Commit graph

7 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Danielle Lancashire 4fbcc668d0
volumes: Add support for mount propagation
This commit introduces support for configuring mount propagation when
mounting volumes with the `volume_mount` stanza on Linux targets.

Similar to Kubernetes, we expose 3 options for configuring mount
propagation:

- private, which is equivalent to `rprivate` on Linux, which does not allow the
           container to see any new nested mounts after the chroot was created.

- host-to-task, which is equivalent to `rslave` on Linux, which allows new mounts
                that have been created _outside of the container_ to be visible
                inside the container after the chroot is created.

- bidirectional, which is equivalent to `rshared` on Linux, which allows both
                 the container to see new mounts created on the host, but
                 importantly _allows the container to create mounts that are
                 visible in other containers an don the host_

private and host-to-task are safe, but bidirectional mounts can be
dangerous, as if the code inside a container creates a mount, and does
not clean it up before tearing down the container, it can cause bad
things to happen inside the kernel.

To add a layer of safety here, we require that the user has ReadWrite
permissions on the volume before allowing bidirectional mounts, as a
defense in depth / validation case, although creating mounts should also require
a priviliged execution environment inside the container.
2019-10-14 14:09:58 +02:00
Danielle Lancashire 78b61de45f
config: Hoist volume.config.source into volume
Currently, using a Volume in a job uses the following configuration:

```
volume "alias-name" {
  type = "volume-type"
  read_only = true

  config {
    source = "host_volume_name"
  }
}
```

This commit migrates to the following:

```
volume "alias-name" {
  type = "volume-type"
  source = "host_volume_name"
  read_only = true
}
```

The original design was based due to being uncertain about the future of storage
plugins, and to allow maxium flexibility.

However, this causes a few issues, namely:
- We frequently need to parse this configuration during submission,
scheduling, and mounting
- It complicates the configuration from and end users perspective
- It complicates the ability to do validation

As we understand the problem space of CSI a little more, it has become
clear that we won't need the `source` to be in config, as it will be
used in the majority of cases:

- Host Volumes: Always need a source
- Preallocated CSI Volumes: Always needs a source from a volume or claim name
- Dynamic Persistent CSI Volumes*: Always needs a source to attach the volumes
                                   to for managing upgrades and to avoid dangling.
- Dynamic Ephemeral CSI Volumes*: Less thought out, but `source` will probably point
                                  to the plugin name, and a `config` block will
                                  allow you to pass meta to the plugin. Or will
                                  point to a pre-configured ephemeral config.
*If implemented

The new design simplifies this by merging the source into the volume
stanza to solve the above issues with usability, performance, and error
handling.
2019-09-13 04:37:59 +02:00
Danielle Lancashire 2e5f28029f
remove hidden field from host volumes
We're not shipping support for "hidden" volumes in 0.10 any more, I'll
convert this to an issue+mini RFC for future enhancement.
2019-08-22 08:48:05 +02:00
Danielle Lancashire 33db40d4e6
structs: Document VolumeMount 2019-08-12 15:39:08 +02:00
Danielle Lancashire 861caa9564
HostVolumeConfig: Source -> Path 2019-08-12 15:39:08 +02:00
Danielle Lancashire e132a30899
structs: Unify Volume and VolumeRequest 2019-08-12 15:39:08 +02:00
Danielle Lancashire 6d7b417e54
structs: Add declarations of basic structs for volume support 2019-08-12 15:39:08 +02:00