Commit graph

191 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Mitchell Hashimoto c9acfa17cb vault: get rid of HangleLogin 2015-03-30 20:26:39 -07:00
Mitchell Hashimoto 69593cde56 remove credential/ lots of tests faililng 2015-03-30 18:07:05 -07:00
Armon Dadgar 042db7798e vault: Adding basic audit table load/unload 2015-03-27 14:00:38 -07:00
Armon Dadgar 609ac4c562 vault: Allow passing in audit factory methods 2015-03-27 13:45:13 -07:00
Armon Dadgar 20c2375352 vault: Adding ACL enforcement 2015-03-24 11:37:07 -07:00
Armon Dadgar 65ef4f1032 vault: wire tokens into expiration manager 2015-03-23 18:11:15 -07:00
Armon Dadgar 86c9bd9083 vault: Give expiration manager a token store reference 2015-03-23 18:00:14 -07:00
Armon Dadgar 6481ff9e34 vault: Generate a root token when initializing 2015-03-23 17:31:30 -07:00
Armon Dadgar 192dcf7d39 vault: first pass at HandleLogin 2015-03-23 13:56:43 -07:00
Armon Dadgar 879a0501f8 vault: Track the token store in core 2015-03-23 13:41:05 -07:00
Mitchell Hashimoto c349e97168 vault: clean up VaultID duplications, make secret responses clearer
/cc @armon - This is a reasonably major refactor that I think cleans up
a lot of the logic with secrets in responses. The reason for the
refactor is that while implementing Renew/Revoke in logical/framework I
found the existing API to be really awkward to work with.

Primarily, we needed a way to send down internal data for Vault core to
store since not all the data you need to revoke a key is always sent
down to the user (for example the user than AWS key belongs to).

At first, I was doing this manually in logical/framework with
req.Storage, but this is going to be such a common event that I think
its something core should assist with. Additionally, I think the added
context for secrets will be useful in the future when we have a Vault
API for returning orphaned out keys: we can also return the internal
data that might help an operator.

So this leads me to this refactor. I've removed most of the fields in
`logical.Response` and replaced it with a single `*Secret` pointer. If
this is non-nil, then the response represents a secret. The Secret
struct encapsulates all the lease info and such.

It also has some fields on it that are only populated at _request_ time
for Revoke/Renew operations. There is precedent for this sort of
behavior in the Go stdlib where http.Request/http.Response have fields
that differ based on client/server. I copied this style.

All core unit tests pass. The APIs fail for obvious reasons but I'll fix
that up in the next commit.
2015-03-19 23:11:42 +01:00
Armon Dadgar d88a41944e vault: Switch AuthTable to using MountTable 2015-03-19 09:54:57 -07:00
Armon Dadgar 8cc88981d6 vault: token store is a credential implementation 2015-03-18 19:11:52 -07:00
Armon Dadgar b8da9c2ee2 vault: first pass at initializing credential backends 2015-03-18 15:46:07 -07:00
Armon Dadgar d2d1822931 vault: Adding hooks for auth loading 2015-03-18 15:30:31 -07:00
Armon Dadgar 21b9bdaf37 vault: Allow passing in credential backends 2015-03-18 15:21:41 -07:00
Armon Dadgar 6e22ca50eb vault: integrate policy and token store into core 2015-03-18 14:00:42 -07:00
Mitchell Hashimoto e078b957d4 vault: start/stop rollback manager post/pre seal 2015-03-17 20:39:45 -05:00
Mitchell Hashimoto abe0859aa5 vault: use RWMutex on MountTable itself 2015-03-17 20:39:45 -05:00
Armon Dadgar 15b7dc2d02 vault: integration expiration manager with core 2015-03-16 15:28:50 -07:00
Mitchell Hashimoto 9f0d59d03f vault: system using the framework 2015-03-15 17:35:59 -07:00
Mitchell Hashimoto d4f54be927 vault: can pass in the backends 2015-03-15 16:25:38 -07:00
Mitchell Hashimoto d1d1929192 vault: convert to logical.Request and friends 2015-03-15 14:53:41 -07:00
Mitchell Hashimoto 9d84e7bacc vault: don't copy the key so it can be zeroed, document, add helper 2015-03-14 18:25:55 -07:00
Mitchell Hashimoto 866b91d858 vault: public TestCoreUnsealed, don't modify key in Unseal
/cc @armon - I do a key copy within Unseal now. It tripped me up for
quite awhile that that method actually modifies the param in-place and I
can't think of any scenario that is good for the user. Do you see any
issues here?
2015-03-14 17:47:11 -07:00
Armon Dadgar 081358091a vault: improve seal/unseal log messages 2015-03-13 11:34:40 -07:00
Armon Dadgar d744d4ee5e vault: integrate expiration manager with core setup/teardown 2015-03-13 11:20:36 -07:00
Armon Dadgar d0380e553d vault: Support a pre-seal teardown 2015-03-13 11:16:24 -07:00
Armon Dadgar 15de847389 vault: Setup expiration manager on unseal 2015-03-12 12:44:30 -07:00
Armon Dadgar 6c759416d0 vault: special view path for system 2015-03-12 12:44:30 -07:00
Armon Dadgar aa0ca02b8c vault: sanity check key length 2015-03-12 11:20:38 -07:00
Mitchell Hashimoto 718065c733 vault: the config has to be exported 2015-03-12 10:22:12 -07:00
Armon Dadgar 91462a61a2 vault: Adding mounts table endpoint 2015-03-11 16:12:15 -07:00
Armon Dadgar b212890043 vault: Setup the mount tables after load 2015-03-11 15:50:42 -07:00
Armon Dadgar f54e4e0f6a vault: Loading mount tables on start 2015-03-11 15:19:41 -07:00
Armon Dadgar fdad9e9ce3 vault: Test routing while sealed 2015-03-11 14:31:55 -07:00
Armon Dadgar 8fdac427a7 vault: Test initialization simple 2015-03-11 11:52:01 -07:00
Armon Dadgar 6794e59e2b vault: First pass at Unseal 2015-03-11 11:43:36 -07:00
Armon Dadgar 8c49152c78 vault: Support secret sharing 2015-03-11 11:34:08 -07:00
Armon Dadgar 53b4e3281a vault: First pass at initialization 2015-03-09 17:45:34 -07:00
Armon Dadgar da34cbb39a vault: Adding core skeleton 2015-03-09 16:33:27 -07:00