The initial implementation of global job stop for MRD looped over all the
regions in the CLI for expedience. This changeset includes the OSS parts of
moving this into the RPC layer so that API consumers don't have to implement
this logic themselves.
When consul.allow_unauthenticated is set to false, the job_endpoint hook validates
that a `-consul-token` is provided and validates the token against the privileges
inherent to a Consul Service Identity policy for all the Connect enabled services
defined in the job.
Before, the check was assuming the service was of type sidecar-proxy. This fixes the
check to use the type of the task so we can distinguish between the different connect
types.
This PR adds initial support for running Consul Connect Ingress Gateways (CIGs) in Nomad. These gateways are declared as part of a task group level service definition within the connect stanza.
```hcl
service {
connect {
gateway {
proxy {
// envoy proxy configuration
}
ingress {
// ingress-gateway configuration entry
}
}
}
}
```
A gateway can be run in `bridge` or `host` networking mode, with the caveat that host networking necessitates manually specifying the Envoy admin listener (which cannot be disabled) via the service port value.
Currently Envoy is the only supported gateway implementation in Consul, and Nomad only supports running Envoy as a gateway using the docker driver.
Aims to address #8294 and tangentially #8647
Add a Postrun hook to send the `CSIVolume.Unpublish` RPC to the server. This
may forward client RPCs to the node plugins or to the controller plugins,
depending on whether other allocations on this node have claims on this
volume.
By making clients responsible for running the `CSIVolume.Unpublish` RPC (and
making the RPC available to a `nomad volume detach` command), the
volumewatcher becomes only used by the core GC job and we no longer need
async volume GC from job deregister and node update.
Fixes https://github.com/hashicorp/nomad/issues/8544
This PR fixes a bug where using `nomad job plan ...` always report no change if the submitted job contain scaling.
The issue has three contributing factors:
1. The plan endpoint doesn't populate the required scaling policy ID; unlike the job register endpoint
2. The plan endpoint suppresses errors on job insertion - the job insertion fails here, because the scaling policy is missing the required ID
3. The scheduler reports no update necessary when the relevant job isn't in store (because the insertion failed)
This PR fixes the first two factors. Changing the scheduler to be more strict might make sense, but may violate some idempotency invariant or make the scheduler more brittle.
adds in oss components to support enterprise multi-vault namespace feature
upgrade specific doc on vault multi-namespaces
vault docs
update test to reflect new error
This fixes a bug where jobs may get "stuck" unprocessed that
dispropotionately affect periodic jobs around leadership transitions.
When registering a job, the job registration and the eval to process it
get applied to raft as two separate transactions; if the job
registration succeeds but eval application fails, the job may remain
unprocessed. Operators may detect such failure, when submitting a job
update and get a 500 error code, and they could retry; periodic jobs
failures are more likely to go unnoticed, and no further periodic
invocations will be processed until an operator force evaluation.
This fixes the issue by ensuring that the job registration and eval
application get persisted and processed atomically in the same raft log
entry.
Also, applies the same change to ensure atomicity in job deregistration.
Backward Compatibility
We must maintain compatibility in two scenarios: mixed clusters where a
leader can handle atomic updates but followers cannot, and a recent
cluster processes old log entries from legacy or mixed cluster mode.
To handle this constraints: ensure that the leader continue to emit the
Evaluation log entry until all servers have upgraded; also, when
processing raft logs, the servers honor evaluations found in both spots,
the Eval in job (de-)registration and the eval update entries.
When an updated server sees mix-mode behavior where an eval is inserted
into the raft log twice, it ignores the second instance.
I made one compromise in consistency in the mixed-mode scenario: servers
may disagree on the eval.CreateIndex value: the leader and updated
servers will report the job registration index while old servers will
report the index of the eval update log entry. This discripency doesn't
seem to be material - it's the eval.JobModifyIndex that matters.
Deployments should wait until kicked off by `Job.Register` so that we can
assert that all regions have a scheduled deployment before starting any
region. This changeset includes the OSS fixes to support the ENT work.
`IsMultiregionStarter` has no more callers in OSS, so remove it here.
Add a scatter-gather for multiregion job plans. Each region's servers
interpolate the plan locally in `Job.Plan` but don't distribute the plan as
done in `Job.Run`.
Note that it's not possible to return a usable modify index from a multiregion
plan for use with `-check-index`. Even if we were to force the modify index to
be the same at the start of `Job.Run` the index immediately drifts during each
region's deployments, depending on events local to each region. So we omit
this section of a multiregion plan.
In multiregion deployments when ACLs are enabled, the deploymentwatcher needs
an appropriately scoped ACL token with the same `submit-job` rights as the
user who submitted it. The token will already be replicated, so store the
accessor ID so that it can be retrieved by the leader.
Integration points for multiregion jobs to be registered in the enterprise
version of Nomad:
* hook in `Job.Register` for enterprise to send job to peer regions
* remove monitoring from `nomad job run` and `nomad job stop` for multiregion jobs
Following the new volumewatcher in #7794 and performance improvements
to it that landed afterwards, there's no particular reason we should
be threading claim releases through the GC eval rather than writing an
empty `CSIVolumeClaimRequest` with the mode set to
`CSIVolumeClaimRelease`, just as the GC evaluation would do.
Also, by batching up these raft messages, we can reduce the amount of
raft writes by 1 and cross-server RPCs by 1 per volume we release
claims on.
Allow a `/v1/jobs?all_namespaces=true` to list all jobs across all
namespaces. The returned list is to contain a `Namespace` field
indicating the job namespace.
If ACL is enabled, the request token needs to be a management token or
have `namespace:list-jobs` capability on all existing namespaces.
An operator could submit a scale request including a negative count
value. This negative value caused the Nomad server to panic. The
fix adds validation to the submitted count, returning an error to
the caller if it is negative.
This changeset adds a subsystem to run on the leader, similar to the
deployment watcher or node drainer. The `Watcher` performs a blocking
query on updates to the `CSIVolumes` table and triggers reaping of
volume claims.
This will avoid tying up scheduling workers by immediately sending
volume claim workloads into their own loop, rather than blocking the
scheduling workers in the core GC job doing things like talking to CSI
controllers
The volume watcher is enabled on leader step-up and disabled on leader
step-down.
The volume claim GC mechanism now makes an empty claim RPC for the
volume to trigger an index bump. That in turn unblocks the blocking
query in the volume watcher so it can assess which claims can be
released for a volume.
The `Job.Deregister` call will block on the client CSI controller RPCs
while the alloc still exists on the Nomad client node. So we need to
make the volume claim reaping async from the `Job.Deregister`. This
allows `nomad job stop` to return immediately. In order to make this
work, this changeset changes the volume GC so that the GC jobs are on a
by-volume basis rather than a by-job basis; we won't have to query
the (possibly deleted) job at the time of volume GC. We smuggle the
volume ID and whether it's a purge into the GC eval ID the same way we
smuggled the job ID previously.
* nomad/state/state_store: error message copy/paste error
* nomad/structs/structs: add a VolumeEval to the JobDeregisterResponse
* nomad/job_endpoint: synchronously, volumeClaimReap on job Deregister
* nomad/core_sched: make volumeClaimReap available without a CoreSched
* nomad/job_endpoint: Deregister return early if the job is missing
* nomad/job_endpoint_test: job Deregistion is idempotent
* nomad/core_sched: conditionally ignore alloc status in volumeClaimReap
* nomad/job_endpoint: volumeClaimReap all allocations, even running
* nomad/core_sched_test: extra argument to collectClaimsToGCImpl
* nomad/job_endpoint: job deregistration is not idempotent
Part of #6120
Building on the support for enabling connect proxy paths in #7323, this change
adds the ability to configure the 'service.check.expose' flag on group-level
service check definitions for services that are connect-enabled. This is a slight
deviation from the "magic" that Consul provides. With Consul, the 'expose' flag
exists on the connect.proxy stanza, which will then auto-generate expose paths
for every HTTP and gRPC service check associated with that connect-enabled
service.
A first attempt at providing similar magic for Nomad's Consul Connect integration
followed that pattern exactly, as seen in #7396. However, on reviewing the PR
we realized having the `expose` flag on the proxy stanza inseperably ties together
the automatic path generation with every HTTP/gRPC defined on the service. This
makes sense in Consul's context, because a service definition is reasonably
associated with a single "task". With Nomad's group level service definitions
however, there is a reasonable expectation that a service definition is more
abstractly representative of multiple services within the task group. In this
case, one would want to define checks of that service which concretely make HTTP
or gRPC requests to different underlying tasks. Such a model is not possible
with the course `proxy.expose` flag.
Instead, we now have the flag made available within the check definitions themselves.
By making the expose feature resolute to each check, it is possible to have
some HTTP/gRPC checks which make use of the envoy exposed paths, as well as
some HTTP/gRPC checks which make use of some orthongonal port-mapping to do
checks on some other task (or even some other bound port of the same task)
within the task group.
Given this example,
group "server-group" {
network {
mode = "bridge"
port "forchecks" {
to = -1
}
}
service {
name = "myserver"
port = 2000
connect {
sidecar_service {
}
}
check {
name = "mycheck-myserver"
type = "http"
port = "forchecks"
interval = "3s"
timeout = "2s"
method = "GET"
path = "/classic/responder/health"
expose = true
}
}
}
Nomad will automatically inject (via job endpoint mutator) the
extrapolated expose path configuration, i.e.
expose {
path {
path = "/classic/responder/health"
protocol = "http"
local_path_port = 2000
listener_port = "forchecks"
}
}
Documentation is coming in #7440 (needs updating, doing next)
Modifications to the `countdash` examples in https://github.com/hashicorp/demo-consul-101/pull/6
which will make the examples in the documentation actually runnable.
Will add some e2e tests based on the above when it becomes available.
