open-nomad/vendor/github.com/mitchellh/go-testing-interface
Seth Hoenig 435c0d9fc8 deps: Switch to Go modules for dependency management
This PR switches the Nomad repository from using govendor to Go modules
for managing dependencies. Aspects of the Nomad workflow remain pretty
much the same. The usual Makefile targets should continue to work as
they always did. The API submodule simply defers to the parent Nomad
version on the repository, keeping the semantics of API versioning that
currently exists.
2020-06-02 14:30:36 -05:00
..
.travis.yml deps: Switch to Go modules for dependency management 2020-06-02 14:30:36 -05:00
go.mod deps: Switch to Go modules for dependency management 2020-06-02 14:30:36 -05:00
LICENSE
README.md
testing.go
testing_go19.go

go-testing-interface

go-testing-interface is a Go library that exports an interface that *testing.T implements as well as a runtime version you can use in its place.

The purpose of this library is so that you can export test helpers as a public API without depending on the "testing" package, since you can't create a *testing.T struct manually. This lets you, for example, use the public testing APIs to generate mock data at runtime, rather than just at test time.

Usage & Example

For usage and examples see the Godoc.

Given a test helper written using go-testing-interface like this:

import "github.com/mitchellh/go-testing-interface"

func TestHelper(t testing.T) {
    t.Fatal("I failed")
}

You can call the test helper in a real test easily:

import "testing"

func TestThing(t *testing.T) {
    TestHelper(t)
}

You can also call the test helper at runtime if needed:

import "github.com/mitchellh/go-testing-interface"

func main() {
    TestHelper(&testing.RuntimeT{})
}

Why?!

*Why would I call a test helper that takes a testing.T at runtime?

You probably shouldn't. The only use case I've seen (and I've had) for this is to implement a "dev mode" for a service where the test helpers are used to populate mock data, create a mock DB, perhaps run service dependencies in-memory, etc.

Outside of a "dev mode", I've never seen a use case for this and I think there shouldn't be one since the point of the testing.T interface is that you can fail immediately.