2015-06-04 11:38:41 +00:00
|
|
|
package nomad
|
2015-06-05 21:54:45 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
import (
|
|
|
|
"errors"
|
|
|
|
"fmt"
|
|
|
|
"testing"
|
2015-08-05 23:32:46 +00:00
|
|
|
"time"
|
2015-06-05 21:54:45 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2017-12-18 21:16:23 +00:00
|
|
|
"github.com/hashicorp/consul/testutil/retry"
|
2017-02-08 05:22:48 +00:00
|
|
|
memdb "github.com/hashicorp/go-memdb"
|
2015-08-11 21:27:14 +00:00
|
|
|
"github.com/hashicorp/nomad/nomad/mock"
|
2017-08-13 23:16:59 +00:00
|
|
|
"github.com/hashicorp/nomad/nomad/state"
|
2015-08-05 23:53:54 +00:00
|
|
|
"github.com/hashicorp/nomad/nomad/structs"
|
2015-06-05 21:54:45 +00:00
|
|
|
"github.com/hashicorp/nomad/testutil"
|
2017-08-13 23:16:59 +00:00
|
|
|
"github.com/stretchr/testify/assert"
|
2015-06-05 21:54:45 +00:00
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
func TestLeader_LeftServer(t *testing.T) {
|
2018-01-12 01:00:30 +00:00
|
|
|
s1 := TestServer(t, nil)
|
2015-06-05 21:54:45 +00:00
|
|
|
defer s1.Shutdown()
|
|
|
|
|
2018-01-12 01:00:30 +00:00
|
|
|
s2 := TestServer(t, func(c *Config) {
|
2015-06-05 21:54:45 +00:00
|
|
|
c.DevDisableBootstrap = true
|
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
defer s2.Shutdown()
|
|
|
|
|
2018-01-12 01:00:30 +00:00
|
|
|
s3 := TestServer(t, func(c *Config) {
|
2015-06-05 21:54:45 +00:00
|
|
|
c.DevDisableBootstrap = true
|
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
defer s3.Shutdown()
|
|
|
|
servers := []*Server{s1, s2, s3}
|
2018-01-12 01:00:30 +00:00
|
|
|
TestJoin(t, s1, s2, s3)
|
2015-06-05 21:54:45 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for _, s := range servers {
|
|
|
|
testutil.WaitForResult(func() (bool, error) {
|
2017-02-02 21:52:31 +00:00
|
|
|
peers, _ := s.numPeers()
|
2017-02-03 01:50:06 +00:00
|
|
|
return peers == 3, nil
|
2015-06-05 21:54:45 +00:00
|
|
|
}, func(err error) {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("should have 3 peers")
|
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Kill any server
|
2017-10-19 21:16:27 +00:00
|
|
|
var peer *Server
|
|
|
|
for _, s := range servers {
|
|
|
|
if !s.IsLeader() {
|
|
|
|
peer = s
|
|
|
|
break
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if peer == nil {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("Should have a non-leader")
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
peer.Shutdown()
|
|
|
|
name := fmt.Sprintf("%s.%s", peer.config.NodeName, peer.config.Region)
|
2015-06-05 21:54:45 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
testutil.WaitForResult(func() (bool, error) {
|
2017-10-19 21:16:27 +00:00
|
|
|
for _, s := range servers {
|
|
|
|
if s == peer {
|
|
|
|
continue
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Force remove the non-leader (transition to left state)
|
|
|
|
if err := s.RemoveFailedNode(name); err != nil {
|
|
|
|
return false, err
|
|
|
|
}
|
2015-06-05 21:54:45 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2017-02-02 21:52:31 +00:00
|
|
|
peers, _ := s.numPeers()
|
2017-02-03 01:50:06 +00:00
|
|
|
return peers == 2, errors.New(fmt.Sprintf("%v", peers))
|
2015-06-05 21:54:45 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return true, nil
|
|
|
|
}, func(err error) {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("err: %s", err)
|
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
func TestLeader_LeftLeader(t *testing.T) {
|
2018-01-12 01:00:30 +00:00
|
|
|
s1 := TestServer(t, nil)
|
2015-06-05 21:54:45 +00:00
|
|
|
defer s1.Shutdown()
|
|
|
|
|
2018-01-12 01:00:30 +00:00
|
|
|
s2 := TestServer(t, func(c *Config) {
|
2015-06-05 21:54:45 +00:00
|
|
|
c.DevDisableBootstrap = true
|
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
defer s2.Shutdown()
|
|
|
|
|
2018-01-12 01:00:30 +00:00
|
|
|
s3 := TestServer(t, func(c *Config) {
|
2015-06-05 21:54:45 +00:00
|
|
|
c.DevDisableBootstrap = true
|
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
defer s3.Shutdown()
|
|
|
|
servers := []*Server{s1, s2, s3}
|
2018-01-12 01:00:30 +00:00
|
|
|
TestJoin(t, s1, s2, s3)
|
2015-06-05 21:54:45 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for _, s := range servers {
|
|
|
|
testutil.WaitForResult(func() (bool, error) {
|
2017-02-02 21:52:31 +00:00
|
|
|
peers, _ := s.numPeers()
|
2017-02-03 01:50:06 +00:00
|
|
|
return peers == 3, nil
|
2015-06-05 21:54:45 +00:00
|
|
|
}, func(err error) {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("should have 3 peers")
|
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Kill the leader!
|
|
|
|
var leader *Server
|
|
|
|
for _, s := range servers {
|
|
|
|
if s.IsLeader() {
|
|
|
|
leader = s
|
|
|
|
break
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if leader == nil {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("Should have a leader")
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
leader.Leave()
|
|
|
|
leader.Shutdown()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for _, s := range servers {
|
|
|
|
if s == leader {
|
|
|
|
continue
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
testutil.WaitForResult(func() (bool, error) {
|
2017-02-02 21:52:31 +00:00
|
|
|
peers, _ := s.numPeers()
|
2017-02-03 01:50:06 +00:00
|
|
|
return peers == 2, errors.New(fmt.Sprintf("%v", peers))
|
2015-06-05 21:54:45 +00:00
|
|
|
}, func(err error) {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("should have 2 peers: %v", err)
|
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
func TestLeader_MultiBootstrap(t *testing.T) {
|
2018-01-12 01:00:30 +00:00
|
|
|
s1 := TestServer(t, nil)
|
2015-06-05 21:54:45 +00:00
|
|
|
defer s1.Shutdown()
|
|
|
|
|
2018-01-12 01:00:30 +00:00
|
|
|
s2 := TestServer(t, nil)
|
2015-06-05 21:54:45 +00:00
|
|
|
defer s2.Shutdown()
|
|
|
|
servers := []*Server{s1, s2}
|
2018-01-12 01:00:30 +00:00
|
|
|
TestJoin(t, s1, s2)
|
2015-06-05 21:54:45 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for _, s := range servers {
|
|
|
|
testutil.WaitForResult(func() (bool, error) {
|
|
|
|
peers := s.Members()
|
|
|
|
return len(peers) == 2, nil
|
|
|
|
}, func(err error) {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("should have 2 peers")
|
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Ensure we don't have multiple raft peers
|
|
|
|
for _, s := range servers {
|
2017-02-02 21:52:31 +00:00
|
|
|
peers, _ := s.numPeers()
|
2017-02-03 01:50:06 +00:00
|
|
|
if peers != 1 {
|
2015-06-05 21:54:45 +00:00
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("should only have 1 raft peer!")
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
2015-08-05 23:32:46 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
func TestLeader_PlanQueue_Reset(t *testing.T) {
|
2018-01-12 01:00:30 +00:00
|
|
|
s1 := TestServer(t, nil)
|
2015-08-05 23:32:46 +00:00
|
|
|
defer s1.Shutdown()
|
|
|
|
|
2018-01-12 01:00:30 +00:00
|
|
|
s2 := TestServer(t, func(c *Config) {
|
2015-08-05 23:32:46 +00:00
|
|
|
c.DevDisableBootstrap = true
|
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
defer s2.Shutdown()
|
|
|
|
|
2018-01-12 01:00:30 +00:00
|
|
|
s3 := TestServer(t, func(c *Config) {
|
2015-08-05 23:32:46 +00:00
|
|
|
c.DevDisableBootstrap = true
|
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
defer s3.Shutdown()
|
|
|
|
servers := []*Server{s1, s2, s3}
|
2018-01-12 01:00:30 +00:00
|
|
|
TestJoin(t, s1, s2, s3)
|
2015-08-05 23:32:46 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for _, s := range servers {
|
|
|
|
testutil.WaitForResult(func() (bool, error) {
|
2017-02-02 21:52:31 +00:00
|
|
|
peers, _ := s.numPeers()
|
2017-02-03 01:50:06 +00:00
|
|
|
return peers == 3, nil
|
2015-08-05 23:32:46 +00:00
|
|
|
}, func(err error) {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("should have 3 peers")
|
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
var leader *Server
|
|
|
|
for _, s := range servers {
|
|
|
|
if s.IsLeader() {
|
|
|
|
leader = s
|
|
|
|
break
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if leader == nil {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("Should have a leader")
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if !leader.planQueue.Enabled() {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("should enable plan queue")
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2015-08-05 23:53:54 +00:00
|
|
|
for _, s := range servers {
|
|
|
|
if !s.IsLeader() && s.planQueue.Enabled() {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("plan queue should not be enabled")
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2015-08-05 23:32:46 +00:00
|
|
|
// Kill the leader
|
|
|
|
leader.Shutdown()
|
|
|
|
time.Sleep(100 * time.Millisecond)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Wait for a new leader
|
|
|
|
leader = nil
|
|
|
|
testutil.WaitForResult(func() (bool, error) {
|
|
|
|
for _, s := range servers {
|
|
|
|
if s.IsLeader() {
|
|
|
|
leader = s
|
|
|
|
return true, nil
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return false, nil
|
|
|
|
}, func(err error) {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("should have leader")
|
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Check that the new leader has a pending GC expiration
|
|
|
|
testutil.WaitForResult(func() (bool, error) {
|
|
|
|
return leader.planQueue.Enabled(), nil
|
|
|
|
}, func(err error) {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("should enable plan queue")
|
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
}
|
2015-08-05 23:53:54 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
func TestLeader_EvalBroker_Reset(t *testing.T) {
|
2018-01-12 01:00:30 +00:00
|
|
|
s1 := TestServer(t, func(c *Config) {
|
2015-08-05 23:53:54 +00:00
|
|
|
c.NumSchedulers = 0
|
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
defer s1.Shutdown()
|
|
|
|
|
2018-01-12 01:00:30 +00:00
|
|
|
s2 := TestServer(t, func(c *Config) {
|
2015-08-05 23:53:54 +00:00
|
|
|
c.NumSchedulers = 0
|
|
|
|
c.DevDisableBootstrap = true
|
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
defer s2.Shutdown()
|
|
|
|
|
2018-01-12 01:00:30 +00:00
|
|
|
s3 := TestServer(t, func(c *Config) {
|
2015-08-05 23:53:54 +00:00
|
|
|
c.NumSchedulers = 0
|
|
|
|
c.DevDisableBootstrap = true
|
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
defer s3.Shutdown()
|
|
|
|
servers := []*Server{s1, s2, s3}
|
2018-01-12 01:00:30 +00:00
|
|
|
TestJoin(t, s1, s2, s3)
|
2015-10-11 22:47:00 +00:00
|
|
|
testutil.WaitForLeader(t, s1.RPC)
|
2015-08-05 23:53:54 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for _, s := range servers {
|
|
|
|
testutil.WaitForResult(func() (bool, error) {
|
2017-02-02 21:52:31 +00:00
|
|
|
peers, _ := s.numPeers()
|
2017-02-03 01:50:06 +00:00
|
|
|
return peers == 3, nil
|
2015-08-05 23:53:54 +00:00
|
|
|
}, func(err error) {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("should have 3 peers")
|
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
var leader *Server
|
|
|
|
for _, s := range servers {
|
|
|
|
if s.IsLeader() {
|
|
|
|
leader = s
|
|
|
|
break
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if leader == nil {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("Should have a leader")
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Inject a pending eval
|
|
|
|
req := structs.EvalUpdateRequest{
|
2015-08-11 21:27:14 +00:00
|
|
|
Evals: []*structs.Evaluation{mock.Eval()},
|
2015-08-05 23:53:54 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
_, _, err := leader.raftApply(structs.EvalUpdateRequestType, req)
|
|
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("err: %v", err)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Kill the leader
|
|
|
|
leader.Shutdown()
|
|
|
|
time.Sleep(100 * time.Millisecond)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Wait for a new leader
|
|
|
|
leader = nil
|
|
|
|
testutil.WaitForResult(func() (bool, error) {
|
|
|
|
for _, s := range servers {
|
|
|
|
if s.IsLeader() {
|
|
|
|
leader = s
|
|
|
|
return true, nil
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return false, nil
|
|
|
|
}, func(err error) {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("should have leader")
|
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Check that the new leader has a pending evaluation
|
|
|
|
testutil.WaitForResult(func() (bool, error) {
|
|
|
|
stats := leader.evalBroker.Stats()
|
|
|
|
return stats.TotalReady == 1, nil
|
|
|
|
}, func(err error) {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("should have pending evaluation")
|
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
}
|
2015-08-15 22:15:00 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2015-12-04 23:10:08 +00:00
|
|
|
func TestLeader_PeriodicDispatcher_Restore_Adds(t *testing.T) {
|
2018-01-12 01:00:30 +00:00
|
|
|
s1 := TestServer(t, func(c *Config) {
|
2015-12-04 23:10:08 +00:00
|
|
|
c.NumSchedulers = 0
|
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
defer s1.Shutdown()
|
|
|
|
|
2018-01-12 01:00:30 +00:00
|
|
|
s2 := TestServer(t, func(c *Config) {
|
2015-12-04 23:10:08 +00:00
|
|
|
c.NumSchedulers = 0
|
|
|
|
c.DevDisableBootstrap = true
|
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
defer s2.Shutdown()
|
|
|
|
|
2018-01-12 01:00:30 +00:00
|
|
|
s3 := TestServer(t, func(c *Config) {
|
2015-12-04 23:10:08 +00:00
|
|
|
c.NumSchedulers = 0
|
|
|
|
c.DevDisableBootstrap = true
|
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
defer s3.Shutdown()
|
|
|
|
servers := []*Server{s1, s2, s3}
|
2018-01-12 01:00:30 +00:00
|
|
|
TestJoin(t, s1, s2, s3)
|
2015-12-04 23:10:08 +00:00
|
|
|
testutil.WaitForLeader(t, s1.RPC)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for _, s := range servers {
|
|
|
|
testutil.WaitForResult(func() (bool, error) {
|
2017-02-02 21:52:31 +00:00
|
|
|
peers, _ := s.numPeers()
|
2017-02-03 01:50:06 +00:00
|
|
|
return peers == 3, nil
|
2015-12-04 23:10:08 +00:00
|
|
|
}, func(err error) {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("should have 3 peers")
|
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
var leader *Server
|
|
|
|
for _, s := range servers {
|
|
|
|
if s.IsLeader() {
|
|
|
|
leader = s
|
|
|
|
break
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if leader == nil {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("Should have a leader")
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2017-08-03 19:37:58 +00:00
|
|
|
// Inject a periodic job, a parameterized periodic job and a non-periodic job
|
2015-12-04 23:10:08 +00:00
|
|
|
periodic := mock.PeriodicJob()
|
|
|
|
nonPeriodic := mock.Job()
|
2017-08-03 19:37:58 +00:00
|
|
|
parameterizedPeriodic := mock.PeriodicJob()
|
|
|
|
parameterizedPeriodic.ParameterizedJob = &structs.ParameterizedJobConfig{}
|
|
|
|
for _, job := range []*structs.Job{nonPeriodic, periodic, parameterizedPeriodic} {
|
2015-12-04 23:10:08 +00:00
|
|
|
req := structs.JobRegisterRequest{
|
|
|
|
Job: job,
|
2017-09-07 23:56:15 +00:00
|
|
|
WriteRequest: structs.WriteRequest{
|
|
|
|
Namespace: job.Namespace,
|
|
|
|
},
|
2015-12-04 23:10:08 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
_, _, err := leader.raftApply(structs.JobRegisterRequestType, req)
|
|
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("err: %v", err)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Kill the leader
|
|
|
|
leader.Shutdown()
|
|
|
|
time.Sleep(100 * time.Millisecond)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Wait for a new leader
|
|
|
|
leader = nil
|
|
|
|
testutil.WaitForResult(func() (bool, error) {
|
|
|
|
for _, s := range servers {
|
|
|
|
if s.IsLeader() {
|
|
|
|
leader = s
|
|
|
|
return true, nil
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return false, nil
|
|
|
|
}, func(err error) {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("should have leader")
|
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
|
2017-09-07 23:56:15 +00:00
|
|
|
tuplePeriodic := structs.NamespacedID{
|
|
|
|
ID: periodic.ID,
|
|
|
|
Namespace: periodic.Namespace,
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
tupleNonPeriodic := structs.NamespacedID{
|
|
|
|
ID: nonPeriodic.ID,
|
|
|
|
Namespace: nonPeriodic.Namespace,
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
tupleParameterized := structs.NamespacedID{
|
|
|
|
ID: parameterizedPeriodic.ID,
|
|
|
|
Namespace: parameterizedPeriodic.Namespace,
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2017-08-03 19:37:58 +00:00
|
|
|
// Check that the new leader is tracking the periodic job only
|
2015-12-04 23:10:08 +00:00
|
|
|
testutil.WaitForResult(func() (bool, error) {
|
2017-09-07 23:56:15 +00:00
|
|
|
if _, tracked := leader.periodicDispatcher.tracked[tuplePeriodic]; !tracked {
|
2017-08-03 19:37:58 +00:00
|
|
|
return false, fmt.Errorf("periodic job not tracked")
|
|
|
|
}
|
2017-09-07 23:56:15 +00:00
|
|
|
if _, tracked := leader.periodicDispatcher.tracked[tupleNonPeriodic]; tracked {
|
2017-08-03 19:37:58 +00:00
|
|
|
return false, fmt.Errorf("non periodic job tracked")
|
|
|
|
}
|
2017-09-07 23:56:15 +00:00
|
|
|
if _, tracked := leader.periodicDispatcher.tracked[tupleParameterized]; tracked {
|
2017-08-03 19:37:58 +00:00
|
|
|
return false, fmt.Errorf("parameterized periodic job tracked")
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return true, nil
|
2015-12-04 23:10:08 +00:00
|
|
|
}, func(err error) {
|
2017-08-03 19:37:58 +00:00
|
|
|
t.Fatalf(err.Error())
|
2015-12-04 23:10:08 +00:00
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
func TestLeader_PeriodicDispatcher_Restore_NoEvals(t *testing.T) {
|
2018-01-12 01:00:30 +00:00
|
|
|
s1 := TestServer(t, func(c *Config) {
|
2015-12-04 23:10:08 +00:00
|
|
|
c.NumSchedulers = 0
|
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
defer s1.Shutdown()
|
2015-12-05 00:53:36 +00:00
|
|
|
testutil.WaitForLeader(t, s1.RPC)
|
2015-12-04 23:10:08 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Inject a periodic job that will be triggered soon.
|
|
|
|
launch := time.Now().Add(1 * time.Second)
|
|
|
|
job := testPeriodicJob(launch)
|
|
|
|
req := structs.JobRegisterRequest{
|
|
|
|
Job: job,
|
2017-09-07 23:56:15 +00:00
|
|
|
WriteRequest: structs.WriteRequest{
|
|
|
|
Namespace: job.Namespace,
|
|
|
|
},
|
2015-12-04 23:10:08 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
_, _, err := s1.raftApply(structs.JobRegisterRequestType, req)
|
|
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("err: %v", err)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Flush the periodic dispatcher, ensuring that no evals will be created.
|
2015-12-05 00:53:36 +00:00
|
|
|
s1.periodicDispatcher.SetEnabled(false)
|
2015-12-04 23:10:08 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2015-12-19 01:26:05 +00:00
|
|
|
// Get the current time to ensure the launch time is after this once we
|
|
|
|
// restore.
|
|
|
|
now := time.Now()
|
|
|
|
|
2015-12-24 02:22:16 +00:00
|
|
|
// Sleep till after the job should have been launched.
|
|
|
|
time.Sleep(3 * time.Second)
|
|
|
|
|
2015-12-04 23:10:08 +00:00
|
|
|
// Restore the periodic dispatcher.
|
2015-12-05 00:53:36 +00:00
|
|
|
s1.periodicDispatcher.SetEnabled(true)
|
2015-12-04 23:10:08 +00:00
|
|
|
s1.restorePeriodicDispatcher()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Ensure the job is tracked.
|
2017-09-07 23:56:15 +00:00
|
|
|
tuple := structs.NamespacedID{
|
|
|
|
ID: job.ID,
|
|
|
|
Namespace: job.Namespace,
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if _, tracked := s1.periodicDispatcher.tracked[tuple]; !tracked {
|
2015-12-04 23:10:08 +00:00
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("periodic job not restored")
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Check that an eval was made.
|
2017-02-08 05:22:48 +00:00
|
|
|
ws := memdb.NewWatchSet()
|
2017-09-07 23:56:15 +00:00
|
|
|
last, err := s1.fsm.State().PeriodicLaunchByID(ws, job.Namespace, job.ID)
|
2015-12-19 01:26:05 +00:00
|
|
|
if err != nil || last == nil {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("failed to get periodic launch time: %v", err)
|
2015-12-04 23:10:08 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2015-12-19 01:26:05 +00:00
|
|
|
if last.Launch.Before(now) {
|
2015-12-24 02:22:16 +00:00
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("restorePeriodicDispatcher did not force launch: last %v; want after %v", last.Launch, now)
|
2015-12-04 23:10:08 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
func TestLeader_PeriodicDispatcher_Restore_Evals(t *testing.T) {
|
2018-01-12 01:00:30 +00:00
|
|
|
s1 := TestServer(t, func(c *Config) {
|
2015-12-04 23:10:08 +00:00
|
|
|
c.NumSchedulers = 0
|
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
defer s1.Shutdown()
|
2015-12-05 00:53:36 +00:00
|
|
|
testutil.WaitForLeader(t, s1.RPC)
|
2015-12-04 23:10:08 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Inject a periodic job that triggered once in the past, should trigger now
|
|
|
|
// and once in the future.
|
|
|
|
now := time.Now()
|
|
|
|
past := now.Add(-1 * time.Second)
|
|
|
|
future := now.Add(10 * time.Second)
|
|
|
|
job := testPeriodicJob(past, now, future)
|
|
|
|
req := structs.JobRegisterRequest{
|
|
|
|
Job: job,
|
2017-09-07 23:56:15 +00:00
|
|
|
WriteRequest: structs.WriteRequest{
|
|
|
|
Namespace: job.Namespace,
|
|
|
|
},
|
2015-12-04 23:10:08 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
_, _, err := s1.raftApply(structs.JobRegisterRequestType, req)
|
|
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("err: %v", err)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Create an eval for the past launch.
|
|
|
|
s1.periodicDispatcher.createEval(job, past)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Flush the periodic dispatcher, ensuring that no evals will be created.
|
2015-12-05 00:53:36 +00:00
|
|
|
s1.periodicDispatcher.SetEnabled(false)
|
2015-12-04 23:10:08 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Sleep till after the job should have been launched.
|
2015-12-05 00:53:36 +00:00
|
|
|
time.Sleep(3 * time.Second)
|
2015-12-04 23:10:08 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Restore the periodic dispatcher.
|
2015-12-05 00:53:36 +00:00
|
|
|
s1.periodicDispatcher.SetEnabled(true)
|
2015-12-04 23:10:08 +00:00
|
|
|
s1.restorePeriodicDispatcher()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Ensure the job is tracked.
|
2017-09-07 23:56:15 +00:00
|
|
|
tuple := structs.NamespacedID{
|
|
|
|
ID: job.ID,
|
|
|
|
Namespace: job.Namespace,
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if _, tracked := s1.periodicDispatcher.tracked[tuple]; !tracked {
|
2015-12-04 23:10:08 +00:00
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("periodic job not restored")
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Check that an eval was made.
|
2017-02-08 05:22:48 +00:00
|
|
|
ws := memdb.NewWatchSet()
|
2017-09-07 23:56:15 +00:00
|
|
|
last, err := s1.fsm.State().PeriodicLaunchByID(ws, job.Namespace, job.ID)
|
2015-12-19 01:26:05 +00:00
|
|
|
if err != nil || last == nil {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("failed to get periodic launch time: %v", err)
|
2015-12-04 23:10:08 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
2015-12-19 01:26:05 +00:00
|
|
|
if last.Launch == past {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("restorePeriodicDispatcher did not force launch")
|
2015-12-04 23:10:08 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2015-08-15 22:15:00 +00:00
|
|
|
func TestLeader_PeriodicDispatch(t *testing.T) {
|
2018-01-12 01:00:30 +00:00
|
|
|
s1 := TestServer(t, func(c *Config) {
|
2015-08-15 22:15:00 +00:00
|
|
|
c.NumSchedulers = 0
|
|
|
|
c.EvalGCInterval = 5 * time.Millisecond
|
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
defer s1.Shutdown()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Wait for a periodic dispatch
|
|
|
|
testutil.WaitForResult(func() (bool, error) {
|
|
|
|
stats := s1.evalBroker.Stats()
|
|
|
|
bySched, ok := stats.ByScheduler[structs.JobTypeCore]
|
|
|
|
if !ok {
|
|
|
|
return false, nil
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return bySched.Ready > 0, nil
|
|
|
|
}, func(err error) {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("should pending job")
|
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
}
|
2015-08-16 18:10:18 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
func TestLeader_ReapFailedEval(t *testing.T) {
|
2018-01-12 01:00:30 +00:00
|
|
|
s1 := TestServer(t, func(c *Config) {
|
2015-08-16 18:10:18 +00:00
|
|
|
c.NumSchedulers = 0
|
|
|
|
c.EvalDeliveryLimit = 1
|
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
defer s1.Shutdown()
|
|
|
|
testutil.WaitForLeader(t, s1.RPC)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Wait for a periodic dispatch
|
|
|
|
eval := mock.Eval()
|
2016-05-18 18:35:15 +00:00
|
|
|
s1.evalBroker.Enqueue(eval)
|
2015-08-16 18:10:18 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Dequeue and Nack
|
|
|
|
out, token, err := s1.evalBroker.Dequeue(defaultSched, time.Second)
|
|
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("err: %v", err)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
s1.evalBroker.Nack(out.ID, token)
|
|
|
|
|
2017-04-12 21:47:59 +00:00
|
|
|
// Wait for an updated and followup evaluation
|
2015-08-16 18:10:18 +00:00
|
|
|
state := s1.fsm.State()
|
|
|
|
testutil.WaitForResult(func() (bool, error) {
|
2017-02-08 05:22:48 +00:00
|
|
|
ws := memdb.NewWatchSet()
|
|
|
|
out, err := state.EvalByID(ws, eval.ID)
|
2015-08-16 18:10:18 +00:00
|
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
|
|
return false, err
|
|
|
|
}
|
2017-04-12 21:47:59 +00:00
|
|
|
if out == nil {
|
|
|
|
return false, fmt.Errorf("expect original evaluation to exist")
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if out.Status != structs.EvalStatusFailed {
|
|
|
|
return false, fmt.Errorf("got status %v; want %v", out.Status, structs.EvalStatusFailed)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// See if there is a followup
|
2017-09-07 23:56:15 +00:00
|
|
|
evals, err := state.EvalsByJob(ws, eval.Namespace, eval.JobID)
|
2017-04-12 21:47:59 +00:00
|
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
|
|
return false, err
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if l := len(evals); l != 2 {
|
|
|
|
return false, fmt.Errorf("got %d evals, want 2", l)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for _, e := range evals {
|
|
|
|
if e.ID == eval.ID {
|
|
|
|
continue
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if e.Status != structs.EvalStatusPending {
|
|
|
|
return false, fmt.Errorf("follow up eval has status %v; want %v",
|
|
|
|
e.Status, structs.EvalStatusPending)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2017-04-14 22:24:55 +00:00
|
|
|
if e.Wait < s1.config.EvalFailedFollowupBaselineDelay ||
|
|
|
|
e.Wait > s1.config.EvalFailedFollowupBaselineDelay+s1.config.EvalFailedFollowupDelayRange {
|
2017-04-12 21:47:59 +00:00
|
|
|
return false, fmt.Errorf("bad wait: %v", e.Wait)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if e.TriggeredBy != structs.EvalTriggerFailedFollowUp {
|
|
|
|
return false, fmt.Errorf("follow up eval TriggeredBy %v; want %v",
|
|
|
|
e.TriggeredBy, structs.EvalTriggerFailedFollowUp)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return true, nil
|
2015-08-16 18:10:18 +00:00
|
|
|
}, func(err error) {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("err: %v", err)
|
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
}
|
2016-01-31 00:16:13 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
func TestLeader_ReapDuplicateEval(t *testing.T) {
|
2018-01-12 01:00:30 +00:00
|
|
|
s1 := TestServer(t, func(c *Config) {
|
2016-01-31 00:16:13 +00:00
|
|
|
c.NumSchedulers = 0
|
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
defer s1.Shutdown()
|
|
|
|
testutil.WaitForLeader(t, s1.RPC)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Create a duplicate blocked eval
|
|
|
|
eval := mock.Eval()
|
|
|
|
eval2 := mock.Eval()
|
|
|
|
eval2.JobID = eval.JobID
|
|
|
|
s1.blockedEvals.Block(eval)
|
|
|
|
s1.blockedEvals.Block(eval2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Wait for the evaluation to marked as cancelled
|
|
|
|
state := s1.fsm.State()
|
|
|
|
testutil.WaitForResult(func() (bool, error) {
|
2017-02-08 05:22:48 +00:00
|
|
|
ws := memdb.NewWatchSet()
|
|
|
|
out, err := state.EvalByID(ws, eval2.ID)
|
2016-01-31 00:16:13 +00:00
|
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
|
|
return false, err
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return out != nil && out.Status == structs.EvalStatusCancelled, nil
|
|
|
|
}, func(err error) {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("err: %v", err)
|
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
}
|
2016-08-22 20:57:27 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
func TestLeader_RestoreVaultAccessors(t *testing.T) {
|
2018-01-12 01:00:30 +00:00
|
|
|
s1 := TestServer(t, func(c *Config) {
|
2016-08-22 20:57:27 +00:00
|
|
|
c.NumSchedulers = 0
|
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
defer s1.Shutdown()
|
|
|
|
testutil.WaitForLeader(t, s1.RPC)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Insert a vault accessor that should be revoked
|
|
|
|
state := s1.fsm.State()
|
|
|
|
va := mock.VaultAccessor()
|
|
|
|
if err := state.UpsertVaultAccessor(100, []*structs.VaultAccessor{va}); err != nil {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("bad: %v", err)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Swap the Vault client
|
|
|
|
tvc := &TestVaultClient{}
|
|
|
|
s1.vault = tvc
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Do a restore
|
|
|
|
if err := s1.restoreRevokingAccessors(); err != nil {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("Failed to restore: %v", err)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if len(tvc.RevokedTokens) != 1 && tvc.RevokedTokens[0].Accessor != va.Accessor {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("Bad revoked accessors: %v", tvc.RevokedTokens)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
2017-08-13 23:16:59 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
func TestLeader_ReplicateACLPolicies(t *testing.T) {
|
|
|
|
t.Parallel()
|
2018-01-12 01:00:30 +00:00
|
|
|
s1, root := TestACLServer(t, func(c *Config) {
|
2017-08-13 23:16:59 +00:00
|
|
|
c.Region = "region1"
|
|
|
|
c.AuthoritativeRegion = "region1"
|
|
|
|
c.ACLEnabled = true
|
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
defer s1.Shutdown()
|
2018-01-12 01:00:30 +00:00
|
|
|
s2, _ := TestACLServer(t, func(c *Config) {
|
2017-08-13 23:16:59 +00:00
|
|
|
c.Region = "region2"
|
|
|
|
c.AuthoritativeRegion = "region1"
|
|
|
|
c.ACLEnabled = true
|
|
|
|
c.ReplicationBackoff = 20 * time.Millisecond
|
2017-08-21 03:51:30 +00:00
|
|
|
c.ReplicationToken = root.SecretID
|
2017-08-13 23:16:59 +00:00
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
defer s2.Shutdown()
|
2018-01-12 01:00:30 +00:00
|
|
|
TestJoin(t, s1, s2)
|
2017-08-13 23:16:59 +00:00
|
|
|
testutil.WaitForLeader(t, s1.RPC)
|
|
|
|
testutil.WaitForLeader(t, s2.RPC)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Write a policy to the authoritative region
|
|
|
|
p1 := mock.ACLPolicy()
|
|
|
|
if err := s1.State().UpsertACLPolicies(100, []*structs.ACLPolicy{p1}); err != nil {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("bad: %v", err)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Wait for the policy to replicate
|
|
|
|
testutil.WaitForResult(func() (bool, error) {
|
|
|
|
state := s2.State()
|
|
|
|
out, err := state.ACLPolicyByName(nil, p1.Name)
|
|
|
|
return out != nil, err
|
|
|
|
}, func(err error) {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("should replicate policy")
|
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
func TestLeader_DiffACLPolicies(t *testing.T) {
|
|
|
|
t.Parallel()
|
|
|
|
|
2017-10-13 21:36:02 +00:00
|
|
|
state := state.TestStateStore(t)
|
2017-08-13 23:16:59 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Populate the local state
|
|
|
|
p1 := mock.ACLPolicy()
|
|
|
|
p2 := mock.ACLPolicy()
|
|
|
|
p3 := mock.ACLPolicy()
|
2017-10-13 21:36:02 +00:00
|
|
|
assert.Nil(t, state.UpsertACLPolicies(100, []*structs.ACLPolicy{p1, p2, p3}))
|
2017-08-13 23:16:59 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Simulate a remote list
|
|
|
|
p2Stub := p2.Stub()
|
|
|
|
p2Stub.ModifyIndex = 50 // Ignored, same index
|
|
|
|
p3Stub := p3.Stub()
|
|
|
|
p3Stub.ModifyIndex = 100 // Updated, higher index
|
2017-08-30 17:06:56 +00:00
|
|
|
p3Stub.Hash = []byte{0, 1, 2, 3}
|
2017-08-13 23:16:59 +00:00
|
|
|
p4 := mock.ACLPolicy()
|
|
|
|
remoteList := []*structs.ACLPolicyListStub{
|
|
|
|
p2Stub,
|
|
|
|
p3Stub,
|
|
|
|
p4.Stub(),
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
delete, update := diffACLPolicies(state, 50, remoteList)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// P1 does not exist on the remote side, should delete
|
|
|
|
assert.Equal(t, []string{p1.Name}, delete)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// P2 is un-modified - ignore. P3 modified, P4 new.
|
|
|
|
assert.Equal(t, []string{p3.Name, p4.Name}, update)
|
|
|
|
}
|
2017-08-13 23:45:13 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
func TestLeader_ReplicateACLTokens(t *testing.T) {
|
|
|
|
t.Parallel()
|
2018-01-12 01:00:30 +00:00
|
|
|
s1, root := TestACLServer(t, func(c *Config) {
|
2017-08-13 23:45:13 +00:00
|
|
|
c.Region = "region1"
|
|
|
|
c.AuthoritativeRegion = "region1"
|
|
|
|
c.ACLEnabled = true
|
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
defer s1.Shutdown()
|
2018-01-12 01:00:30 +00:00
|
|
|
s2, _ := TestACLServer(t, func(c *Config) {
|
2017-08-13 23:45:13 +00:00
|
|
|
c.Region = "region2"
|
|
|
|
c.AuthoritativeRegion = "region1"
|
|
|
|
c.ACLEnabled = true
|
|
|
|
c.ReplicationBackoff = 20 * time.Millisecond
|
2017-08-21 03:51:30 +00:00
|
|
|
c.ReplicationToken = root.SecretID
|
2017-08-13 23:45:13 +00:00
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
defer s2.Shutdown()
|
2018-01-12 01:00:30 +00:00
|
|
|
TestJoin(t, s1, s2)
|
2017-08-13 23:45:13 +00:00
|
|
|
testutil.WaitForLeader(t, s1.RPC)
|
|
|
|
testutil.WaitForLeader(t, s2.RPC)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Write a token to the authoritative region
|
|
|
|
p1 := mock.ACLToken()
|
|
|
|
p1.Global = true
|
|
|
|
if err := s1.State().UpsertACLTokens(100, []*structs.ACLToken{p1}); err != nil {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("bad: %v", err)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Wait for the token to replicate
|
|
|
|
testutil.WaitForResult(func() (bool, error) {
|
|
|
|
state := s2.State()
|
|
|
|
out, err := state.ACLTokenByAccessorID(nil, p1.AccessorID)
|
|
|
|
return out != nil, err
|
|
|
|
}, func(err error) {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("should replicate token")
|
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
func TestLeader_DiffACLTokens(t *testing.T) {
|
|
|
|
t.Parallel()
|
|
|
|
|
2017-10-13 21:36:02 +00:00
|
|
|
state := state.TestStateStore(t)
|
2017-08-13 23:45:13 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Populate the local state
|
|
|
|
p0 := mock.ACLToken()
|
|
|
|
p1 := mock.ACLToken()
|
|
|
|
p1.Global = true
|
|
|
|
p2 := mock.ACLToken()
|
|
|
|
p2.Global = true
|
|
|
|
p3 := mock.ACLToken()
|
|
|
|
p3.Global = true
|
2017-10-13 21:36:02 +00:00
|
|
|
assert.Nil(t, state.UpsertACLTokens(100, []*structs.ACLToken{p0, p1, p2, p3}))
|
2017-08-13 23:45:13 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Simulate a remote list
|
|
|
|
p2Stub := p2.Stub()
|
|
|
|
p2Stub.ModifyIndex = 50 // Ignored, same index
|
|
|
|
p3Stub := p3.Stub()
|
|
|
|
p3Stub.ModifyIndex = 100 // Updated, higher index
|
2017-08-30 17:06:56 +00:00
|
|
|
p3Stub.Hash = []byte{0, 1, 2, 3}
|
2017-08-13 23:45:13 +00:00
|
|
|
p4 := mock.ACLToken()
|
|
|
|
p4.Global = true
|
|
|
|
remoteList := []*structs.ACLTokenListStub{
|
|
|
|
p2Stub,
|
|
|
|
p3Stub,
|
|
|
|
p4.Stub(),
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
delete, update := diffACLTokens(state, 50, remoteList)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// P0 is local and should be ignored
|
|
|
|
// P1 does not exist on the remote side, should delete
|
|
|
|
assert.Equal(t, []string{p1.AccessorID}, delete)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// P2 is un-modified - ignore. P3 modified, P4 new.
|
|
|
|
assert.Equal(t, []string{p3.AccessorID, p4.AccessorID}, update)
|
|
|
|
}
|
2017-11-22 00:29:11 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
func TestLeader_UpgradeRaftVersion(t *testing.T) {
|
|
|
|
t.Parallel()
|
2018-01-12 01:00:30 +00:00
|
|
|
s1 := TestServer(t, func(c *Config) {
|
|
|
|
c.Datacenter = "dc1"
|
2017-11-22 00:29:11 +00:00
|
|
|
c.RaftConfig.ProtocolVersion = 2
|
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
defer s1.Shutdown()
|
|
|
|
|
2018-01-12 01:00:30 +00:00
|
|
|
s2 := TestServer(t, func(c *Config) {
|
2017-11-22 00:29:11 +00:00
|
|
|
c.DevDisableBootstrap = true
|
|
|
|
c.RaftConfig.ProtocolVersion = 1
|
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
defer s2.Shutdown()
|
|
|
|
|
2018-01-12 01:00:30 +00:00
|
|
|
s3 := TestServer(t, func(c *Config) {
|
2017-11-22 00:29:11 +00:00
|
|
|
c.DevDisableBootstrap = true
|
|
|
|
c.RaftConfig.ProtocolVersion = 2
|
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
defer s3.Shutdown()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
servers := []*Server{s1, s2, s3}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Try to join
|
2018-01-12 01:00:30 +00:00
|
|
|
TestJoin(t, s1, s2, s3)
|
2017-11-22 00:29:11 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for _, s := range servers {
|
|
|
|
testutil.WaitForResult(func() (bool, error) {
|
|
|
|
peers, _ := s.numPeers()
|
|
|
|
return peers == 3, nil
|
|
|
|
}, func(err error) {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("should have 3 peers")
|
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Kill the v1 server
|
|
|
|
if err := s2.Leave(); err != nil {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatal(err)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for _, s := range []*Server{s1, s3} {
|
2017-12-18 21:16:23 +00:00
|
|
|
minVer, err := s.autopilot.MinRaftProtocol()
|
2017-11-22 00:29:11 +00:00
|
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatal(err)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if got, want := minVer, 2; got != want {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("got min raft version %d want %d", got, want)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Replace the dead server with one running raft protocol v3
|
2018-01-12 01:00:30 +00:00
|
|
|
s4 := TestServer(t, func(c *Config) {
|
2017-11-22 00:29:11 +00:00
|
|
|
c.DevDisableBootstrap = true
|
|
|
|
c.Datacenter = "dc1"
|
|
|
|
c.RaftConfig.ProtocolVersion = 3
|
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
defer s4.Shutdown()
|
2018-01-12 01:00:30 +00:00
|
|
|
TestJoin(t, s1, s4)
|
2017-11-22 00:29:11 +00:00
|
|
|
servers[1] = s4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Make sure we're back to 3 total peers with the new one added via ID
|
|
|
|
for _, s := range servers {
|
|
|
|
testutil.WaitForResult(func() (bool, error) {
|
|
|
|
addrs := 0
|
|
|
|
ids := 0
|
|
|
|
future := s.raft.GetConfiguration()
|
|
|
|
if err := future.Error(); err != nil {
|
|
|
|
return false, err
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
for _, server := range future.Configuration().Servers {
|
|
|
|
if string(server.ID) == string(server.Address) {
|
|
|
|
addrs++
|
|
|
|
} else {
|
|
|
|
ids++
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if got, want := addrs, 2; got != want {
|
|
|
|
return false, fmt.Errorf("got %d server addresses want %d", got, want)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if got, want := ids, 1; got != want {
|
|
|
|
return false, fmt.Errorf("got %d server ids want %d", got, want)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return true, nil
|
|
|
|
}, func(err error) {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatal(err)
|
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
2017-12-18 21:16:23 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
func TestLeader_RollRaftServer(t *testing.T) {
|
|
|
|
t.Parallel()
|
2018-01-12 01:00:30 +00:00
|
|
|
s1 := TestServer(t, func(c *Config) {
|
2017-12-18 21:16:23 +00:00
|
|
|
c.RaftConfig.ProtocolVersion = 2
|
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
defer s1.Shutdown()
|
|
|
|
|
2018-01-12 01:00:30 +00:00
|
|
|
s2 := TestServer(t, func(c *Config) {
|
2017-12-18 21:16:23 +00:00
|
|
|
c.DevDisableBootstrap = true
|
|
|
|
c.RaftConfig.ProtocolVersion = 1
|
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
defer s2.Shutdown()
|
|
|
|
|
2018-01-12 01:00:30 +00:00
|
|
|
s3 := TestServer(t, func(c *Config) {
|
2017-12-18 21:16:23 +00:00
|
|
|
c.DevDisableBootstrap = true
|
|
|
|
c.RaftConfig.ProtocolVersion = 2
|
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
defer s3.Shutdown()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
servers := []*Server{s1, s2, s3}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Try to join
|
2018-01-12 01:00:30 +00:00
|
|
|
TestJoin(t, s1, s2, s3)
|
2017-12-18 21:16:23 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for _, s := range servers {
|
|
|
|
retry.Run(t, func(r *retry.R) { r.Check(wantPeers(s, 3)) })
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Kill the v1 server
|
|
|
|
s2.Shutdown()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for _, s := range []*Server{s1, s3} {
|
|
|
|
retry.Run(t, func(r *retry.R) {
|
|
|
|
minVer, err := s.autopilot.MinRaftProtocol()
|
|
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
|
|
r.Fatal(err)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if got, want := minVer, 2; got != want {
|
|
|
|
r.Fatalf("got min raft version %d want %d", got, want)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Replace the dead server with one running raft protocol v3
|
2018-01-12 01:00:30 +00:00
|
|
|
s4 := TestServer(t, func(c *Config) {
|
2017-12-18 21:16:23 +00:00
|
|
|
c.DevDisableBootstrap = true
|
|
|
|
c.RaftConfig.ProtocolVersion = 3
|
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
defer s4.Shutdown()
|
2018-01-12 01:00:30 +00:00
|
|
|
TestJoin(t, s4, s1)
|
2017-12-18 21:16:23 +00:00
|
|
|
servers[1] = s4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Make sure the dead server is removed and we're back to 3 total peers
|
|
|
|
for _, s := range servers {
|
|
|
|
retry.Run(t, func(r *retry.R) {
|
|
|
|
addrs := 0
|
|
|
|
ids := 0
|
|
|
|
future := s.raft.GetConfiguration()
|
|
|
|
if err := future.Error(); err != nil {
|
|
|
|
r.Fatal(err)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
for _, server := range future.Configuration().Servers {
|
|
|
|
if string(server.ID) == string(server.Address) {
|
|
|
|
addrs++
|
|
|
|
} else {
|
|
|
|
ids++
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if got, want := addrs, 2; got != want {
|
|
|
|
r.Fatalf("got %d server addresses want %d", got, want)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if got, want := ids, 1; got != want {
|
|
|
|
r.Fatalf("got %d server ids want %d", got, want)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|