Fixes#13505
This fixes#13505 by treating reserved_ports like we treat a lot of jobspec settings: merging settings from more global stanzas (client.reserved.reserved_ports) "down" into more specific stanzas (client.host_networks[].reserved_ports).
As discussed in #13505 there are other options, and since it's totally broken right now we have some flexibility:
Treat overlapping reserved_ports on addresses as invalid and refuse to start agents. However, I'm not sure there's a cohesive model we want to publish right now since so much 0.9-0.12 compat code still exists! We would have to explain to folks that if their -network-interface and host_network addresses overlapped, they could only specify reserved_ports in one place or the other?! It gets ugly.
Use the global client.reserved.reserved_ports value as the default and treat host_network[].reserverd_ports as overrides. My first suggestion in the issue, but @groggemans made me realize the addresses on the agent's interface (as configured by -network-interface) may overlap with host_networks, so you'd need to remove the global reserved_ports from addresses shared with a shared network?! This seemed really confusing and subtle for users to me.
So I think "merging down" creates the most expressive yet understandable approach. I've played around with it a bit, and it doesn't seem too surprising. The only frustrating part is how difficult it is to observe the available addresses and ports on a node! However that's a job for another PR.
Processing an evaluation is nearly a pure function over the state
snapshot, but we randomly shuffle the nodes. This means that
developers can't take a given state snapshot and pass an evaluation
through it and be guaranteed the same plan results.
But the evaluation ID is already random, so if we use this as the seed
for shuffling the nodes we can greatly reduce the sources of
non-determinism. Unfortunately golang map iteration uses a global
source of randomness and not a goroutine-local one, but arguably
if the scheduler behavior is impacted by this, that's a bug in the
iteration.
* use msgtype in upsert node
adds message type to signature for upsert node, update tests, remove placeholder method
* UpsertAllocs msg type test setup
* use upsertallocs with msg type in signature
update test usage of delete node
delete placeholder msgtype method
* add msgtype to upsert evals signature, update test call sites with test setup msg type
handle snapshot upsert eval outside of FSM and ignore eval event
remove placeholder upsertevalsmsgtype
handle job plan rpc and prevent event creation for plan
msgtype cleanup upsertnodeevents
updatenodedrain msgtype
msg type 0 is a node registration event, so set the default to the ignore type
* fix named import
* fix signature ordering on upsertnode to match
Fixes#6787
In ProposedAllocs the proposed alloc slice was being copied while its
contents were not. Since RemoveAllocs nils elements of the proposed
alloc slice and is called twice, it could panic on the second call when
erroneously accessing a nil'd alloc.
The fix is to not copy the proposed alloc slice and pass the slice
returned by the 1st RemoveAllocs call to the 2nd call, thus maintaining
the trimmed length.
The old logic for cancelling duplicate blocked evaluations by job id had
the issue where the newer evaluation could have additional node classes
that it is (in)eligible for that we would not capture. This could make
it such that cluster state could change such that the job would make
progress but no evaluation was unblocked.
This commit implements an allocation selection algorithm for finding
allocations to preempt. It currently special cases network resource asks
from others (cpu/memory/disk/iops).
hashicorp-copywrite[bot]