* Docs - update ldap page to add clarity around sAMAccountName
Updated https://developer.hashicorp.com/vault/docs/secrets/ldap#active-directory-ad-1 to clarify customers configure username properly using username_template when sAMAccountName is involved.
* Docs - edit on last update for ldap page
Fixed the link /vault/docs/concepts/username-templating
* Document 'managed_key' key type for transit. Document new 'usages' parameter when creating a managed key in the system backend.
* Document new managed key parameters for transit managed key rotation.
* Remove dynamic keys from SSH Secrets Engine
This removes the functionality of Vault creating keys and adding them to
the authorized keys file on hosts.
This functionality has been deprecated since Vault version 0.7.2.
The preferred alternative is to use the SSH CA method, which also allows
key generation but places limits on TTL and doesn't require Vault reach
out to provision each key on the specified host, making it much more
secure.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Scheel <alex.scheel@hashicorp.com>
* Remove dynamic ssh references from documentation
Signed-off-by: Alexander Scheel <alex.scheel@hashicorp.com>
* Add changelog entry
Signed-off-by: Alexander Scheel <alex.scheel@hashicorp.com>
* Remove dynamic key secret type entirely
Signed-off-by: Alexander Scheel <alex.scheel@hashicorp.com>
* Clarify changelog language
Signed-off-by: Alexander Scheel <alex.scheel@hashicorp.com>
* Add removal notice to the website
Signed-off-by: Alexander Scheel <alex.scheel@hashicorp.com>
---------
Signed-off-by: Alexander Scheel <alex.scheel@hashicorp.com>
* Add documentation for KMIP features implemented in 1.13
* Add release version for key format types
* Fix syntax
* Add supported hashing algorithms and padding methods
* Fix formatting
* Add nit picks from review feedback
* add compatibility info to consul service reg docs
* fix alert formatting
* add consul dataplane compatibility partial
* add compat partial to more consul doc pages
* fix links
* Add known issue about PKI secrets engine with Consul
* Added KB article URL
* Update website/content/docs/secrets/pki/index.mdx
Co-authored-by: Jared Kirschner <85913323+jkirschner-hashicorp@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Jared Kirschner <85913323+jkirschner-hashicorp@users.noreply.github.com>
Thanks to Khai Tran for identifying that syslogging has a lower limit
on message size and sometimes large CRLs can hit that limit.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Scheel <alex.scheel@hashicorp.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexander Scheel <alex.scheel@hashicorp.com>
* Add clarifications on revocation
Signed-off-by: Alexander Scheel <alex.scheel@hashicorp.com>
* Talk about rationale for separating roots from intermediates
Signed-off-by: Alexander Scheel <alex.scheel@hashicorp.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexander Scheel <alex.scheel@hashicorp.com>
* Ensure correct write ordering in rebuildIssuersChains
When troubleshooting a recent migration failure from 1.10->1.11, it was
noted that some PKI mounts had bad chain construction despite having
valid, chaining issuers. Due to the cluster's leadership trashing
between nodes, the migration logic was re-executed several times,
partially succeeding each time. While the legacy CA bundle migration
logic was written with this in mind, one shortcoming in the chain
building code lead us to truncate the ca_chain: by sorting the list of
issuers after including non-written issuers (with random IDs), these
issuers would occasionally be persisted prior to storage _prior_ to
existing CAs with modified chains.
The migration code carefully imported the active issuer prior to its
parents. However, due to this bug, there was a chance that, if write to
the pending parent succeeded but updating the active issuer didn't, the
active issuer's ca_chain field would only contain the self-reference and
not the parent's reference as well. Ultimately, a workaround of setting
and subsequently unsetting a manual chain would force a chain
regeneration.
In this patch, we simply fix the write ordering: because we need to
ensure a stable chain sorting, we leave the sort location in the same
place, but delay writing the provided referenceCert to the last
position. This is because the reference is meant to be the user-facing
action: without transactional write capabilities, other chains may
succeed, but if the last user-facing action fails, the user will
hopefully retry the action. This will also correct migration, by
ensuring the subsequent issuer import will be attempted again,
triggering another chain build and only persisting this issuer when
all other issuers have also been updated.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Scheel <alex.scheel@hashicorp.com>
* Remigrate ca_chains to fix any missing issuers
In the previous commit, we identified an issue that would occur on
legacy issuer migration to the new storage format. This is easy enough
to detect for any given mount (by an operator), but automating scanning
and remediating all PKI mounts in large deployments might be difficult.
Write a new storage migration version to regenerate all chains on
upgrade, once.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Scheel <alex.scheel@hashicorp.com>
* Add changelog entry
Signed-off-by: Alexander Scheel <alex.scheel@hashicorp.com>
* Add issue to PKI considerations documentation
Signed-off-by: Alexander Scheel <alex.scheel@hashicorp.com>
* Correct %v -> %w in chain building errs
Signed-off-by: Alexander Scheel <alex.scheel@hashicorp.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexander Scheel <alex.scheel@hashicorp.com>
* Update signed-ssh-certificates.mdx
Add a pointer to the doc regarding reading back the pub key with the CLI
* Update website/content/docs/secrets/ssh/signed-ssh-certificates.mdx
Co-authored-by: Alexander Scheel <alex.scheel@hashicorp.com>
* Clarify language around PSS CSR issues
Also point out that PKCS#11 tokens have the same problem.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Scheel <alex.scheel@hashicorp.com>
* Update website/content/docs/secrets/pki/considerations.mdx
Co-authored-by: Steven Clark <steven.clark@hashicorp.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexander Scheel <alex.scheel@hashicorp.com>
Co-authored-by: Steven Clark <steven.clark@hashicorp.com>
* Allow OCSP to use issuer's RevocationSigAlgo
When an issuer specifies a RevocationSigAlgo, we should largely follow
this for both CRLs and OCSP. However, x/crypto/ocsp lacks support for
PSS signatures, so we drop these down to PKCS#1v1.5 instead.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Scheel <alex.scheel@hashicorp.com>
* Add warning when issuer has PSS-based RevSigAlgo
Signed-off-by: Alexander Scheel <alex.scheel@hashicorp.com>
* Add note about OCSP and PSS support
Signed-off-by: Alexander Scheel <alex.scheel@hashicorp.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexander Scheel <alex.scheel@hashicorp.com>
* PKI: Add support for signature_bits param to the intermediate/generate api
- Mainly to work properly with GCP backed managed keys, we need to
issue signatures that would match the GCP key algorithm.
- At this time due to https://github.com/golang/go/issues/45990 we
can't issue PSS signed CSRs, as the libraries in Go always request
a PKCS1v15.
- Add an extra check in intermediate/generate that validates the CSR's
signature before providing it back to the client in case we generated
a bad signature such as if an end-user used a GCP backed managed key
with a RSA PSS algorithm.
- GCP ignores the requested signature type and always signs with the
key's algorithm which can lead to a CSR that says it is signed with
a PKCS1v15 algorithm but is actually a RSA PSS signature
* Add cl
* PR feedback
