logical/aws: refactor access key create to the secret file

This commit is contained in:
Mitchell Hashimoto 2015-03-21 11:49:56 +01:00
parent 665cbaa3e4
commit 05246433bb
2 changed files with 79 additions and 66 deletions

View File

@ -2,8 +2,6 @@ package aws
import (
"fmt"
"math/rand"
"time"
"github.com/hashicorp/aws-sdk-go/aws"
"github.com/hashicorp/aws-sdk-go/gen/iam"
@ -30,79 +28,21 @@ func pathUser(b *backend) *framework.Path {
func (b *backend) pathUserRead(
req *logical.Request, d *framework.FieldData) (*logical.Response, error) {
client, err := clientIAM(req.Storage)
if err != nil {
return logical.ErrorResponse(err.Error()), nil
}
policyName := d.Get("name").(string)
// Read the policy
policy, err := req.Storage.Get("policy/" + d.Get("name").(string))
policy, err := req.Storage.Get("policy/" + policyName)
if err != nil {
return nil, fmt.Errorf("error retrieving policy: %s", err)
}
if policy == nil {
return logical.ErrorResponse(fmt.Sprintf(
"Policy '%s' not found", d.Get("name").(string))), nil
"Policy '%s' not found", policyName)), nil
}
// Generate a random username. We don't put the policy names in the
// username because the AWS console makes it pretty easy to see that.
username := fmt.Sprintf("vault-%d-%d", time.Now().Unix(), rand.Int31n(10000))
// Write to the WAL that this user will be created. We do this before
// the user is created because if switch the order then the WAL put
// can fail, which would put us in an awkward position: we have a user
// we need to rollback but can't put the WAL entry to do the rollback.
walId, err := framework.PutWAL(req.Storage, "user", &walUser{
UserName: username,
})
if err != nil {
return nil, fmt.Errorf("Error writing WAL entry: %s", err)
}
// Create the user
_, err = client.CreateUser(&iam.CreateUserRequest{
UserName: aws.String(username),
})
if err != nil {
return logical.ErrorResponse(fmt.Sprintf(
"Error creating IAM user: %s", err)), nil
}
// Add the user to all the groups
err = client.PutUserPolicy(&iam.PutUserPolicyRequest{
UserName: aws.String(username),
PolicyName: aws.String(d.Get("name").(string)),
PolicyDocument: aws.String(string(policy.Value)),
})
if err != nil {
return logical.ErrorResponse(fmt.Sprintf(
"Error adding user to group: %s", err)), nil
}
// Create the keys
keyResp, err := client.CreateAccessKey(&iam.CreateAccessKeyRequest{
UserName: aws.String(username),
})
if err != nil {
return logical.ErrorResponse(fmt.Sprintf(
"Error creating access keys: %s", err)), nil
}
// Remove the WAL entry, we succeeded! If we fail, we don't return
// the secret because it'll get rolled back anyways, so we have to return
// an error here.
if err := framework.DeleteWAL(req.Storage, walId); err != nil {
return nil, fmt.Errorf("Failed to commit WAL entry: %s", err)
}
// Return the info!
return b.Secret(SecretAccessKeyType).Response(map[string]interface{}{
"access_key": *keyResp.AccessKey.AccessKeyID,
"secret_key": *keyResp.AccessKey.SecretAccessKey,
}, map[string]interface{}{
"username": username,
}), nil
// Use the helper to create the secret
return b.secretAccessKeysCreate(
req.Storage, policyName, string(policy.Value))
}
func pathUserRollback(req *logical.Request, _kind string, data interface{}) error {

View File

@ -2,7 +2,11 @@ package aws
import (
"fmt"
"math/rand"
"time"
"github.com/hashicorp/aws-sdk-go/aws"
"github.com/hashicorp/aws-sdk-go/gen/iam"
"github.com/hashicorp/vault/logical"
"github.com/hashicorp/vault/logical/framework"
)
@ -28,6 +32,75 @@ func secretAccessKeys() *framework.Secret {
}
}
func (b *backend) secretAccessKeysCreate(
s logical.Storage,
policyName string, policy string) (*logical.Response, error) {
client, err := clientIAM(s)
if err != nil {
return logical.ErrorResponse(err.Error()), nil
}
// Generate a random username. We don't put the policy names in the
// username because the AWS console makes it pretty easy to see that.
username := fmt.Sprintf("vault-%d-%d", time.Now().Unix(), rand.Int31n(10000))
// Write to the WAL that this user will be created. We do this before
// the user is created because if switch the order then the WAL put
// can fail, which would put us in an awkward position: we have a user
// we need to rollback but can't put the WAL entry to do the rollback.
walId, err := framework.PutWAL(s, "user", &walUser{
UserName: username,
})
if err != nil {
return nil, fmt.Errorf("Error writing WAL entry: %s", err)
}
// Create the user
_, err = client.CreateUser(&iam.CreateUserRequest{
UserName: aws.String(username),
})
if err != nil {
return logical.ErrorResponse(fmt.Sprintf(
"Error creating IAM user: %s", err)), nil
}
// Add the user to all the groups
err = client.PutUserPolicy(&iam.PutUserPolicyRequest{
UserName: aws.String(username),
PolicyName: aws.String(policyName),
PolicyDocument: aws.String(policy),
})
if err != nil {
return logical.ErrorResponse(fmt.Sprintf(
"Error adding user to group: %s", err)), nil
}
// Create the keys
keyResp, err := client.CreateAccessKey(&iam.CreateAccessKeyRequest{
UserName: aws.String(username),
})
if err != nil {
return logical.ErrorResponse(fmt.Sprintf(
"Error creating access keys: %s", err)), nil
}
// Remove the WAL entry, we succeeded! If we fail, we don't return
// the secret because it'll get rolled back anyways, so we have to return
// an error here.
if err := framework.DeleteWAL(s, walId); err != nil {
return nil, fmt.Errorf("Failed to commit WAL entry: %s", err)
}
// Return the info!
return b.Secret(SecretAccessKeyType).Response(map[string]interface{}{
"access_key": *keyResp.AccessKey.AccessKeyID,
"secret_key": *keyResp.AccessKey.SecretAccessKey,
}, map[string]interface{}{
"username": username,
"policy": policy,
}), nil
}
func secretAccessKeysRevoke(
req *logical.Request, d *framework.FieldData) (*logical.Response, error) {
// Get the username from the internal data