* use msgtype in upsert node
adds message type to signature for upsert node, update tests, remove placeholder method
* UpsertAllocs msg type test setup
* use upsertallocs with msg type in signature
update test usage of delete node
delete placeholder msgtype method
* add msgtype to upsert evals signature, update test call sites with test setup msg type
handle snapshot upsert eval outside of FSM and ignore eval event
remove placeholder upsertevalsmsgtype
handle job plan rpc and prevent event creation for plan
msgtype cleanup upsertnodeevents
updatenodedrain msgtype
msg type 0 is a node registration event, so set the default to the ignore type
* fix named import
* fix signature ordering on upsertnode to match
* Node Drain events and Node Events (#8980)
Deployment status updates
handle deployment status updates (paused, failed, resume)
deployment alloc health
generate events from apply plan result
txn err check, slim down deployment event
one ndjson line per index
* consolidate down to node event + type
* fix UpdateDeploymentAllocHealth test invocations
* fix test
* `nextRegion` should take status parameter
* thread Deployment/Job RPCs thru `nextRegion`
* add `nextRegion` calls to `deploymentwatcher`
* use a better description for paused for peer
This deflake the tests in the deploymentwatcher package. The package
uses a mock deployment watcher backend, where the watcher in a
background goroutine calls UpdateDeploymentStatus . If the mock isn't
configured to expect the call, the background goroutine will fail. One
UpdateDeploymentStatus call is made at the end of the background
goroutine, which may occur after the test completes, thus explaining the
flakiness.
Fix an issue in which the deployment watcher would fail the deployment
based on the earliest progress deadline of the deployment regardless of
if the task group has finished.
Further fix an issue where the blocked eval optimization would make it
so no evals were created to progress the deployment. To reproduce this
issue, prior to this commit, you can create a job with two task groups.
The first group has count 1 and resources such that it can not be
placed. The second group has count 3, max_parallel=1, and can be placed.
Run this first and then update the second group to do a deployment. It
will place the first of three, but never progress since there exists a
blocked eval. However, that doesn't capture the fact that there are two
groups being deployed.
Drew Bailey