Rename SnapshotAfter to SnapshotMinIndex. The old name was not
technically accurate. SnapshotAtOrAfter is more accurate, but wordy and
still lacks context about what precisely it is at or after (the index).
SnapshotMinIndex was chosen as it describes the action (snapshot), a
constraint (minimum), and the object of the constraint (index).
Fix a case where `node.StatusUpdatedAt` was manipulated directly in
memory.
This ensures that StatusUpdatedAt is set in raft layer, and ensures that
the field is updated when node drain/eligibility is updated too.
This fixes a bug in the state store during plan apply. When
denormalizing preempted allocations it incorrectly set the preemptor's
job during the update. This eventually causes a panic downstream in the
client. Added a test assertion that failed before and passes after this fix
Fixes https://github.com/hashicorp/nomad/issues/4299
Upon investigating this case further, we determined the issue to be a race between applying `JobBatchDeregisterRequest` fsm operation and processing job-deregister evals.
Processing job-deregister evals should wait until the FSM log message finishes applying, by using the snapshot index. However, with `JobBatchDeregister`, any single individual job deregistering was applied accidentally incremented the snapshot index and resulted into processing job-deregister evals. When a Nomad server receives an eval for a job in the batch that is yet to be deleted, we accidentally re-run it depending on the state of allocation.
This change ensures that we delete deregister all of the jobs and inserts all evals in a single transactions, thus blocking processing related evals until deregistering complete.
Fix an issue in which the deployment watcher would fail the deployment
based on the earliest progress deadline of the deployment regardless of
if the task group has finished.
Further fix an issue where the blocked eval optimization would make it
so no evals were created to progress the deployment. To reproduce this
issue, prior to this commit, you can create a job with two task groups.
The first group has count 1 and resources such that it can not be
placed. The second group has count 3, max_parallel=1, and can be placed.
Run this first and then update the second group to do a deployment. It
will place the first of three, but never progress since there exists a
blocked eval. However, that doesn't capture the fact that there are two
groups being deployed.
This commit implements an allocation selection algorithm for finding
allocations to preempt. It currently special cases network resource asks
from others (cpu/memory/disk/iops).
Fixes three issues:
1. Retrieving the latest evaluation index was not properly selecting the
greatest index. This would undermine checks we had to reduce the number
of evaluations created when the latest eval index was greater than any
alloc change
2. Fix an issue where the blocking query code was using the incorrect
index such that the index was higher than necassary.
3. Special case handling of blocked evaluation since the create/snapshot
index is no particularly useful since they can be reblocked.
Michael Schurter