This PR
- upgrades the serf library
- has the test start the join process using the un-joined server first
- disables schedulers on the servers
- uses the WaitForLeader and wantPeers helpers
Not sure which, if any of these actually improves the flakiness of this test.
* Remove redundant schedulable check in `FreeWriteClaims`. If a volume
has been created but not yet claimed, its capabilities will be checked
in `WriteSchedulable` at both scheduling time and claim time. We don't
need to also check them in the `FreeWriteClaims` method.
* Enforce maximum volume claims for writers.
When the scheduler checks feasibility for CSI volumes, the check is
fairly loose: earlier versions of the same job are not counted as
active claims. This allows the scheduler to place new allocations
for the new version of a job, under the assumption that we'll replace
the existing allocations and their volume claims.
But when the alloc runner claims the volume, we need to enforce the
active claims even if they're for allocations of an earlier version of
the job. Otherwise we'll try to mount a volume that's currently being
unmounted, and this will cause replacement allocations to frequently
fail.
* Enforce single-node reader check for read-only volumes. When the
alloc runner makes a claim for a read-only volume, we only check that
the volume is potentially schedulable and not that it actually has
free read claims.
If a plugin job fails before successfully fingerprinting the plugins,
the plugin will not exist when we try to delete the job. Tolerate
missing plugins.
The volumewatcher test incorrectly represents the change in attachment
and access modes introduced in Nomad 1.1.0 to support volume
creation. This leads to a test that happens to pass but only
accidentally.
Update the test to correctly represent the volume modes set by the
existing claims on the test volumes.
Nomad inherited protocol version numbering configuration from Consul and
Serf, but unlike those projects Nomad has never used it. Nomad's
`protocol_version` has always been `1`.
While the code is effectively unused and therefore poses no runtime
risks to leave, I felt like removing it was best because:
1. Nomad's RPC subsystem has been able to evolve extensively without
needing to increment the version number.
2. Nomad's HTTP API has evolved extensively without increment
`API{Major,Minor}Version`. If we want to version the HTTP API in the
future, I doubt this is the mechanism we would choose.
3. The presence of the `server.protocol_version` configuration
parameter is confusing since `server.raft_protocol` *is* an important
parameter for operators to consider. Even more confusing is that
there is a distinct Serf protocol version which is included in `nomad
server members` output under the heading `Protocol`. `raft_protocol`
is the *only* protocol version relevant to Nomad developers and
operators. The other protocol versions are either deadcode or have
never changed (Serf).
4. If we were to need to version the RPC, HTTP API, or Serf protocols, I
don't think these configuration parameters and variables are the best
choice. If we come to that point we should choose a versioning scheme
based on the use case and modern best practices -- not this 6+ year
old dead code.
These API endpoints now return results in chronological order. They
can return results in reverse chronological order by setting the
query parameter ascending=true.
- Eval.List
- Deployment.List
When an allocation is updated, the job summary for the associated job
is also updated. CSI uses the job summary to set the expected count
for controller and node plugins. We incorrectly used the allocation's
server status instead of the job status when deciding whether to
update or remove the job from the plugins. This caused a node drain or
other terminal state for an allocation to clear the expected count for
the entire plugin.
Use the job status to guide whether to update or remove the expected
count.
The existing CSI tests for the state store incorrectly modeled the
updates we received from servers vs those we received from clients,
leading to test assertions that passed when they should not.
Rework the tests to clarify each step in the lifecycle and rename CSI state
store functions for clarity
PR #11956 implemented a new mTLS RPC check to validate the role of the
certificate used in the request, but further testing revealed two flaws:
1. client-only endpoints did not accept server certificates so the
request would fail when forwarded from one server to another.
2. the certificate was being checked after the request was forwarded,
so the check would happen over the server certificate, not the
actual source.
This commit checks for the desired mTLS level, where the client level
accepts both, a server or a client certificate. It also validates the
cercertificate before the request is forwarded.
Non-CSI garbage collection tasks on the server only log the cutoff
index in the case where it's not a forced GC from `nomad system gc`.
Do the same for CSI for consistency.
Update the logic in the Nomad client's alloc health tracker which
erroneously marks existing healthy allocations with dead poststart ephemeral
tasks as unhealthy even if they were already successful during a previous
deployment.
This PR replaces use of time.After with a safe helper function
that creates a time.Timer to use instead. The new function returns
both a time.Timer and a Stop function that the caller must handle.
Unlike time.NewTimer, the helper function does not panic if the duration
set is <= 0.
The Plan.Submit endpoint assumed PlanRequest.Plan was never nil. While
there is no evidence it ever has been nil, we should not panic if a nil
plan is ever submitted because that would crash the leader.
* The volume claim GC method and volumewatcher both have logic
collecting terminal allocations that duplicates most of the logic
that's now in the state store's `CSIVolumeDenormalize` method. Copy
this logic into the state store so that all code paths have the same
view of the past claims.
* Remove logic in the volume claim GC that now lives in the state
store's `CSIVolumeDenormalize` method.
* Remove logic in the volumewatcher that now lives in the state
store's `CSIVolumeDenormalize` method.
* Remove logic in the node unpublish RPC that now lives in the state
store's `CSIVolumeDenormalize` method.
In the client's `(*csiHook) Postrun()` method, we make an unpublish
RPC that includes a claim in the `CSIVolumeClaimStateUnpublishing`
state and using the mode from the client. But then in the
`(*CSIVolume) Unpublish` RPC handler, we query the volume from the
state store (because we only get an ID from the client). And when we
make the client RPC for the node unpublish step, we use the _current
volume's_ view of the mode. If the volume's mode has been changed
before the old allocations can have their claims released, then we end
up making a CSI RPC that will never succeed.
Why does this code path get the mode from the volume and not the
claim? Because the claim written by the GC job in `(*CoreScheduler)
csiVolumeClaimGC` doesn't have a mode. Instead it just writes a claim
in the unpublishing state to ensure the volumewatcher detects a "past
claim" change and reaps all the claims on the volumes.
Fix this by ensuring that the `CSIVolumeDenormalize` creates past
claims for all nil allocations with a correct access mode set.
* csi: resolve invalid claim states on read
It's currently possible for CSI volumes to be claimed by allocations
that no longer exist. This changeset asserts a reasonable state at
the state store level by registering these nil allocations as "past
claims" on any read. This will cause any pass through the periodic GC
or volumewatcher to trigger the unpublishing workflow for those claims.
* csi: make feasibility check errors more understandable
When the feasibility checker finds we have no free write claims, it
checks to see if any of those claims are for the job we're currently
scheduling (so that earlier versions of a job can't block claims for
new versions) and reports a conflict if the volume can't be scheduled
so that the user can fix their claims. But when the checker hits a
claim that has a GCd allocation, the state is recoverable by the
server once claim reaping completes and no user intervention is
required; the blocked eval should complete. Differentiate the
scheduler error produced by these two conditions.
The volumewatcher that runs on the leader needs to make RPC calls
rather than writing to raft (as we do in the deploymentwatcher)
because the unpublish workflow needs to make RPC calls to the
clients. This requires that the volumewatcher has access to the
leader's ACL token.
But when leadership transitions, the new leader creates a new leader
ACL token. This ACL token needs to be passed into the volumewatcher
when we enable it, otherwise the volumewatcher can find itself with a
stale token.
* The volume claim GC method and volumewatcher both have logic
collecting terminal allocations that duplicates most of the logic
that's now in the state store's `CSIVolumeDenormalize` method. Copy
this logic into the state store so that all code paths have the same
view of the past claims.
* Remove logic in the volume claim GC that now lives in the state
store's `CSIVolumeDenormalize` method.
* Remove logic in the volumewatcher that now lives in the state
store's `CSIVolumeDenormalize` method.
* Remove logic in the node unpublish RPC that now lives in the state
store's `CSIVolumeDenormalize` method.
In the client's `(*csiHook) Postrun()` method, we make an unpublish
RPC that includes a claim in the `CSIVolumeClaimStateUnpublishing`
state and using the mode from the client. But then in the
`(*CSIVolume) Unpublish` RPC handler, we query the volume from the
state store (because we only get an ID from the client). And when we
make the client RPC for the node unpublish step, we use the _current
volume's_ view of the mode. If the volume's mode has been changed
before the old allocations can have their claims released, then we end
up making a CSI RPC that will never succeed.
Why does this code path get the mode from the volume and not the
claim? Because the claim written by the GC job in `(*CoreScheduler)
csiVolumeClaimGC` doesn't have a mode. Instead it just writes a claim
in the unpublishing state to ensure the volumewatcher detects a "past
claim" change and reaps all the claims on the volumes.
Fix this by ensuring that the `CSIVolumeDenormalize` creates past
claims for all nil allocations with a correct access mode set.
* csi: resolve invalid claim states on read
It's currently possible for CSI volumes to be claimed by allocations
that no longer exist. This changeset asserts a reasonable state at
the state store level by registering these nil allocations as "past
claims" on any read. This will cause any pass through the periodic GC
or volumewatcher to trigger the unpublishing workflow for those claims.
* csi: make feasibility check errors more understandable
When the feasibility checker finds we have no free write claims, it
checks to see if any of those claims are for the job we're currently
scheduling (so that earlier versions of a job can't block claims for
new versions) and reports a conflict if the volume can't be scheduled
so that the user can fix their claims. But when the checker hits a
claim that has a GCd allocation, the state is recoverable by the
server once claim reaping completes and no user intervention is
required; the blocked eval should complete. Differentiate the
scheduler error produced by these two conditions.
The volumewatcher that runs on the leader needs to make RPC calls
rather than writing to raft (as we do in the deploymentwatcher)
because the unpublish workflow needs to make RPC calls to the
clients. This requires that the volumewatcher has access to the
leader's ACL token.
But when leadership transitions, the new leader creates a new leader
ACL token. This ACL token needs to be passed into the volumewatcher
when we enable it, otherwise the volumewatcher can find itself with a
stale token.
James Rasell