When an alloc runner prestart hook fails, the task runners aren't invoked
and they remain in a pending state.
This leads to terrible results, some of which are:
* Lockup in GC process as reported in https://github.com/hashicorp/nomad/pull/5861
* Lockup in shutdown process as TR.Shutdown() waits for WaitCh to be closed
* Alloc not being restarted/rescheduled to another node (as it's still in
pending state)
* Unexpected restart of alloc on a client restart, potentially days/weeks after
alloc expected start time!
Here, we treat all tasks to have failed if alloc runner prestart hook fails.
This fixes the lockups, and permits the alloc to be rescheduled on another node.
While it's desirable to retry alloc runner in such failures, I opted to treat it
out of scope. I'm afraid of some subtles about alloc and task runners and their
idempotency that's better handled in a follow up PR.
This might be one of the root causes for
https://github.com/hashicorp/nomad/issues/5840 .
This change fixes a bug where nomad would avoid running alloc tasks if
the alloc is client terminal but the server copy on the client isn't
marked as running.
Here, we fix the case by having task runner uses the
allocRunner.shouldRun() instead of only checking the server updated
alloc.
Here, we preserve much of the invariants such that `tr.Run()` is always
run, and don't change the overall alloc runner and task runner
lifecycles.
Fixes https://github.com/hashicorp/nomad/issues/5883
We currently only run cleanup Service Hooks when a task is either
Killed, or Exited. However, due to the implementation of a task runner,
tasks are only Exited if they every correctly started running, which is
not true when you recieve an error early in the task start flow, such as
not being able to pull secrets from Vault.
This updates the service hook to also call consul deregistration
routines during a task Stop lifecycle event, to ensure that any
registered checks and services are cleared in such cases.
fixes#5770
Builds upon earlier commit that cleans up restored handles of terminal
allocs by also emitting terminated events and calling exited hooks when
appropriate.
The test is sadly quite complicated and peeks into things (logmon's
reattach config) AR doesn't normally have access to.
However, I couldn't find another way of asserting logmon got cleaned up
without resorting to smaller unit tests. Smaller unit tests risk
re-implementing dependencies in an unrealistic way, so I opted for an
ugly integration test.
Michael Schurter