Bad news: the hot patch we were using breaks in Go 1.19.4: 6109c07ec4
Good news: we can now patch with an environment variable at runtime.
Co-authored-by: Christopher Swenson <christopher.swenson@hashicorp.com>
We need to take a read lock when reading any of the FSM fields. Expose a
new fsm.Stats to handle a racy read and make sure we're consistently using
the f.db read lock wrappers.
The removal of the phony $(OUT) target was preventing `make ci-config`
from recognizing changes to .go-version, since it is not an explicit file target.
Reintroduce this change to get parity with ENT and fix go version bumps.
* Allow mounting external plugins with same name/type as deprecated builtins
* Add some go tests for deprecation status handling
* Move timestamp storage to post-unseal
* Add upgrade-aware deprecation shutdown and tests
When issuing a core.Shutdown(), it is common to background the shutdown
request. This allows Vault to continue cleaning up, mainly to release
the stateLock. This allows the shutdown to complete, but is inherently
racy, so the core.shutdownDoneCh needs to be made atomic.
* Return the partial success code override for all batch error types
* changelog
* docs
* Lost the actual override logic. :)
* And don't hardcode 400
* gate on success
* Initial worker pool
* Run postUnsealFuncs in parallel
* Use the old logic for P=1
* changelog
* Use a CPU count relative worker pool
* Update vault/core.go
Co-authored-by: Nick Cabatoff <ncabatoff@hashicorp.com>
* Done must be called once per postUnsealFunc
* Defer is overkill
Co-authored-by: Nick Cabatoff <ncabatoff@hashicorp.com>
Introducing a new approach to testing Vault artifacts before merge
and after merge/notorization/signing. Rather than run a few static
scenarios across the artifacts, we now have the ability to run a
pseudo random sample of scenarios across many different build artifacts.
We've added 20 possible scenarios for the AMD64 and ARM64 binary
bundles, which we've broken into five test groups. On any given push to
a pull request branch, we will now choose a random test group and
execute its corresponding scenarios against the resulting build
artifacts. This gives us greater test coverage but lets us split the
verification across many different pull requests.
The post-merge release testing pipeline behaves in a similar fashion,
however, the artifacts that we use for testing have been notarized and
signed prior to testing. We've also reduce the number of groups so that
we run more scenarios after merge to a release branch.
We intend to take what we've learned building this in Github Actions and
roll it into an easier to use feature that is native to Enos. Until then,
we'll have to manually add scenarios to each matrix file and manually
number the test group. It's important to note that Github requires every
matrix to include at least one vector, so every artifact that is being
tested must include a single scenario in order for all workflows to pass
and thus satisfy branch merge requirements.
* Add support for different artifact types to enos-run
* Add support for different runner type to enos-run
* Add arm64 scenarios to build matrix
* Expand build matrices to include different variants
* Update Consul versions in Enos scenarios and matrices
* Refactor enos-run environment
* Add minimum version filtering support to enos-run. This allows us to
automatically exclude scenarios that require a more recent version of
Vault
* Add maximum version filtering support to enos-run. This allows us to
automatically exclude scenarios that require an older version of
Vault
* Fix Node 12 deprecation warnings
* Rename enos-verify-stable to enos-release-testing-oss
* Convert artifactory matrix into enos-release-testing-oss matrices
* Add all Vault editions to Enos scenario matrices
* Fix verify version with complex Vault edition metadata
* Rename the crt-builder to ci-helper
* Add more version helpers to ci-helper and Makefile
* Update CODEOWNERS for quality team
* Add support for filtering matrices by group and version constraints
* Add support for pseudo random test scenario execution
Signed-off-by: Ryan Cragun <me@ryan.ec>
* Rename path_config -> path_keys_config
Signed-off-by: Alexander Scheel <alex.scheel@hashicorp.com>
* Add config/keys to disable upserting
Transit would allow anyone with Create permissions on the encryption
endpoint to automatically create new encryption keys. This becomes hard
to reason about for operators, especially if typos are subtly
introduced (e.g., my-key vs my_key) -- there is no way to merge these
two keys afterwards.
Add the ability to globally disable upserting, so that if the
applications using Transit do not need the capability, it can be
globally disallowed even under permissive policies.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Scheel <alex.scheel@hashicorp.com>
* Add documentation on disabling upsert
Signed-off-by: Alexander Scheel <alex.scheel@hashicorp.com>
* Add changelog entry
Signed-off-by: Alexander Scheel <alex.scheel@hashicorp.com>
* Update website/content/api-docs/secret/transit.mdx
Co-authored-by: tjperry07 <tjperry07@users.noreply.github.com>
* Update website/content/api-docs/secret/transit.mdx
Co-authored-by: tjperry07 <tjperry07@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexander Scheel <alex.scheel@hashicorp.com>
Co-authored-by: tjperry07 <tjperry07@users.noreply.github.com>
* add Link config, init, and capabilities
* add node status proto
* bump protoc version to 3.21.9
* make proto
* adding link tests
* remove wrapped link
* add changelog entry
* update changelog entry
A lot of places took a (context, backend, request) tuple, ignoring the
request proper and only using it for its storage. This (modified) tuple
is exactly the set of elements in the shared storage context, so we
should be using that instead of manually passing all three elements
around.
This simplifies a few places where we'd generate a storage context at
the request level and then split it apart only to recreate it again
later (e.g., CRL building).
Signed-off-by: Alexander Scheel <alex.scheel@hashicorp.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexander Scheel <alex.scheel@hashicorp.com>
- Nick brought this to our attention, one of the PKI test suites
is overwriting the production code's value leading to a data race
issue.
- Remove the setting of the variable with the same value from the test
suite.
Ryan Cragun