within err authorized, if the account key verified
* add max_entry_size to sanitized config output
* add changelog entry
* add test parallelism
* add inmem test case
* use named struct fields for TestSysConfigState_Sanitized cases
* updates clients config view for census reporting
* adds changelog entry
* fixes issue with modal staying open and error not showing on clients config save failure
* adds min retention months to clients config model and form validation
* revert STS lease changes, now create a lease for STS credentials but keep the ttl
Co-authored-by: Calvin Leung Huang <1883212+calvn@users.noreply.github.com>
The previous strategy for provisioning infrastructure targets was to use
the cheapest instances that could reliably perform as Vault cluster
nodes. With this change we introduce a new model for target node
infrastructure. We've replaced on-demand instances for a spot
fleet. While the spot price fluctuates based on dynamic pricing,
capacity, region, instance type, and platform, cost savings for our
most common combinations range between 20-70%.
This change only includes spot fleet targets for Vault clusters.
We'll be updating our Consul backend bidding in another PR.
* Create a new `vault_cluster` module that handles installation,
configuration, initializing, and unsealing Vault clusters.
* Create a `target_ec2_instances` module that can provision a group of
instances on-demand.
* Create a `target_ec2_spot_fleet` module that can bid on a fleet of
spot instances.
* Extend every Enos scenario to utilize the spot fleet target acquisition
strategy and the `vault_cluster` module.
* Update our Enos CI modules to handle both the `aws-nuke` permissions
and also the privileges to provision spot fleets.
* Only use us-east-1 and us-west-2 in our scenario matrices as costs are
lower than us-west-1.
Signed-off-by: Ryan Cragun <me@ryan.ec>
* Distinguish POST-as-GET from POST-with-empty-body
Signed-off-by: Alexander Scheel <alex.scheel@hashicorp.com>
* Add ACME authorization, identifier, and challenge types
Signed-off-by: Alexander Scheel <alex.scheel@hashicorp.com>
* Add ability to load and save authorizations
Signed-off-by: Alexander Scheel <alex.scheel@hashicorp.com>
* Add ACME authorizations path handling
This supports two methods: a fetch handler over the authorization, to
expose the underlying challenges, and a deactivate handler to revoke
the authorization and mark its challenges invalid.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Scheel <alex.scheel@hashicorp.com>
* Add ACME challenge path handling
These paths kick off processing and validation of the challenge by the
ACME client.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Scheel <alex.scheel@hashicorp.com>
---------
Signed-off-by: Alexander Scheel <alex.scheel@hashicorp.com>
* Use a UUID for ACME kid instead of a key fingerprint
* PR feedback
- Calculate thumbprint within CreateAccount instead of passing it in
- Reorder writes within CreateAccount to now write out thumbprint entry
first as we can easily recover/overwrite it if we fail mid-way
- Change back LoadAccount in acme to return an error if it fails to
lookup the entry
* Clearify comment within ACME CreateAccount
* Rework ACME workflow test to leverage Golang's ACME client library
- Instead of testing manually, leverage the Golang ACME library
to test against our implementation from the unit tests.
* Add tests for new-account and misc fixes
- Set and return the account status for registration
- Add handlers for the account/ api/updates
- Switch acme/ to cluster local storage
- Disable terms of service checks for now as we don't set the url
* PR feedback
- Implement account deactivation
- Create separate account update handler, to not mix account creation
logic
- Add kid field to account update definition
- Add support to update contact details on an existing account
* Correctly find certificates for unified delta CRL
When building the unified delta CRL, WAL entries from the non-primary
cluster were ignored. This resulted in an incomplete delta CRL,
preventing some entries from appearing.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Scheel <alex.scheel@hashicorp.com>
* Correctly rebuild unified delta CRLs
When deciding if the Unified Delta CRL should be rebuilt, we need to
check the status of all clusters and their last revoked serial numbers.
If any new serial has been revoked on any cluster, we should rebuild the
unified delta CRLs.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Scheel <alex.scheel@hashicorp.com>
* Correctly persist Unified Delta CRL build entries
When building the unified CRL, we need to read the last seen serial
number from all clusters, not just the present cluster, and write it
to the last built serial for that cluster's unified delta WAL entry.
This prevents us from continuously rebuilding unified CRLs now that we
have fixed our rebuild heuristic.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Scheel <alex.scheel@hashicorp.com>
* Fix getLastWALSerial for unified delta CRLs
getLastWALSerial ignored its path argument, preventing it from reading
the specified cluster-specific WAL entry. On the primary cluster, this
was mostly equivalent, but now that we're correctly reading WAL entries
and revocations for other clusters, we need to handle reading these
entries correctly.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Scheel <alex.scheel@hashicorp.com>
* Copy delta WAL entries in event of failure
Any local delta WAL should be persisted to unified delta WAL space as
well. If such unified persistence fails, we need to ensure that they get
eventually moved up, otherwise they'll remain missing until the next
full CRL rebuild occurs, which might be significantly longer than when
the next delta CRL rebuild would otherwise occur. runUnifiedTransfer
already handles this for us, but it lacked logic for delta WAL serials.
The only interesting catch here is that we refuse to copy any entries
whose full unified revocation entry has not also been written.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Scheel <alex.scheel@hashicorp.com>
* Make doUnifiedTransferMissingLocalSerials log an error
This message is mostly an error and would always be helpful information
to have when troubleshooting failures.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Scheel <alex.scheel@hashicorp.com>
* Warn on cross-cluster write failures during revoke
When revoking certificates, we log cross-cluster revocation failures,
but we should really expose this information to the caller, that their
local revocation was successful, but their cross-cluster revocation
failed.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Scheel <alex.scheel@hashicorp.com>
* Ensure unified delta WAL entry has full entry
Delta WAL entries are empty files whose only information (a revoked
serial number) is contained in the file path. These depend implicitly on
a full revocation entry existing for this file (whether a cross-cluster
unified entry or a local entry).
We should not write unified delta WAL entries without the corresponding
full unified revocation entry existing. Add a warning in this case.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Scheel <alex.scheel@hashicorp.com>
* Add changelog entry
Signed-off-by: Alexander Scheel <alex.scheel@hashicorp.com>
---------
Signed-off-by: Alexander Scheel <alex.scheel@hashicorp.com>
