Registration and restoring allocs don't share state or depend on each
other in any way (syncing allocs with servers is done outside of
registration).
Since restoring is synchronous, start the registration goroutine first.
For nodes with lots of allocs to restore or close to their heartbeat
deadline, this could be the difference between becoming "lost" or not.
Refactoring of 104067bc2b2002a4e45ae7b667a476b89addc162
Switch the MarkLive method for a chan that is closed by the client.
Thanks to @notnoop for the idea!
The old approach called a method on most existing ARs and TRs on every
runAllocs call. The new approach does a once.Do call in runAllocs to
accomplish the same thing with less work. Able to remove the gate
abstraction that did much more than was needed.
Fixes#1795
Running restored allocations and pulling what allocations to run from
the server happen concurrently. This means that if a client is rebooted,
and has its allocations rescheduled, it may restart the dead allocations
before it contacts the server and determines they should be dead.
This commit makes tasks that fail to reattach on restore wait until the
server is contacted before restarting.
Related to #4280
This PR adds
`client.allocs.<job>.<group>.<alloc>.<task>.memory.allocated` as a gauge
in bytes to metrics to ease calculating how close a task is to OOMing.
```
'nomad.client.allocs.memory.allocated.example.cache.6d98cbaf-d6bc-2a84-c63f-bfff8905a9d8.redis.rusty': 268435456.000
'nomad.client.allocs.memory.cache.example.cache.6d98cbaf-d6bc-2a84-c63f-bfff8905a9d8.redis.rusty': 5677056.000
'nomad.client.allocs.memory.kernel_max_usage.example.cache.6d98cbaf-d6bc-2a84-c63f-bfff8905a9d8.redis.rusty': 0.000
'nomad.client.allocs.memory.kernel_usage.example.cache.6d98cbaf-d6bc-2a84-c63f-bfff8905a9d8.redis.rusty': 0.000
'nomad.client.allocs.memory.max_usage.example.cache.6d98cbaf-d6bc-2a84-c63f-bfff8905a9d8.redis.rusty': 8908800.000
'nomad.client.allocs.memory.rss.example.cache.6d98cbaf-d6bc-2a84-c63f-bfff8905a9d8.redis.rusty': 876544.000
'nomad.client.allocs.memory.swap.example.cache.6d98cbaf-d6bc-2a84-c63f-bfff8905a9d8.redis.rusty': 0.000
'nomad.client.allocs.memory.usage.example.cache.6d98cbaf-d6bc-2a84-c63f-bfff8905a9d8.redis.rusty': 8208384.000
```
* client: was not using up-to-date client state in determining which alloc count towards allocated resources
* Update client/client.go
Co-Authored-By: cgbaker <cgbaker@hashicorp.com>
This fixes a confusing UX where a previously successful deployment's
healthy/unhealthy count would get updated if any allocations failed after
the deployment was already marked as successful.
This command will be used to send a signal to either a single task within an
allocation, or all of the tasks if <task-name> is omitted. If the sent signal
terminates the allocation, it will be treated as if the allocation has crashed,
rather than as if it was operator-terminated.
Signal validation is currently handled by the driver itself and nomad
does not attempt to restrict or validate them.
Currently, when logmon fails to reattach, we will retry reattachment to
the same pid until the task restart specification is exhausted.
Because we cannot clear hook state during error conditions, it is not
possible for us to signal to a future restart that it _shouldn't_
attempt to reattach to the plugin.
Here we revert to explicitly detecting reattachment seperately from a
launch of a new logmon, so we can recover from scenarios where a logmon
plugin has failed.
This is a net improvement over the current hard failure situation, as it
means in the most common case (the pid has gone away), we can recover.
Other reattachment failure modes where the plugin may still be running
could potentially cause a duplicate process, or a subsequent failure to launch
a new plugin.
If there was a duplicate process, it could potentially cause duplicate
logging. This is better than a production workload outage.
If there was a subsequent failure to launch a new plugin, it would fail
in the same (retry until restarts are exhausted) as the current failure
mode.
This adds a `nomad alloc restart` command and api that allows a job operator
with the alloc-lifecycle acl to perform an in-place restart of a Nomad
allocation, or a given subtask.
Remove runLaunched tracking as Run is *always* called for killable
TaskRunners. TaskRunners which fail before Run can be called (during
NewTaskRunner or Restore) are not killable as they're never added to the
client's alloc map.
I chose to make them more of integration tests since there's a lot more
plumbing involved. The internal implementation details of how we craft
task envs can now change and these tests will still properly assert the
task runtime environment is setup properly.
Some of the context uses in TR hooks are useless (Killed during Stop
never seems meaningful).
None of the hooks are interruptable for graceful shutdown which is
unfortunate and probably needs fixing.
Builds upon earlier commit that cleans up restored handles of terminal
allocs by also emitting terminated events and calling exited hooks when
appropriate.
The test is sadly quite complicated and peeks into things (logmon's
reattach config) AR doesn't normally have access to.
However, I couldn't find another way of asserting logmon got cleaned up
without resorting to smaller unit tests. Smaller unit tests risk
re-implementing dependencies in an unrealistic way, so I opted for an
ugly integration test.
This commit is a significant change. TR.Run is now always executed, even
for terminal allocations. This was changed to allow TR.Run to cleanup
(run stop hooks) if a handle was recovered.
This is intended to handle the case of Nomad receiving a
DesiredStatus=Stop allocation update, persisting it, but crashing before
stopping AR/TR.
The commit also renames task runner hook data as it was very easy to
accidently set state on Requests instead of Responses using the old
field names.
This code chooses to be conservative as opposed to optimal: when failing
to reattach to logmon simply return a recoverable error instead of
immediately trying to restart logmon.
The recoverable error will cause the task's restart policy to be
applied and a new logmon will be launched upon restart.
Trying to do the optimal approach of simply starting a new logmon
requires error string comparison and should be tested against a task
actively logging to assert the behavior (are writes blocked? dropped?).
