Add a scatter-gather for multiregion job plans. Each region's servers
interpolate the plan locally in `Job.Plan` but don't distribute the plan as
done in `Job.Run`.
Note that it's not possible to return a usable modify index from a multiregion
plan for use with `-check-index`. Even if we were to force the modify index to
be the same at the start of `Job.Run` the index immediately drifts during each
region's deployments, depending on events local to each region. So we omit
this section of a multiregion plan.
In multiregion deployments when ACLs are enabled, the deploymentwatcher needs
an appropriately scoped ACL token with the same `submit-job` rights as the
user who submitted it. The token will already be replicated, so store the
accessor ID so that it can be retrieved by the leader.
Integration points for multiregion jobs to be registered in the enterprise
version of Nomad:
* hook in `Job.Register` for enterprise to send job to peer regions
* remove monitoring from `nomad job run` and `nomad job stop` for multiregion jobs
Following the new volumewatcher in #7794 and performance improvements
to it that landed afterwards, there's no particular reason we should
be threading claim releases through the GC eval rather than writing an
empty `CSIVolumeClaimRequest` with the mode set to
`CSIVolumeClaimRelease`, just as the GC evaluation would do.
Also, by batching up these raft messages, we can reduce the amount of
raft writes by 1 and cross-server RPCs by 1 per volume we release
claims on.
Allow a `/v1/jobs?all_namespaces=true` to list all jobs across all
namespaces. The returned list is to contain a `Namespace` field
indicating the job namespace.
If ACL is enabled, the request token needs to be a management token or
have `namespace:list-jobs` capability on all existing namespaces.
An operator could submit a scale request including a negative count
value. This negative value caused the Nomad server to panic. The
fix adds validation to the submitted count, returning an error to
the caller if it is negative.
This changeset adds a subsystem to run on the leader, similar to the
deployment watcher or node drainer. The `Watcher` performs a blocking
query on updates to the `CSIVolumes` table and triggers reaping of
volume claims.
This will avoid tying up scheduling workers by immediately sending
volume claim workloads into their own loop, rather than blocking the
scheduling workers in the core GC job doing things like talking to CSI
controllers
The volume watcher is enabled on leader step-up and disabled on leader
step-down.
The volume claim GC mechanism now makes an empty claim RPC for the
volume to trigger an index bump. That in turn unblocks the blocking
query in the volume watcher so it can assess which claims can be
released for a volume.
The `Job.Deregister` call will block on the client CSI controller RPCs
while the alloc still exists on the Nomad client node. So we need to
make the volume claim reaping async from the `Job.Deregister`. This
allows `nomad job stop` to return immediately. In order to make this
work, this changeset changes the volume GC so that the GC jobs are on a
by-volume basis rather than a by-job basis; we won't have to query
the (possibly deleted) job at the time of volume GC. We smuggle the
volume ID and whether it's a purge into the GC eval ID the same way we
smuggled the job ID previously.
* nomad/state/state_store: error message copy/paste error
* nomad/structs/structs: add a VolumeEval to the JobDeregisterResponse
* nomad/job_endpoint: synchronously, volumeClaimReap on job Deregister
* nomad/core_sched: make volumeClaimReap available without a CoreSched
* nomad/job_endpoint: Deregister return early if the job is missing
* nomad/job_endpoint_test: job Deregistion is idempotent
* nomad/core_sched: conditionally ignore alloc status in volumeClaimReap
* nomad/job_endpoint: volumeClaimReap all allocations, even running
* nomad/core_sched_test: extra argument to collectClaimsToGCImpl
* nomad/job_endpoint: job deregistration is not idempotent
Part of #6120
Building on the support for enabling connect proxy paths in #7323, this change
adds the ability to configure the 'service.check.expose' flag on group-level
service check definitions for services that are connect-enabled. This is a slight
deviation from the "magic" that Consul provides. With Consul, the 'expose' flag
exists on the connect.proxy stanza, which will then auto-generate expose paths
for every HTTP and gRPC service check associated with that connect-enabled
service.
A first attempt at providing similar magic for Nomad's Consul Connect integration
followed that pattern exactly, as seen in #7396. However, on reviewing the PR
we realized having the `expose` flag on the proxy stanza inseperably ties together
the automatic path generation with every HTTP/gRPC defined on the service. This
makes sense in Consul's context, because a service definition is reasonably
associated with a single "task". With Nomad's group level service definitions
however, there is a reasonable expectation that a service definition is more
abstractly representative of multiple services within the task group. In this
case, one would want to define checks of that service which concretely make HTTP
or gRPC requests to different underlying tasks. Such a model is not possible
with the course `proxy.expose` flag.
Instead, we now have the flag made available within the check definitions themselves.
By making the expose feature resolute to each check, it is possible to have
some HTTP/gRPC checks which make use of the envoy exposed paths, as well as
some HTTP/gRPC checks which make use of some orthongonal port-mapping to do
checks on some other task (or even some other bound port of the same task)
within the task group.
Given this example,
group "server-group" {
network {
mode = "bridge"
port "forchecks" {
to = -1
}
}
service {
name = "myserver"
port = 2000
connect {
sidecar_service {
}
}
check {
name = "mycheck-myserver"
type = "http"
port = "forchecks"
interval = "3s"
timeout = "2s"
method = "GET"
path = "/classic/responder/health"
expose = true
}
}
}
Nomad will automatically inject (via job endpoint mutator) the
extrapolated expose path configuration, i.e.
expose {
path {
path = "/classic/responder/health"
protocol = "http"
local_path_port = 2000
listener_port = "forchecks"
}
}
Documentation is coming in #7440 (needs updating, doing next)
Modifications to the `countdash` examples in https://github.com/hashicorp/demo-consul-101/pull/6
which will make the examples in the documentation actually runnable.
Will add some e2e tests based on the above when it becomes available.
* acl/policy: add the volume ACL policies
* nomad/csi_endpoint: enforce ACLs for volume access
* nomad/search_endpoint_oss: volume acls
* acl/acl: add plugin read as a global policy
* acl/policy: add PluginPolicy global cap type
* nomad/csi_endpoint: check the global plugin ACL policy
* nomad/mock/acl: PluginPolicy
* nomad/csi_endpoint: fix list rebase
* nomad/core_sched_test: new test since #7358
* nomad/csi_endpoint_test: use correct permissions for list
* nomad/csi_endpoint: allowCSIMount keeps ACL checks together
* nomad/job_endpoint: check mount permission for jobs
* nomad/job_endpoint_test: need plugin read, too
Nomad jobs may be configured with a TaskGroup which contains a Service
definition that is Consul Connect enabled. These service definitions end
up establishing a Consul Connect Proxy Task (e.g. envoy, by default). In
the case where Consul ACLs are enabled, a Service Identity token is required
for these tasks to run & connect, etc. This changeset enables the Nomad Server
to recieve RPC requests for the derivation of SI tokens on behalf of instances
of Consul Connect using Tasks. Those tokens are then relayed back to the
requesting Client, which then injects the tokens in the secrets directory of
the Task.
Fixes#6853
Canonicalize jobs first before adding any sidecars. This fixes a bug
where sidecar tasks were added without interpolated names and broke
validation. Sidecar tasks must be canonicalized independently.
Also adds a group network to the mock connect job because it wasn't a
valid connect job before!
The existing version constraint uses logic optimized for package
managers, not schedulers, when checking prereleases:
- 1.3.0-beta1 will *not* satisfy ">= 0.6.1"
- 1.7.0-rc1 will *not* satisfy ">= 1.6.0-beta1"
This is due to package managers wishing to favor final releases over
prereleases.
In a scheduler versions more often represent the earliest release all
required features/APIs are available in a system. Whether the constraint
or the version being evaluated are prereleases has no impact on
ordering.
This commit adds a new constraint - `semver` - which will use Semver
v2.0 ordering when evaluating constraints. Given the above examples:
- 1.3.0-beta1 satisfies ">= 0.6.1" using `semver`
- 1.7.0-rc1 satisfies ">= 1.6.0-beta1" using `semver`
Since existing jobspecs may rely on the old behavior, a new constraint
was added and the implicit Consul Connect and Vault constraints were
updated to use it.
There's a bug in version parsing that breaks this constraint when using
a prerelease enterprise version of Vault (eg 1.3.0-beta1+ent). While
this does not fix the underlying bug it does provide a workaround for
future issues related to the implicit constraint. Like the implicit
Connect constraint: *all* implicit constraints should be overridable to
allow users to workaround bugs or other factors should the need arise.
This commit introduces support for configuring mount propagation when
mounting volumes with the `volume_mount` stanza on Linux targets.
Similar to Kubernetes, we expose 3 options for configuring mount
propagation:
- private, which is equivalent to `rprivate` on Linux, which does not allow the
container to see any new nested mounts after the chroot was created.
- host-to-task, which is equivalent to `rslave` on Linux, which allows new mounts
that have been created _outside of the container_ to be visible
inside the container after the chroot is created.
- bidirectional, which is equivalent to `rshared` on Linux, which allows both
the container to see new mounts created on the host, but
importantly _allows the container to create mounts that are
visible in other containers an don the host_
private and host-to-task are safe, but bidirectional mounts can be
dangerous, as if the code inside a container creates a mount, and does
not clean it up before tearing down the container, it can cause bad
things to happen inside the kernel.
To add a layer of safety here, we require that the user has ReadWrite
permissions on the volume before allowing bidirectional mounts, as a
defense in depth / validation case, although creating mounts should also require
a priviliged execution environment inside the container.
