The previous strategy for provisioning infrastructure targets was to use
the cheapest instances that could reliably perform as Vault cluster
nodes. With this change we introduce a new model for target node
infrastructure. We've replaced on-demand instances for a spot
fleet. While the spot price fluctuates based on dynamic pricing,
capacity, region, instance type, and platform, cost savings for our
most common combinations range between 20-70%.
This change only includes spot fleet targets for Vault clusters.
We'll be updating our Consul backend bidding in another PR.
* Create a new `vault_cluster` module that handles installation,
configuration, initializing, and unsealing Vault clusters.
* Create a `target_ec2_instances` module that can provision a group of
instances on-demand.
* Create a `target_ec2_spot_fleet` module that can bid on a fleet of
spot instances.
* Extend every Enos scenario to utilize the spot fleet target acquisition
strategy and the `vault_cluster` module.
* Update our Enos CI modules to handle both the `aws-nuke` permissions
and also the privileges to provision spot fleets.
* Only use us-east-1 and us-west-2 in our scenario matrices as costs are
lower than us-west-1.
Signed-off-by: Ryan Cragun <me@ryan.ec>
* Distinguish POST-as-GET from POST-with-empty-body
Signed-off-by: Alexander Scheel <alex.scheel@hashicorp.com>
* Add ACME authorization, identifier, and challenge types
Signed-off-by: Alexander Scheel <alex.scheel@hashicorp.com>
* Add ability to load and save authorizations
Signed-off-by: Alexander Scheel <alex.scheel@hashicorp.com>
* Add ACME authorizations path handling
This supports two methods: a fetch handler over the authorization, to
expose the underlying challenges, and a deactivate handler to revoke
the authorization and mark its challenges invalid.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Scheel <alex.scheel@hashicorp.com>
* Add ACME challenge path handling
These paths kick off processing and validation of the challenge by the
ACME client.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Scheel <alex.scheel@hashicorp.com>
---------
Signed-off-by: Alexander Scheel <alex.scheel@hashicorp.com>
* Use a UUID for ACME kid instead of a key fingerprint
* PR feedback
- Calculate thumbprint within CreateAccount instead of passing it in
- Reorder writes within CreateAccount to now write out thumbprint entry
first as we can easily recover/overwrite it if we fail mid-way
- Change back LoadAccount in acme to return an error if it fails to
lookup the entry
* Clearify comment within ACME CreateAccount
* Rework ACME workflow test to leverage Golang's ACME client library
- Instead of testing manually, leverage the Golang ACME library
to test against our implementation from the unit tests.
* Add tests for new-account and misc fixes
- Set and return the account status for registration
- Add handlers for the account/ api/updates
- Switch acme/ to cluster local storage
- Disable terms of service checks for now as we don't set the url
* PR feedback
- Implement account deactivation
- Create separate account update handler, to not mix account creation
logic
- Add kid field to account update definition
- Add support to update contact details on an existing account
* Correctly find certificates for unified delta CRL
When building the unified delta CRL, WAL entries from the non-primary
cluster were ignored. This resulted in an incomplete delta CRL,
preventing some entries from appearing.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Scheel <alex.scheel@hashicorp.com>
* Correctly rebuild unified delta CRLs
When deciding if the Unified Delta CRL should be rebuilt, we need to
check the status of all clusters and their last revoked serial numbers.
If any new serial has been revoked on any cluster, we should rebuild the
unified delta CRLs.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Scheel <alex.scheel@hashicorp.com>
* Correctly persist Unified Delta CRL build entries
When building the unified CRL, we need to read the last seen serial
number from all clusters, not just the present cluster, and write it
to the last built serial for that cluster's unified delta WAL entry.
This prevents us from continuously rebuilding unified CRLs now that we
have fixed our rebuild heuristic.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Scheel <alex.scheel@hashicorp.com>
* Fix getLastWALSerial for unified delta CRLs
getLastWALSerial ignored its path argument, preventing it from reading
the specified cluster-specific WAL entry. On the primary cluster, this
was mostly equivalent, but now that we're correctly reading WAL entries
and revocations for other clusters, we need to handle reading these
entries correctly.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Scheel <alex.scheel@hashicorp.com>
* Copy delta WAL entries in event of failure
Any local delta WAL should be persisted to unified delta WAL space as
well. If such unified persistence fails, we need to ensure that they get
eventually moved up, otherwise they'll remain missing until the next
full CRL rebuild occurs, which might be significantly longer than when
the next delta CRL rebuild would otherwise occur. runUnifiedTransfer
already handles this for us, but it lacked logic for delta WAL serials.
The only interesting catch here is that we refuse to copy any entries
whose full unified revocation entry has not also been written.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Scheel <alex.scheel@hashicorp.com>
* Make doUnifiedTransferMissingLocalSerials log an error
This message is mostly an error and would always be helpful information
to have when troubleshooting failures.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Scheel <alex.scheel@hashicorp.com>
* Warn on cross-cluster write failures during revoke
When revoking certificates, we log cross-cluster revocation failures,
but we should really expose this information to the caller, that their
local revocation was successful, but their cross-cluster revocation
failed.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Scheel <alex.scheel@hashicorp.com>
* Ensure unified delta WAL entry has full entry
Delta WAL entries are empty files whose only information (a revoked
serial number) is contained in the file path. These depend implicitly on
a full revocation entry existing for this file (whether a cross-cluster
unified entry or a local entry).
We should not write unified delta WAL entries without the corresponding
full unified revocation entry existing. Add a warning in this case.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Scheel <alex.scheel@hashicorp.com>
* Add changelog entry
Signed-off-by: Alexander Scheel <alex.scheel@hashicorp.com>
---------
Signed-off-by: Alexander Scheel <alex.scheel@hashicorp.com>
* fix console formatting for help output
* fix again
* fix again
* fix, add to ignore
* fix, add to ignore
* add to ignore file
* fix formatting, no verify
* remove lib/story.md
* add changelog
* hold off updating ignore list for separate ticket
* fix test
The extra core setup is no longer needed in Vault Enterprise, and the
licensing code here has no effect here or in Vault Enterprise.
I pulled this commit into Vault Enterprise and it still compiled fine,
and all tests pass. (Though a few functions can be deleted there as
well after this is merged.)
When reading the config, we attempt to detect if the running Vault
instance has been changed from its Enterprise status on write.
Similarly, we should detect if the mount is a local mount instead. While
this isn't changeable at runtime, using sys/raw to side-load an invalid
config could be possible.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Scheel <alex.scheel@hashicorp.com>
Sometimes the tests will modify the client to set a namespace; this
results in testhelpers sometimes trying to access sys/ endpoints with a
namespace, which usually don't work well.
Detect an unset namespaces, if present, before executing, and restore
afterwards so as not to affect the tests.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Scheel <alex.scheel@hashicorp.com>
* Log, don't err, on unified delta WAL write failure
When the PBPWF fails on the Active node of a PR Secondary cluster with a
read-only failure, there is no value in forwarding this request up to
the Active node of the PR Primary cluster: it does not have the local
revocation context necessary to write a Delta WAL entry for this
request, and would likely end up writing a cross-cluster revocation
entry (if it is enabled) or else erring completely.
Instead, log this error like we do when failing to write unified CRL
entries. Switch both to using Error instead of Debug for this type of
failure.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Scheel <alex.scheel@hashicorp.com>
* Add changelog entry
Signed-off-by: Alexander Scheel <alex.scheel@hashicorp.com>
---------
Signed-off-by: Alexander Scheel <alex.scheel@hashicorp.com>
Ryan Cragun