* Two things:
* Change how we populate and clear leader UUID. This fixes a case where
if a standby disconnects from an active node and reconnects, without the
active node restarting, the UUID doesn't change so triggers on a new
active node don't get run.
* Add a bunch of test helpers and minor updates to things.
This lets other parts of Vault that can't depend on the vault package
take advantage of the subview functionality.
This also allows getting rid of BarrierStorage and vault.Entry, two
totally redundant abstractions.
Roughly 25% of calls to logical.ErrorResponse() include an inner fmt.Sprintf() call.
This PR would simplify these cases:
`return logical.ErrorResponse(fmt.Sprintf("unable to read role '%s'", role))`
could become
`return logical.ErrorResponse("unable to read role '%s'", role)`
With only a single parameter passed in, behavior is unchanged.
The result will still pass gofmtcheck and won't trigger additional
changes if someone isn't using goimports, but it will avoid the
piecemeal imports changes we've been seeing.
* Strip empty strings from database revocation stmts
It's technically valid to give empty strings as statements to run on
most databases. However, in the case of revocation statements, it's not
only generally inadvisable but can lead to lack of revocations when you
expect them. This strips empty strings from the array of revocation
statements.
It also makes two other changes:
* Return statements on read as empty but valid arrays rather than nulls,
so that typing information is inferred (this is more in line with the
rest of Vault these days)
* Changes field data for TypeStringSlice and TypeCommaStringSlice such
that a client-supplied value of `""` doesn't turn into `[]string{""}`
but rather `[]string{}`.
The latter and the explicit revocation statement changes are related,
and defense in depth.
* logical/aws: Harden WAL entry creation
If AWS IAM user creation failed in any way, the WAL corresponding to the
IAM user would get left around and Vault would try to roll it back.
However, because the user never existed, the rollback failed. Thus, the
WAL would essentially get "stuck" and Vault would continually attempt to
roll it back, failing every time. A similar situation could arise if the
IAM user that Vault created got deleted out of band, or if Vault deleted
it but was unable to write the lease revocation back to storage (e.g., a
storage failure).
This attempts to harden it in two ways. One is by deleting the WAL log
entry if the IAM user creation fails. However, the WAL deletion could
still fail, and this wouldn't help where the user is deleted out of
band, so second, consider the user rolled back if the user just doesn't
exist, under certain circumstances.
Fixes#5190
* Fix segfault in expiration unit tests
TestExpiration_Tidy was passing in a leaseEntry that had a nil Secret,
which then caused a segfault as the changes to revokeEntry didn't check
whether Secret was nil; this is probably unlikely to occur in real life,
but good to be extra cautious.
* Fix potential segfault
Missed the else...
* Respond to PR feedback
* Fix for using ExplicitMaxTTL in auth method plugins.
* Reverted pb.go files for readability of PR.
* Fixed indenting of comment.
* Reverted unintended change by go test.
* Initial implemntation of returning 529 for rate limits
- bump aws iam and sts packages to v1.14.31 to get mocking interface
- promote the iam and sts clients to the aws backend struct, for mocking in tests
- this also promotes some functions to methods on the Backend struct, so
that we can use the injected client
Generating creds requires reading config/root for credentials to contact
IAM. Here we make pathConfigRoot a method on aws/backend so we can clear
the clients on successful update of config/root path. Adds a mutex to
safely clear the clients
* refactor locking and unlocking into methods on *backend
* refactor/simply the locking
* check client after grabbing lock
We do this already in the CLI, but because we do it there the UI doesn't
have ordered responses.
We could put it in the UI, but it seems like we might as well just make
it nice for all API users.
Fixes#5141
* Add request timeouts in normal request path and to expirations
* Add ability to adjust default max request duration
* Some test fixes
* Ensure tests have defaults set for max request duration
* Add context cancel checking to inmem/file
* Fix tests
* Fix tests
* Set default max request duration to basically infinity for this release for BC
* Address feedback
It's not obvious why this should be secret, and if it were considered
secret, when and what anything would ever be allowed to access it.
Likely the right way to tie secret values to particular
entities/aliases/groups would be to use the upcoming templated ACL
feature.
This change makes it so that if a lease is revoked through user action,
we set the expiration time to now and update pending, just as we do with
tokens. This allows the normal retry logic to apply in these cases as
well, instead of just erroring out immediately. The idea being that once
you tell Vault to revoke something it should keep doing its darndest to
actually make that happen.
