Fixes#10200
**The bug**
A user reported receiving the following error when an alloc was placed
that needed to preempt existing allocs:
```
[ERROR] client.alloc_watcher: error querying previous alloc:
alloc_id=28... previous_alloc=8e... error="rpc error: alloc lookup
failed: index error: UUID must be 36 characters"
```
The previous alloc (8e) was already complete on the client. This is
possible if an alloc stops *after* the scheduling decision was made to
preempt it, but *before* the node running both allocations was able to
pull and start the preemptor. While that is hopefully a narrow window of
time, you can expect it to occur in high throughput batch scheduling
heavy systems.
However the RPC error made no sense! `previous_alloc` in the logs was a
valid 36 character UUID!
**The fix**
The fix is:
```
- prevAllocID: c.Alloc.PreviousAllocation,
+ prevAllocID: watchedAllocID,
```
The alloc watcher new func used for preemption improperly referenced
Alloc.PreviousAllocation instead of the passed in watchedAllocID. When
multiple allocs are preempted, a watcher is created for each with
watchedAllocID set properly by the caller. In this case
Alloc.PreviousAllocation="" -- which is where the `UUID must be 36 characters`
error was coming from! Sadly we were properly referencing
watchedAllocID in the log, so it made the error make no sense!
**The repro**
I was able to reproduce this with a dev agent with [preemption enabled](https://gist.github.com/schmichael/53f79cbd898afdfab76865ad8c7fc6a0#file-preempt-hcl)
and [lowered limits](https://gist.github.com/schmichael/53f79cbd898afdfab76865ad8c7fc6a0#file-limits-hcl)
for ease of repro.
First I started a [low priority count 3 job](https://gist.github.com/schmichael/53f79cbd898afdfab76865ad8c7fc6a0#file-preempt-lo-nomad),
then a [high priority job](https://gist.github.com/schmichael/53f79cbd898afdfab76865ad8c7fc6a0#file-preempt-hi-nomad)
that evicts 2 low priority jobs. Everything worked as expected.
However if I force it to use the [remotePrevAlloc implementation](https://github.com/hashicorp/nomad/blob/v1.3.0-beta.1/client/allocwatcher/alloc_watcher.go#L147),
it reproduces the bug because the watcher references PreviousAllocation
instead of watchedAllocID.
e2544dd089