Commit graph

14 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Jeff Mitchell 8069fa7972 Address some listing review feedback 2016-01-22 10:07:32 -05:00
Jeff Mitchell 5341cb69cc Updates and documentation 2016-01-22 10:07:32 -05:00
Jeff Mitchell c7cec2aabc Add unit tests 2015-10-07 20:17:06 -04:00
Jeff Mitchell 10d24779c0 Rename GetWarnings->Warnings for responses 2015-10-07 16:18:39 -04:00
Jeff Mitchell d740fd4a6a Add the ability for warnings to be added to responses. These are
marshalled into JSON or displayed from the CLI depending on the output
mode. This allows conferring information such as "no such policy exists"
when creating a token -- not an error, but something the user should be
aware of.

Fixes #676
2015-10-07 16:18:39 -04:00
Caleb Tennis 7750af7014 Fix a couple of typos 2015-08-09 15:20:06 -04:00
Armon Dadgar 784f17a0a8 logical: Adding special fields to do raw HTTP 2015-05-27 14:09:47 -07:00
Mitchell Hashimoto 65145cf435 logical: add Redirect to response 2015-03-30 17:56:24 -07:00
Mitchell Hashimoto 2c3657f4fe logical: add credential info to logical backend structures 2015-03-30 14:23:32 -07:00
Mitchell Hashimoto 62d9bec8be logical/aws 2015-03-20 19:03:20 +01:00
Mitchell Hashimoto c349e97168 vault: clean up VaultID duplications, make secret responses clearer
/cc @armon - This is a reasonably major refactor that I think cleans up
a lot of the logic with secrets in responses. The reason for the
refactor is that while implementing Renew/Revoke in logical/framework I
found the existing API to be really awkward to work with.

Primarily, we needed a way to send down internal data for Vault core to
store since not all the data you need to revoke a key is always sent
down to the user (for example the user than AWS key belongs to).

At first, I was doing this manually in logical/framework with
req.Storage, but this is going to be such a common event that I think
its something core should assist with. Additionally, I think the added
context for secrets will be useful in the future when we have a Vault
API for returning orphaned out keys: we can also return the internal
data that might help an operator.

So this leads me to this refactor. I've removed most of the fields in
`logical.Response` and replaced it with a single `*Secret` pointer. If
this is non-nil, then the response represents a secret. The Secret
struct encapsulates all the lease info and such.

It also has some fields on it that are only populated at _request_ time
for Revoke/Renew operations. There is precedent for this sort of
behavior in the Go stdlib where http.Request/http.Response have fields
that differ based on client/server. I copied this style.

All core unit tests pass. The APIs fail for obvious reasons but I'll fix
that up in the next commit.
2015-03-19 23:11:42 +01:00
Armon Dadgar e85cd66b30 all: Removing fields from Lease 2015-03-16 13:29:51 -07:00
Mitchell Hashimoto c3ae1b59a1 vault: Passthrough backend uses logical.Backend 2015-03-15 14:27:06 -07:00
Mitchell Hashimoto 63a9eb321a logical: put structs here, vault uses them 2015-03-15 14:27:06 -07:00