luxolus/open-vault
2
0
Fork 0
Code Issues 1 Pull requests Releases Activity
open-vault/.github/workflows/enos-release-testing-oss.yml

73 lines
3.4 KiB
YAML
Raw Normal View History

[QT-488] Fix Enos testing workflow name (#19905) Signed-off-by: Jaymala Sinha <jaymala@hashicorp.com>
2023-03-31 17:15:19 +00:00
name: enos-release-testing-oss
[QT-436] Pseudo random artifact test scenarios (#18056) Introducing a new approach to testing Vault artifacts before merge and after merge/notorization/signing. Rather than run a few static scenarios across the artifacts, we now have the ability to run a pseudo random sample of scenarios across many different build artifacts. We've added 20 possible scenarios for the AMD64 and ARM64 binary bundles, which we've broken into five test groups. On any given push to a pull request branch, we will now choose a random test group and execute its corresponding scenarios against the resulting build artifacts. This gives us greater test coverage but lets us split the verification across many different pull requests. The post-merge release testing pipeline behaves in a similar fashion, however, the artifacts that we use for testing have been notarized and signed prior to testing. We've also reduce the number of groups so that we run more scenarios after merge to a release branch. We intend to take what we've learned building this in Github Actions and roll it into an easier to use feature that is native to Enos. Until then, we'll have to manually add scenarios to each matrix file and manually number the test group. It's important to note that Github requires every matrix to include at least one vector, so every artifact that is being tested must include a single scenario in order for all workflows to pass and thus satisfy branch merge requirements. * Add support for different artifact types to enos-run * Add support for different runner type to enos-run * Add arm64 scenarios to build matrix * Expand build matrices to include different variants * Update Consul versions in Enos scenarios and matrices * Refactor enos-run environment * Add minimum version filtering support to enos-run. This allows us to automatically exclude scenarios that require a more recent version of Vault * Add maximum version filtering support to enos-run. This allows us to automatically exclude scenarios that require an older version of Vault * Fix Node 12 deprecation warnings * Rename enos-verify-stable to enos-release-testing-oss * Convert artifactory matrix into enos-release-testing-oss matrices * Add all Vault editions to Enos scenario matrices * Fix verify version with complex Vault edition metadata * Rename the crt-builder to ci-helper * Add more version helpers to ci-helper and Makefile * Update CODEOWNERS for quality team * Add support for filtering matrices by group and version constraints * Add support for pseudo random test scenario execution Signed-off-by: Ryan Cragun <me@ryan.ec>
2022-12-12 20:46:04 +00:00
on:
repository_dispatch:
types:
- enos-release-testing-oss
- enos-release-testing-oss::*
jobs:
test: normalize job and steps between build and release test workflows (#18425) Signed-off-by: Ryan Cragun <me@ryan.ec>
2022-12-15 23:10:49 +00:00
product-metadata:
[QT-436] Pseudo random artifact test scenarios (#18056) Introducing a new approach to testing Vault artifacts before merge and after merge/notorization/signing. Rather than run a few static scenarios across the artifacts, we now have the ability to run a pseudo random sample of scenarios across many different build artifacts. We've added 20 possible scenarios for the AMD64 and ARM64 binary bundles, which we've broken into five test groups. On any given push to a pull request branch, we will now choose a random test group and execute its corresponding scenarios against the resulting build artifacts. This gives us greater test coverage but lets us split the verification across many different pull requests. The post-merge release testing pipeline behaves in a similar fashion, however, the artifacts that we use for testing have been notarized and signed prior to testing. We've also reduce the number of groups so that we run more scenarios after merge to a release branch. We intend to take what we've learned building this in Github Actions and roll it into an easier to use feature that is native to Enos. Until then, we'll have to manually add scenarios to each matrix file and manually number the test group. It's important to note that Github requires every matrix to include at least one vector, so every artifact that is being tested must include a single scenario in order for all workflows to pass and thus satisfy branch merge requirements. * Add support for different artifact types to enos-run * Add support for different runner type to enos-run * Add arm64 scenarios to build matrix * Expand build matrices to include different variants * Update Consul versions in Enos scenarios and matrices * Refactor enos-run environment * Add minimum version filtering support to enos-run. This allows us to automatically exclude scenarios that require a more recent version of Vault * Add maximum version filtering support to enos-run. This allows us to automatically exclude scenarios that require an older version of Vault * Fix Node 12 deprecation warnings * Rename enos-verify-stable to enos-release-testing-oss * Convert artifactory matrix into enos-release-testing-oss matrices * Add all Vault editions to Enos scenario matrices * Fix verify version with complex Vault edition metadata * Rename the crt-builder to ci-helper * Add more version helpers to ci-helper and Makefile * Update CODEOWNERS for quality team * Add support for filtering matrices by group and version constraints * Add support for pseudo random test scenario execution Signed-off-by: Ryan Cragun <me@ryan.ec>
2022-12-12 20:46:04 +00:00
if: ${{ startsWith(github.event.client_payload.payload.branch, 'release/') }}
test: fix release testing workflows (#18322) * Use the correct runner * Fix indentation Signed-off-by: Ryan Cragun <me@ryan.ec>
2022-12-12 23:07:16 +00:00
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
[QT-436] Pseudo random artifact test scenarios (#18056) Introducing a new approach to testing Vault artifacts before merge and after merge/notorization/signing. Rather than run a few static scenarios across the artifacts, we now have the ability to run a pseudo random sample of scenarios across many different build artifacts. We've added 20 possible scenarios for the AMD64 and ARM64 binary bundles, which we've broken into five test groups. On any given push to a pull request branch, we will now choose a random test group and execute its corresponding scenarios against the resulting build artifacts. This gives us greater test coverage but lets us split the verification across many different pull requests. The post-merge release testing pipeline behaves in a similar fashion, however, the artifacts that we use for testing have been notarized and signed prior to testing. We've also reduce the number of groups so that we run more scenarios after merge to a release branch. We intend to take what we've learned building this in Github Actions and roll it into an easier to use feature that is native to Enos. Until then, we'll have to manually add scenarios to each matrix file and manually number the test group. It's important to note that Github requires every matrix to include at least one vector, so every artifact that is being tested must include a single scenario in order for all workflows to pass and thus satisfy branch merge requirements. * Add support for different artifact types to enos-run * Add support for different runner type to enos-run * Add arm64 scenarios to build matrix * Expand build matrices to include different variants * Update Consul versions in Enos scenarios and matrices * Refactor enos-run environment * Add minimum version filtering support to enos-run. This allows us to automatically exclude scenarios that require a more recent version of Vault * Add maximum version filtering support to enos-run. This allows us to automatically exclude scenarios that require an older version of Vault * Fix Node 12 deprecation warnings * Rename enos-verify-stable to enos-release-testing-oss * Convert artifactory matrix into enos-release-testing-oss matrices * Add all Vault editions to Enos scenario matrices * Fix verify version with complex Vault edition metadata * Rename the crt-builder to ci-helper * Add more version helpers to ci-helper and Makefile * Update CODEOWNERS for quality team * Add support for filtering matrices by group and version constraints * Add support for pseudo random test scenario execution Signed-off-by: Ryan Cragun <me@ryan.ec>
2022-12-12 20:46:04 +00:00
outputs:
test: don't use actions-set-product-version in release testing (#22948) (#22951) Signed-off-by: Ryan Cragun <me@ryan.ec>
2023-09-08 22:57:15 +00:00
vault-revision: ${{ github.event.client_payload.payload.sha }}
vault-version: ${{ github.event.client_payload.payload.version }}
[QT-506] Use enos scenario samples for testing (#22641) (#22933) Replace our prior implementation of Enos test groups with the new Enos sampling feature. With this feature we're able to describe which scenarios and variant combinations are valid for a given artifact and allow enos to create a valid sample field (a matrix of all compatible scenarios) and take an observation (select some to run) for us. This ensures that every valid scenario and variant combination will now be a candidate for testing in the pipeline. See QT-504[0] for further details on the Enos sampling capabilities. Our prior implementation only tested the amd64 and arm64 zip artifacts, as well as the Docker container. We now include the following new artifacts in the test matrix: * CE Amd64 Debian package * CE Amd64 RPM package * CE Arm64 Debian package * CE Arm64 RPM package Each artifact includes a sample definition for both pre-merge/post-merge (build) and release testing. Changes: * Remove the hand crafted `enos-run-matrices` ci matrix targets and replace them with per-artifact samples. * Use enos sampling to generate different sample groups on all pull requests. * Update the enos scenario matrices to handle HSM and FIPS packages. * Simplify enos scenarios by using shared globals instead of cargo-culted locals. Note: This will require coordination with vault-enterprise to ensure a smooth migration to the new system. Integrating new scenarios or modifying existing scenarios/variants should be much smoother after this initial migration. [0] https://github.com/hashicorp/enos/pull/102 Signed-off-by: Ryan Cragun <me@ryan.ec> Co-authored-by: Ryan Cragun <me@ryan.ec>
2023-09-08 19:31:09 +00:00
vault-version-package: ${{ steps.get-metadata.outputs.vault-version-package }}
test: fix release testing workflows (#18322) * Use the correct runner * Fix indentation Signed-off-by: Ryan Cragun <me@ryan.ec>
2022-12-12 23:07:16 +00:00
steps:
[QT-576] Optimize build workflow (#21486) (#21601) Improve our build workflow execution time by using custom runners, improved caching and conditional Web UI builds. Runners ------- We improve our build times[0] by using larger custom runners[1] when building the UI and Vault. Caching ------- We improve Vault caching by keeping a cache for each build job. This strategy has the following properties which should result in faster build times when `go.sum` hasn't been changed from prior builds, or when a pull request is retried or updated after a prior successful build: * Builds will restore cached Go modules and Go build cache according to the Go version, platform, architecture, go tags, and hash of `go.sum` that relates to each individual build workflow. This reduces the amount of time it will take to download the cache on hits and upload the cache on misses. * Parallel build workflows won't clobber each others build cache. This results in much faster compile times after cache hits because the Go compiler can reuse the platform, architecture, and tag specific build cache that it created on prior runs. * Older modules and build cache will not be uploaded when creating a new cache. This should result in lean cache sizes on an ongoing basis. * On cache misses we will have to upload our compressed module and build cache. This will slightly extend the build time for pull requests that modify `go.sum`. Web UI ------ We no longer build the web UI in every build workflow. Instead we separate the UI building into its own workflow and cache the resulting assets. The same UI assets are restored from cache during build worklows. This strategy has the following properties: * If the `ui` directory has not changed from prior builds we'll restore `http/web_ui` from cache and skip building the UI for no reason. * We continue to use the built-in `yarn` caching functionality in `action/setup-node`. The default mode saves the `yarn` global cache. to improve UI build times if the cache has not been modified. Changes ------- * Add per platform/archicture Go module and build caching * Move UI building into a separate job and cache the result * Restore UI cache during build * Pin workflows Notes ----- [0] https://hashicorp.atlassian.net/browse/QT-578 [1] https://github.com/hashicorp/vault/actions/runs/5415830307/jobs/9844829929 Signed-off-by: Ryan Cragun <me@ryan.ec>
2023-07-05 21:19:49 +00:00
- uses: actions/checkout@c85c95e3d7251135ab7dc9ce3241c5835cc595a9 # v3.5.3
test: add build artifacts to release testing workflow (#18336) Add build artifacts to release testing workflow Signed-off-by: Ryan Cragun <me@ryan.ec>
2022-12-13 19:00:58 +00:00
with:
test: normalize job and steps between build and release test workflows (#18425) Signed-off-by: Ryan Cragun <me@ryan.ec>
2022-12-15 23:10:49 +00:00
# Check out the repository at the same Git SHA that was used to create
# the artifacts to get the correct metadata.
test: add build artifacts to release testing workflow (#18336) Add build artifacts to release testing workflow Signed-off-by: Ryan Cragun <me@ryan.ec>
2022-12-13 19:00:58 +00:00
ref: ${{ github.event.client_payload.payload.sha }}
test: normalize job and steps between build and release test workflows (#18425) Signed-off-by: Ryan Cragun <me@ryan.ec>
2022-12-15 23:10:49 +00:00
- id: get-metadata
test: don't use actions-set-product-version in release testing (#22948) (#22951) Signed-off-by: Ryan Cragun <me@ryan.ec>
2023-09-08 22:57:15 +00:00
env:
VAULT_VERSION: ${{ github.event.client_payload.payload.version }}
test: add build artifacts to release testing workflow (#18336) Add build artifacts to release testing workflow Signed-off-by: Ryan Cragun <me@ryan.ec>
2022-12-13 19:00:58 +00:00
run: |
test: don't use actions-set-product-version in release testing (#22948) (#22951) Signed-off-by: Ryan Cragun <me@ryan.ec>
2023-09-08 22:57:15 +00:00
echo "vault-version-package=$(make ci-get-version-package)" >> "$GITHUB_OUTPUT"
[QT-488] Get artifact summary info along with product metadata (#19977) * [QT-488] Get artifact summary info along with product metadata Signed-off-by: Jaymala Sinha <jaymala@hashicorp.com> * Fix GH Lint warnings Signed-off-by: Jaymala Sinha <jaymala@hashicorp.com> --------- Signed-off-by: Jaymala Sinha <jaymala@hashicorp.com>
2023-04-05 19:49:46 +00:00
- name: Release Artifact Info
run: |
# shellcheck disable=SC2129
echo "__Product:__ ${{ github.event.client_payload.payload.product }}" >> "$GITHUB_STEP_SUMMARY"
echo "__Version:__ ${{ github.event.client_payload.payload.version }}" >> "$GITHUB_STEP_SUMMARY"
echo "__Commit:__ ${{ github.event.client_payload.payload.sha }}" >> "$GITHUB_STEP_SUMMARY"
echo "" >> "$GITHUB_STEP_SUMMARY"
echo "[Build Workflow](https://github.com/${{github.event.client_payload.payload.org}}/${{github.event.client_payload.payload.repo}}/actions/runs/${{github.event.client_payload.payload.buildworkflowid}})" >> "$GITHUB_STEP_SUMMARY"
[QT-436] Pseudo random artifact test scenarios (#18056) Introducing a new approach to testing Vault artifacts before merge and after merge/notorization/signing. Rather than run a few static scenarios across the artifacts, we now have the ability to run a pseudo random sample of scenarios across many different build artifacts. We've added 20 possible scenarios for the AMD64 and ARM64 binary bundles, which we've broken into five test groups. On any given push to a pull request branch, we will now choose a random test group and execute its corresponding scenarios against the resulting build artifacts. This gives us greater test coverage but lets us split the verification across many different pull requests. The post-merge release testing pipeline behaves in a similar fashion, however, the artifacts that we use for testing have been notarized and signed prior to testing. We've also reduce the number of groups so that we run more scenarios after merge to a release branch. We intend to take what we've learned building this in Github Actions and roll it into an easier to use feature that is native to Enos. Until then, we'll have to manually add scenarios to each matrix file and manually number the test group. It's important to note that Github requires every matrix to include at least one vector, so every artifact that is being tested must include a single scenario in order for all workflows to pass and thus satisfy branch merge requirements. * Add support for different artifact types to enos-run * Add support for different runner type to enos-run * Add arm64 scenarios to build matrix * Expand build matrices to include different variants * Update Consul versions in Enos scenarios and matrices * Refactor enos-run environment * Add minimum version filtering support to enos-run. This allows us to automatically exclude scenarios that require a more recent version of Vault * Add maximum version filtering support to enos-run. This allows us to automatically exclude scenarios that require an older version of Vault * Fix Node 12 deprecation warnings * Rename enos-verify-stable to enos-release-testing-oss * Convert artifactory matrix into enos-release-testing-oss matrices * Add all Vault editions to Enos scenario matrices * Fix verify version with complex Vault edition metadata * Rename the crt-builder to ci-helper * Add more version helpers to ci-helper and Makefile * Update CODEOWNERS for quality team * Add support for filtering matrices by group and version constraints * Add support for pseudo random test scenario execution Signed-off-by: Ryan Cragun <me@ryan.ec>
2022-12-12 20:46:04 +00:00
test:
test: add build artifacts to release testing workflow (#18336) Add build artifacts to release testing workflow Signed-off-by: Ryan Cragun <me@ryan.ec>
2022-12-13 19:00:58 +00:00
name: Test ${{ matrix.build-artifact-name }}
[QT-436] Pseudo random artifact test scenarios (#18056) Introducing a new approach to testing Vault artifacts before merge and after merge/notorization/signing. Rather than run a few static scenarios across the artifacts, we now have the ability to run a pseudo random sample of scenarios across many different build artifacts. We've added 20 possible scenarios for the AMD64 and ARM64 binary bundles, which we've broken into five test groups. On any given push to a pull request branch, we will now choose a random test group and execute its corresponding scenarios against the resulting build artifacts. This gives us greater test coverage but lets us split the verification across many different pull requests. The post-merge release testing pipeline behaves in a similar fashion, however, the artifacts that we use for testing have been notarized and signed prior to testing. We've also reduce the number of groups so that we run more scenarios after merge to a release branch. We intend to take what we've learned building this in Github Actions and roll it into an easier to use feature that is native to Enos. Until then, we'll have to manually add scenarios to each matrix file and manually number the test group. It's important to note that Github requires every matrix to include at least one vector, so every artifact that is being tested must include a single scenario in order for all workflows to pass and thus satisfy branch merge requirements. * Add support for different artifact types to enos-run * Add support for different runner type to enos-run * Add arm64 scenarios to build matrix * Expand build matrices to include different variants * Update Consul versions in Enos scenarios and matrices * Refactor enos-run environment * Add minimum version filtering support to enos-run. This allows us to automatically exclude scenarios that require a more recent version of Vault * Add maximum version filtering support to enos-run. This allows us to automatically exclude scenarios that require an older version of Vault * Fix Node 12 deprecation warnings * Rename enos-verify-stable to enos-release-testing-oss * Convert artifactory matrix into enos-release-testing-oss matrices * Add all Vault editions to Enos scenario matrices * Fix verify version with complex Vault edition metadata * Rename the crt-builder to ci-helper * Add more version helpers to ci-helper and Makefile * Update CODEOWNERS for quality team * Add support for filtering matrices by group and version constraints * Add support for pseudo random test scenario execution Signed-off-by: Ryan Cragun <me@ryan.ec>
2022-12-12 20:46:04 +00:00
if: ${{ startsWith(github.event.client_payload.payload.branch, 'release/') }}
test: normalize job and steps between build and release test workflows (#18425) Signed-off-by: Ryan Cragun <me@ryan.ec>
2022-12-15 23:10:49 +00:00
needs: product-metadata
Rename reusable enos-run workflow file (#18757) * Rename reusable enos-run workflow file Signed-off-by: Jaymala Sinha <jaymala@hashicorp.com> * Update Enos README file Signed-off-by: Jaymala Sinha <jaymala@hashicorp.com> Signed-off-by: Jaymala Sinha <jaymala@hashicorp.com>
2023-01-18 23:37:38 +00:00
uses: ./.github/workflows/test-run-enos-scenario-matrix.yml
[QT-436] Pseudo random artifact test scenarios (#18056) Introducing a new approach to testing Vault artifacts before merge and after merge/notorization/signing. Rather than run a few static scenarios across the artifacts, we now have the ability to run a pseudo random sample of scenarios across many different build artifacts. We've added 20 possible scenarios for the AMD64 and ARM64 binary bundles, which we've broken into five test groups. On any given push to a pull request branch, we will now choose a random test group and execute its corresponding scenarios against the resulting build artifacts. This gives us greater test coverage but lets us split the verification across many different pull requests. The post-merge release testing pipeline behaves in a similar fashion, however, the artifacts that we use for testing have been notarized and signed prior to testing. We've also reduce the number of groups so that we run more scenarios after merge to a release branch. We intend to take what we've learned building this in Github Actions and roll it into an easier to use feature that is native to Enos. Until then, we'll have to manually add scenarios to each matrix file and manually number the test group. It's important to note that Github requires every matrix to include at least one vector, so every artifact that is being tested must include a single scenario in order for all workflows to pass and thus satisfy branch merge requirements. * Add support for different artifact types to enos-run * Add support for different runner type to enos-run * Add arm64 scenarios to build matrix * Expand build matrices to include different variants * Update Consul versions in Enos scenarios and matrices * Refactor enos-run environment * Add minimum version filtering support to enos-run. This allows us to automatically exclude scenarios that require a more recent version of Vault * Add maximum version filtering support to enos-run. This allows us to automatically exclude scenarios that require an older version of Vault * Fix Node 12 deprecation warnings * Rename enos-verify-stable to enos-release-testing-oss * Convert artifactory matrix into enos-release-testing-oss matrices * Add all Vault editions to Enos scenario matrices * Fix verify version with complex Vault edition metadata * Rename the crt-builder to ci-helper * Add more version helpers to ci-helper and Makefile * Update CODEOWNERS for quality team * Add support for filtering matrices by group and version constraints * Add support for pseudo random test scenario execution Signed-off-by: Ryan Cragun <me@ryan.ec>
2022-12-12 20:46:04 +00:00
strategy:
fail-fast: false
matrix:
include:
Backport [QT-602] Run `proxy` and `agent` test scenarios (#23176) into release/1.14.x (#23302) * [QT-602] Run `proxy` and `agent` test scenarios (#23176) Update our `proxy` and `agent` scenarios to support new variants and perform baseline verification and their scenario specific verification. We integrate these updated scenarios into the pipeline by adding them to artifact samples. We've also improved the reliability of the `autopilot` and `replication` scenarios by refactoring our IP address gathering. Previously, we'd ask vault for the primary IP address and use some Terraform logic to determine followers. The leader IP address gathering script was also implicitly responsible for ensuring that a found leader was within a given group of hosts, and thus waiting for a given cluster to have a leader, and also for doing some arithmetic and outputting `replication` specific output data. We've broken these responsibilities into individual modules, improved their error messages, and fixed various races and bugs, including: * Fix a race between creating the file audit device and installing and starting vault in the `replication` scenario. * Fix how we determine our leader and follower IP addresses. We now query vault instead of a prior implementation that inferred the followers and sometimes did not allow all nodes to be an expected leader. * Fix a bug where we'd always always fail on the first wrong condition in the `vault_verify_performance_replication` module. We also performed some maintenance tasks on Enos scenarios byupdating our references from `oss` to `ce` to handle the naming and license changes. We also enabled `shellcheck` linting for enos module scripts. * Rename `oss` to `ce` for license and naming changes. * Convert template enos scripts to scripts that take environment variables. * Add `shellcheck` linting for enos module scripts. * Add additional `backend` and `seal` support to `proxy` and `agent` scenarios. * Update scenarios to include all baseline verification. * Add `proxy` and `agent` scenarios to artifact samples. * Remove IP address verification from the `vault_get_cluster_ips` modules and implement a new `vault_wait_for_leader` module. * Determine follower IP addresses by querying vault in the `vault_get_cluster_ips` module. * Move replication specific behavior out of the `vault_get_cluster_ips` module and into it's own `replication_data` module. * Extend initial version support for the `upgrade` and `autopilot` scenarios. We also discovered an issue with undo_logs that has been described in the VAULT-20259. As such, we've disabled the undo_logs check until it has been fixed. * actions: fix actionlint error and linting logic (#23305) Signed-off-by: Ryan Cragun <me@ryan.ec>
2023-09-27 16:53:12 +00:00
- sample-name: release_ce_linux_amd64_deb
[QT-506] Use enos scenario samples for testing (#22641) (#22933) Replace our prior implementation of Enos test groups with the new Enos sampling feature. With this feature we're able to describe which scenarios and variant combinations are valid for a given artifact and allow enos to create a valid sample field (a matrix of all compatible scenarios) and take an observation (select some to run) for us. This ensures that every valid scenario and variant combination will now be a candidate for testing in the pipeline. See QT-504[0] for further details on the Enos sampling capabilities. Our prior implementation only tested the amd64 and arm64 zip artifacts, as well as the Docker container. We now include the following new artifacts in the test matrix: * CE Amd64 Debian package * CE Amd64 RPM package * CE Arm64 Debian package * CE Arm64 RPM package Each artifact includes a sample definition for both pre-merge/post-merge (build) and release testing. Changes: * Remove the hand crafted `enos-run-matrices` ci matrix targets and replace them with per-artifact samples. * Use enos sampling to generate different sample groups on all pull requests. * Update the enos scenario matrices to handle HSM and FIPS packages. * Simplify enos scenarios by using shared globals instead of cargo-culted locals. Note: This will require coordination with vault-enterprise to ensure a smooth migration to the new system. Integrating new scenarios or modifying existing scenarios/variants should be much smoother after this initial migration. [0] https://github.com/hashicorp/enos/pull/102 Signed-off-by: Ryan Cragun <me@ryan.ec> Co-authored-by: Ryan Cragun <me@ryan.ec>
2023-09-08 19:31:09 +00:00
build-artifact-name: vault_${{ needs.product-metadata.outputs.vault-version-package }}-1_amd64.deb
Backport [QT-602] Run `proxy` and `agent` test scenarios (#23176) into release/1.14.x (#23302) * [QT-602] Run `proxy` and `agent` test scenarios (#23176) Update our `proxy` and `agent` scenarios to support new variants and perform baseline verification and their scenario specific verification. We integrate these updated scenarios into the pipeline by adding them to artifact samples. We've also improved the reliability of the `autopilot` and `replication` scenarios by refactoring our IP address gathering. Previously, we'd ask vault for the primary IP address and use some Terraform logic to determine followers. The leader IP address gathering script was also implicitly responsible for ensuring that a found leader was within a given group of hosts, and thus waiting for a given cluster to have a leader, and also for doing some arithmetic and outputting `replication` specific output data. We've broken these responsibilities into individual modules, improved their error messages, and fixed various races and bugs, including: * Fix a race between creating the file audit device and installing and starting vault in the `replication` scenario. * Fix how we determine our leader and follower IP addresses. We now query vault instead of a prior implementation that inferred the followers and sometimes did not allow all nodes to be an expected leader. * Fix a bug where we'd always always fail on the first wrong condition in the `vault_verify_performance_replication` module. We also performed some maintenance tasks on Enos scenarios byupdating our references from `oss` to `ce` to handle the naming and license changes. We also enabled `shellcheck` linting for enos module scripts. * Rename `oss` to `ce` for license and naming changes. * Convert template enos scripts to scripts that take environment variables. * Add `shellcheck` linting for enos module scripts. * Add additional `backend` and `seal` support to `proxy` and `agent` scenarios. * Update scenarios to include all baseline verification. * Add `proxy` and `agent` scenarios to artifact samples. * Remove IP address verification from the `vault_get_cluster_ips` modules and implement a new `vault_wait_for_leader` module. * Determine follower IP addresses by querying vault in the `vault_get_cluster_ips` module. * Move replication specific behavior out of the `vault_get_cluster_ips` module and into it's own `replication_data` module. * Extend initial version support for the `upgrade` and `autopilot` scenarios. We also discovered an issue with undo_logs that has been described in the VAULT-20259. As such, we've disabled the undo_logs check until it has been fixed. * actions: fix actionlint error and linting logic (#23305) Signed-off-by: Ryan Cragun <me@ryan.ec>
2023-09-27 16:53:12 +00:00
- sample-name: release_ce_linux_arm64_deb
[QT-506] Use enos scenario samples for testing (#22641) (#22933) Replace our prior implementation of Enos test groups with the new Enos sampling feature. With this feature we're able to describe which scenarios and variant combinations are valid for a given artifact and allow enos to create a valid sample field (a matrix of all compatible scenarios) and take an observation (select some to run) for us. This ensures that every valid scenario and variant combination will now be a candidate for testing in the pipeline. See QT-504[0] for further details on the Enos sampling capabilities. Our prior implementation only tested the amd64 and arm64 zip artifacts, as well as the Docker container. We now include the following new artifacts in the test matrix: * CE Amd64 Debian package * CE Amd64 RPM package * CE Arm64 Debian package * CE Arm64 RPM package Each artifact includes a sample definition for both pre-merge/post-merge (build) and release testing. Changes: * Remove the hand crafted `enos-run-matrices` ci matrix targets and replace them with per-artifact samples. * Use enos sampling to generate different sample groups on all pull requests. * Update the enos scenario matrices to handle HSM and FIPS packages. * Simplify enos scenarios by using shared globals instead of cargo-culted locals. Note: This will require coordination with vault-enterprise to ensure a smooth migration to the new system. Integrating new scenarios or modifying existing scenarios/variants should be much smoother after this initial migration. [0] https://github.com/hashicorp/enos/pull/102 Signed-off-by: Ryan Cragun <me@ryan.ec> Co-authored-by: Ryan Cragun <me@ryan.ec>
2023-09-08 19:31:09 +00:00
build-artifact-name: vault_${{ needs.product-metadata.outputs.vault-version-package }}-1_arm64.deb
Backport [QT-602] Run `proxy` and `agent` test scenarios (#23176) into release/1.14.x (#23302) * [QT-602] Run `proxy` and `agent` test scenarios (#23176) Update our `proxy` and `agent` scenarios to support new variants and perform baseline verification and their scenario specific verification. We integrate these updated scenarios into the pipeline by adding them to artifact samples. We've also improved the reliability of the `autopilot` and `replication` scenarios by refactoring our IP address gathering. Previously, we'd ask vault for the primary IP address and use some Terraform logic to determine followers. The leader IP address gathering script was also implicitly responsible for ensuring that a found leader was within a given group of hosts, and thus waiting for a given cluster to have a leader, and also for doing some arithmetic and outputting `replication` specific output data. We've broken these responsibilities into individual modules, improved their error messages, and fixed various races and bugs, including: * Fix a race between creating the file audit device and installing and starting vault in the `replication` scenario. * Fix how we determine our leader and follower IP addresses. We now query vault instead of a prior implementation that inferred the followers and sometimes did not allow all nodes to be an expected leader. * Fix a bug where we'd always always fail on the first wrong condition in the `vault_verify_performance_replication` module. We also performed some maintenance tasks on Enos scenarios byupdating our references from `oss` to `ce` to handle the naming and license changes. We also enabled `shellcheck` linting for enos module scripts. * Rename `oss` to `ce` for license and naming changes. * Convert template enos scripts to scripts that take environment variables. * Add `shellcheck` linting for enos module scripts. * Add additional `backend` and `seal` support to `proxy` and `agent` scenarios. * Update scenarios to include all baseline verification. * Add `proxy` and `agent` scenarios to artifact samples. * Remove IP address verification from the `vault_get_cluster_ips` modules and implement a new `vault_wait_for_leader` module. * Determine follower IP addresses by querying vault in the `vault_get_cluster_ips` module. * Move replication specific behavior out of the `vault_get_cluster_ips` module and into it's own `replication_data` module. * Extend initial version support for the `upgrade` and `autopilot` scenarios. We also discovered an issue with undo_logs that has been described in the VAULT-20259. As such, we've disabled the undo_logs check until it has been fixed. * actions: fix actionlint error and linting logic (#23305) Signed-off-by: Ryan Cragun <me@ryan.ec>
2023-09-27 16:53:12 +00:00
- sample-name: release_ce_linux_amd64_rpm
[QT-506] Use enos scenario samples for testing (#22641) (#22933) Replace our prior implementation of Enos test groups with the new Enos sampling feature. With this feature we're able to describe which scenarios and variant combinations are valid for a given artifact and allow enos to create a valid sample field (a matrix of all compatible scenarios) and take an observation (select some to run) for us. This ensures that every valid scenario and variant combination will now be a candidate for testing in the pipeline. See QT-504[0] for further details on the Enos sampling capabilities. Our prior implementation only tested the amd64 and arm64 zip artifacts, as well as the Docker container. We now include the following new artifacts in the test matrix: * CE Amd64 Debian package * CE Amd64 RPM package * CE Arm64 Debian package * CE Arm64 RPM package Each artifact includes a sample definition for both pre-merge/post-merge (build) and release testing. Changes: * Remove the hand crafted `enos-run-matrices` ci matrix targets and replace them with per-artifact samples. * Use enos sampling to generate different sample groups on all pull requests. * Update the enos scenario matrices to handle HSM and FIPS packages. * Simplify enos scenarios by using shared globals instead of cargo-culted locals. Note: This will require coordination with vault-enterprise to ensure a smooth migration to the new system. Integrating new scenarios or modifying existing scenarios/variants should be much smoother after this initial migration. [0] https://github.com/hashicorp/enos/pull/102 Signed-off-by: Ryan Cragun <me@ryan.ec> Co-authored-by: Ryan Cragun <me@ryan.ec>
2023-09-08 19:31:09 +00:00
build-artifact-name: vault_${{ needs.product-metadata.outputs.vault-version-package }}-1.x86_64.rpm
Backport [QT-602] Run `proxy` and `agent` test scenarios (#23176) into release/1.14.x (#23302) * [QT-602] Run `proxy` and `agent` test scenarios (#23176) Update our `proxy` and `agent` scenarios to support new variants and perform baseline verification and their scenario specific verification. We integrate these updated scenarios into the pipeline by adding them to artifact samples. We've also improved the reliability of the `autopilot` and `replication` scenarios by refactoring our IP address gathering. Previously, we'd ask vault for the primary IP address and use some Terraform logic to determine followers. The leader IP address gathering script was also implicitly responsible for ensuring that a found leader was within a given group of hosts, and thus waiting for a given cluster to have a leader, and also for doing some arithmetic and outputting `replication` specific output data. We've broken these responsibilities into individual modules, improved their error messages, and fixed various races and bugs, including: * Fix a race between creating the file audit device and installing and starting vault in the `replication` scenario. * Fix how we determine our leader and follower IP addresses. We now query vault instead of a prior implementation that inferred the followers and sometimes did not allow all nodes to be an expected leader. * Fix a bug where we'd always always fail on the first wrong condition in the `vault_verify_performance_replication` module. We also performed some maintenance tasks on Enos scenarios byupdating our references from `oss` to `ce` to handle the naming and license changes. We also enabled `shellcheck` linting for enos module scripts. * Rename `oss` to `ce` for license and naming changes. * Convert template enos scripts to scripts that take environment variables. * Add `shellcheck` linting for enos module scripts. * Add additional `backend` and `seal` support to `proxy` and `agent` scenarios. * Update scenarios to include all baseline verification. * Add `proxy` and `agent` scenarios to artifact samples. * Remove IP address verification from the `vault_get_cluster_ips` modules and implement a new `vault_wait_for_leader` module. * Determine follower IP addresses by querying vault in the `vault_get_cluster_ips` module. * Move replication specific behavior out of the `vault_get_cluster_ips` module and into it's own `replication_data` module. * Extend initial version support for the `upgrade` and `autopilot` scenarios. We also discovered an issue with undo_logs that has been described in the VAULT-20259. As such, we've disabled the undo_logs check until it has been fixed. * actions: fix actionlint error and linting logic (#23305) Signed-off-by: Ryan Cragun <me@ryan.ec>
2023-09-27 16:53:12 +00:00
- sample-name: release_ce_linux_arm64_rpm
[QT-506] Use enos scenario samples for testing (#22641) (#22933) Replace our prior implementation of Enos test groups with the new Enos sampling feature. With this feature we're able to describe which scenarios and variant combinations are valid for a given artifact and allow enos to create a valid sample field (a matrix of all compatible scenarios) and take an observation (select some to run) for us. This ensures that every valid scenario and variant combination will now be a candidate for testing in the pipeline. See QT-504[0] for further details on the Enos sampling capabilities. Our prior implementation only tested the amd64 and arm64 zip artifacts, as well as the Docker container. We now include the following new artifacts in the test matrix: * CE Amd64 Debian package * CE Amd64 RPM package * CE Arm64 Debian package * CE Arm64 RPM package Each artifact includes a sample definition for both pre-merge/post-merge (build) and release testing. Changes: * Remove the hand crafted `enos-run-matrices` ci matrix targets and replace them with per-artifact samples. * Use enos sampling to generate different sample groups on all pull requests. * Update the enos scenario matrices to handle HSM and FIPS packages. * Simplify enos scenarios by using shared globals instead of cargo-culted locals. Note: This will require coordination with vault-enterprise to ensure a smooth migration to the new system. Integrating new scenarios or modifying existing scenarios/variants should be much smoother after this initial migration. [0] https://github.com/hashicorp/enos/pull/102 Signed-off-by: Ryan Cragun <me@ryan.ec> Co-authored-by: Ryan Cragun <me@ryan.ec>
2023-09-08 19:31:09 +00:00
build-artifact-name: vault_${{ needs.product-metadata.outputs.vault-version-package }}-1.aarch64.rpm
Backport [QT-602] Run `proxy` and `agent` test scenarios (#23176) into release/1.14.x (#23302) * [QT-602] Run `proxy` and `agent` test scenarios (#23176) Update our `proxy` and `agent` scenarios to support new variants and perform baseline verification and their scenario specific verification. We integrate these updated scenarios into the pipeline by adding them to artifact samples. We've also improved the reliability of the `autopilot` and `replication` scenarios by refactoring our IP address gathering. Previously, we'd ask vault for the primary IP address and use some Terraform logic to determine followers. The leader IP address gathering script was also implicitly responsible for ensuring that a found leader was within a given group of hosts, and thus waiting for a given cluster to have a leader, and also for doing some arithmetic and outputting `replication` specific output data. We've broken these responsibilities into individual modules, improved their error messages, and fixed various races and bugs, including: * Fix a race between creating the file audit device and installing and starting vault in the `replication` scenario. * Fix how we determine our leader and follower IP addresses. We now query vault instead of a prior implementation that inferred the followers and sometimes did not allow all nodes to be an expected leader. * Fix a bug where we'd always always fail on the first wrong condition in the `vault_verify_performance_replication` module. We also performed some maintenance tasks on Enos scenarios byupdating our references from `oss` to `ce` to handle the naming and license changes. We also enabled `shellcheck` linting for enos module scripts. * Rename `oss` to `ce` for license and naming changes. * Convert template enos scripts to scripts that take environment variables. * Add `shellcheck` linting for enos module scripts. * Add additional `backend` and `seal` support to `proxy` and `agent` scenarios. * Update scenarios to include all baseline verification. * Add `proxy` and `agent` scenarios to artifact samples. * Remove IP address verification from the `vault_get_cluster_ips` modules and implement a new `vault_wait_for_leader` module. * Determine follower IP addresses by querying vault in the `vault_get_cluster_ips` module. * Move replication specific behavior out of the `vault_get_cluster_ips` module and into it's own `replication_data` module. * Extend initial version support for the `upgrade` and `autopilot` scenarios. We also discovered an issue with undo_logs that has been described in the VAULT-20259. As such, we've disabled the undo_logs check until it has been fixed. * actions: fix actionlint error and linting logic (#23305) Signed-off-by: Ryan Cragun <me@ryan.ec>
2023-09-27 16:53:12 +00:00
- sample-name: release_ce_linux_amd64_zip
test: add build artifacts to release testing workflow (#18336) Add build artifacts to release testing workflow Signed-off-by: Ryan Cragun <me@ryan.ec>
2022-12-13 19:00:58 +00:00
build-artifact-name: vault_${{ needs.product-metadata.outputs.vault-version }}_linux_amd64.zip
Backport [QT-602] Run `proxy` and `agent` test scenarios (#23176) into release/1.14.x (#23302) * [QT-602] Run `proxy` and `agent` test scenarios (#23176) Update our `proxy` and `agent` scenarios to support new variants and perform baseline verification and their scenario specific verification. We integrate these updated scenarios into the pipeline by adding them to artifact samples. We've also improved the reliability of the `autopilot` and `replication` scenarios by refactoring our IP address gathering. Previously, we'd ask vault for the primary IP address and use some Terraform logic to determine followers. The leader IP address gathering script was also implicitly responsible for ensuring that a found leader was within a given group of hosts, and thus waiting for a given cluster to have a leader, and also for doing some arithmetic and outputting `replication` specific output data. We've broken these responsibilities into individual modules, improved their error messages, and fixed various races and bugs, including: * Fix a race between creating the file audit device and installing and starting vault in the `replication` scenario. * Fix how we determine our leader and follower IP addresses. We now query vault instead of a prior implementation that inferred the followers and sometimes did not allow all nodes to be an expected leader. * Fix a bug where we'd always always fail on the first wrong condition in the `vault_verify_performance_replication` module. We also performed some maintenance tasks on Enos scenarios byupdating our references from `oss` to `ce` to handle the naming and license changes. We also enabled `shellcheck` linting for enos module scripts. * Rename `oss` to `ce` for license and naming changes. * Convert template enos scripts to scripts that take environment variables. * Add `shellcheck` linting for enos module scripts. * Add additional `backend` and `seal` support to `proxy` and `agent` scenarios. * Update scenarios to include all baseline verification. * Add `proxy` and `agent` scenarios to artifact samples. * Remove IP address verification from the `vault_get_cluster_ips` modules and implement a new `vault_wait_for_leader` module. * Determine follower IP addresses by querying vault in the `vault_get_cluster_ips` module. * Move replication specific behavior out of the `vault_get_cluster_ips` module and into it's own `replication_data` module. * Extend initial version support for the `upgrade` and `autopilot` scenarios. We also discovered an issue with undo_logs that has been described in the VAULT-20259. As such, we've disabled the undo_logs check until it has been fixed. * actions: fix actionlint error and linting logic (#23305) Signed-off-by: Ryan Cragun <me@ryan.ec>
2023-09-27 16:53:12 +00:00
- sample-name: release_ce_linux_arm64_zip
test: add build artifacts to release testing workflow (#18336) Add build artifacts to release testing workflow Signed-off-by: Ryan Cragun <me@ryan.ec>
2022-12-13 19:00:58 +00:00
build-artifact-name: vault_${{ needs.product-metadata.outputs.vault-version }}_linux_arm64.zip
[QT-436] Pseudo random artifact test scenarios (#18056) Introducing a new approach to testing Vault artifacts before merge and after merge/notorization/signing. Rather than run a few static scenarios across the artifacts, we now have the ability to run a pseudo random sample of scenarios across many different build artifacts. We've added 20 possible scenarios for the AMD64 and ARM64 binary bundles, which we've broken into five test groups. On any given push to a pull request branch, we will now choose a random test group and execute its corresponding scenarios against the resulting build artifacts. This gives us greater test coverage but lets us split the verification across many different pull requests. The post-merge release testing pipeline behaves in a similar fashion, however, the artifacts that we use for testing have been notarized and signed prior to testing. We've also reduce the number of groups so that we run more scenarios after merge to a release branch. We intend to take what we've learned building this in Github Actions and roll it into an easier to use feature that is native to Enos. Until then, we'll have to manually add scenarios to each matrix file and manually number the test group. It's important to note that Github requires every matrix to include at least one vector, so every artifact that is being tested must include a single scenario in order for all workflows to pass and thus satisfy branch merge requirements. * Add support for different artifact types to enos-run * Add support for different runner type to enos-run * Add arm64 scenarios to build matrix * Expand build matrices to include different variants * Update Consul versions in Enos scenarios and matrices * Refactor enos-run environment * Add minimum version filtering support to enos-run. This allows us to automatically exclude scenarios that require a more recent version of Vault * Add maximum version filtering support to enos-run. This allows us to automatically exclude scenarios that require an older version of Vault * Fix Node 12 deprecation warnings * Rename enos-verify-stable to enos-release-testing-oss * Convert artifactory matrix into enos-release-testing-oss matrices * Add all Vault editions to Enos scenario matrices * Fix verify version with complex Vault edition metadata * Rename the crt-builder to ci-helper * Add more version helpers to ci-helper and Makefile * Update CODEOWNERS for quality team * Add support for filtering matrices by group and version constraints * Add support for pseudo random test scenario execution Signed-off-by: Ryan Cragun <me@ryan.ec>
2022-12-12 20:46:04 +00:00
with:
test: pass build artifact name to release testing workflow (#18411) Signed-off-by: Ryan Cragun <me@ryan.ec>
2022-12-15 18:47:14 +00:00
build-artifact-name: ${{ matrix.build-artifact-name }}
[QT-506] Use enos scenario samples for testing (#22641) (#22933) Replace our prior implementation of Enos test groups with the new Enos sampling feature. With this feature we're able to describe which scenarios and variant combinations are valid for a given artifact and allow enos to create a valid sample field (a matrix of all compatible scenarios) and take an observation (select some to run) for us. This ensures that every valid scenario and variant combination will now be a candidate for testing in the pipeline. See QT-504[0] for further details on the Enos sampling capabilities. Our prior implementation only tested the amd64 and arm64 zip artifacts, as well as the Docker container. We now include the following new artifacts in the test matrix: * CE Amd64 Debian package * CE Amd64 RPM package * CE Arm64 Debian package * CE Arm64 RPM package Each artifact includes a sample definition for both pre-merge/post-merge (build) and release testing. Changes: * Remove the hand crafted `enos-run-matrices` ci matrix targets and replace them with per-artifact samples. * Use enos sampling to generate different sample groups on all pull requests. * Update the enos scenario matrices to handle HSM and FIPS packages. * Simplify enos scenarios by using shared globals instead of cargo-culted locals. Note: This will require coordination with vault-enterprise to ensure a smooth migration to the new system. Integrating new scenarios or modifying existing scenarios/variants should be much smoother after this initial migration. [0] https://github.com/hashicorp/enos/pull/102 Signed-off-by: Ryan Cragun <me@ryan.ec> Co-authored-by: Ryan Cragun <me@ryan.ec>
2023-09-08 19:31:09 +00:00
sample-max: 2
sample-name: ${{ matrix.sample-name }}
test: add build artifacts to release testing workflow (#18336) Add build artifacts to release testing workflow Signed-off-by: Ryan Cragun <me@ryan.ec>
2022-12-13 19:00:58 +00:00
vault-revision: ${{ needs.product-metadata.outputs.vault-revision }}
cherrypick of https://github.com/hashicorp/vault/commit/a9a4b0b9ff4459deaeab4ba62927a2e2633be878 (#22813)
2023-09-06 17:24:39 +00:00
vault-version: ${{ needs.product-metadata.outputs.vault-version }}
[QT-436] Pseudo random artifact test scenarios (#18056) Introducing a new approach to testing Vault artifacts before merge and after merge/notorization/signing. Rather than run a few static scenarios across the artifacts, we now have the ability to run a pseudo random sample of scenarios across many different build artifacts. We've added 20 possible scenarios for the AMD64 and ARM64 binary bundles, which we've broken into five test groups. On any given push to a pull request branch, we will now choose a random test group and execute its corresponding scenarios against the resulting build artifacts. This gives us greater test coverage but lets us split the verification across many different pull requests. The post-merge release testing pipeline behaves in a similar fashion, however, the artifacts that we use for testing have been notarized and signed prior to testing. We've also reduce the number of groups so that we run more scenarios after merge to a release branch. We intend to take what we've learned building this in Github Actions and roll it into an easier to use feature that is native to Enos. Until then, we'll have to manually add scenarios to each matrix file and manually number the test group. It's important to note that Github requires every matrix to include at least one vector, so every artifact that is being tested must include a single scenario in order for all workflows to pass and thus satisfy branch merge requirements. * Add support for different artifact types to enos-run * Add support for different runner type to enos-run * Add arm64 scenarios to build matrix * Expand build matrices to include different variants * Update Consul versions in Enos scenarios and matrices * Refactor enos-run environment * Add minimum version filtering support to enos-run. This allows us to automatically exclude scenarios that require a more recent version of Vault * Add maximum version filtering support to enos-run. This allows us to automatically exclude scenarios that require an older version of Vault * Fix Node 12 deprecation warnings * Rename enos-verify-stable to enos-release-testing-oss * Convert artifactory matrix into enos-release-testing-oss matrices * Add all Vault editions to Enos scenario matrices * Fix verify version with complex Vault edition metadata * Rename the crt-builder to ci-helper * Add more version helpers to ci-helper and Makefile * Update CODEOWNERS for quality team * Add support for filtering matrices by group and version constraints * Add support for pseudo random test scenario execution Signed-off-by: Ryan Cragun <me@ryan.ec>
2022-12-12 20:46:04 +00:00
secrets: inherit
Persist metadata post release tests (#18531) Signed-off-by: Jaymala Sinha <jaymala@hashicorp.com>
2022-12-22 22:20:05 +00:00
save-metadata:
runs-on: linux
release testing: always save the metadata (#20402) Signed-off-by: Ryan Cragun <me@ryan.ec>
2023-04-28 21:15:03 +00:00
if: always()
Save release testing metadata only when tests are run (#18540) Signed-off-by: Jaymala Sinha <jaymala@hashicorp.com> Signed-off-by: Jaymala Sinha <jaymala@hashicorp.com>
2022-12-23 19:06:42 +00:00
needs: test
Persist metadata post release tests (#18531) Signed-off-by: Jaymala Sinha <jaymala@hashicorp.com>
2022-12-22 22:20:05 +00:00
steps:
- name: Persist metadata
uses: hashicorp/actions-persist-metadata@v1
Reference in a new issue Copy permalink