The `ephemeral_disk` block's `migrate` field allows for best-effort migration of
the ephemeral disk data to new nodes. The documentation says the `migrate` field
is only respected if `sticky=true`, but in fact if client ACLs are not set the
data is migrated even if `sticky=false`.
The existing behavior when client ACLs are disabled has existed since the early
implementation, so "fixing" that case now would silently break backwards
compatibility. Additionally, having `migrate` not imply `sticky` seems
nonsensical: it suggests that if we place on a new node we migrate the data but
if we place on the same node, we throw the data away!
Update so that `migrate=true` implies `sticky=true` as follows:
* The failure mode when client ACLs are enabled comes from the server not passing
along a migration token. Update the server so that the server provides a
migration token whenever `migrate=true` and not just when `sticky=true` too.
* Update the scheduler so that `migrate` implies `sticky`.
* Update the client so that we check for `migrate || sticky` where appropriate.
* Refactor the E2E tests to move them off the old framework and make the intention
of the test more clear.
While working on several open drain issues, I'm fixing up the E2E tests. This
subset of tests being refactored are existing ones that already work. I'm
shipping these as their own PR to keep review sizes manageable when I push up
PRs in the next few days for #9902, #12314, and #12915.
The nodedrain deadline test asserts that all allocations are migrated by the
deadline. However, when the deadline is short (e.g. 10s), the test may fail
because of scheduler/client-propagation delays.
In one failing test, it took ~15s from the RPC call to the moment to the moment
the scheduler issued migration update, and then 3 seconds for the alloc to be
stopped.
Here, I increase the timeouts to avoid such false positives.