* Add a stronger warning about the usage of recovery keys
* Update website/content/docs/concepts/seal.mdx
Co-authored-by: Nick Cabatoff <ncabatoff@hashicorp.com>
* Keep the mitigation text in the warning box
---------
Co-authored-by: Nick Cabatoff <ncabatoff@hashicorp.com>
This article seems to use the terms "shares" and "shards" interchangeably to describe the parts in which the secret is split under SSS.
While both seem to be correct, sticking to one term would save a newbie reader (like myself) the confusion.
Since the Wikipedia article that's linked in this article only mentions "shares" and the CLI flags (for recovery keys) also use `-shares`, I opted for that.
* Update seal.mdx
The following sentence does not read easily:
"Take down the old active node, update its configuration of the old active node to use the new seal blocks (completely unaware of the old seal type) and bring it back up."
I have changed this to the sentence below, which I believe reads better.
Take down the old active node, update its configuration to use the new seal blocks (completely unaware of the old seal type) and bring it back up.
* Update website/content/docs/concepts/seal.mdx
* trigger ci
Co-authored-by: Loann Le <84412881+taoism4504@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: taoism4504 <loann@hashicorp.com>
