In addition to the specific permissions that are already mentioned, the project also needs the `iam.googleapis.com` API enabled, otherwise authenticating will fail with an error similar to:
```
Error authenticating: Error making API request.
URL: PUT https://localhost:8200/v1/auth/gcp/login
Code: 400. Errors:
* could not find service account key or Google Oauth cert with given 'kid' id
```
Specifying the `allowed_organiztaional_units` parameter to a cert auth
backend role will require client certificates to contain at least one of
a list of one or more "organizational units" (OU).
Example use cases:
Certificates are issued to entities in an organization arrangement by
organizational unit (OU). The OU may be a department, team, or any other logical
grouping of resources with similar roles. The entities within the OU
should be granted the same policies.
```
$ vault write auth/cert/certs/ou-engineering \
certificate=@ca.pem \
policies=engineering \
allowed_organiztaional_units=engineering
$ vault write auth/cert/certs/ou-engineering \
certificate=@ca.pem \
policies=engineering \
allowed_organiztaional_units=engineering,support
```
* auth/aws: Make identity alias configurable
This is inspired by #4178, though not quite exactly what is requested
there. Rather than just use RoleSessionName as the Identity alias, the
full ARN is uses as the Alias. This mitigates against concerns that an
AWS role with an insufficiently secured trust policy could allow an
attacker to generate arbitrary RoleSessionNames in AssumeRole calls to
impersonate anybody in the Identity store that had an alias set up.
By using the full ARN, the owner of the identity store has to explicitly
trust specific AWS roles in specific AWS accounts to generate an
appropriate RoleSessionName to map back to an identity.
Fixes#4178
* Respond to PR feedback
* Remove CreateOperation
Response to PR feedback
* Add AWS Secret Engine Root Credential Rotation
This allows the AWS Secret Engine to rotate its credentials used to
access AWS. This will only work when the AWS Secret Engine has been
provided explicit IAM credentials via the config/root endpoint, and
further, when the IAM credentials provided are the only access key on
the IAM user associated wtih the access key (because AWS allows a
maximum of 2 access keys per user).
Fixes#4385
* Add test for AWS root credential rotation
Also fix a typo in the root credential rotation code
* Add docs for AWS root rotation
* Add locks around reading and writing config/root
And wire the backend up in a bunch of places so the config can get the
lock
* Respond to PR feedback
* Fix casing in error messages
* Fix merge errors
* Fix locking bugs
* Add test file for testing path_restore in Transit backend. Fails because 'force' is not implemented yet
* initial implementation of 'force', to force restore of existing transit key atomically
Update AWS Auth backend to use TypeHeader for iam request headers
- Remove parseIamRequestHeaders function and test, no longer needed with new TypeHeader
- Update AWS auth login docs
This will cause them to be removed even if they have not expired yet,
whereas before it would simply leave them in the store until they were
expired, but remove from revocation info.
* Disallow adding CA's serial to revocation list
* Allow disabling revocation list generation. This returns an empty (but
signed) list, but does not affect tracking of revocations so turning it
back on will populate the list properly.
* Nomad: updating max token length to 256
* Initial support for supporting custom max token name length for Nomad
* simplify/correct tests
* document nomad max_token_name_length
* removed support for max token length env var. Rename field for clarity
* cleanups after removing env var support
* move RandomWithPrefix to testhelpers
* fix spelling
* Remove default 256 value. Use zero as a sentinel value and ignore it
* update docs
* Make AWS credential types more explicit
The AWS secret engine had a lot of confusing overloading with role
paramemters and how they mapped to each of the three credential types
supported. This now adds parameters to remove the overloading while
maintaining backwards compatibility.
With the change, it also becomes easier to add other feature requests.
Attaching multiple managed policies to IAM users and adding a policy
document to STS AssumedRole credentials is now also supported.
Fixes#4229Fixes#3751Fixes#2817
* Add missing write action to STS endpoint
* Allow unsetting policy_document with empty string
This allows unsetting the policy_document by passing in an empty string.
Previously, it would fail because the empty string isn't a valid JSON
document.
* Respond to some PR feedback
* Refactor and simplify role reading/upgrading
This gets rid of the duplicated role upgrade code between both role
reading and role writing by handling the upgrade all in the role
reading.
* Eliminate duplicated AWS secret test code
The testAccStepReadUser and testAccStepReadSTS were virtually identical,
so they are consolidated into a single method with the path passed in.
* Switch to use AWS ARN parser
* Consistently use "Google Cloud" where appropriate
* Update GCP docs
This updates the GCP docs to use the new updated fields that will be
present in the next release of the plugin as well as fixes up some
inconsistencies between the GCP docs and other auth method
documentation.
* Database updates
* Add create/update distinction for connection config
* Add create/update distinction for role config
* Add db name and revocation statements to leases to give revocation a
shot at working if the role has been deleted
Fixes#3544Fixes#4782
* Add create/update info to docs
Creating/Updating a secret in KV-V2 produces a status code `200` with a response body of `application/json`, whereas the previous documentation notated a `204 (empty body)` expected response code.
The docs for how to create secondary DR tokens were incorrect, which caused issues at a customer. I fixed the documentation with the proper syntax and formatting, which I copied from the perf replication docs (after changing endpoints). Can someone take a quick look for me?
