Use HCP Consul and HCP Vault for the Consul and Vault clusters used in E2E testing. This has the following benefits:
* Without the need to support mTLS bootstrapping for Consul and Vault, we can simplify the mTLS configuration by leaning on Terraform instead of janky bash shell scripting.
* Vault bootstrapping is no longer required, so we can eliminate even more janky shell scripting
* Our E2E exercises HCP, which is important to us as an organization
* With the reduction in configurability, we can simplify the Terraform configuration and drop the complicated `provision.sh`/`provision.ps1` scripts we were using previously. We can template Nomad configuration files and upload them with the `file` provisioner.
* Packer builds for Linux and Windows become much simpler.
tl;dr way less janky shell scripting!
Provisions vault with the policies described in the Nomad Vault integration
guide, and drops a configuration file for Nomad vault server configuration
with its token. The vault root token is exposed to the E2E runner so that
tests can write additional policies to vault.
Adds a `nomad_acls` flag to our Terraform stack that bootstraps Nomad ACLs via
a `local-exec` provider. There's no way to set the `NOMAD_TOKEN` in the Nomad
TF provider if we're bootstrapping in the same Terraform stack, so instead of
using `resource.nomad_acl_token`, we also bootstrap a wide-open anonymous
policy. The resulting management token is exported as an environment var with
`$(terraform output environment)` and tests that want stricter ACLs will be
able to write them using that token.
This should also provide a basis to do similar work with Consul ACLs in the
future.