open-nomad/scheduler/feasible_test.go

764 lines
16 KiB
Go
Raw Normal View History

2015-08-13 17:13:11 +00:00
package scheduler
import (
"reflect"
"testing"
"github.com/hashicorp/nomad/nomad/mock"
"github.com/hashicorp/nomad/nomad/structs"
)
2015-08-13 22:01:02 +00:00
func TestStaticIterator_Reset(t *testing.T) {
_, ctx := testContext(t)
var nodes []*structs.Node
for i := 0; i < 3; i++ {
nodes = append(nodes, mock.Node())
}
static := NewStaticIterator(ctx, nodes)
for i := 0; i < 6; i++ {
static.Reset()
for j := 0; j < i; j++ {
static.Next()
}
static.Reset()
out := collectFeasible(static)
if len(out) != len(nodes) {
t.Fatalf("out: %#v", out)
t.Fatalf("missing nodes %d %#v", i, static)
}
ids := make(map[string]struct{})
for _, o := range out {
if _, ok := ids[o.ID]; ok {
t.Fatalf("duplicate")
}
ids[o.ID] = struct{}{}
}
}
}
func TestStaticIterator_SetNodes(t *testing.T) {
_, ctx := testContext(t)
var nodes []*structs.Node
for i := 0; i < 3; i++ {
nodes = append(nodes, mock.Node())
}
static := NewStaticIterator(ctx, nodes)
newNodes := []*structs.Node{mock.Node()}
static.SetNodes(newNodes)
out := collectFeasible(static)
if !reflect.DeepEqual(out, newNodes) {
t.Fatalf("bad: %#v", out)
}
}
2015-08-13 17:13:11 +00:00
func TestRandomIterator(t *testing.T) {
2015-08-13 18:33:58 +00:00
_, ctx := testContext(t)
2015-08-13 17:13:11 +00:00
var nodes []*structs.Node
for i := 0; i < 10; i++ {
nodes = append(nodes, mock.Node())
}
nc := make([]*structs.Node, len(nodes))
copy(nc, nodes)
rand := NewRandomIterator(ctx, nc)
2015-08-13 19:02:42 +00:00
out := collectFeasible(rand)
2015-08-13 17:13:11 +00:00
if len(out) != len(nodes) {
t.Fatalf("missing nodes")
}
if reflect.DeepEqual(out, nodes) {
t.Fatalf("same order")
}
}
func TestDriverChecker(t *testing.T) {
2015-08-13 18:33:58 +00:00
_, ctx := testContext(t)
nodes := []*structs.Node{
mock.Node(),
mock.Node(),
mock.Node(),
mock.Node(),
}
2015-10-14 23:45:19 +00:00
nodes[0].Attributes["driver.foo"] = "1"
nodes[1].Attributes["driver.foo"] = "0"
nodes[2].Attributes["driver.foo"] = "true"
nodes[3].Attributes["driver.foo"] = "False"
drivers := map[string]struct{}{
2015-09-07 02:47:02 +00:00
"exec": struct{}{},
"foo": struct{}{},
}
checker := NewDriverChecker(ctx, drivers)
cases := []struct {
Node *structs.Node
Result bool
}{
{
Node: nodes[0],
Result: true,
},
{
Node: nodes[1],
Result: false,
},
{
Node: nodes[2],
Result: true,
},
{
Node: nodes[3],
Result: false,
},
}
for i, c := range cases {
if act := checker.Feasible(c.Node); act != c.Result {
t.Fatalf("case(%d) failed: got %v; want %v", i, act, c.Result)
}
}
}
func TestConstraintChecker(t *testing.T) {
2015-08-13 18:33:58 +00:00
_, ctx := testContext(t)
nodes := []*structs.Node{
mock.Node(),
mock.Node(),
mock.Node(),
2015-12-22 01:15:34 +00:00
mock.Node(),
}
nodes[0].Attributes["kernel.name"] = "freebsd"
nodes[1].Datacenter = "dc2"
2015-12-22 01:15:34 +00:00
nodes[2].NodeClass = "large"
constraints := []*structs.Constraint{
&structs.Constraint{
Operand: "=",
2016-02-05 00:50:20 +00:00
LTarget: "${node.datacenter}",
RTarget: "dc1",
},
&structs.Constraint{
Operand: "is",
2016-02-05 00:50:20 +00:00
LTarget: "${attr.kernel.name}",
RTarget: "linux",
},
2015-12-22 01:15:34 +00:00
&structs.Constraint{
Operand: "is",
2016-02-05 00:50:20 +00:00
LTarget: "${node.class}",
2015-12-22 01:15:34 +00:00
RTarget: "large",
},
}
checker := NewConstraintChecker(ctx, constraints)
cases := []struct {
Node *structs.Node
Result bool
}{
{
Node: nodes[0],
Result: false,
},
{
Node: nodes[1],
Result: false,
},
{
Node: nodes[2],
Result: true,
},
}
for i, c := range cases {
if act := checker.Feasible(c.Node); act != c.Result {
t.Fatalf("case(%d) failed: got %v; want %v", i, act, c.Result)
}
}
}
func TestResolveConstraintTarget(t *testing.T) {
type tcase struct {
target string
node *structs.Node
val interface{}
result bool
}
node := mock.Node()
cases := []tcase{
{
2016-02-05 00:50:20 +00:00
target: "${node.unique.id}",
node: node,
val: node.ID,
result: true,
},
{
2016-02-05 00:50:20 +00:00
target: "${node.datacenter}",
node: node,
val: node.Datacenter,
result: true,
},
{
2016-02-05 00:50:20 +00:00
target: "${node.unique.name}",
node: node,
val: node.Name,
result: true,
},
2015-12-22 01:15:34 +00:00
{
2016-02-05 00:50:20 +00:00
target: "${node.class}",
2015-12-22 01:15:34 +00:00
node: node,
val: node.NodeClass,
result: true,
},
{
2016-02-05 00:50:20 +00:00
target: "${node.foo}",
node: node,
result: false,
},
{
2016-02-05 00:50:20 +00:00
target: "${attr.kernel.name}",
node: node,
val: node.Attributes["kernel.name"],
result: true,
},
{
2016-02-05 00:50:20 +00:00
target: "${attr.rand}",
node: node,
result: false,
},
{
2016-02-05 00:50:20 +00:00
target: "${meta.pci-dss}",
node: node,
val: node.Meta["pci-dss"],
result: true,
},
{
2016-02-05 00:50:20 +00:00
target: "${meta.rand}",
node: node,
result: false,
},
}
for _, tc := range cases {
res, ok := resolveConstraintTarget(tc.target, tc.node)
if ok != tc.result {
t.Fatalf("TC: %#v, Result: %v %v", tc, res, ok)
}
if ok && !reflect.DeepEqual(res, tc.val) {
t.Fatalf("TC: %#v, Result: %v %v", tc, res, ok)
}
}
}
func TestCheckConstraint(t *testing.T) {
type tcase struct {
op string
lVal, rVal interface{}
result bool
}
cases := []tcase{
{
op: "=",
lVal: "foo", rVal: "foo",
result: true,
},
{
op: "is",
lVal: "foo", rVal: "foo",
result: true,
},
{
op: "==",
lVal: "foo", rVal: "foo",
result: true,
},
{
op: "!=",
lVal: "foo", rVal: "foo",
result: false,
},
{
op: "!=",
lVal: "foo", rVal: "bar",
result: true,
},
{
op: "not",
lVal: "foo", rVal: "bar",
result: true,
},
{
op: structs.ConstraintVersion,
lVal: "1.2.3", rVal: "~> 1.0",
result: true,
},
2015-10-11 19:35:13 +00:00
{
op: structs.ConstraintRegex,
2015-10-11 19:35:13 +00:00
lVal: "foobarbaz", rVal: "[\\w]+",
result: true,
},
{
op: "<",
lVal: "foo", rVal: "bar",
result: false,
},
2016-10-19 20:06:28 +00:00
{
op: structs.ConstraintSetContains,
lVal: "foo,bar,baz", rVal: "foo, bar ",
result: true,
},
{
op: structs.ConstraintSetContains,
lVal: "foo,bar,baz", rVal: "foo,bam",
result: false,
},
}
for _, tc := range cases {
_, ctx := testContext(t)
if res := checkConstraint(ctx, tc.op, tc.lVal, tc.rVal); res != tc.result {
t.Fatalf("TC: %#v, Result: %v", tc, res)
}
}
}
2015-08-13 19:02:42 +00:00
func TestCheckLexicalOrder(t *testing.T) {
type tcase struct {
op string
lVal, rVal interface{}
result bool
}
cases := []tcase{
{
op: "<",
lVal: "bar", rVal: "foo",
result: true,
},
{
op: "<=",
lVal: "foo", rVal: "foo",
result: true,
},
{
op: ">",
lVal: "bar", rVal: "foo",
result: false,
},
{
op: ">=",
lVal: "bar", rVal: "bar",
result: true,
},
{
op: ">",
lVal: 1, rVal: "foo",
result: false,
},
}
for _, tc := range cases {
if res := checkLexicalOrder(tc.op, tc.lVal, tc.rVal); res != tc.result {
t.Fatalf("TC: %#v, Result: %v", tc, res)
}
}
}
func TestCheckVersionConstraint(t *testing.T) {
type tcase struct {
lVal, rVal interface{}
result bool
}
cases := []tcase{
{
lVal: "1.2.3", rVal: "~> 1.0",
result: true,
},
{
lVal: "1.2.3", rVal: ">= 1.0, < 1.4",
result: true,
},
{
lVal: "2.0.1", rVal: "~> 1.0",
result: false,
},
{
lVal: "1.4", rVal: ">= 1.0, < 1.4",
result: false,
},
{
lVal: 1, rVal: "~> 1.0",
result: true,
},
}
for _, tc := range cases {
_, ctx := testContext(t)
if res := checkVersionConstraint(ctx, tc.lVal, tc.rVal); res != tc.result {
t.Fatalf("TC: %#v, Result: %v", tc, res)
}
}
}
2015-10-11 19:35:13 +00:00
func TestCheckRegexpConstraint(t *testing.T) {
type tcase struct {
lVal, rVal interface{}
result bool
}
cases := []tcase{
{
lVal: "foobar", rVal: "bar",
result: true,
},
{
lVal: "foobar", rVal: "^foo",
result: true,
},
{
lVal: "foobar", rVal: "^bar",
result: false,
},
{
lVal: "zipzap", rVal: "foo",
result: false,
},
{
lVal: 1, rVal: "foo",
result: false,
},
}
for _, tc := range cases {
_, ctx := testContext(t)
if res := checkRegexpConstraint(ctx, tc.lVal, tc.rVal); res != tc.result {
2015-10-11 19:35:13 +00:00
t.Fatalf("TC: %#v, Result: %v", tc, res)
}
}
}
func TestProposedAllocConstraint_JobDistinctHosts(t *testing.T) {
_, ctx := testContext(t)
nodes := []*structs.Node{
mock.Node(),
mock.Node(),
mock.Node(),
mock.Node(),
}
static := NewStaticIterator(ctx, nodes)
// Create a job with a distinct_hosts constraint and two task groups.
tg1 := &structs.TaskGroup{Name: "bar"}
tg2 := &structs.TaskGroup{Name: "baz"}
job := &structs.Job{
ID: "foo",
Constraints: []*structs.Constraint{{Operand: structs.ConstraintDistinctHosts}},
TaskGroups: []*structs.TaskGroup{tg1, tg2},
}
propsed := NewProposedAllocConstraintIterator(ctx, static)
propsed.SetTaskGroup(tg1)
propsed.SetJob(job)
out := collectFeasible(propsed)
if len(out) != 4 {
t.Fatalf("Bad: %#v", out)
}
selected := make(map[string]struct{}, 4)
for _, option := range out {
if _, ok := selected[option.ID]; ok {
t.Fatalf("selected node %v for more than one alloc", option)
}
selected[option.ID] = struct{}{}
}
}
func TestProposedAllocConstraint_JobDistinctHosts_Infeasible(t *testing.T) {
_, ctx := testContext(t)
nodes := []*structs.Node{
mock.Node(),
mock.Node(),
}
static := NewStaticIterator(ctx, nodes)
// Create a job with a distinct_hosts constraint and two task groups.
tg1 := &structs.TaskGroup{Name: "bar"}
tg2 := &structs.TaskGroup{Name: "baz"}
job := &structs.Job{
ID: "foo",
Constraints: []*structs.Constraint{{Operand: structs.ConstraintDistinctHosts}},
TaskGroups: []*structs.TaskGroup{tg1, tg2},
}
// Add allocs placing tg1 on node1 and tg2 on node2. This should make the
// job unsatisfiable.
plan := ctx.Plan()
plan.NodeAllocation[nodes[0].ID] = []*structs.Allocation{
&structs.Allocation{
TaskGroup: tg1.Name,
JobID: job.ID,
ID: structs.GenerateUUID(),
},
// Should be ignored as it is a different job.
&structs.Allocation{
TaskGroup: tg2.Name,
JobID: "ignore 2",
ID: structs.GenerateUUID(),
},
}
plan.NodeAllocation[nodes[1].ID] = []*structs.Allocation{
&structs.Allocation{
TaskGroup: tg2.Name,
JobID: job.ID,
ID: structs.GenerateUUID(),
},
// Should be ignored as it is a different job.
&structs.Allocation{
TaskGroup: tg1.Name,
JobID: "ignore 2",
ID: structs.GenerateUUID(),
},
}
propsed := NewProposedAllocConstraintIterator(ctx, static)
propsed.SetTaskGroup(tg1)
propsed.SetJob(job)
out := collectFeasible(propsed)
if len(out) != 0 {
t.Fatalf("Bad: %#v", out)
}
}
func TestProposedAllocConstraint_JobDistinctHosts_InfeasibleCount(t *testing.T) {
_, ctx := testContext(t)
nodes := []*structs.Node{
mock.Node(),
mock.Node(),
}
static := NewStaticIterator(ctx, nodes)
// Create a job with a distinct_hosts constraint and three task groups.
tg1 := &structs.TaskGroup{Name: "bar"}
tg2 := &structs.TaskGroup{Name: "baz"}
tg3 := &structs.TaskGroup{Name: "bam"}
job := &structs.Job{
ID: "foo",
Constraints: []*structs.Constraint{{Operand: structs.ConstraintDistinctHosts}},
TaskGroups: []*structs.TaskGroup{tg1, tg2, tg3},
}
propsed := NewProposedAllocConstraintIterator(ctx, static)
propsed.SetTaskGroup(tg1)
propsed.SetJob(job)
// It should not be able to place 3 tasks with only two nodes.
out := collectFeasible(propsed)
if len(out) != 2 {
t.Fatalf("Bad: %#v", out)
}
}
func TestProposedAllocConstraint_TaskGroupDistinctHosts(t *testing.T) {
_, ctx := testContext(t)
nodes := []*structs.Node{
mock.Node(),
mock.Node(),
}
static := NewStaticIterator(ctx, nodes)
// Create a task group with a distinct_hosts constraint.
taskGroup := &structs.TaskGroup{
Name: "example",
Constraints: []*structs.Constraint{
{Operand: structs.ConstraintDistinctHosts},
},
}
// Add a planned alloc to node1.
plan := ctx.Plan()
plan.NodeAllocation[nodes[0].ID] = []*structs.Allocation{
&structs.Allocation{
TaskGroup: taskGroup.Name,
JobID: "foo",
},
}
// Add a planned alloc to node2 with the same task group name but a
// different job.
plan.NodeAllocation[nodes[1].ID] = []*structs.Allocation{
&structs.Allocation{
TaskGroup: taskGroup.Name,
JobID: "bar",
},
}
propsed := NewProposedAllocConstraintIterator(ctx, static)
propsed.SetTaskGroup(taskGroup)
propsed.SetJob(&structs.Job{ID: "foo"})
out := collectFeasible(propsed)
if len(out) != 1 {
t.Fatalf("Bad: %#v", out)
}
// Expect it to skip the first node as there is a previous alloc on it for
// the same task group.
if out[0] != nodes[1] {
t.Fatalf("Bad: %v", out)
}
}
2015-08-13 19:02:42 +00:00
func collectFeasible(iter FeasibleIterator) (out []*structs.Node) {
for {
next := iter.Next()
if next == nil {
break
}
out = append(out, next)
}
return
}
// mockFeasibilityChecker is a FeasibilityChecker that returns predetermined
// feasibility values.
type mockFeasibilityChecker struct {
retVals []bool
i int
}
func newMockFeasiblityChecker(values ...bool) *mockFeasibilityChecker {
return &mockFeasibilityChecker{retVals: values}
}
func (c *mockFeasibilityChecker) Feasible(*structs.Node) bool {
if c.i >= len(c.retVals) {
c.i++
return false
}
f := c.retVals[c.i]
c.i++
return f
}
// calls returns how many times the checker was called.
func (c *mockFeasibilityChecker) calls() int { return c.i }
func TestFeasibilityWrapper_JobIneligible(t *testing.T) {
_, ctx := testContext(t)
nodes := []*structs.Node{mock.Node()}
static := NewStaticIterator(ctx, nodes)
mocked := newMockFeasiblityChecker(false)
wrapper := NewFeasibilityWrapper(ctx, static, []FeasibilityChecker{mocked}, nil)
// Set the job to ineligible
ctx.Eligibility().SetJobEligibility(false, nodes[0].ComputedClass)
// Run the wrapper.
out := collectFeasible(wrapper)
if out != nil || mocked.calls() != 0 {
t.Fatalf("bad: %#v %d", out, mocked.calls())
}
}
func TestFeasibilityWrapper_JobEscapes(t *testing.T) {
_, ctx := testContext(t)
nodes := []*structs.Node{mock.Node()}
static := NewStaticIterator(ctx, nodes)
mocked := newMockFeasiblityChecker(false)
wrapper := NewFeasibilityWrapper(ctx, static, []FeasibilityChecker{mocked}, nil)
// Set the job to escaped
cc := nodes[0].ComputedClass
2016-01-27 00:43:42 +00:00
ctx.Eligibility().job[cc] = EvalComputedClassEscaped
// Run the wrapper.
out := collectFeasible(wrapper)
if out != nil || mocked.calls() != 1 {
t.Fatalf("bad: %#v", out)
}
// Ensure that the job status didn't change from escaped even though the
// option failed.
if status := ctx.Eligibility().JobStatus(cc); status != EvalComputedClassEscaped {
t.Fatalf("job status is %v; want %v", status, EvalComputedClassEscaped)
}
}
func TestFeasibilityWrapper_JobAndTg_Eligible(t *testing.T) {
_, ctx := testContext(t)
nodes := []*structs.Node{mock.Node()}
static := NewStaticIterator(ctx, nodes)
jobMock := newMockFeasiblityChecker(true)
tgMock := newMockFeasiblityChecker(false)
wrapper := NewFeasibilityWrapper(ctx, static, []FeasibilityChecker{jobMock}, []FeasibilityChecker{tgMock})
// Set the job to escaped
cc := nodes[0].ComputedClass
2016-01-27 00:43:42 +00:00
ctx.Eligibility().job[cc] = EvalComputedClassEligible
ctx.Eligibility().SetTaskGroupEligibility(true, "foo", cc)
wrapper.SetTaskGroup("foo")
// Run the wrapper.
out := collectFeasible(wrapper)
if out == nil || tgMock.calls() != 0 {
t.Fatalf("bad: %#v %v", out, tgMock.calls())
}
}
func TestFeasibilityWrapper_JobEligible_TgIneligible(t *testing.T) {
_, ctx := testContext(t)
nodes := []*structs.Node{mock.Node()}
static := NewStaticIterator(ctx, nodes)
jobMock := newMockFeasiblityChecker(true)
tgMock := newMockFeasiblityChecker(false)
wrapper := NewFeasibilityWrapper(ctx, static, []FeasibilityChecker{jobMock}, []FeasibilityChecker{tgMock})
// Set the job to escaped
cc := nodes[0].ComputedClass
2016-01-27 00:43:42 +00:00
ctx.Eligibility().job[cc] = EvalComputedClassEligible
ctx.Eligibility().SetTaskGroupEligibility(false, "foo", cc)
wrapper.SetTaskGroup("foo")
// Run the wrapper.
out := collectFeasible(wrapper)
if out != nil || tgMock.calls() != 0 {
t.Fatalf("bad: %#v %v", out, tgMock.calls())
}
}
func TestFeasibilityWrapper_JobEligible_TgEscaped(t *testing.T) {
_, ctx := testContext(t)
nodes := []*structs.Node{mock.Node()}
static := NewStaticIterator(ctx, nodes)
jobMock := newMockFeasiblityChecker(true)
tgMock := newMockFeasiblityChecker(true)
wrapper := NewFeasibilityWrapper(ctx, static, []FeasibilityChecker{jobMock}, []FeasibilityChecker{tgMock})
// Set the job to escaped
cc := nodes[0].ComputedClass
2016-01-27 00:43:42 +00:00
ctx.Eligibility().job[cc] = EvalComputedClassEligible
ctx.Eligibility().taskGroups["foo"] =
map[string]ComputedClassFeasibility{cc: EvalComputedClassEscaped}
wrapper.SetTaskGroup("foo")
// Run the wrapper.
out := collectFeasible(wrapper)
if out == nil || tgMock.calls() != 1 {
t.Fatalf("bad: %#v %v", out, tgMock.calls())
}
2016-01-27 00:43:42 +00:00
if e, ok := ctx.Eligibility().taskGroups["foo"][cc]; !ok || e != EvalComputedClassEscaped {
t.Fatalf("bad: %v %v", e, ok)
}
}