2017-06-01 22:16:24 +00:00
|
|
|
package scheduler
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
import (
|
2017-06-02 23:11:29 +00:00
|
|
|
"fmt"
|
2017-06-01 22:16:24 +00:00
|
|
|
"log"
|
|
|
|
"os"
|
|
|
|
"reflect"
|
|
|
|
"regexp"
|
|
|
|
"strconv"
|
|
|
|
"testing"
|
2017-06-02 23:11:29 +00:00
|
|
|
"time"
|
2017-06-01 22:16:24 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2017-06-02 23:11:29 +00:00
|
|
|
"github.com/hashicorp/nomad/helper"
|
2017-09-29 16:58:48 +00:00
|
|
|
"github.com/hashicorp/nomad/helper/uuid"
|
2017-06-01 22:16:24 +00:00
|
|
|
"github.com/hashicorp/nomad/nomad/mock"
|
|
|
|
"github.com/hashicorp/nomad/nomad/structs"
|
|
|
|
"github.com/kr/pretty"
|
2018-03-02 00:23:44 +00:00
|
|
|
"github.com/stretchr/testify/require"
|
2017-06-01 22:16:24 +00:00
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
Basic Tests:
|
2017-06-02 23:11:29 +00:00
|
|
|
√ Place when there is nothing in the cluster
|
|
|
|
√ Place remainder when there is some in the cluster
|
|
|
|
√ Scale down from n to n-m where n != m
|
|
|
|
√ Scale down from n to zero
|
|
|
|
√ Inplace upgrade test
|
|
|
|
√ Inplace upgrade and scale up test
|
|
|
|
√ Inplace upgrade and scale down test
|
|
|
|
√ Destructive upgrade
|
|
|
|
√ Destructive upgrade and scale up test
|
|
|
|
√ Destructive upgrade and scale down test
|
|
|
|
√ Handle lost nodes
|
|
|
|
√ Handle lost nodes and scale up
|
|
|
|
√ Handle lost nodes and scale down
|
|
|
|
√ Handle draining nodes
|
|
|
|
√ Handle draining nodes and scale up
|
|
|
|
√ Handle draining nodes and scale down
|
|
|
|
√ Handle task group being removed
|
|
|
|
√ Handle job being stopped both as .Stopped and nil
|
|
|
|
√ Place more that one group
|
2018-03-02 00:23:44 +00:00
|
|
|
√ Handle delayed rescheduling failed allocs for batch jobs
|
|
|
|
√ Handle delayed rescheduling failed allocs for service jobs
|
|
|
|
√ Handle eligible now rescheduling failed allocs for batch jobs
|
|
|
|
√ Handle eligible now rescheduling failed allocs for service jobs
|
2018-02-19 12:53:14 +00:00
|
|
|
√ Previously rescheduled allocs should not be rescheduled again
|
2018-03-02 00:23:44 +00:00
|
|
|
√ Aggregated evaluations for allocations that fail close together
|
2017-06-02 23:11:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2017-07-07 18:42:51 +00:00
|
|
|
Update stanza Tests:
|
2017-06-02 23:11:29 +00:00
|
|
|
√ Stopped job cancels any active deployment
|
|
|
|
√ Stopped job doesn't cancel terminal deployment
|
|
|
|
√ JobIndex change cancels any active deployment
|
2017-12-13 17:36:03 +00:00
|
|
|
√ JobIndex change doesn't cancels any terminal deployment
|
2017-06-02 23:11:29 +00:00
|
|
|
√ Destructive changes create deployment and get rolled out via max_parallelism
|
2017-06-06 21:08:46 +00:00
|
|
|
√ Don't create a deployment if there are no changes
|
|
|
|
√ Deployment created by all inplace updates
|
2017-06-02 23:11:29 +00:00
|
|
|
√ Paused or failed deployment doesn't create any more canaries
|
2017-08-04 00:42:14 +00:00
|
|
|
√ Paused or failed deployment doesn't do any placements unless replacing lost allocs
|
2017-06-02 23:11:29 +00:00
|
|
|
√ Paused or failed deployment doesn't do destructive updates
|
|
|
|
√ Paused does do migrations
|
|
|
|
√ Failed deployment doesn't do migrations
|
|
|
|
√ Canary that is on a draining node
|
|
|
|
√ Canary that is on a lost node
|
|
|
|
√ Stop old canaries
|
|
|
|
√ Create new canaries on job change
|
|
|
|
√ Create new canaries on job change while scaling up
|
|
|
|
√ Create new canaries on job change while scaling down
|
|
|
|
√ Fill canaries if partial placement
|
|
|
|
√ Promote canaries unblocks max_parallel
|
|
|
|
√ Promote canaries when canaries == count
|
|
|
|
√ Only place as many as are healthy in deployment
|
|
|
|
√ Limit calculation accounts for healthy allocs on migrating/lost nodes
|
|
|
|
√ Failed deployment should not place anything
|
2017-06-06 21:08:46 +00:00
|
|
|
√ Run after canaries have been promoted, new allocs have been rolled out and there is no deployment
|
2017-07-05 19:50:40 +00:00
|
|
|
√ Failed deployment cancels non-promoted task groups
|
2017-07-06 15:39:16 +00:00
|
|
|
√ Failed deployment and updated job works
|
|
|
|
√ Finished deployment gets marked as complete
|
2017-07-19 18:08:45 +00:00
|
|
|
√ Change job change while scaling up
|
2017-08-21 19:41:19 +00:00
|
|
|
√ Update the job when all allocations from the previous job haven't been placed yet.
|
2018-01-19 17:58:59 +00:00
|
|
|
√ Paused or failed deployment doesn't do any rescheduling of failed allocs
|
2018-02-02 23:22:37 +00:00
|
|
|
√ Running deployment with failed allocs doesn't do any rescheduling of failed allocs
|
2017-06-01 22:16:24 +00:00
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
|
2017-06-02 23:11:29 +00:00
|
|
|
var (
|
|
|
|
canaryUpdate = &structs.UpdateStrategy{
|
|
|
|
Canary: 2,
|
|
|
|
MaxParallel: 2,
|
|
|
|
HealthCheck: structs.UpdateStrategyHealthCheck_Checks,
|
|
|
|
MinHealthyTime: 10 * time.Second,
|
|
|
|
HealthyDeadline: 10 * time.Minute,
|
2017-07-07 18:42:51 +00:00
|
|
|
Stagger: 31 * time.Second,
|
2017-06-02 23:11:29 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
noCanaryUpdate = &structs.UpdateStrategy{
|
|
|
|
MaxParallel: 4,
|
|
|
|
HealthCheck: structs.UpdateStrategyHealthCheck_Checks,
|
|
|
|
MinHealthyTime: 10 * time.Second,
|
|
|
|
HealthyDeadline: 10 * time.Minute,
|
2017-07-07 18:42:51 +00:00
|
|
|
Stagger: 31 * time.Second,
|
2017-06-02 23:11:29 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
2017-06-01 22:16:24 +00:00
|
|
|
func testLogger() *log.Logger {
|
|
|
|
return log.New(os.Stderr, "", log.LstdFlags)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
func allocUpdateFnIgnore(*structs.Allocation, *structs.Job, *structs.TaskGroup) (bool, bool, *structs.Allocation) {
|
|
|
|
return true, false, nil
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
func allocUpdateFnDestructive(*structs.Allocation, *structs.Job, *structs.TaskGroup) (bool, bool, *structs.Allocation) {
|
|
|
|
return false, true, nil
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
func allocUpdateFnInplace(existing *structs.Allocation, _ *structs.Job, newTG *structs.TaskGroup) (bool, bool, *structs.Allocation) {
|
|
|
|
// Create a shallow copy
|
|
|
|
newAlloc := new(structs.Allocation)
|
|
|
|
*newAlloc = *existing
|
|
|
|
newAlloc.TaskResources = make(map[string]*structs.Resources)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Use the new task resources but keep the network from the old
|
|
|
|
for _, task := range newTG.Tasks {
|
|
|
|
r := task.Resources.Copy()
|
|
|
|
r.Networks = existing.TaskResources[task.Name].Networks
|
|
|
|
newAlloc.TaskResources[task.Name] = r
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return false, false, newAlloc
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2017-06-02 23:11:29 +00:00
|
|
|
func allocUpdateFnMock(handled map[string]allocUpdateType, unhandled allocUpdateType) allocUpdateType {
|
|
|
|
return func(existing *structs.Allocation, newJob *structs.Job, newTG *structs.TaskGroup) (bool, bool, *structs.Allocation) {
|
|
|
|
if fn, ok := handled[existing.ID]; ok {
|
|
|
|
return fn(existing, newJob, newTG)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return unhandled(existing, newJob, newTG)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2017-06-01 22:16:24 +00:00
|
|
|
var (
|
|
|
|
// AllocationIndexRegex is a regular expression to find the allocation index.
|
|
|
|
allocationIndexRegex = regexp.MustCompile(".+\\[(\\d+)\\]$")
|
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// allocNameToIndex returns the index of the allocation.
|
|
|
|
func allocNameToIndex(name string) uint {
|
|
|
|
matches := allocationIndexRegex.FindStringSubmatch(name)
|
|
|
|
if len(matches) != 2 {
|
|
|
|
return 0
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
index, err := strconv.Atoi(matches[1])
|
|
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
|
|
return 0
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return uint(index)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
func assertNamesHaveIndexes(t *testing.T, indexes []int, names []string) {
|
2017-09-14 21:00:33 +00:00
|
|
|
t.Helper()
|
2017-06-01 22:16:24 +00:00
|
|
|
m := make(map[uint]int)
|
|
|
|
for _, i := range indexes {
|
|
|
|
m[uint(i)] += 1
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for _, n := range names {
|
|
|
|
index := allocNameToIndex(n)
|
|
|
|
val, contained := m[index]
|
|
|
|
if !contained {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("Unexpected index %d from name %s\nAll names: %v", index, n, names)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
val--
|
|
|
|
if val < 0 {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("Index %d repeated too many times\nAll names: %v", index, names)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
m[index] = val
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for k, remainder := range m {
|
|
|
|
if remainder != 0 {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("Index %d has %d remaining uses expected\nAll names: %v", k, remainder, names)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2017-07-06 16:55:39 +00:00
|
|
|
func assertNoCanariesStopped(t *testing.T, d *structs.Deployment, stop []allocStopResult) {
|
2017-09-14 21:00:33 +00:00
|
|
|
t.Helper()
|
2017-07-06 16:55:39 +00:00
|
|
|
canaryIndex := make(map[string]struct{})
|
|
|
|
for _, state := range d.TaskGroups {
|
|
|
|
for _, c := range state.PlacedCanaries {
|
|
|
|
canaryIndex[c] = struct{}{}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2017-06-02 23:11:29 +00:00
|
|
|
for _, s := range stop {
|
2017-07-06 16:55:39 +00:00
|
|
|
if _, ok := canaryIndex[s.alloc.ID]; ok {
|
2017-06-02 23:11:29 +00:00
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("Stopping canary alloc %q %q", s.alloc.ID, s.alloc.Name)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
func assertPlaceResultsHavePreviousAllocs(t *testing.T, numPrevious int, place []allocPlaceResult) {
|
2017-09-14 21:00:33 +00:00
|
|
|
t.Helper()
|
2017-06-02 23:11:29 +00:00
|
|
|
names := make(map[string]struct{}, numPrevious)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
found := 0
|
|
|
|
for _, p := range place {
|
|
|
|
if _, ok := names[p.name]; ok {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("Name %q already placed", p.name)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
names[p.name] = struct{}{}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if p.previousAlloc == nil {
|
|
|
|
continue
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if act := p.previousAlloc.Name; p.name != act {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("Name mismatch on previous alloc; got %q; want %q", act, p.name)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
found++
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if numPrevious != found {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("wanted %d; got %d placements with previous allocs", numPrevious, found)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2018-01-19 19:21:50 +00:00
|
|
|
func assertPlacementsAreRescheduled(t *testing.T, numRescheduled int, place []allocPlaceResult) {
|
|
|
|
t.Helper()
|
|
|
|
names := make(map[string]struct{}, numRescheduled)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
found := 0
|
|
|
|
for _, p := range place {
|
|
|
|
if _, ok := names[p.name]; ok {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("Name %q already placed", p.name)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
names[p.name] = struct{}{}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if p.previousAlloc == nil {
|
|
|
|
continue
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if p.reschedule {
|
|
|
|
found++
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if numRescheduled != found {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("wanted %d; got %d placements that are rescheduled", numRescheduled, found)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2017-06-01 22:16:24 +00:00
|
|
|
func intRange(pairs ...int) []int {
|
|
|
|
if len(pairs)%2 != 0 {
|
|
|
|
return nil
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
var r []int
|
|
|
|
for i := 0; i < len(pairs); i += 2 {
|
|
|
|
for j := pairs[i]; j <= pairs[i+1]; j++ {
|
|
|
|
r = append(r, j)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return r
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
func placeResultsToNames(place []allocPlaceResult) []string {
|
|
|
|
names := make([]string, 0, len(place))
|
|
|
|
for _, p := range place {
|
|
|
|
names = append(names, p.name)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return names
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2017-07-15 23:31:33 +00:00
|
|
|
func destructiveResultsToNames(destructive []allocDestructiveResult) []string {
|
|
|
|
names := make([]string, 0, len(destructive))
|
|
|
|
for _, d := range destructive {
|
|
|
|
names = append(names, d.placeName)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return names
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2017-06-01 22:16:24 +00:00
|
|
|
func stopResultsToNames(stop []allocStopResult) []string {
|
|
|
|
names := make([]string, 0, len(stop))
|
|
|
|
for _, s := range stop {
|
|
|
|
names = append(names, s.alloc.Name)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return names
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
func allocsToNames(allocs []*structs.Allocation) []string {
|
|
|
|
names := make([]string, 0, len(allocs))
|
|
|
|
for _, a := range allocs {
|
|
|
|
names = append(names, a.Name)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return names
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
type resultExpectation struct {
|
|
|
|
createDeployment *structs.Deployment
|
2017-06-02 23:11:29 +00:00
|
|
|
deploymentUpdates []*structs.DeploymentStatusUpdate
|
2017-06-01 22:16:24 +00:00
|
|
|
place int
|
2017-07-15 23:31:33 +00:00
|
|
|
destructive int
|
2017-06-01 22:16:24 +00:00
|
|
|
inplace int
|
|
|
|
stop int
|
|
|
|
desiredTGUpdates map[string]*structs.DesiredUpdates
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
func assertResults(t *testing.T, r *reconcileResults, exp *resultExpectation) {
|
2017-09-14 21:00:33 +00:00
|
|
|
t.Helper()
|
2017-07-04 20:31:01 +00:00
|
|
|
if exp.createDeployment != nil && r.deployment == nil {
|
2017-06-01 22:16:24 +00:00
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("Expect a created deployment got none")
|
2017-07-04 20:31:01 +00:00
|
|
|
} else if exp.createDeployment == nil && r.deployment != nil {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("Expect no created deployment; got %#v", r.deployment)
|
|
|
|
} else if exp.createDeployment != nil && r.deployment != nil {
|
2017-06-02 23:11:29 +00:00
|
|
|
// Clear the deployment ID
|
2017-07-04 20:31:01 +00:00
|
|
|
r.deployment.ID, exp.createDeployment.ID = "", ""
|
|
|
|
if !reflect.DeepEqual(r.deployment, exp.createDeployment) {
|
2017-06-06 21:08:46 +00:00
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("Unexpected createdDeployment; got\n %#v\nwant\n%#v\nDiff: %v",
|
2017-07-04 20:31:01 +00:00
|
|
|
r.deployment, exp.createDeployment, pretty.Diff(r.deployment, exp.createDeployment))
|
2017-06-02 23:11:29 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
2017-06-01 22:16:24 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2017-06-02 23:11:29 +00:00
|
|
|
if !reflect.DeepEqual(r.deploymentUpdates, exp.deploymentUpdates) {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("Unexpected deploymentUpdates: %v", pretty.Diff(r.deploymentUpdates, exp.deploymentUpdates))
|
2017-06-01 22:16:24 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if l := len(r.place); l != exp.place {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("Expected %d placements; got %d", exp.place, l)
|
|
|
|
}
|
2017-07-15 23:31:33 +00:00
|
|
|
if l := len(r.destructiveUpdate); l != exp.destructive {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("Expected %d destructive; got %d", exp.destructive, l)
|
|
|
|
}
|
2017-06-01 22:16:24 +00:00
|
|
|
if l := len(r.inplaceUpdate); l != exp.inplace {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("Expected %d inplaceUpdate; got %d", exp.inplace, l)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if l := len(r.stop); l != exp.stop {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("Expected %d stops; got %d", exp.stop, l)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if l := len(r.desiredTGUpdates); l != len(exp.desiredTGUpdates) {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("Expected %d task group desired tg updates annotations; got %d", len(exp.desiredTGUpdates), l)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Check the desired updates happened
|
|
|
|
for group, desired := range exp.desiredTGUpdates {
|
|
|
|
act, ok := r.desiredTGUpdates[group]
|
|
|
|
if !ok {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("Expected desired updates for group %q", group)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if !reflect.DeepEqual(act, desired) {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("Unexpected annotations for group %q: %v", group, pretty.Diff(act, desired))
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Tests the reconciler properly handles placements for a job that has no
|
|
|
|
// existing allocations
|
|
|
|
func TestReconciler_Place_NoExisting(t *testing.T) {
|
|
|
|
job := mock.Job()
|
|
|
|
reconciler := NewAllocReconciler(testLogger(), allocUpdateFnIgnore, false, job.ID, job, nil, nil, nil)
|
|
|
|
r := reconciler.Compute()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Assert the correct results
|
|
|
|
assertResults(t, r, &resultExpectation{
|
|
|
|
createDeployment: nil,
|
2017-06-02 23:11:29 +00:00
|
|
|
deploymentUpdates: nil,
|
2017-06-01 22:16:24 +00:00
|
|
|
place: 10,
|
|
|
|
inplace: 0,
|
|
|
|
stop: 0,
|
|
|
|
desiredTGUpdates: map[string]*structs.DesiredUpdates{
|
|
|
|
job.TaskGroups[0].Name: {
|
|
|
|
Place: 10,
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assertNamesHaveIndexes(t, intRange(0, 9), placeResultsToNames(r.place))
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Tests the reconciler properly handles placements for a job that has some
|
|
|
|
// existing allocations
|
|
|
|
func TestReconciler_Place_Existing(t *testing.T) {
|
|
|
|
job := mock.Job()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Create 3 existing allocations
|
|
|
|
var allocs []*structs.Allocation
|
|
|
|
for i := 0; i < 5; i++ {
|
|
|
|
alloc := mock.Alloc()
|
|
|
|
alloc.Job = job
|
|
|
|
alloc.JobID = job.ID
|
2017-09-29 16:58:48 +00:00
|
|
|
alloc.NodeID = uuid.Generate()
|
2017-06-01 22:16:24 +00:00
|
|
|
alloc.Name = structs.AllocName(job.ID, job.TaskGroups[0].Name, uint(i))
|
|
|
|
allocs = append(allocs, alloc)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
reconciler := NewAllocReconciler(testLogger(), allocUpdateFnIgnore, false, job.ID, job, nil, allocs, nil)
|
|
|
|
r := reconciler.Compute()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Assert the correct results
|
|
|
|
assertResults(t, r, &resultExpectation{
|
|
|
|
createDeployment: nil,
|
2017-06-02 23:11:29 +00:00
|
|
|
deploymentUpdates: nil,
|
2017-06-01 22:16:24 +00:00
|
|
|
place: 5,
|
|
|
|
inplace: 0,
|
|
|
|
stop: 0,
|
|
|
|
desiredTGUpdates: map[string]*structs.DesiredUpdates{
|
|
|
|
job.TaskGroups[0].Name: {
|
|
|
|
Place: 5,
|
|
|
|
Ignore: 5,
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assertNamesHaveIndexes(t, intRange(5, 9), placeResultsToNames(r.place))
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Tests the reconciler properly handles stopping allocations for a job that has
|
|
|
|
// scaled down
|
|
|
|
func TestReconciler_ScaleDown_Partial(t *testing.T) {
|
|
|
|
// Has desired 10
|
|
|
|
job := mock.Job()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Create 20 existing allocations
|
|
|
|
var allocs []*structs.Allocation
|
|
|
|
for i := 0; i < 20; i++ {
|
|
|
|
alloc := mock.Alloc()
|
|
|
|
alloc.Job = job
|
|
|
|
alloc.JobID = job.ID
|
2017-09-29 16:58:48 +00:00
|
|
|
alloc.NodeID = uuid.Generate()
|
2017-06-01 22:16:24 +00:00
|
|
|
alloc.Name = structs.AllocName(job.ID, job.TaskGroups[0].Name, uint(i))
|
|
|
|
allocs = append(allocs, alloc)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
reconciler := NewAllocReconciler(testLogger(), allocUpdateFnIgnore, false, job.ID, job, nil, allocs, nil)
|
|
|
|
r := reconciler.Compute()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Assert the correct results
|
|
|
|
assertResults(t, r, &resultExpectation{
|
|
|
|
createDeployment: nil,
|
2017-06-02 23:11:29 +00:00
|
|
|
deploymentUpdates: nil,
|
2017-06-01 22:16:24 +00:00
|
|
|
place: 0,
|
|
|
|
inplace: 0,
|
|
|
|
stop: 10,
|
|
|
|
desiredTGUpdates: map[string]*structs.DesiredUpdates{
|
|
|
|
job.TaskGroups[0].Name: {
|
|
|
|
Ignore: 10,
|
|
|
|
Stop: 10,
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assertNamesHaveIndexes(t, intRange(10, 19), stopResultsToNames(r.stop))
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Tests the reconciler properly handles stopping allocations for a job that has
|
|
|
|
// scaled down to zero desired
|
|
|
|
func TestReconciler_ScaleDown_Zero(t *testing.T) {
|
|
|
|
// Set desired 0
|
|
|
|
job := mock.Job()
|
|
|
|
job.TaskGroups[0].Count = 0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Create 20 existing allocations
|
|
|
|
var allocs []*structs.Allocation
|
|
|
|
for i := 0; i < 20; i++ {
|
|
|
|
alloc := mock.Alloc()
|
|
|
|
alloc.Job = job
|
|
|
|
alloc.JobID = job.ID
|
2017-09-29 16:58:48 +00:00
|
|
|
alloc.NodeID = uuid.Generate()
|
2017-06-01 22:16:24 +00:00
|
|
|
alloc.Name = structs.AllocName(job.ID, job.TaskGroups[0].Name, uint(i))
|
|
|
|
allocs = append(allocs, alloc)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
reconciler := NewAllocReconciler(testLogger(), allocUpdateFnIgnore, false, job.ID, job, nil, allocs, nil)
|
|
|
|
r := reconciler.Compute()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Assert the correct results
|
|
|
|
assertResults(t, r, &resultExpectation{
|
|
|
|
createDeployment: nil,
|
2017-06-02 23:11:29 +00:00
|
|
|
deploymentUpdates: nil,
|
2017-06-01 22:16:24 +00:00
|
|
|
place: 0,
|
|
|
|
inplace: 0,
|
|
|
|
stop: 20,
|
|
|
|
desiredTGUpdates: map[string]*structs.DesiredUpdates{
|
|
|
|
job.TaskGroups[0].Name: {
|
|
|
|
Stop: 20,
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assertNamesHaveIndexes(t, intRange(0, 19), stopResultsToNames(r.stop))
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2017-09-14 21:00:33 +00:00
|
|
|
// Tests the reconciler properly handles stopping allocations for a job that has
|
|
|
|
// scaled down to zero desired where allocs have duplicate names
|
|
|
|
func TestReconciler_ScaleDown_Zero_DuplicateNames(t *testing.T) {
|
|
|
|
// Set desired 0
|
|
|
|
job := mock.Job()
|
|
|
|
job.TaskGroups[0].Count = 0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Create 20 existing allocations
|
|
|
|
var allocs []*structs.Allocation
|
|
|
|
var expectedStopped []int
|
|
|
|
for i := 0; i < 20; i++ {
|
|
|
|
alloc := mock.Alloc()
|
|
|
|
alloc.Job = job
|
|
|
|
alloc.JobID = job.ID
|
2017-09-29 16:58:48 +00:00
|
|
|
alloc.NodeID = uuid.Generate()
|
2017-09-14 21:00:33 +00:00
|
|
|
alloc.Name = structs.AllocName(job.ID, job.TaskGroups[0].Name, uint(i%2))
|
|
|
|
allocs = append(allocs, alloc)
|
|
|
|
expectedStopped = append(expectedStopped, i%2)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
reconciler := NewAllocReconciler(testLogger(), allocUpdateFnIgnore, false, job.ID, job, nil, allocs, nil)
|
|
|
|
r := reconciler.Compute()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Assert the correct results
|
|
|
|
assertResults(t, r, &resultExpectation{
|
|
|
|
createDeployment: nil,
|
|
|
|
deploymentUpdates: nil,
|
|
|
|
place: 0,
|
|
|
|
inplace: 0,
|
|
|
|
stop: 20,
|
|
|
|
desiredTGUpdates: map[string]*structs.DesiredUpdates{
|
|
|
|
job.TaskGroups[0].Name: {
|
|
|
|
Stop: 20,
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assertNamesHaveIndexes(t, expectedStopped, stopResultsToNames(r.stop))
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2017-06-01 22:16:24 +00:00
|
|
|
// Tests the reconciler properly handles inplace upgrading allocations
|
|
|
|
func TestReconciler_Inplace(t *testing.T) {
|
|
|
|
job := mock.Job()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Create 10 existing allocations
|
|
|
|
var allocs []*structs.Allocation
|
|
|
|
for i := 0; i < 10; i++ {
|
|
|
|
alloc := mock.Alloc()
|
|
|
|
alloc.Job = job
|
|
|
|
alloc.JobID = job.ID
|
2017-09-29 16:58:48 +00:00
|
|
|
alloc.NodeID = uuid.Generate()
|
2017-06-01 22:16:24 +00:00
|
|
|
alloc.Name = structs.AllocName(job.ID, job.TaskGroups[0].Name, uint(i))
|
|
|
|
allocs = append(allocs, alloc)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
reconciler := NewAllocReconciler(testLogger(), allocUpdateFnInplace, false, job.ID, job, nil, allocs, nil)
|
|
|
|
r := reconciler.Compute()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Assert the correct results
|
|
|
|
assertResults(t, r, &resultExpectation{
|
|
|
|
createDeployment: nil,
|
2017-06-02 23:11:29 +00:00
|
|
|
deploymentUpdates: nil,
|
2017-06-01 22:16:24 +00:00
|
|
|
place: 0,
|
|
|
|
inplace: 10,
|
|
|
|
stop: 0,
|
|
|
|
desiredTGUpdates: map[string]*structs.DesiredUpdates{
|
|
|
|
job.TaskGroups[0].Name: {
|
|
|
|
InPlaceUpdate: 10,
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assertNamesHaveIndexes(t, intRange(0, 9), allocsToNames(r.inplaceUpdate))
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Tests the reconciler properly handles inplace upgrading allocations while
|
|
|
|
// scaling up
|
|
|
|
func TestReconciler_Inplace_ScaleUp(t *testing.T) {
|
|
|
|
// Set desired 15
|
|
|
|
job := mock.Job()
|
|
|
|
job.TaskGroups[0].Count = 15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Create 10 existing allocations
|
|
|
|
var allocs []*structs.Allocation
|
|
|
|
for i := 0; i < 10; i++ {
|
|
|
|
alloc := mock.Alloc()
|
|
|
|
alloc.Job = job
|
|
|
|
alloc.JobID = job.ID
|
2017-09-29 16:58:48 +00:00
|
|
|
alloc.NodeID = uuid.Generate()
|
2017-06-01 22:16:24 +00:00
|
|
|
alloc.Name = structs.AllocName(job.ID, job.TaskGroups[0].Name, uint(i))
|
|
|
|
allocs = append(allocs, alloc)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
reconciler := NewAllocReconciler(testLogger(), allocUpdateFnInplace, false, job.ID, job, nil, allocs, nil)
|
|
|
|
r := reconciler.Compute()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Assert the correct results
|
|
|
|
assertResults(t, r, &resultExpectation{
|
|
|
|
createDeployment: nil,
|
2017-06-02 23:11:29 +00:00
|
|
|
deploymentUpdates: nil,
|
2017-06-01 22:16:24 +00:00
|
|
|
place: 5,
|
|
|
|
inplace: 10,
|
|
|
|
stop: 0,
|
|
|
|
desiredTGUpdates: map[string]*structs.DesiredUpdates{
|
|
|
|
job.TaskGroups[0].Name: {
|
|
|
|
Place: 5,
|
|
|
|
InPlaceUpdate: 10,
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assertNamesHaveIndexes(t, intRange(0, 9), allocsToNames(r.inplaceUpdate))
|
|
|
|
assertNamesHaveIndexes(t, intRange(10, 14), placeResultsToNames(r.place))
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Tests the reconciler properly handles inplace upgrading allocations while
|
|
|
|
// scaling down
|
|
|
|
func TestReconciler_Inplace_ScaleDown(t *testing.T) {
|
|
|
|
// Set desired 5
|
|
|
|
job := mock.Job()
|
|
|
|
job.TaskGroups[0].Count = 5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Create 10 existing allocations
|
|
|
|
var allocs []*structs.Allocation
|
|
|
|
for i := 0; i < 10; i++ {
|
|
|
|
alloc := mock.Alloc()
|
|
|
|
alloc.Job = job
|
|
|
|
alloc.JobID = job.ID
|
2017-09-29 16:58:48 +00:00
|
|
|
alloc.NodeID = uuid.Generate()
|
2017-06-01 22:16:24 +00:00
|
|
|
alloc.Name = structs.AllocName(job.ID, job.TaskGroups[0].Name, uint(i))
|
|
|
|
allocs = append(allocs, alloc)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
reconciler := NewAllocReconciler(testLogger(), allocUpdateFnInplace, false, job.ID, job, nil, allocs, nil)
|
|
|
|
r := reconciler.Compute()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Assert the correct results
|
|
|
|
assertResults(t, r, &resultExpectation{
|
|
|
|
createDeployment: nil,
|
2017-06-02 23:11:29 +00:00
|
|
|
deploymentUpdates: nil,
|
2017-06-01 22:16:24 +00:00
|
|
|
place: 0,
|
|
|
|
inplace: 5,
|
|
|
|
stop: 5,
|
|
|
|
desiredTGUpdates: map[string]*structs.DesiredUpdates{
|
|
|
|
job.TaskGroups[0].Name: {
|
|
|
|
Stop: 5,
|
|
|
|
InPlaceUpdate: 5,
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assertNamesHaveIndexes(t, intRange(0, 4), allocsToNames(r.inplaceUpdate))
|
|
|
|
assertNamesHaveIndexes(t, intRange(5, 9), stopResultsToNames(r.stop))
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Tests the reconciler properly handles destructive upgrading allocations
|
|
|
|
func TestReconciler_Destructive(t *testing.T) {
|
|
|
|
job := mock.Job()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Create 10 existing allocations
|
|
|
|
var allocs []*structs.Allocation
|
|
|
|
for i := 0; i < 10; i++ {
|
|
|
|
alloc := mock.Alloc()
|
|
|
|
alloc.Job = job
|
|
|
|
alloc.JobID = job.ID
|
2017-09-29 16:58:48 +00:00
|
|
|
alloc.NodeID = uuid.Generate()
|
2017-06-01 22:16:24 +00:00
|
|
|
alloc.Name = structs.AllocName(job.ID, job.TaskGroups[0].Name, uint(i))
|
|
|
|
allocs = append(allocs, alloc)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
reconciler := NewAllocReconciler(testLogger(), allocUpdateFnDestructive, false, job.ID, job, nil, allocs, nil)
|
|
|
|
r := reconciler.Compute()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Assert the correct results
|
|
|
|
assertResults(t, r, &resultExpectation{
|
|
|
|
createDeployment: nil,
|
2017-06-02 23:11:29 +00:00
|
|
|
deploymentUpdates: nil,
|
2017-07-15 23:31:33 +00:00
|
|
|
destructive: 10,
|
2017-06-01 22:16:24 +00:00
|
|
|
desiredTGUpdates: map[string]*structs.DesiredUpdates{
|
|
|
|
job.TaskGroups[0].Name: {
|
|
|
|
DestructiveUpdate: 10,
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
|
2017-07-15 23:31:33 +00:00
|
|
|
assertNamesHaveIndexes(t, intRange(0, 9), destructiveResultsToNames(r.destructiveUpdate))
|
2017-06-01 22:16:24 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Tests the reconciler properly handles destructive upgrading allocations while
|
|
|
|
// scaling up
|
|
|
|
func TestReconciler_Destructive_ScaleUp(t *testing.T) {
|
|
|
|
// Set desired 15
|
|
|
|
job := mock.Job()
|
|
|
|
job.TaskGroups[0].Count = 15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Create 10 existing allocations
|
|
|
|
var allocs []*structs.Allocation
|
|
|
|
for i := 0; i < 10; i++ {
|
|
|
|
alloc := mock.Alloc()
|
|
|
|
alloc.Job = job
|
|
|
|
alloc.JobID = job.ID
|
2017-09-29 16:58:48 +00:00
|
|
|
alloc.NodeID = uuid.Generate()
|
2017-06-01 22:16:24 +00:00
|
|
|
alloc.Name = structs.AllocName(job.ID, job.TaskGroups[0].Name, uint(i))
|
|
|
|
allocs = append(allocs, alloc)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
reconciler := NewAllocReconciler(testLogger(), allocUpdateFnDestructive, false, job.ID, job, nil, allocs, nil)
|
|
|
|
r := reconciler.Compute()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Assert the correct results
|
|
|
|
assertResults(t, r, &resultExpectation{
|
|
|
|
createDeployment: nil,
|
2017-06-02 23:11:29 +00:00
|
|
|
deploymentUpdates: nil,
|
2017-07-15 23:31:33 +00:00
|
|
|
place: 5,
|
|
|
|
destructive: 10,
|
2017-06-01 22:16:24 +00:00
|
|
|
desiredTGUpdates: map[string]*structs.DesiredUpdates{
|
|
|
|
job.TaskGroups[0].Name: {
|
|
|
|
Place: 5,
|
|
|
|
DestructiveUpdate: 10,
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
|
2017-07-15 23:31:33 +00:00
|
|
|
assertNamesHaveIndexes(t, intRange(0, 9), destructiveResultsToNames(r.destructiveUpdate))
|
|
|
|
assertNamesHaveIndexes(t, intRange(10, 14), placeResultsToNames(r.place))
|
2017-06-01 22:16:24 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Tests the reconciler properly handles destructive upgrading allocations while
|
|
|
|
// scaling down
|
|
|
|
func TestReconciler_Destructive_ScaleDown(t *testing.T) {
|
|
|
|
// Set desired 5
|
|
|
|
job := mock.Job()
|
|
|
|
job.TaskGroups[0].Count = 5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Create 10 existing allocations
|
|
|
|
var allocs []*structs.Allocation
|
|
|
|
for i := 0; i < 10; i++ {
|
|
|
|
alloc := mock.Alloc()
|
|
|
|
alloc.Job = job
|
|
|
|
alloc.JobID = job.ID
|
2017-09-29 16:58:48 +00:00
|
|
|
alloc.NodeID = uuid.Generate()
|
2017-06-01 22:16:24 +00:00
|
|
|
alloc.Name = structs.AllocName(job.ID, job.TaskGroups[0].Name, uint(i))
|
|
|
|
allocs = append(allocs, alloc)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
reconciler := NewAllocReconciler(testLogger(), allocUpdateFnDestructive, false, job.ID, job, nil, allocs, nil)
|
|
|
|
r := reconciler.Compute()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Assert the correct results
|
|
|
|
assertResults(t, r, &resultExpectation{
|
|
|
|
createDeployment: nil,
|
2017-06-02 23:11:29 +00:00
|
|
|
deploymentUpdates: nil,
|
2017-07-15 23:31:33 +00:00
|
|
|
destructive: 5,
|
|
|
|
stop: 5,
|
2017-06-01 22:16:24 +00:00
|
|
|
desiredTGUpdates: map[string]*structs.DesiredUpdates{
|
|
|
|
job.TaskGroups[0].Name: {
|
|
|
|
Stop: 5,
|
|
|
|
DestructiveUpdate: 5,
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
|
2017-07-15 23:31:33 +00:00
|
|
|
assertNamesHaveIndexes(t, intRange(5, 9), stopResultsToNames(r.stop))
|
|
|
|
assertNamesHaveIndexes(t, intRange(0, 4), destructiveResultsToNames(r.destructiveUpdate))
|
2017-06-01 22:16:24 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Tests the reconciler properly handles lost nodes with allocations
|
|
|
|
func TestReconciler_LostNode(t *testing.T) {
|
|
|
|
job := mock.Job()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Create 10 existing allocations
|
|
|
|
var allocs []*structs.Allocation
|
|
|
|
for i := 0; i < 10; i++ {
|
|
|
|
alloc := mock.Alloc()
|
|
|
|
alloc.Job = job
|
|
|
|
alloc.JobID = job.ID
|
2017-09-29 16:58:48 +00:00
|
|
|
alloc.NodeID = uuid.Generate()
|
2017-06-01 22:16:24 +00:00
|
|
|
alloc.Name = structs.AllocName(job.ID, job.TaskGroups[0].Name, uint(i))
|
|
|
|
allocs = append(allocs, alloc)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Build a map of tainted nodes
|
|
|
|
tainted := make(map[string]*structs.Node, 2)
|
|
|
|
for i := 0; i < 2; i++ {
|
|
|
|
n := mock.Node()
|
|
|
|
n.ID = allocs[i].NodeID
|
|
|
|
n.Status = structs.NodeStatusDown
|
|
|
|
tainted[n.ID] = n
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
reconciler := NewAllocReconciler(testLogger(), allocUpdateFnIgnore, false, job.ID, job, nil, allocs, tainted)
|
|
|
|
r := reconciler.Compute()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Assert the correct results
|
|
|
|
assertResults(t, r, &resultExpectation{
|
|
|
|
createDeployment: nil,
|
2017-06-02 23:11:29 +00:00
|
|
|
deploymentUpdates: nil,
|
2017-06-01 22:16:24 +00:00
|
|
|
place: 2,
|
|
|
|
inplace: 0,
|
|
|
|
stop: 2,
|
|
|
|
desiredTGUpdates: map[string]*structs.DesiredUpdates{
|
|
|
|
job.TaskGroups[0].Name: {
|
|
|
|
Place: 2,
|
2017-06-02 23:11:29 +00:00
|
|
|
Stop: 2,
|
2017-06-01 22:16:24 +00:00
|
|
|
Ignore: 8,
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assertNamesHaveIndexes(t, intRange(0, 1), stopResultsToNames(r.stop))
|
|
|
|
assertNamesHaveIndexes(t, intRange(0, 1), placeResultsToNames(r.place))
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Tests the reconciler properly handles lost nodes with allocations while
|
|
|
|
// scaling up
|
|
|
|
func TestReconciler_LostNode_ScaleUp(t *testing.T) {
|
|
|
|
// Set desired 15
|
|
|
|
job := mock.Job()
|
|
|
|
job.TaskGroups[0].Count = 15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Create 10 existing allocations
|
|
|
|
var allocs []*structs.Allocation
|
|
|
|
for i := 0; i < 10; i++ {
|
|
|
|
alloc := mock.Alloc()
|
|
|
|
alloc.Job = job
|
|
|
|
alloc.JobID = job.ID
|
2017-09-29 16:58:48 +00:00
|
|
|
alloc.NodeID = uuid.Generate()
|
2017-06-01 22:16:24 +00:00
|
|
|
alloc.Name = structs.AllocName(job.ID, job.TaskGroups[0].Name, uint(i))
|
|
|
|
allocs = append(allocs, alloc)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Build a map of tainted nodes
|
|
|
|
tainted := make(map[string]*structs.Node, 2)
|
|
|
|
for i := 0; i < 2; i++ {
|
|
|
|
n := mock.Node()
|
|
|
|
n.ID = allocs[i].NodeID
|
|
|
|
n.Status = structs.NodeStatusDown
|
|
|
|
tainted[n.ID] = n
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
reconciler := NewAllocReconciler(testLogger(), allocUpdateFnIgnore, false, job.ID, job, nil, allocs, tainted)
|
|
|
|
r := reconciler.Compute()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Assert the correct results
|
|
|
|
assertResults(t, r, &resultExpectation{
|
|
|
|
createDeployment: nil,
|
2017-06-02 23:11:29 +00:00
|
|
|
deploymentUpdates: nil,
|
2017-06-01 22:16:24 +00:00
|
|
|
place: 7,
|
|
|
|
inplace: 0,
|
|
|
|
stop: 2,
|
|
|
|
desiredTGUpdates: map[string]*structs.DesiredUpdates{
|
|
|
|
job.TaskGroups[0].Name: {
|
|
|
|
Place: 7,
|
2017-06-02 23:11:29 +00:00
|
|
|
Stop: 2,
|
2017-06-01 22:16:24 +00:00
|
|
|
Ignore: 8,
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assertNamesHaveIndexes(t, intRange(0, 1), stopResultsToNames(r.stop))
|
|
|
|
assertNamesHaveIndexes(t, intRange(0, 1, 10, 14), placeResultsToNames(r.place))
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Tests the reconciler properly handles lost nodes with allocations while
|
|
|
|
// scaling down
|
|
|
|
func TestReconciler_LostNode_ScaleDown(t *testing.T) {
|
|
|
|
// Set desired 5
|
|
|
|
job := mock.Job()
|
|
|
|
job.TaskGroups[0].Count = 5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Create 10 existing allocations
|
|
|
|
var allocs []*structs.Allocation
|
|
|
|
for i := 0; i < 10; i++ {
|
|
|
|
alloc := mock.Alloc()
|
|
|
|
alloc.Job = job
|
|
|
|
alloc.JobID = job.ID
|
2017-09-29 16:58:48 +00:00
|
|
|
alloc.NodeID = uuid.Generate()
|
2017-06-01 22:16:24 +00:00
|
|
|
alloc.Name = structs.AllocName(job.ID, job.TaskGroups[0].Name, uint(i))
|
|
|
|
allocs = append(allocs, alloc)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Build a map of tainted nodes
|
|
|
|
tainted := make(map[string]*structs.Node, 2)
|
|
|
|
for i := 0; i < 2; i++ {
|
|
|
|
n := mock.Node()
|
|
|
|
n.ID = allocs[i].NodeID
|
|
|
|
n.Status = structs.NodeStatusDown
|
|
|
|
tainted[n.ID] = n
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
reconciler := NewAllocReconciler(testLogger(), allocUpdateFnIgnore, false, job.ID, job, nil, allocs, tainted)
|
|
|
|
r := reconciler.Compute()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Assert the correct results
|
|
|
|
assertResults(t, r, &resultExpectation{
|
|
|
|
createDeployment: nil,
|
2017-06-02 23:11:29 +00:00
|
|
|
deploymentUpdates: nil,
|
2017-06-01 22:16:24 +00:00
|
|
|
place: 0,
|
|
|
|
inplace: 0,
|
|
|
|
stop: 5,
|
|
|
|
desiredTGUpdates: map[string]*structs.DesiredUpdates{
|
|
|
|
job.TaskGroups[0].Name: {
|
|
|
|
Stop: 5,
|
|
|
|
Ignore: 5,
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assertNamesHaveIndexes(t, intRange(0, 1, 7, 9), stopResultsToNames(r.stop))
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Tests the reconciler properly handles draining nodes with allocations
|
|
|
|
func TestReconciler_DrainNode(t *testing.T) {
|
|
|
|
job := mock.Job()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Create 10 existing allocations
|
|
|
|
var allocs []*structs.Allocation
|
|
|
|
for i := 0; i < 10; i++ {
|
|
|
|
alloc := mock.Alloc()
|
|
|
|
alloc.Job = job
|
|
|
|
alloc.JobID = job.ID
|
2017-09-29 16:58:48 +00:00
|
|
|
alloc.NodeID = uuid.Generate()
|
2017-06-01 22:16:24 +00:00
|
|
|
alloc.Name = structs.AllocName(job.ID, job.TaskGroups[0].Name, uint(i))
|
|
|
|
allocs = append(allocs, alloc)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Build a map of tainted nodes
|
|
|
|
tainted := make(map[string]*structs.Node, 2)
|
|
|
|
for i := 0; i < 2; i++ {
|
|
|
|
n := mock.Node()
|
|
|
|
n.ID = allocs[i].NodeID
|
2018-02-23 01:38:44 +00:00
|
|
|
allocs[i].DesiredTransition.Migrate = helper.BoolToPtr(true)
|
2017-06-01 22:16:24 +00:00
|
|
|
n.Drain = true
|
|
|
|
tainted[n.ID] = n
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
reconciler := NewAllocReconciler(testLogger(), allocUpdateFnIgnore, false, job.ID, job, nil, allocs, tainted)
|
|
|
|
r := reconciler.Compute()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Assert the correct results
|
|
|
|
assertResults(t, r, &resultExpectation{
|
|
|
|
createDeployment: nil,
|
2017-06-02 23:11:29 +00:00
|
|
|
deploymentUpdates: nil,
|
2017-06-01 22:16:24 +00:00
|
|
|
place: 2,
|
|
|
|
inplace: 0,
|
|
|
|
stop: 2,
|
|
|
|
desiredTGUpdates: map[string]*structs.DesiredUpdates{
|
|
|
|
job.TaskGroups[0].Name: {
|
|
|
|
Migrate: 2,
|
|
|
|
Ignore: 8,
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assertNamesHaveIndexes(t, intRange(0, 1), stopResultsToNames(r.stop))
|
|
|
|
assertNamesHaveIndexes(t, intRange(0, 1), placeResultsToNames(r.place))
|
2017-06-02 23:11:29 +00:00
|
|
|
assertPlaceResultsHavePreviousAllocs(t, 2, r.place)
|
2018-01-19 19:21:50 +00:00
|
|
|
// These should not have the reschedule field set
|
|
|
|
assertPlacementsAreRescheduled(t, 0, r.place)
|
2017-06-01 22:16:24 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Tests the reconciler properly handles draining nodes with allocations while
|
|
|
|
// scaling up
|
|
|
|
func TestReconciler_DrainNode_ScaleUp(t *testing.T) {
|
|
|
|
// Set desired 15
|
|
|
|
job := mock.Job()
|
|
|
|
job.TaskGroups[0].Count = 15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Create 10 existing allocations
|
|
|
|
var allocs []*structs.Allocation
|
|
|
|
for i := 0; i < 10; i++ {
|
|
|
|
alloc := mock.Alloc()
|
|
|
|
alloc.Job = job
|
|
|
|
alloc.JobID = job.ID
|
2017-09-29 16:58:48 +00:00
|
|
|
alloc.NodeID = uuid.Generate()
|
2017-06-01 22:16:24 +00:00
|
|
|
alloc.Name = structs.AllocName(job.ID, job.TaskGroups[0].Name, uint(i))
|
|
|
|
allocs = append(allocs, alloc)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Build a map of tainted nodes
|
|
|
|
tainted := make(map[string]*structs.Node, 2)
|
|
|
|
for i := 0; i < 2; i++ {
|
|
|
|
n := mock.Node()
|
|
|
|
n.ID = allocs[i].NodeID
|
2018-02-23 01:38:44 +00:00
|
|
|
allocs[i].DesiredTransition.Migrate = helper.BoolToPtr(true)
|
2017-06-01 22:16:24 +00:00
|
|
|
n.Drain = true
|
|
|
|
tainted[n.ID] = n
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
reconciler := NewAllocReconciler(testLogger(), allocUpdateFnIgnore, false, job.ID, job, nil, allocs, tainted)
|
|
|
|
r := reconciler.Compute()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Assert the correct results
|
|
|
|
assertResults(t, r, &resultExpectation{
|
|
|
|
createDeployment: nil,
|
2017-06-02 23:11:29 +00:00
|
|
|
deploymentUpdates: nil,
|
2017-06-01 22:16:24 +00:00
|
|
|
place: 7,
|
|
|
|
inplace: 0,
|
|
|
|
stop: 2,
|
|
|
|
desiredTGUpdates: map[string]*structs.DesiredUpdates{
|
|
|
|
job.TaskGroups[0].Name: {
|
|
|
|
Place: 5,
|
|
|
|
Migrate: 2,
|
|
|
|
Ignore: 8,
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assertNamesHaveIndexes(t, intRange(0, 1), stopResultsToNames(r.stop))
|
|
|
|
assertNamesHaveIndexes(t, intRange(0, 1, 10, 14), placeResultsToNames(r.place))
|
2017-06-02 23:11:29 +00:00
|
|
|
assertPlaceResultsHavePreviousAllocs(t, 2, r.place)
|
2018-01-19 19:21:50 +00:00
|
|
|
// These should not have the reschedule field set
|
|
|
|
assertPlacementsAreRescheduled(t, 0, r.place)
|
2017-06-01 22:16:24 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Tests the reconciler properly handles draining nodes with allocations while
|
|
|
|
// scaling down
|
|
|
|
func TestReconciler_DrainNode_ScaleDown(t *testing.T) {
|
|
|
|
// Set desired 8
|
|
|
|
job := mock.Job()
|
|
|
|
job.TaskGroups[0].Count = 8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Create 10 existing allocations
|
|
|
|
var allocs []*structs.Allocation
|
|
|
|
for i := 0; i < 10; i++ {
|
|
|
|
alloc := mock.Alloc()
|
|
|
|
alloc.Job = job
|
|
|
|
alloc.JobID = job.ID
|
2017-09-29 16:58:48 +00:00
|
|
|
alloc.NodeID = uuid.Generate()
|
2017-06-01 22:16:24 +00:00
|
|
|
alloc.Name = structs.AllocName(job.ID, job.TaskGroups[0].Name, uint(i))
|
|
|
|
allocs = append(allocs, alloc)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Build a map of tainted nodes
|
|
|
|
tainted := make(map[string]*structs.Node, 3)
|
|
|
|
for i := 0; i < 3; i++ {
|
|
|
|
n := mock.Node()
|
|
|
|
n.ID = allocs[i].NodeID
|
2018-02-23 01:38:44 +00:00
|
|
|
allocs[i].DesiredTransition.Migrate = helper.BoolToPtr(true)
|
2017-06-01 22:16:24 +00:00
|
|
|
n.Drain = true
|
|
|
|
tainted[n.ID] = n
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
reconciler := NewAllocReconciler(testLogger(), allocUpdateFnIgnore, false, job.ID, job, nil, allocs, tainted)
|
|
|
|
r := reconciler.Compute()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Assert the correct results
|
|
|
|
assertResults(t, r, &resultExpectation{
|
|
|
|
createDeployment: nil,
|
2017-06-02 23:11:29 +00:00
|
|
|
deploymentUpdates: nil,
|
2017-06-01 22:16:24 +00:00
|
|
|
place: 1,
|
|
|
|
inplace: 0,
|
|
|
|
stop: 3,
|
|
|
|
desiredTGUpdates: map[string]*structs.DesiredUpdates{
|
|
|
|
job.TaskGroups[0].Name: {
|
|
|
|
Migrate: 1,
|
|
|
|
Stop: 2,
|
|
|
|
Ignore: 7,
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assertNamesHaveIndexes(t, intRange(0, 2), stopResultsToNames(r.stop))
|
|
|
|
assertNamesHaveIndexes(t, intRange(0, 0), placeResultsToNames(r.place))
|
2017-06-02 23:11:29 +00:00
|
|
|
assertPlaceResultsHavePreviousAllocs(t, 1, r.place)
|
2018-01-19 19:21:50 +00:00
|
|
|
// These should not have the reschedule field set
|
|
|
|
assertPlacementsAreRescheduled(t, 0, r.place)
|
2017-06-01 22:16:24 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Tests the reconciler properly handles a task group being removed
|
|
|
|
func TestReconciler_RemovedTG(t *testing.T) {
|
|
|
|
job := mock.Job()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Create 10 allocations for a tg that no longer exists
|
|
|
|
var allocs []*structs.Allocation
|
|
|
|
for i := 0; i < 10; i++ {
|
|
|
|
alloc := mock.Alloc()
|
|
|
|
alloc.Job = job
|
|
|
|
alloc.JobID = job.ID
|
2017-09-29 16:58:48 +00:00
|
|
|
alloc.NodeID = uuid.Generate()
|
2017-06-01 22:16:24 +00:00
|
|
|
alloc.Name = structs.AllocName(job.ID, job.TaskGroups[0].Name, uint(i))
|
|
|
|
allocs = append(allocs, alloc)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
oldName := job.TaskGroups[0].Name
|
|
|
|
newName := "different"
|
|
|
|
job.TaskGroups[0].Name = newName
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
reconciler := NewAllocReconciler(testLogger(), allocUpdateFnIgnore, false, job.ID, job, nil, allocs, nil)
|
|
|
|
r := reconciler.Compute()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Assert the correct results
|
|
|
|
assertResults(t, r, &resultExpectation{
|
|
|
|
createDeployment: nil,
|
2017-06-02 23:11:29 +00:00
|
|
|
deploymentUpdates: nil,
|
2017-06-01 22:16:24 +00:00
|
|
|
place: 10,
|
|
|
|
inplace: 0,
|
|
|
|
stop: 10,
|
|
|
|
desiredTGUpdates: map[string]*structs.DesiredUpdates{
|
|
|
|
oldName: {
|
|
|
|
Stop: 10,
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
newName: {
|
|
|
|
Place: 10,
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assertNamesHaveIndexes(t, intRange(0, 9), stopResultsToNames(r.stop))
|
|
|
|
assertNamesHaveIndexes(t, intRange(0, 9), placeResultsToNames(r.place))
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Tests the reconciler properly handles a job in stopped states
|
|
|
|
func TestReconciler_JobStopped(t *testing.T) {
|
|
|
|
job := mock.Job()
|
|
|
|
job.Stop = true
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
cases := []struct {
|
|
|
|
name string
|
|
|
|
job *structs.Job
|
|
|
|
jobID, taskGroup string
|
|
|
|
}{
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
name: "stopped job",
|
|
|
|
job: job,
|
|
|
|
jobID: job.ID,
|
|
|
|
taskGroup: job.TaskGroups[0].Name,
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
name: "nil job",
|
|
|
|
job: nil,
|
|
|
|
jobID: "foo",
|
|
|
|
taskGroup: "bar",
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for _, c := range cases {
|
|
|
|
t.Run(c.name, func(t *testing.T) {
|
2017-06-02 23:11:29 +00:00
|
|
|
// Create 10 allocations
|
2017-06-01 22:16:24 +00:00
|
|
|
var allocs []*structs.Allocation
|
|
|
|
for i := 0; i < 10; i++ {
|
|
|
|
alloc := mock.Alloc()
|
|
|
|
alloc.Job = c.job
|
|
|
|
alloc.JobID = c.jobID
|
2017-09-29 16:58:48 +00:00
|
|
|
alloc.NodeID = uuid.Generate()
|
2017-06-01 22:16:24 +00:00
|
|
|
alloc.Name = structs.AllocName(c.jobID, c.taskGroup, uint(i))
|
|
|
|
alloc.TaskGroup = c.taskGroup
|
|
|
|
allocs = append(allocs, alloc)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
reconciler := NewAllocReconciler(testLogger(), allocUpdateFnIgnore, false, c.jobID, c.job, nil, allocs, nil)
|
|
|
|
r := reconciler.Compute()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Assert the correct results
|
|
|
|
assertResults(t, r, &resultExpectation{
|
|
|
|
createDeployment: nil,
|
2017-06-02 23:11:29 +00:00
|
|
|
deploymentUpdates: nil,
|
2017-06-01 22:16:24 +00:00
|
|
|
place: 0,
|
|
|
|
inplace: 0,
|
|
|
|
stop: 10,
|
|
|
|
desiredTGUpdates: map[string]*structs.DesiredUpdates{
|
|
|
|
c.taskGroup: {
|
|
|
|
Stop: 10,
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assertNamesHaveIndexes(t, intRange(0, 9), stopResultsToNames(r.stop))
|
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Tests the reconciler properly handles jobs with multiple task groups
|
|
|
|
func TestReconciler_MultiTG(t *testing.T) {
|
|
|
|
job := mock.Job()
|
|
|
|
tg2 := job.TaskGroups[0].Copy()
|
|
|
|
tg2.Name = "foo"
|
|
|
|
job.TaskGroups = append(job.TaskGroups, tg2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Create 2 existing allocations for the first tg
|
|
|
|
var allocs []*structs.Allocation
|
|
|
|
for i := 0; i < 2; i++ {
|
|
|
|
alloc := mock.Alloc()
|
|
|
|
alloc.Job = job
|
|
|
|
alloc.JobID = job.ID
|
2017-09-29 16:58:48 +00:00
|
|
|
alloc.NodeID = uuid.Generate()
|
2017-06-01 22:16:24 +00:00
|
|
|
alloc.Name = structs.AllocName(job.ID, job.TaskGroups[0].Name, uint(i))
|
|
|
|
allocs = append(allocs, alloc)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
reconciler := NewAllocReconciler(testLogger(), allocUpdateFnIgnore, false, job.ID, job, nil, allocs, nil)
|
|
|
|
r := reconciler.Compute()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Assert the correct results
|
|
|
|
assertResults(t, r, &resultExpectation{
|
|
|
|
createDeployment: nil,
|
2017-06-02 23:11:29 +00:00
|
|
|
deploymentUpdates: nil,
|
2017-06-01 22:16:24 +00:00
|
|
|
place: 18,
|
|
|
|
inplace: 0,
|
|
|
|
stop: 0,
|
|
|
|
desiredTGUpdates: map[string]*structs.DesiredUpdates{
|
|
|
|
job.TaskGroups[0].Name: {
|
|
|
|
Place: 8,
|
|
|
|
Ignore: 2,
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
tg2.Name: {
|
|
|
|
Place: 10,
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assertNamesHaveIndexes(t, intRange(2, 9, 0, 9), placeResultsToNames(r.place))
|
|
|
|
}
|
2017-06-02 23:11:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2018-03-02 00:23:44 +00:00
|
|
|
// Tests delayed rescheduling of failed batch allocations
|
|
|
|
func TestReconciler_RescheduleLater_Batch(t *testing.T) {
|
|
|
|
require := require.New(t)
|
2018-01-19 23:13:11 +00:00
|
|
|
// Set desired 4
|
2018-01-19 17:58:59 +00:00
|
|
|
job := mock.Job()
|
2018-01-19 23:13:11 +00:00
|
|
|
job.TaskGroups[0].Count = 4
|
2018-03-02 00:23:44 +00:00
|
|
|
now := time.Now()
|
|
|
|
// Set up reschedule policy
|
|
|
|
delayDur := 15 * time.Second
|
|
|
|
job.TaskGroups[0].ReschedulePolicy = &structs.ReschedulePolicy{Attempts: 3, Interval: 24 * time.Hour, Delay: delayDur, DelayFunction: "linear"}
|
|
|
|
tgName := job.TaskGroups[0].Name
|
|
|
|
// Create 6 existing allocations - 2 running, 1 complete and 3 failed
|
|
|
|
var allocs []*structs.Allocation
|
|
|
|
for i := 0; i < 6; i++ {
|
|
|
|
alloc := mock.Alloc()
|
|
|
|
alloc.Job = job
|
|
|
|
alloc.JobID = job.ID
|
|
|
|
alloc.NodeID = uuid.Generate()
|
|
|
|
alloc.Name = structs.AllocName(job.ID, job.TaskGroups[0].Name, uint(i))
|
|
|
|
allocs = append(allocs, alloc)
|
|
|
|
alloc.ClientStatus = structs.AllocClientStatusRunning
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Mark 3 as failed with restart tracking info
|
|
|
|
allocs[0].ClientStatus = structs.AllocClientStatusFailed
|
|
|
|
allocs[0].NextAllocation = allocs[1].ID
|
|
|
|
allocs[1].ClientStatus = structs.AllocClientStatusFailed
|
|
|
|
allocs[1].RescheduleTracker = &structs.RescheduleTracker{Events: []*structs.RescheduleEvent{
|
|
|
|
{RescheduleTime: time.Now().Add(-1 * time.Hour).UTC().UnixNano(),
|
|
|
|
PrevAllocID: allocs[0].ID,
|
|
|
|
PrevNodeID: uuid.Generate(),
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
}}
|
|
|
|
allocs[1].NextAllocation = allocs[2].ID
|
|
|
|
allocs[2].ClientStatus = structs.AllocClientStatusFailed
|
|
|
|
allocs[2].TaskStates = map[string]*structs.TaskState{tgName: {State: "start",
|
|
|
|
StartedAt: now.Add(-1 * time.Hour),
|
|
|
|
FinishedAt: now}}
|
|
|
|
allocs[2].RescheduleTracker = &structs.RescheduleTracker{Events: []*structs.RescheduleEvent{
|
|
|
|
{RescheduleTime: time.Now().Add(-2 * time.Hour).UTC().UnixNano(),
|
|
|
|
PrevAllocID: allocs[0].ID,
|
|
|
|
PrevNodeID: uuid.Generate(),
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
{RescheduleTime: time.Now().Add(-1 * time.Hour).UTC().UnixNano(),
|
|
|
|
PrevAllocID: allocs[1].ID,
|
|
|
|
PrevNodeID: uuid.Generate(),
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
}}
|
|
|
|
// Mark one as complete
|
|
|
|
allocs[5].ClientStatus = structs.AllocClientStatusComplete
|
2018-01-19 17:58:59 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2018-03-02 00:23:44 +00:00
|
|
|
reconciler := NewAllocReconciler(testLogger(), allocUpdateFnIgnore, true, job.ID, job, nil, allocs, nil)
|
|
|
|
r := reconciler.Compute()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Two reschedule attempts were already made, one more can be made at a future time
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Verify that the follow up eval has the expected waitUntil time
|
|
|
|
evals := r.desiredFollowupEvals[tgName]
|
|
|
|
require.NotNil(evals)
|
|
|
|
require.Equal(1, len(evals))
|
|
|
|
require.Equal(now.Add(delayDur), evals[0].WaitUntil)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Alloc 5 should not be replaced because it is terminal
|
|
|
|
assertResults(t, r, &resultExpectation{
|
|
|
|
createDeployment: nil,
|
|
|
|
deploymentUpdates: nil,
|
|
|
|
place: 0,
|
|
|
|
inplace: 1,
|
|
|
|
stop: 0,
|
|
|
|
desiredTGUpdates: map[string]*structs.DesiredUpdates{
|
|
|
|
job.TaskGroups[0].Name: {
|
|
|
|
Place: 0,
|
|
|
|
InPlaceUpdate: 1,
|
|
|
|
Ignore: 3,
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
assertNamesHaveIndexes(t, intRange(2, 2), allocsToNames(r.inplaceUpdate))
|
|
|
|
// verify that the followup evalID field is set correctly
|
|
|
|
r.inplaceUpdate[0].EvalID = evals[0].ID
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Tests delayed rescheduling of failed batch allocations and batching of allocs
|
|
|
|
// with fail times that are close together
|
|
|
|
func TestReconciler_RescheduleLaterWithBatchedEvals_Batch(t *testing.T) {
|
|
|
|
require := require.New(t)
|
|
|
|
// Set desired 4
|
|
|
|
job := mock.Job()
|
|
|
|
job.TaskGroups[0].Count = 10
|
|
|
|
now := time.Now()
|
2018-01-19 17:58:59 +00:00
|
|
|
// Set up reschedule policy
|
2018-03-02 00:23:44 +00:00
|
|
|
delayDur := 15 * time.Second
|
|
|
|
job.TaskGroups[0].ReschedulePolicy = &structs.ReschedulePolicy{Attempts: 3, Interval: 24 * time.Hour, Delay: delayDur, DelayFunction: "linear"}
|
|
|
|
tgName := job.TaskGroups[0].Name
|
|
|
|
// Create 10 existing allocations
|
|
|
|
var allocs []*structs.Allocation
|
|
|
|
for i := 0; i < 10; i++ {
|
|
|
|
alloc := mock.Alloc()
|
|
|
|
alloc.Job = job
|
|
|
|
alloc.JobID = job.ID
|
|
|
|
alloc.NodeID = uuid.Generate()
|
|
|
|
alloc.Name = structs.AllocName(job.ID, job.TaskGroups[0].Name, uint(i))
|
|
|
|
allocs = append(allocs, alloc)
|
|
|
|
alloc.ClientStatus = structs.AllocClientStatusRunning
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Mark 5 as failed with fail times very close together
|
|
|
|
for i := 0; i < 5; i++ {
|
|
|
|
allocs[i].ClientStatus = structs.AllocClientStatusFailed
|
|
|
|
allocs[i].TaskStates = map[string]*structs.TaskState{tgName: {State: "start",
|
|
|
|
StartedAt: now.Add(-1 * time.Hour),
|
|
|
|
FinishedAt: now.Add(time.Duration(50*i) * time.Millisecond)}}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Mark two more as failed several seconds later
|
|
|
|
for i := 5; i < 7; i++ {
|
|
|
|
allocs[i].ClientStatus = structs.AllocClientStatusFailed
|
|
|
|
allocs[i].TaskStates = map[string]*structs.TaskState{tgName: {State: "start",
|
|
|
|
StartedAt: now.Add(-1 * time.Hour),
|
|
|
|
FinishedAt: now.Add(10 * time.Second)}}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
reconciler := NewAllocReconciler(testLogger(), allocUpdateFnIgnore, true, job.ID, job, nil, allocs, nil)
|
|
|
|
r := reconciler.Compute()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Verify that two follow up evals were created
|
|
|
|
evals := r.desiredFollowupEvals[tgName]
|
|
|
|
require.NotNil(evals)
|
|
|
|
require.Equal(2, len(evals))
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Verify expected WaitUntil values for both batched evals
|
|
|
|
require.Equal(now.Add(delayDur), evals[0].WaitUntil)
|
|
|
|
secondBatchDuration := delayDur + 10*time.Second
|
|
|
|
require.Equal(now.Add(secondBatchDuration), evals[1].WaitUntil)
|
2018-01-19 17:58:59 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2018-03-02 00:23:44 +00:00
|
|
|
// Alloc 5 should not be replaced because it is terminal
|
|
|
|
assertResults(t, r, &resultExpectation{
|
|
|
|
createDeployment: nil,
|
|
|
|
deploymentUpdates: nil,
|
|
|
|
place: 0,
|
|
|
|
inplace: 7,
|
|
|
|
stop: 0,
|
|
|
|
desiredTGUpdates: map[string]*structs.DesiredUpdates{
|
|
|
|
job.TaskGroups[0].Name: {
|
|
|
|
Place: 0,
|
|
|
|
InPlaceUpdate: 7,
|
|
|
|
Ignore: 3,
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
assertNamesHaveIndexes(t, intRange(0, 6), allocsToNames(r.inplaceUpdate))
|
|
|
|
// verify that the followup evalID field is set correctly
|
|
|
|
for _, alloc := range r.inplaceUpdate {
|
|
|
|
if allocNameToIndex(alloc.Name) < 5 {
|
|
|
|
require.Equal(evals[0].ID, alloc.FollowupEvalID)
|
|
|
|
} else if allocNameToIndex(alloc.Name) < 7 {
|
|
|
|
require.Equal(evals[1].ID, alloc.FollowupEvalID)
|
|
|
|
} else {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("Unexpected alloc name in Inplace results %v", alloc.Name)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Tests rescheduling failed batch allocations
|
|
|
|
func TestReconciler_RescheduleNow_Batch(t *testing.T) {
|
|
|
|
require := require.New(t)
|
|
|
|
// Set desired 4
|
|
|
|
job := mock.Job()
|
|
|
|
job.TaskGroups[0].Count = 4
|
|
|
|
now := time.Now()
|
|
|
|
// Set up reschedule policy
|
|
|
|
job.TaskGroups[0].ReschedulePolicy = &structs.ReschedulePolicy{Attempts: 3, Interval: 24 * time.Hour, Delay: 5 * time.Second, DelayFunction: "linear"}
|
|
|
|
tgName := job.TaskGroups[0].Name
|
2018-01-19 23:13:11 +00:00
|
|
|
// Create 6 existing allocations - 2 running, 1 complete and 3 failed
|
2018-01-19 17:58:59 +00:00
|
|
|
var allocs []*structs.Allocation
|
2018-01-19 23:13:11 +00:00
|
|
|
for i := 0; i < 6; i++ {
|
2018-01-19 17:58:59 +00:00
|
|
|
alloc := mock.Alloc()
|
|
|
|
alloc.Job = job
|
|
|
|
alloc.JobID = job.ID
|
|
|
|
alloc.NodeID = uuid.Generate()
|
|
|
|
alloc.Name = structs.AllocName(job.ID, job.TaskGroups[0].Name, uint(i))
|
|
|
|
allocs = append(allocs, alloc)
|
|
|
|
alloc.ClientStatus = structs.AllocClientStatusRunning
|
|
|
|
}
|
2018-01-19 23:13:11 +00:00
|
|
|
// Mark 3 as failed with restart tracking info
|
2018-01-19 17:58:59 +00:00
|
|
|
allocs[0].ClientStatus = structs.AllocClientStatusFailed
|
2018-02-19 12:53:14 +00:00
|
|
|
allocs[0].NextAllocation = allocs[1].ID
|
2018-01-19 23:13:11 +00:00
|
|
|
allocs[1].ClientStatus = structs.AllocClientStatusFailed
|
|
|
|
allocs[1].RescheduleTracker = &structs.RescheduleTracker{Events: []*structs.RescheduleEvent{
|
|
|
|
{RescheduleTime: time.Now().Add(-1 * time.Hour).UTC().UnixNano(),
|
|
|
|
PrevAllocID: allocs[0].ID,
|
|
|
|
PrevNodeID: uuid.Generate(),
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
}}
|
2018-02-19 12:53:14 +00:00
|
|
|
allocs[1].NextAllocation = allocs[2].ID
|
2018-01-19 23:13:11 +00:00
|
|
|
allocs[2].ClientStatus = structs.AllocClientStatusFailed
|
2018-03-02 00:23:44 +00:00
|
|
|
allocs[2].TaskStates = map[string]*structs.TaskState{tgName: {State: "start",
|
|
|
|
StartedAt: now.Add(-1 * time.Hour),
|
|
|
|
FinishedAt: now.Add(-10 * time.Second)}}
|
2018-01-19 23:13:11 +00:00
|
|
|
allocs[2].RescheduleTracker = &structs.RescheduleTracker{Events: []*structs.RescheduleEvent{
|
|
|
|
{RescheduleTime: time.Now().Add(-2 * time.Hour).UTC().UnixNano(),
|
|
|
|
PrevAllocID: allocs[0].ID,
|
|
|
|
PrevNodeID: uuid.Generate(),
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
{RescheduleTime: time.Now().Add(-1 * time.Hour).UTC().UnixNano(),
|
|
|
|
PrevAllocID: allocs[1].ID,
|
|
|
|
PrevNodeID: uuid.Generate(),
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
}}
|
2018-01-19 17:58:59 +00:00
|
|
|
// Mark one as complete
|
2018-01-19 23:13:11 +00:00
|
|
|
allocs[5].ClientStatus = structs.AllocClientStatusComplete
|
2018-01-19 17:58:59 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2018-01-19 21:20:00 +00:00
|
|
|
reconciler := NewAllocReconciler(testLogger(), allocUpdateFnIgnore, true, job.ID, job, nil, allocs, nil)
|
2018-01-19 17:58:59 +00:00
|
|
|
r := reconciler.Compute()
|
|
|
|
|
2018-03-02 00:23:44 +00:00
|
|
|
// Verify that no follow up evals were created
|
|
|
|
evals := r.desiredFollowupEvals[tgName]
|
|
|
|
require.Nil(evals)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Two reschedule attempts were made, one more can be made now
|
2018-01-19 23:13:11 +00:00
|
|
|
// Alloc 5 should not be replaced because it is terminal
|
2018-01-19 17:58:59 +00:00
|
|
|
assertResults(t, r, &resultExpectation{
|
|
|
|
createDeployment: nil,
|
|
|
|
deploymentUpdates: nil,
|
|
|
|
place: 1,
|
|
|
|
inplace: 0,
|
|
|
|
stop: 0,
|
|
|
|
desiredTGUpdates: map[string]*structs.DesiredUpdates{
|
|
|
|
job.TaskGroups[0].Name: {
|
|
|
|
Place: 1,
|
2018-01-19 23:13:11 +00:00
|
|
|
Ignore: 3,
|
2018-01-19 17:58:59 +00:00
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
})
|
2018-03-02 00:23:44 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2018-01-19 23:13:11 +00:00
|
|
|
assertNamesHaveIndexes(t, intRange(2, 2), placeResultsToNames(r.place))
|
2018-01-19 17:58:59 +00:00
|
|
|
assertPlaceResultsHavePreviousAllocs(t, 1, r.place)
|
2018-01-19 19:21:50 +00:00
|
|
|
assertPlacementsAreRescheduled(t, 1, r.place)
|
2018-03-02 00:23:44 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2018-01-19 17:58:59 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Tests rescheduling failed service allocations with desired state stop
|
2018-03-02 00:23:44 +00:00
|
|
|
func TestReconciler_RescheduleLater_Service(t *testing.T) {
|
|
|
|
require := require.New(t)
|
2018-01-19 17:58:59 +00:00
|
|
|
// Set desired 5
|
|
|
|
job := mock.Job()
|
|
|
|
job.TaskGroups[0].Count = 5
|
2018-03-02 00:23:44 +00:00
|
|
|
tgName := job.TaskGroups[0].Name
|
|
|
|
now := time.Now()
|
2018-01-19 17:58:59 +00:00
|
|
|
// Set up reschedule policy
|
2018-03-02 00:23:44 +00:00
|
|
|
delayDur := 15 * time.Second
|
2018-03-13 15:06:26 +00:00
|
|
|
job.TaskGroups[0].ReschedulePolicy = &structs.ReschedulePolicy{Attempts: 1, Interval: 24 * time.Hour, Delay: delayDur, MaxDelay: 1 * time.Hour}
|
2018-01-19 17:58:59 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Create 5 existing allocations
|
|
|
|
var allocs []*structs.Allocation
|
|
|
|
for i := 0; i < 5; i++ {
|
|
|
|
alloc := mock.Alloc()
|
|
|
|
alloc.Job = job
|
|
|
|
alloc.JobID = job.ID
|
|
|
|
alloc.NodeID = uuid.Generate()
|
|
|
|
alloc.Name = structs.AllocName(job.ID, job.TaskGroups[0].Name, uint(i))
|
|
|
|
allocs = append(allocs, alloc)
|
|
|
|
alloc.ClientStatus = structs.AllocClientStatusRunning
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Mark two as failed
|
|
|
|
allocs[0].ClientStatus = structs.AllocClientStatusFailed
|
2018-03-02 00:23:44 +00:00
|
|
|
// Mark one of them as already rescheduled once
|
|
|
|
allocs[0].RescheduleTracker = &structs.RescheduleTracker{Events: []*structs.RescheduleEvent{
|
|
|
|
{RescheduleTime: time.Now().Add(-1 * time.Hour).UTC().UnixNano(),
|
|
|
|
PrevAllocID: uuid.Generate(),
|
|
|
|
PrevNodeID: uuid.Generate(),
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
}}
|
|
|
|
allocs[1].TaskStates = map[string]*structs.TaskState{tgName: {State: "start",
|
|
|
|
StartedAt: now.Add(-1 * time.Hour),
|
|
|
|
FinishedAt: now}}
|
2018-01-19 17:58:59 +00:00
|
|
|
allocs[1].ClientStatus = structs.AllocClientStatusFailed
|
|
|
|
|
2018-03-02 00:23:44 +00:00
|
|
|
// Mark one as desired state stop
|
|
|
|
allocs[4].DesiredStatus = structs.AllocDesiredStatusStop
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
reconciler := NewAllocReconciler(testLogger(), allocUpdateFnIgnore, false, job.ID, job, nil, allocs, nil)
|
|
|
|
r := reconciler.Compute()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Should place a new placement and create a follow up eval for the delayed reschedule
|
|
|
|
// Verify that the follow up eval has the expected waitUntil time
|
|
|
|
evals := r.desiredFollowupEvals[tgName]
|
|
|
|
require.NotNil(evals)
|
|
|
|
require.Equal(1, len(evals))
|
|
|
|
require.Equal(now.Add(delayDur), evals[0].WaitUntil)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assertResults(t, r, &resultExpectation{
|
|
|
|
createDeployment: nil,
|
|
|
|
deploymentUpdates: nil,
|
|
|
|
place: 1,
|
|
|
|
inplace: 1,
|
|
|
|
stop: 0,
|
|
|
|
desiredTGUpdates: map[string]*structs.DesiredUpdates{
|
|
|
|
job.TaskGroups[0].Name: {
|
|
|
|
Place: 1,
|
|
|
|
InPlaceUpdate: 1,
|
|
|
|
Ignore: 3,
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assertNamesHaveIndexes(t, intRange(4, 4), placeResultsToNames(r.place))
|
|
|
|
assertNamesHaveIndexes(t, intRange(1, 1), allocsToNames(r.inplaceUpdate))
|
|
|
|
// verify that the followup evalID field is set correctly
|
|
|
|
r.inplaceUpdate[0].EvalID = evals[0].ID
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Tests rescheduling failed service allocations with desired state stop
|
|
|
|
func TestReconciler_RescheduleNow_Service(t *testing.T) {
|
|
|
|
require := require.New(t)
|
|
|
|
// Set desired 5
|
|
|
|
job := mock.Job()
|
|
|
|
job.TaskGroups[0].Count = 5
|
|
|
|
tgName := job.TaskGroups[0].Name
|
|
|
|
now := time.Now()
|
|
|
|
// Set up reschedule policy
|
2018-03-13 15:06:26 +00:00
|
|
|
job.TaskGroups[0].ReschedulePolicy = &structs.ReschedulePolicy{Attempts: 1, Interval: 24 * time.Hour, Delay: 5 * time.Second, MaxDelay: 1 * time.Hour}
|
2018-03-02 00:23:44 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Create 5 existing allocations
|
|
|
|
var allocs []*structs.Allocation
|
|
|
|
for i := 0; i < 5; i++ {
|
|
|
|
alloc := mock.Alloc()
|
|
|
|
alloc.Job = job
|
|
|
|
alloc.JobID = job.ID
|
|
|
|
alloc.NodeID = uuid.Generate()
|
|
|
|
alloc.Name = structs.AllocName(job.ID, job.TaskGroups[0].Name, uint(i))
|
|
|
|
allocs = append(allocs, alloc)
|
|
|
|
alloc.ClientStatus = structs.AllocClientStatusRunning
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Mark two as failed
|
|
|
|
allocs[0].ClientStatus = structs.AllocClientStatusFailed
|
2018-01-19 21:20:00 +00:00
|
|
|
// Mark one of them as already rescheduled once
|
2018-03-02 00:23:44 +00:00
|
|
|
allocs[0].RescheduleTracker = &structs.RescheduleTracker{Events: []*structs.RescheduleEvent{
|
2018-01-19 21:20:00 +00:00
|
|
|
{RescheduleTime: time.Now().Add(-1 * time.Hour).UTC().UnixNano(),
|
|
|
|
PrevAllocID: uuid.Generate(),
|
|
|
|
PrevNodeID: uuid.Generate(),
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
}}
|
2018-03-02 00:23:44 +00:00
|
|
|
allocs[1].TaskStates = map[string]*structs.TaskState{tgName: {State: "start",
|
|
|
|
StartedAt: now.Add(-1 * time.Hour),
|
|
|
|
FinishedAt: now.Add(-10 * time.Second)}}
|
|
|
|
allocs[1].ClientStatus = structs.AllocClientStatusFailed
|
2018-01-19 21:20:00 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2018-01-19 17:58:59 +00:00
|
|
|
// Mark one as desired state stop
|
|
|
|
allocs[4].DesiredStatus = structs.AllocDesiredStatusStop
|
|
|
|
|
2018-01-19 21:20:00 +00:00
|
|
|
reconciler := NewAllocReconciler(testLogger(), allocUpdateFnIgnore, false, job.ID, job, nil, allocs, nil)
|
2018-01-19 17:58:59 +00:00
|
|
|
r := reconciler.Compute()
|
|
|
|
|
2018-03-02 00:23:44 +00:00
|
|
|
// Verify that no follow up evals were created
|
|
|
|
evals := r.desiredFollowupEvals[tgName]
|
|
|
|
require.Nil(evals)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Verify that one rescheduled alloc and one replacement for terminal alloc were placed
|
2018-01-19 17:58:59 +00:00
|
|
|
assertResults(t, r, &resultExpectation{
|
|
|
|
createDeployment: nil,
|
|
|
|
deploymentUpdates: nil,
|
2018-01-19 21:20:00 +00:00
|
|
|
place: 2,
|
2018-01-19 17:58:59 +00:00
|
|
|
inplace: 0,
|
|
|
|
stop: 0,
|
|
|
|
desiredTGUpdates: map[string]*structs.DesiredUpdates{
|
|
|
|
job.TaskGroups[0].Name: {
|
2018-01-19 21:20:00 +00:00
|
|
|
Place: 2,
|
|
|
|
Ignore: 3,
|
2018-01-19 17:58:59 +00:00
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
|
2018-03-02 00:23:44 +00:00
|
|
|
assertNamesHaveIndexes(t, intRange(1, 1, 4, 4), placeResultsToNames(r.place))
|
|
|
|
// Rescheduled allocs should have previous allocs
|
2018-01-19 21:20:00 +00:00
|
|
|
assertPlaceResultsHavePreviousAllocs(t, 1, r.place)
|
|
|
|
assertPlacementsAreRescheduled(t, 1, r.place)
|
2018-01-19 17:58:59 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2018-02-19 12:53:14 +00:00
|
|
|
// Tests failed service allocations that were already rescheduled won't be rescheduled again
|
|
|
|
func TestReconciler_DontReschedule_PreviouslyRescheduled(t *testing.T) {
|
|
|
|
// Set desired 5
|
|
|
|
job := mock.Job()
|
|
|
|
job.TaskGroups[0].Count = 5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Set up reschedule policy
|
|
|
|
job.TaskGroups[0].ReschedulePolicy = &structs.ReschedulePolicy{Attempts: 5, Interval: 24 * time.Hour}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Create 7 existing allocations
|
|
|
|
var allocs []*structs.Allocation
|
|
|
|
for i := 0; i < 7; i++ {
|
|
|
|
alloc := mock.Alloc()
|
|
|
|
alloc.Job = job
|
|
|
|
alloc.JobID = job.ID
|
|
|
|
alloc.NodeID = uuid.Generate()
|
|
|
|
alloc.Name = structs.AllocName(job.ID, job.TaskGroups[0].Name, uint(i))
|
|
|
|
allocs = append(allocs, alloc)
|
|
|
|
alloc.ClientStatus = structs.AllocClientStatusRunning
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Mark two as failed and rescheduled
|
|
|
|
allocs[0].ClientStatus = structs.AllocClientStatusFailed
|
|
|
|
allocs[0].ID = allocs[1].ID
|
|
|
|
allocs[1].ClientStatus = structs.AllocClientStatusFailed
|
|
|
|
allocs[1].RescheduleTracker = &structs.RescheduleTracker{Events: []*structs.RescheduleEvent{
|
|
|
|
{RescheduleTime: time.Now().Add(-1 * time.Hour).UTC().UnixNano(),
|
|
|
|
PrevAllocID: uuid.Generate(),
|
|
|
|
PrevNodeID: uuid.Generate(),
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
}}
|
|
|
|
allocs[1].NextAllocation = allocs[2].ID
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Mark one as desired state stop
|
|
|
|
allocs[4].DesiredStatus = structs.AllocDesiredStatusStop
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
reconciler := NewAllocReconciler(testLogger(), allocUpdateFnIgnore, false, job.ID, job, nil, allocs, nil)
|
|
|
|
r := reconciler.Compute()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Should place 1 - one is a new placement to make up the desired count of 5
|
|
|
|
// failing allocs are not rescheduled
|
|
|
|
assertResults(t, r, &resultExpectation{
|
|
|
|
createDeployment: nil,
|
|
|
|
deploymentUpdates: nil,
|
|
|
|
place: 1,
|
|
|
|
inplace: 0,
|
|
|
|
stop: 0,
|
|
|
|
desiredTGUpdates: map[string]*structs.DesiredUpdates{
|
|
|
|
job.TaskGroups[0].Name: {
|
|
|
|
Place: 1,
|
|
|
|
Ignore: 4,
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// name index 0 is used for the replacement because its
|
|
|
|
assertNamesHaveIndexes(t, intRange(0, 0), placeResultsToNames(r.place))
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2017-06-02 23:11:29 +00:00
|
|
|
// Tests the reconciler cancels an old deployment when the job is being stopped
|
|
|
|
func TestReconciler_CancelDeployment_JobStop(t *testing.T) {
|
|
|
|
job := mock.Job()
|
|
|
|
job.Stop = true
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
running := structs.NewDeployment(job)
|
|
|
|
failed := structs.NewDeployment(job)
|
|
|
|
failed.Status = structs.DeploymentStatusFailed
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
cases := []struct {
|
|
|
|
name string
|
|
|
|
job *structs.Job
|
|
|
|
jobID, taskGroup string
|
|
|
|
deployment *structs.Deployment
|
|
|
|
cancel bool
|
|
|
|
}{
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
name: "stopped job, running deployment",
|
|
|
|
job: job,
|
|
|
|
jobID: job.ID,
|
|
|
|
taskGroup: job.TaskGroups[0].Name,
|
|
|
|
deployment: running,
|
|
|
|
cancel: true,
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
name: "nil job, running deployment",
|
|
|
|
job: nil,
|
|
|
|
jobID: "foo",
|
|
|
|
taskGroup: "bar",
|
|
|
|
deployment: running,
|
|
|
|
cancel: true,
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
name: "stopped job, failed deployment",
|
|
|
|
job: job,
|
|
|
|
jobID: job.ID,
|
|
|
|
taskGroup: job.TaskGroups[0].Name,
|
|
|
|
deployment: failed,
|
|
|
|
cancel: false,
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
name: "nil job, failed deployment",
|
|
|
|
job: nil,
|
|
|
|
jobID: "foo",
|
|
|
|
taskGroup: "bar",
|
|
|
|
deployment: failed,
|
|
|
|
cancel: false,
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for _, c := range cases {
|
|
|
|
t.Run(c.name, func(t *testing.T) {
|
|
|
|
// Create 10 allocations
|
|
|
|
var allocs []*structs.Allocation
|
|
|
|
for i := 0; i < 10; i++ {
|
|
|
|
alloc := mock.Alloc()
|
|
|
|
alloc.Job = c.job
|
|
|
|
alloc.JobID = c.jobID
|
2017-09-29 16:58:48 +00:00
|
|
|
alloc.NodeID = uuid.Generate()
|
2017-06-02 23:11:29 +00:00
|
|
|
alloc.Name = structs.AllocName(c.jobID, c.taskGroup, uint(i))
|
|
|
|
alloc.TaskGroup = c.taskGroup
|
|
|
|
allocs = append(allocs, alloc)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
reconciler := NewAllocReconciler(testLogger(), allocUpdateFnIgnore, false, c.jobID, c.job, c.deployment, allocs, nil)
|
|
|
|
r := reconciler.Compute()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
var updates []*structs.DeploymentStatusUpdate
|
|
|
|
if c.cancel {
|
|
|
|
updates = []*structs.DeploymentStatusUpdate{
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
DeploymentID: c.deployment.ID,
|
|
|
|
Status: structs.DeploymentStatusCancelled,
|
|
|
|
StatusDescription: structs.DeploymentStatusDescriptionStoppedJob,
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Assert the correct results
|
|
|
|
assertResults(t, r, &resultExpectation{
|
|
|
|
createDeployment: nil,
|
|
|
|
deploymentUpdates: updates,
|
|
|
|
place: 0,
|
|
|
|
inplace: 0,
|
|
|
|
stop: 10,
|
|
|
|
desiredTGUpdates: map[string]*structs.DesiredUpdates{
|
|
|
|
c.taskGroup: {
|
|
|
|
Stop: 10,
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assertNamesHaveIndexes(t, intRange(0, 9), stopResultsToNames(r.stop))
|
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Tests the reconciler cancels an old deployment when the job is updated
|
|
|
|
func TestReconciler_CancelDeployment_JobUpdate(t *testing.T) {
|
|
|
|
// Create a base job
|
|
|
|
job := mock.Job()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Create two deployments
|
|
|
|
running := structs.NewDeployment(job)
|
|
|
|
failed := structs.NewDeployment(job)
|
|
|
|
failed.Status = structs.DeploymentStatusFailed
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Make the job newer than the deployment
|
2017-07-07 02:55:58 +00:00
|
|
|
job.Version += 10
|
2017-06-02 23:11:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
cases := []struct {
|
|
|
|
name string
|
|
|
|
deployment *structs.Deployment
|
|
|
|
cancel bool
|
|
|
|
}{
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
name: "running deployment",
|
|
|
|
deployment: running,
|
|
|
|
cancel: true,
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
name: "failed deployment",
|
|
|
|
deployment: failed,
|
|
|
|
cancel: false,
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for _, c := range cases {
|
|
|
|
t.Run(c.name, func(t *testing.T) {
|
|
|
|
// Create 10 allocations
|
|
|
|
var allocs []*structs.Allocation
|
|
|
|
for i := 0; i < 10; i++ {
|
|
|
|
alloc := mock.Alloc()
|
|
|
|
alloc.Job = job
|
|
|
|
alloc.JobID = job.ID
|
2017-09-29 16:58:48 +00:00
|
|
|
alloc.NodeID = uuid.Generate()
|
2017-06-02 23:11:29 +00:00
|
|
|
alloc.Name = structs.AllocName(job.ID, job.TaskGroups[0].Name, uint(i))
|
|
|
|
alloc.TaskGroup = job.TaskGroups[0].Name
|
|
|
|
allocs = append(allocs, alloc)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
reconciler := NewAllocReconciler(testLogger(), allocUpdateFnIgnore, false, job.ID, job, c.deployment, allocs, nil)
|
|
|
|
r := reconciler.Compute()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
var updates []*structs.DeploymentStatusUpdate
|
|
|
|
if c.cancel {
|
|
|
|
updates = []*structs.DeploymentStatusUpdate{
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
DeploymentID: c.deployment.ID,
|
|
|
|
Status: structs.DeploymentStatusCancelled,
|
|
|
|
StatusDescription: structs.DeploymentStatusDescriptionNewerJob,
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Assert the correct results
|
|
|
|
assertResults(t, r, &resultExpectation{
|
|
|
|
createDeployment: nil,
|
|
|
|
deploymentUpdates: updates,
|
|
|
|
place: 0,
|
|
|
|
inplace: 0,
|
|
|
|
stop: 0,
|
|
|
|
desiredTGUpdates: map[string]*structs.DesiredUpdates{
|
|
|
|
job.TaskGroups[0].Name: {
|
|
|
|
Ignore: 10,
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2017-06-06 21:08:46 +00:00
|
|
|
// Tests the reconciler creates a deployment and does a rolling upgrade with
|
|
|
|
// destructive changes
|
|
|
|
func TestReconciler_CreateDeployment_RollingUpgrade_Destructive(t *testing.T) {
|
2017-06-02 23:11:29 +00:00
|
|
|
job := mock.Job()
|
|
|
|
job.TaskGroups[0].Update = noCanaryUpdate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Create 10 allocations from the old job
|
|
|
|
var allocs []*structs.Allocation
|
|
|
|
for i := 0; i < 10; i++ {
|
|
|
|
alloc := mock.Alloc()
|
|
|
|
alloc.Job = job
|
|
|
|
alloc.JobID = job.ID
|
2017-09-29 16:58:48 +00:00
|
|
|
alloc.NodeID = uuid.Generate()
|
2017-06-02 23:11:29 +00:00
|
|
|
alloc.Name = structs.AllocName(job.ID, job.TaskGroups[0].Name, uint(i))
|
|
|
|
alloc.TaskGroup = job.TaskGroups[0].Name
|
|
|
|
allocs = append(allocs, alloc)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
reconciler := NewAllocReconciler(testLogger(), allocUpdateFnDestructive, false, job.ID, job, nil, allocs, nil)
|
|
|
|
r := reconciler.Compute()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
d := structs.NewDeployment(job)
|
|
|
|
d.TaskGroups[job.TaskGroups[0].Name] = &structs.DeploymentState{
|
|
|
|
DesiredTotal: 10,
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Assert the correct results
|
|
|
|
assertResults(t, r, &resultExpectation{
|
|
|
|
createDeployment: d,
|
|
|
|
deploymentUpdates: nil,
|
2017-07-15 23:31:33 +00:00
|
|
|
destructive: 4,
|
2017-06-02 23:11:29 +00:00
|
|
|
desiredTGUpdates: map[string]*structs.DesiredUpdates{
|
|
|
|
job.TaskGroups[0].Name: {
|
|
|
|
DestructiveUpdate: 4,
|
|
|
|
Ignore: 6,
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
|
2017-07-15 23:31:33 +00:00
|
|
|
assertNamesHaveIndexes(t, intRange(0, 3), destructiveResultsToNames(r.destructiveUpdate))
|
2017-06-02 23:11:29 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2017-06-06 21:08:46 +00:00
|
|
|
// Tests the reconciler creates a deployment for inplace updates
|
|
|
|
func TestReconciler_CreateDeployment_RollingUpgrade_Inplace(t *testing.T) {
|
|
|
|
job := mock.Job()
|
|
|
|
job.TaskGroups[0].Update = noCanaryUpdate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Create 10 allocations from the old job
|
|
|
|
var allocs []*structs.Allocation
|
|
|
|
for i := 0; i < 10; i++ {
|
|
|
|
alloc := mock.Alloc()
|
|
|
|
alloc.Job = job
|
|
|
|
alloc.JobID = job.ID
|
2017-09-29 16:58:48 +00:00
|
|
|
alloc.NodeID = uuid.Generate()
|
2017-06-06 21:08:46 +00:00
|
|
|
alloc.Name = structs.AllocName(job.ID, job.TaskGroups[0].Name, uint(i))
|
|
|
|
alloc.TaskGroup = job.TaskGroups[0].Name
|
|
|
|
allocs = append(allocs, alloc)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
reconciler := NewAllocReconciler(testLogger(), allocUpdateFnInplace, false, job.ID, job, nil, allocs, nil)
|
|
|
|
r := reconciler.Compute()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
d := structs.NewDeployment(job)
|
|
|
|
d.TaskGroups[job.TaskGroups[0].Name] = &structs.DeploymentState{
|
|
|
|
DesiredTotal: 10,
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Assert the correct results
|
|
|
|
assertResults(t, r, &resultExpectation{
|
|
|
|
createDeployment: d,
|
|
|
|
deploymentUpdates: nil,
|
|
|
|
place: 0,
|
|
|
|
inplace: 10,
|
|
|
|
stop: 0,
|
|
|
|
desiredTGUpdates: map[string]*structs.DesiredUpdates{
|
|
|
|
job.TaskGroups[0].Name: {
|
|
|
|
InPlaceUpdate: 10,
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Tests the reconciler doesn't creates a deployment if there are no changes
|
|
|
|
func TestReconciler_DontCreateDeployment_NoChanges(t *testing.T) {
|
|
|
|
job := mock.Job()
|
|
|
|
job.TaskGroups[0].Update = noCanaryUpdate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Create 10 allocations from the job
|
|
|
|
var allocs []*structs.Allocation
|
|
|
|
for i := 0; i < 10; i++ {
|
|
|
|
alloc := mock.Alloc()
|
|
|
|
alloc.Job = job
|
|
|
|
alloc.JobID = job.ID
|
2017-09-29 16:58:48 +00:00
|
|
|
alloc.NodeID = uuid.Generate()
|
2017-06-06 21:08:46 +00:00
|
|
|
alloc.Name = structs.AllocName(job.ID, job.TaskGroups[0].Name, uint(i))
|
|
|
|
alloc.TaskGroup = job.TaskGroups[0].Name
|
|
|
|
allocs = append(allocs, alloc)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
reconciler := NewAllocReconciler(testLogger(), allocUpdateFnIgnore, false, job.ID, job, nil, allocs, nil)
|
|
|
|
r := reconciler.Compute()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Assert the correct results
|
|
|
|
assertResults(t, r, &resultExpectation{
|
|
|
|
createDeployment: nil,
|
|
|
|
deploymentUpdates: nil,
|
|
|
|
place: 0,
|
|
|
|
inplace: 0,
|
|
|
|
stop: 0,
|
|
|
|
desiredTGUpdates: map[string]*structs.DesiredUpdates{
|
|
|
|
job.TaskGroups[0].Name: {
|
|
|
|
DestructiveUpdate: 0,
|
|
|
|
Ignore: 10,
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2017-06-02 23:11:29 +00:00
|
|
|
// Tests the reconciler doesn't place any more canaries when the deployment is
|
|
|
|
// paused or failed
|
|
|
|
func TestReconciler_PausedOrFailedDeployment_NoMoreCanaries(t *testing.T) {
|
|
|
|
job := mock.Job()
|
|
|
|
job.TaskGroups[0].Update = canaryUpdate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
cases := []struct {
|
|
|
|
name string
|
|
|
|
deploymentStatus string
|
2017-07-05 19:50:40 +00:00
|
|
|
stop uint64
|
2017-06-02 23:11:29 +00:00
|
|
|
}{
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
name: "paused deployment",
|
|
|
|
deploymentStatus: structs.DeploymentStatusPaused,
|
2017-07-05 19:50:40 +00:00
|
|
|
stop: 0,
|
2017-06-02 23:11:29 +00:00
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
name: "failed deployment",
|
|
|
|
deploymentStatus: structs.DeploymentStatusFailed,
|
2017-07-05 19:50:40 +00:00
|
|
|
stop: 1,
|
2017-06-02 23:11:29 +00:00
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for _, c := range cases {
|
|
|
|
t.Run(c.name, func(t *testing.T) {
|
2017-07-05 19:50:40 +00:00
|
|
|
// Create a deployment that is paused/failed and has placed some canaries
|
2017-06-02 23:11:29 +00:00
|
|
|
d := structs.NewDeployment(job)
|
|
|
|
d.Status = c.deploymentStatus
|
|
|
|
d.TaskGroups[job.TaskGroups[0].Name] = &structs.DeploymentState{
|
|
|
|
Promoted: false,
|
|
|
|
DesiredCanaries: 2,
|
|
|
|
DesiredTotal: 10,
|
|
|
|
PlacedAllocs: 1,
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Create 10 allocations for the original job
|
|
|
|
var allocs []*structs.Allocation
|
|
|
|
for i := 0; i < 10; i++ {
|
|
|
|
alloc := mock.Alloc()
|
|
|
|
alloc.Job = job
|
|
|
|
alloc.JobID = job.ID
|
2017-09-29 16:58:48 +00:00
|
|
|
alloc.NodeID = uuid.Generate()
|
2017-06-02 23:11:29 +00:00
|
|
|
alloc.Name = structs.AllocName(job.ID, job.TaskGroups[0].Name, uint(i))
|
|
|
|
alloc.TaskGroup = job.TaskGroups[0].Name
|
|
|
|
allocs = append(allocs, alloc)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Create one canary
|
|
|
|
canary := mock.Alloc()
|
|
|
|
canary.Job = job
|
|
|
|
canary.JobID = job.ID
|
2017-09-29 16:58:48 +00:00
|
|
|
canary.NodeID = uuid.Generate()
|
2017-06-02 23:11:29 +00:00
|
|
|
canary.Name = structs.AllocName(job.ID, job.TaskGroups[0].Name, 0)
|
|
|
|
canary.TaskGroup = job.TaskGroups[0].Name
|
|
|
|
canary.DeploymentID = d.ID
|
|
|
|
allocs = append(allocs, canary)
|
2017-07-05 19:50:40 +00:00
|
|
|
d.TaskGroups[canary.TaskGroup].PlacedCanaries = []string{canary.ID}
|
2017-06-02 23:11:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
mockUpdateFn := allocUpdateFnMock(map[string]allocUpdateType{canary.ID: allocUpdateFnIgnore}, allocUpdateFnDestructive)
|
|
|
|
reconciler := NewAllocReconciler(testLogger(), mockUpdateFn, false, job.ID, job, d, allocs, nil)
|
|
|
|
r := reconciler.Compute()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Assert the correct results
|
|
|
|
assertResults(t, r, &resultExpectation{
|
|
|
|
createDeployment: nil,
|
|
|
|
deploymentUpdates: nil,
|
|
|
|
place: 0,
|
|
|
|
inplace: 0,
|
2017-07-05 19:50:40 +00:00
|
|
|
stop: int(c.stop),
|
2017-06-02 23:11:29 +00:00
|
|
|
desiredTGUpdates: map[string]*structs.DesiredUpdates{
|
|
|
|
job.TaskGroups[0].Name: {
|
2017-07-05 19:50:40 +00:00
|
|
|
Ignore: 11 - c.stop,
|
|
|
|
Stop: c.stop,
|
2017-06-02 23:11:29 +00:00
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Tests the reconciler doesn't place any more allocs when the deployment is
|
|
|
|
// paused or failed
|
|
|
|
func TestReconciler_PausedOrFailedDeployment_NoMorePlacements(t *testing.T) {
|
|
|
|
job := mock.Job()
|
|
|
|
job.TaskGroups[0].Update = noCanaryUpdate
|
|
|
|
job.TaskGroups[0].Count = 15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
cases := []struct {
|
|
|
|
name string
|
|
|
|
deploymentStatus string
|
|
|
|
}{
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
name: "paused deployment",
|
|
|
|
deploymentStatus: structs.DeploymentStatusPaused,
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
name: "failed deployment",
|
|
|
|
deploymentStatus: structs.DeploymentStatusFailed,
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for _, c := range cases {
|
|
|
|
t.Run(c.name, func(t *testing.T) {
|
|
|
|
// Create a deployment that is paused and has placed some canaries
|
|
|
|
d := structs.NewDeployment(job)
|
|
|
|
d.Status = c.deploymentStatus
|
|
|
|
d.TaskGroups[job.TaskGroups[0].Name] = &structs.DeploymentState{
|
|
|
|
Promoted: false,
|
|
|
|
DesiredTotal: 15,
|
|
|
|
PlacedAllocs: 10,
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Create 10 allocations for the new job
|
|
|
|
var allocs []*structs.Allocation
|
|
|
|
for i := 0; i < 10; i++ {
|
|
|
|
alloc := mock.Alloc()
|
|
|
|
alloc.Job = job
|
|
|
|
alloc.JobID = job.ID
|
2017-09-29 16:58:48 +00:00
|
|
|
alloc.NodeID = uuid.Generate()
|
2017-06-02 23:11:29 +00:00
|
|
|
alloc.Name = structs.AllocName(job.ID, job.TaskGroups[0].Name, uint(i))
|
|
|
|
alloc.TaskGroup = job.TaskGroups[0].Name
|
|
|
|
allocs = append(allocs, alloc)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
reconciler := NewAllocReconciler(testLogger(), allocUpdateFnIgnore, false, job.ID, job, d, allocs, nil)
|
|
|
|
r := reconciler.Compute()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Assert the correct results
|
|
|
|
assertResults(t, r, &resultExpectation{
|
|
|
|
createDeployment: nil,
|
|
|
|
deploymentUpdates: nil,
|
|
|
|
place: 0,
|
|
|
|
inplace: 0,
|
|
|
|
stop: 0,
|
|
|
|
desiredTGUpdates: map[string]*structs.DesiredUpdates{
|
|
|
|
job.TaskGroups[0].Name: {
|
|
|
|
Ignore: 10,
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Tests the reconciler doesn't do any more destructive updates when the
|
|
|
|
// deployment is paused or failed
|
|
|
|
func TestReconciler_PausedOrFailedDeployment_NoMoreDestructiveUpdates(t *testing.T) {
|
|
|
|
job := mock.Job()
|
|
|
|
job.TaskGroups[0].Update = noCanaryUpdate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
cases := []struct {
|
|
|
|
name string
|
|
|
|
deploymentStatus string
|
|
|
|
}{
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
name: "paused deployment",
|
|
|
|
deploymentStatus: structs.DeploymentStatusPaused,
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
name: "failed deployment",
|
|
|
|
deploymentStatus: structs.DeploymentStatusFailed,
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for _, c := range cases {
|
|
|
|
t.Run(c.name, func(t *testing.T) {
|
|
|
|
// Create a deployment that is paused and has placed some canaries
|
|
|
|
d := structs.NewDeployment(job)
|
|
|
|
d.Status = c.deploymentStatus
|
|
|
|
d.TaskGroups[job.TaskGroups[0].Name] = &structs.DeploymentState{
|
|
|
|
Promoted: false,
|
|
|
|
DesiredTotal: 10,
|
|
|
|
PlacedAllocs: 1,
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Create 9 allocations for the original job
|
|
|
|
var allocs []*structs.Allocation
|
|
|
|
for i := 1; i < 10; i++ {
|
|
|
|
alloc := mock.Alloc()
|
|
|
|
alloc.Job = job
|
|
|
|
alloc.JobID = job.ID
|
2017-09-29 16:58:48 +00:00
|
|
|
alloc.NodeID = uuid.Generate()
|
2017-06-02 23:11:29 +00:00
|
|
|
alloc.Name = structs.AllocName(job.ID, job.TaskGroups[0].Name, uint(i))
|
|
|
|
alloc.TaskGroup = job.TaskGroups[0].Name
|
|
|
|
allocs = append(allocs, alloc)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Create one for the new job
|
|
|
|
newAlloc := mock.Alloc()
|
|
|
|
newAlloc.Job = job
|
|
|
|
newAlloc.JobID = job.ID
|
2017-09-29 16:58:48 +00:00
|
|
|
newAlloc.NodeID = uuid.Generate()
|
2017-06-02 23:11:29 +00:00
|
|
|
newAlloc.Name = structs.AllocName(job.ID, job.TaskGroups[0].Name, 0)
|
|
|
|
newAlloc.TaskGroup = job.TaskGroups[0].Name
|
|
|
|
newAlloc.DeploymentID = d.ID
|
|
|
|
allocs = append(allocs, newAlloc)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
mockUpdateFn := allocUpdateFnMock(map[string]allocUpdateType{newAlloc.ID: allocUpdateFnIgnore}, allocUpdateFnDestructive)
|
|
|
|
reconciler := NewAllocReconciler(testLogger(), mockUpdateFn, false, job.ID, job, d, allocs, nil)
|
|
|
|
r := reconciler.Compute()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Assert the correct results
|
|
|
|
assertResults(t, r, &resultExpectation{
|
|
|
|
createDeployment: nil,
|
|
|
|
deploymentUpdates: nil,
|
|
|
|
place: 0,
|
|
|
|
inplace: 0,
|
|
|
|
stop: 0,
|
|
|
|
desiredTGUpdates: map[string]*structs.DesiredUpdates{
|
|
|
|
job.TaskGroups[0].Name: {
|
|
|
|
Ignore: 10,
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Tests the reconciler handles migrations correctly when a deployment is paused
|
|
|
|
// or failed
|
|
|
|
func TestReconciler_PausedOrFailedDeployment_Migrations(t *testing.T) {
|
|
|
|
job := mock.Job()
|
|
|
|
job.TaskGroups[0].Update = noCanaryUpdate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
cases := []struct {
|
|
|
|
name string
|
|
|
|
deploymentStatus string
|
|
|
|
place int
|
|
|
|
stop int
|
|
|
|
ignoreAnnotation uint64
|
|
|
|
migrateAnnotation uint64
|
|
|
|
stopAnnotation uint64
|
|
|
|
}{
|
|
|
|
{
|
2017-07-07 18:42:51 +00:00
|
|
|
name: "paused deployment",
|
|
|
|
deploymentStatus: structs.DeploymentStatusPaused,
|
|
|
|
place: 0,
|
|
|
|
stop: 3,
|
|
|
|
ignoreAnnotation: 5,
|
|
|
|
stopAnnotation: 3,
|
2017-06-02 23:11:29 +00:00
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
name: "failed deployment",
|
|
|
|
deploymentStatus: structs.DeploymentStatusFailed,
|
|
|
|
place: 0,
|
|
|
|
stop: 3,
|
|
|
|
ignoreAnnotation: 5,
|
|
|
|
migrateAnnotation: 0,
|
|
|
|
stopAnnotation: 3,
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for _, c := range cases {
|
|
|
|
t.Run(c.name, func(t *testing.T) {
|
|
|
|
// Create a deployment that is paused and has placed some canaries
|
|
|
|
d := structs.NewDeployment(job)
|
|
|
|
d.Status = c.deploymentStatus
|
|
|
|
d.TaskGroups[job.TaskGroups[0].Name] = &structs.DeploymentState{
|
|
|
|
Promoted: false,
|
|
|
|
DesiredTotal: 10,
|
|
|
|
PlacedAllocs: 8,
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Create 8 allocations in the deployment
|
|
|
|
var allocs []*structs.Allocation
|
|
|
|
for i := 0; i < 8; i++ {
|
|
|
|
alloc := mock.Alloc()
|
|
|
|
alloc.Job = job
|
|
|
|
alloc.JobID = job.ID
|
2017-09-29 16:58:48 +00:00
|
|
|
alloc.NodeID = uuid.Generate()
|
2017-06-02 23:11:29 +00:00
|
|
|
alloc.Name = structs.AllocName(job.ID, job.TaskGroups[0].Name, uint(i))
|
|
|
|
alloc.TaskGroup = job.TaskGroups[0].Name
|
|
|
|
alloc.DeploymentID = d.ID
|
|
|
|
allocs = append(allocs, alloc)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Build a map of tainted nodes
|
|
|
|
tainted := make(map[string]*structs.Node, 3)
|
|
|
|
for i := 0; i < 3; i++ {
|
|
|
|
n := mock.Node()
|
|
|
|
n.ID = allocs[i].NodeID
|
2018-02-23 01:38:44 +00:00
|
|
|
allocs[i].DesiredTransition.Migrate = helper.BoolToPtr(true)
|
2017-06-02 23:11:29 +00:00
|
|
|
n.Drain = true
|
|
|
|
tainted[n.ID] = n
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
reconciler := NewAllocReconciler(testLogger(), allocUpdateFnIgnore, false, job.ID, job, d, allocs, tainted)
|
|
|
|
r := reconciler.Compute()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Assert the correct results
|
|
|
|
assertResults(t, r, &resultExpectation{
|
|
|
|
createDeployment: nil,
|
|
|
|
deploymentUpdates: nil,
|
|
|
|
place: c.place,
|
|
|
|
inplace: 0,
|
|
|
|
stop: c.stop,
|
|
|
|
desiredTGUpdates: map[string]*structs.DesiredUpdates{
|
|
|
|
job.TaskGroups[0].Name: {
|
|
|
|
Migrate: c.migrateAnnotation,
|
|
|
|
Ignore: c.ignoreAnnotation,
|
|
|
|
Stop: c.stopAnnotation,
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Tests the reconciler handles migrating a canary correctly on a draining node
|
|
|
|
func TestReconciler_DrainNode_Canary(t *testing.T) {
|
|
|
|
job := mock.Job()
|
|
|
|
job.TaskGroups[0].Update = canaryUpdate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Create a deployment that is paused and has placed some canaries
|
|
|
|
d := structs.NewDeployment(job)
|
2017-07-05 19:50:40 +00:00
|
|
|
s := &structs.DeploymentState{
|
2017-06-02 23:11:29 +00:00
|
|
|
Promoted: false,
|
|
|
|
DesiredTotal: 10,
|
|
|
|
DesiredCanaries: 2,
|
|
|
|
PlacedAllocs: 2,
|
|
|
|
}
|
2017-07-05 19:50:40 +00:00
|
|
|
d.TaskGroups[job.TaskGroups[0].Name] = s
|
2017-06-02 23:11:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Create 10 allocations from the old job
|
|
|
|
var allocs []*structs.Allocation
|
|
|
|
for i := 0; i < 10; i++ {
|
|
|
|
alloc := mock.Alloc()
|
|
|
|
alloc.Job = job
|
|
|
|
alloc.JobID = job.ID
|
2017-09-29 16:58:48 +00:00
|
|
|
alloc.NodeID = uuid.Generate()
|
2017-06-02 23:11:29 +00:00
|
|
|
alloc.Name = structs.AllocName(job.ID, job.TaskGroups[0].Name, uint(i))
|
|
|
|
alloc.TaskGroup = job.TaskGroups[0].Name
|
|
|
|
allocs = append(allocs, alloc)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Create two canaries for the new job
|
|
|
|
handled := make(map[string]allocUpdateType)
|
|
|
|
for i := 0; i < 2; i++ {
|
|
|
|
// Create one canary
|
|
|
|
canary := mock.Alloc()
|
|
|
|
canary.Job = job
|
|
|
|
canary.JobID = job.ID
|
2017-09-29 16:58:48 +00:00
|
|
|
canary.NodeID = uuid.Generate()
|
2017-06-02 23:11:29 +00:00
|
|
|
canary.Name = structs.AllocName(job.ID, job.TaskGroups[0].Name, uint(i))
|
|
|
|
canary.TaskGroup = job.TaskGroups[0].Name
|
|
|
|
canary.DeploymentID = d.ID
|
2017-07-05 19:50:40 +00:00
|
|
|
s.PlacedCanaries = append(s.PlacedCanaries, canary.ID)
|
2017-06-02 23:11:29 +00:00
|
|
|
allocs = append(allocs, canary)
|
|
|
|
handled[canary.ID] = allocUpdateFnIgnore
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Build a map of tainted nodes that contains the last canary
|
|
|
|
tainted := make(map[string]*structs.Node, 1)
|
|
|
|
n := mock.Node()
|
|
|
|
n.ID = allocs[11].NodeID
|
2018-02-23 01:38:44 +00:00
|
|
|
allocs[11].DesiredTransition.Migrate = helper.BoolToPtr(true)
|
2017-06-02 23:11:29 +00:00
|
|
|
n.Drain = true
|
|
|
|
tainted[n.ID] = n
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
mockUpdateFn := allocUpdateFnMock(handled, allocUpdateFnDestructive)
|
|
|
|
reconciler := NewAllocReconciler(testLogger(), mockUpdateFn, false, job.ID, job, d, allocs, tainted)
|
|
|
|
r := reconciler.Compute()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Assert the correct results
|
|
|
|
assertResults(t, r, &resultExpectation{
|
|
|
|
createDeployment: nil,
|
|
|
|
deploymentUpdates: nil,
|
|
|
|
place: 1,
|
|
|
|
inplace: 0,
|
|
|
|
stop: 1,
|
|
|
|
desiredTGUpdates: map[string]*structs.DesiredUpdates{
|
|
|
|
job.TaskGroups[0].Name: {
|
|
|
|
Canary: 1,
|
|
|
|
Ignore: 11,
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
assertNamesHaveIndexes(t, intRange(1, 1), stopResultsToNames(r.stop))
|
|
|
|
assertNamesHaveIndexes(t, intRange(1, 1), placeResultsToNames(r.place))
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Tests the reconciler handles migrating a canary correctly on a lost node
|
|
|
|
func TestReconciler_LostNode_Canary(t *testing.T) {
|
|
|
|
job := mock.Job()
|
|
|
|
job.TaskGroups[0].Update = canaryUpdate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Create a deployment that is paused and has placed some canaries
|
|
|
|
d := structs.NewDeployment(job)
|
2017-07-05 19:50:40 +00:00
|
|
|
s := &structs.DeploymentState{
|
2017-06-02 23:11:29 +00:00
|
|
|
Promoted: false,
|
|
|
|
DesiredTotal: 10,
|
|
|
|
DesiredCanaries: 2,
|
|
|
|
PlacedAllocs: 2,
|
|
|
|
}
|
2017-07-05 19:50:40 +00:00
|
|
|
d.TaskGroups[job.TaskGroups[0].Name] = s
|
2017-06-02 23:11:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Create 10 allocations from the old job
|
|
|
|
var allocs []*structs.Allocation
|
|
|
|
for i := 0; i < 10; i++ {
|
|
|
|
alloc := mock.Alloc()
|
|
|
|
alloc.Job = job
|
|
|
|
alloc.JobID = job.ID
|
2017-09-29 16:58:48 +00:00
|
|
|
alloc.NodeID = uuid.Generate()
|
2017-06-02 23:11:29 +00:00
|
|
|
alloc.Name = structs.AllocName(job.ID, job.TaskGroups[0].Name, uint(i))
|
|
|
|
alloc.TaskGroup = job.TaskGroups[0].Name
|
|
|
|
allocs = append(allocs, alloc)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Create two canaries for the new job
|
|
|
|
handled := make(map[string]allocUpdateType)
|
|
|
|
for i := 0; i < 2; i++ {
|
|
|
|
// Create one canary
|
|
|
|
canary := mock.Alloc()
|
|
|
|
canary.Job = job
|
|
|
|
canary.JobID = job.ID
|
2017-09-29 16:58:48 +00:00
|
|
|
canary.NodeID = uuid.Generate()
|
2017-06-02 23:11:29 +00:00
|
|
|
canary.Name = structs.AllocName(job.ID, job.TaskGroups[0].Name, uint(i))
|
|
|
|
canary.TaskGroup = job.TaskGroups[0].Name
|
2017-07-05 19:50:40 +00:00
|
|
|
s.PlacedCanaries = append(s.PlacedCanaries, canary.ID)
|
2017-06-02 23:11:29 +00:00
|
|
|
canary.DeploymentID = d.ID
|
|
|
|
allocs = append(allocs, canary)
|
|
|
|
handled[canary.ID] = allocUpdateFnIgnore
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Build a map of tainted nodes that contains the last canary
|
|
|
|
tainted := make(map[string]*structs.Node, 1)
|
|
|
|
n := mock.Node()
|
|
|
|
n.ID = allocs[11].NodeID
|
|
|
|
n.Status = structs.NodeStatusDown
|
|
|
|
tainted[n.ID] = n
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
mockUpdateFn := allocUpdateFnMock(handled, allocUpdateFnDestructive)
|
|
|
|
reconciler := NewAllocReconciler(testLogger(), mockUpdateFn, false, job.ID, job, d, allocs, tainted)
|
|
|
|
r := reconciler.Compute()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Assert the correct results
|
|
|
|
assertResults(t, r, &resultExpectation{
|
|
|
|
createDeployment: nil,
|
|
|
|
deploymentUpdates: nil,
|
|
|
|
place: 1,
|
|
|
|
inplace: 0,
|
|
|
|
stop: 1,
|
|
|
|
desiredTGUpdates: map[string]*structs.DesiredUpdates{
|
|
|
|
job.TaskGroups[0].Name: {
|
|
|
|
Canary: 1,
|
|
|
|
Ignore: 11,
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assertNamesHaveIndexes(t, intRange(1, 1), stopResultsToNames(r.stop))
|
|
|
|
assertNamesHaveIndexes(t, intRange(1, 1), placeResultsToNames(r.place))
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Tests the reconciler handles stopping canaries from older deployments
|
|
|
|
func TestReconciler_StopOldCanaries(t *testing.T) {
|
|
|
|
job := mock.Job()
|
|
|
|
job.TaskGroups[0].Update = canaryUpdate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Create an old deployment that has placed some canaries
|
|
|
|
d := structs.NewDeployment(job)
|
2017-07-05 19:50:40 +00:00
|
|
|
s := &structs.DeploymentState{
|
2017-06-02 23:11:29 +00:00
|
|
|
Promoted: false,
|
|
|
|
DesiredTotal: 10,
|
|
|
|
DesiredCanaries: 2,
|
|
|
|
PlacedAllocs: 2,
|
|
|
|
}
|
2017-07-05 19:50:40 +00:00
|
|
|
d.TaskGroups[job.TaskGroups[0].Name] = s
|
2017-06-02 23:11:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Update the job
|
2017-07-07 02:55:58 +00:00
|
|
|
job.Version += 10
|
2017-06-02 23:11:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Create 10 allocations from the old job
|
|
|
|
var allocs []*structs.Allocation
|
|
|
|
for i := 0; i < 10; i++ {
|
|
|
|
alloc := mock.Alloc()
|
|
|
|
alloc.Job = job
|
|
|
|
alloc.JobID = job.ID
|
2017-09-29 16:58:48 +00:00
|
|
|
alloc.NodeID = uuid.Generate()
|
2017-06-02 23:11:29 +00:00
|
|
|
alloc.Name = structs.AllocName(job.ID, job.TaskGroups[0].Name, uint(i))
|
|
|
|
alloc.TaskGroup = job.TaskGroups[0].Name
|
|
|
|
allocs = append(allocs, alloc)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Create canaries
|
|
|
|
for i := 0; i < 2; i++ {
|
|
|
|
// Create one canary
|
|
|
|
canary := mock.Alloc()
|
|
|
|
canary.Job = job
|
|
|
|
canary.JobID = job.ID
|
2017-09-29 16:58:48 +00:00
|
|
|
canary.NodeID = uuid.Generate()
|
2017-06-02 23:11:29 +00:00
|
|
|
canary.Name = structs.AllocName(job.ID, job.TaskGroups[0].Name, uint(i))
|
|
|
|
canary.TaskGroup = job.TaskGroups[0].Name
|
2017-07-05 19:50:40 +00:00
|
|
|
s.PlacedCanaries = append(s.PlacedCanaries, canary.ID)
|
2017-06-02 23:11:29 +00:00
|
|
|
canary.DeploymentID = d.ID
|
|
|
|
allocs = append(allocs, canary)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
reconciler := NewAllocReconciler(testLogger(), allocUpdateFnDestructive, false, job.ID, job, d, allocs, nil)
|
|
|
|
r := reconciler.Compute()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
newD := structs.NewDeployment(job)
|
2017-07-07 06:30:46 +00:00
|
|
|
newD.StatusDescription = structs.DeploymentStatusDescriptionRunningNeedsPromotion
|
2017-06-02 23:11:29 +00:00
|
|
|
newD.TaskGroups[job.TaskGroups[0].Name] = &structs.DeploymentState{
|
|
|
|
DesiredCanaries: 2,
|
|
|
|
DesiredTotal: 10,
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Assert the correct results
|
|
|
|
assertResults(t, r, &resultExpectation{
|
|
|
|
createDeployment: newD,
|
|
|
|
deploymentUpdates: []*structs.DeploymentStatusUpdate{
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
DeploymentID: d.ID,
|
|
|
|
Status: structs.DeploymentStatusCancelled,
|
|
|
|
StatusDescription: structs.DeploymentStatusDescriptionNewerJob,
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
place: 2,
|
|
|
|
inplace: 0,
|
|
|
|
stop: 2,
|
|
|
|
desiredTGUpdates: map[string]*structs.DesiredUpdates{
|
|
|
|
job.TaskGroups[0].Name: {
|
|
|
|
Canary: 2,
|
|
|
|
Stop: 2,
|
|
|
|
Ignore: 10,
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assertNamesHaveIndexes(t, intRange(0, 1), stopResultsToNames(r.stop))
|
|
|
|
assertNamesHaveIndexes(t, intRange(0, 1), placeResultsToNames(r.place))
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Tests the reconciler creates new canaries when the job changes
|
|
|
|
func TestReconciler_NewCanaries(t *testing.T) {
|
|
|
|
job := mock.Job()
|
|
|
|
job.TaskGroups[0].Update = canaryUpdate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Create 10 allocations from the old job
|
|
|
|
var allocs []*structs.Allocation
|
|
|
|
for i := 0; i < 10; i++ {
|
|
|
|
alloc := mock.Alloc()
|
|
|
|
alloc.Job = job
|
|
|
|
alloc.JobID = job.ID
|
2017-09-29 16:58:48 +00:00
|
|
|
alloc.NodeID = uuid.Generate()
|
2017-06-02 23:11:29 +00:00
|
|
|
alloc.Name = structs.AllocName(job.ID, job.TaskGroups[0].Name, uint(i))
|
|
|
|
alloc.TaskGroup = job.TaskGroups[0].Name
|
|
|
|
allocs = append(allocs, alloc)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
reconciler := NewAllocReconciler(testLogger(), allocUpdateFnDestructive, false, job.ID, job, nil, allocs, nil)
|
|
|
|
r := reconciler.Compute()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
newD := structs.NewDeployment(job)
|
2017-07-07 06:30:46 +00:00
|
|
|
newD.StatusDescription = structs.DeploymentStatusDescriptionRunningNeedsPromotion
|
2017-06-02 23:11:29 +00:00
|
|
|
newD.TaskGroups[job.TaskGroups[0].Name] = &structs.DeploymentState{
|
|
|
|
DesiredCanaries: 2,
|
|
|
|
DesiredTotal: 10,
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Assert the correct results
|
|
|
|
assertResults(t, r, &resultExpectation{
|
|
|
|
createDeployment: newD,
|
|
|
|
deploymentUpdates: nil,
|
|
|
|
place: 2,
|
|
|
|
inplace: 0,
|
|
|
|
stop: 0,
|
|
|
|
desiredTGUpdates: map[string]*structs.DesiredUpdates{
|
|
|
|
job.TaskGroups[0].Name: {
|
|
|
|
Canary: 2,
|
|
|
|
Ignore: 10,
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assertNamesHaveIndexes(t, intRange(0, 1), placeResultsToNames(r.place))
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2017-07-25 18:27:47 +00:00
|
|
|
// Tests the reconciler creates new canaries when the job changes for multiple
|
|
|
|
// task groups
|
|
|
|
func TestReconciler_NewCanaries_MultiTG(t *testing.T) {
|
|
|
|
job := mock.Job()
|
|
|
|
job.TaskGroups[0].Update = canaryUpdate
|
|
|
|
job.TaskGroups = append(job.TaskGroups, job.TaskGroups[0].Copy())
|
|
|
|
job.TaskGroups[0].Name = "tg2"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Create 10 allocations from the old job for each tg
|
|
|
|
var allocs []*structs.Allocation
|
|
|
|
for j := 0; j < 2; j++ {
|
|
|
|
for i := 0; i < 10; i++ {
|
|
|
|
alloc := mock.Alloc()
|
|
|
|
alloc.Job = job
|
|
|
|
alloc.JobID = job.ID
|
2017-09-29 16:58:48 +00:00
|
|
|
alloc.NodeID = uuid.Generate()
|
2017-07-25 18:27:47 +00:00
|
|
|
alloc.Name = structs.AllocName(job.ID, job.TaskGroups[j].Name, uint(i))
|
|
|
|
alloc.TaskGroup = job.TaskGroups[j].Name
|
|
|
|
allocs = append(allocs, alloc)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
reconciler := NewAllocReconciler(testLogger(), allocUpdateFnDestructive, false, job.ID, job, nil, allocs, nil)
|
|
|
|
r := reconciler.Compute()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
newD := structs.NewDeployment(job)
|
|
|
|
newD.StatusDescription = structs.DeploymentStatusDescriptionRunningNeedsPromotion
|
|
|
|
state := &structs.DeploymentState{
|
|
|
|
DesiredCanaries: 2,
|
|
|
|
DesiredTotal: 10,
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
newD.TaskGroups[job.TaskGroups[0].Name] = state
|
|
|
|
newD.TaskGroups[job.TaskGroups[1].Name] = state.Copy()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Assert the correct results
|
|
|
|
assertResults(t, r, &resultExpectation{
|
|
|
|
createDeployment: newD,
|
|
|
|
deploymentUpdates: nil,
|
|
|
|
place: 4,
|
|
|
|
inplace: 0,
|
|
|
|
stop: 0,
|
|
|
|
desiredTGUpdates: map[string]*structs.DesiredUpdates{
|
|
|
|
job.TaskGroups[0].Name: {
|
|
|
|
Canary: 2,
|
|
|
|
Ignore: 10,
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
job.TaskGroups[1].Name: {
|
|
|
|
Canary: 2,
|
|
|
|
Ignore: 10,
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assertNamesHaveIndexes(t, intRange(0, 1, 0, 1), placeResultsToNames(r.place))
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2017-06-02 23:11:29 +00:00
|
|
|
// Tests the reconciler creates new canaries when the job changes and scales up
|
|
|
|
func TestReconciler_NewCanaries_ScaleUp(t *testing.T) {
|
|
|
|
// Scale the job up to 15
|
|
|
|
job := mock.Job()
|
|
|
|
job.TaskGroups[0].Update = canaryUpdate
|
|
|
|
job.TaskGroups[0].Count = 15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Create 10 allocations from the old job
|
|
|
|
var allocs []*structs.Allocation
|
|
|
|
for i := 0; i < 10; i++ {
|
|
|
|
alloc := mock.Alloc()
|
|
|
|
alloc.Job = job
|
|
|
|
alloc.JobID = job.ID
|
2017-09-29 16:58:48 +00:00
|
|
|
alloc.NodeID = uuid.Generate()
|
2017-06-02 23:11:29 +00:00
|
|
|
alloc.Name = structs.AllocName(job.ID, job.TaskGroups[0].Name, uint(i))
|
|
|
|
alloc.TaskGroup = job.TaskGroups[0].Name
|
|
|
|
allocs = append(allocs, alloc)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
reconciler := NewAllocReconciler(testLogger(), allocUpdateFnDestructive, false, job.ID, job, nil, allocs, nil)
|
|
|
|
r := reconciler.Compute()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
newD := structs.NewDeployment(job)
|
2017-07-07 06:30:46 +00:00
|
|
|
newD.StatusDescription = structs.DeploymentStatusDescriptionRunningNeedsPromotion
|
2017-06-02 23:11:29 +00:00
|
|
|
newD.TaskGroups[job.TaskGroups[0].Name] = &structs.DeploymentState{
|
|
|
|
DesiredCanaries: 2,
|
|
|
|
DesiredTotal: 15,
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Assert the correct results
|
|
|
|
assertResults(t, r, &resultExpectation{
|
|
|
|
createDeployment: newD,
|
|
|
|
deploymentUpdates: nil,
|
|
|
|
place: 2,
|
|
|
|
inplace: 0,
|
|
|
|
stop: 0,
|
|
|
|
desiredTGUpdates: map[string]*structs.DesiredUpdates{
|
|
|
|
job.TaskGroups[0].Name: {
|
|
|
|
Canary: 2,
|
|
|
|
Ignore: 10,
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assertNamesHaveIndexes(t, intRange(0, 1), placeResultsToNames(r.place))
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Tests the reconciler creates new canaries when the job changes and scales
|
|
|
|
// down
|
|
|
|
func TestReconciler_NewCanaries_ScaleDown(t *testing.T) {
|
|
|
|
// Scale the job down to 5
|
|
|
|
job := mock.Job()
|
|
|
|
job.TaskGroups[0].Update = canaryUpdate
|
|
|
|
job.TaskGroups[0].Count = 5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Create 10 allocations from the old job
|
|
|
|
var allocs []*structs.Allocation
|
|
|
|
for i := 0; i < 10; i++ {
|
|
|
|
alloc := mock.Alloc()
|
|
|
|
alloc.Job = job
|
|
|
|
alloc.JobID = job.ID
|
2017-09-29 16:58:48 +00:00
|
|
|
alloc.NodeID = uuid.Generate()
|
2017-06-02 23:11:29 +00:00
|
|
|
alloc.Name = structs.AllocName(job.ID, job.TaskGroups[0].Name, uint(i))
|
|
|
|
alloc.TaskGroup = job.TaskGroups[0].Name
|
|
|
|
allocs = append(allocs, alloc)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
reconciler := NewAllocReconciler(testLogger(), allocUpdateFnDestructive, false, job.ID, job, nil, allocs, nil)
|
|
|
|
r := reconciler.Compute()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
newD := structs.NewDeployment(job)
|
2017-07-07 06:30:46 +00:00
|
|
|
newD.StatusDescription = structs.DeploymentStatusDescriptionRunningNeedsPromotion
|
2017-06-02 23:11:29 +00:00
|
|
|
newD.TaskGroups[job.TaskGroups[0].Name] = &structs.DeploymentState{
|
|
|
|
DesiredCanaries: 2,
|
|
|
|
DesiredTotal: 5,
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Assert the correct results
|
|
|
|
assertResults(t, r, &resultExpectation{
|
|
|
|
createDeployment: newD,
|
|
|
|
deploymentUpdates: nil,
|
|
|
|
place: 2,
|
|
|
|
inplace: 0,
|
|
|
|
stop: 5,
|
|
|
|
desiredTGUpdates: map[string]*structs.DesiredUpdates{
|
|
|
|
job.TaskGroups[0].Name: {
|
|
|
|
Canary: 2,
|
|
|
|
Stop: 5,
|
|
|
|
Ignore: 5,
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assertNamesHaveIndexes(t, intRange(0, 1), placeResultsToNames(r.place))
|
|
|
|
assertNamesHaveIndexes(t, intRange(5, 9), stopResultsToNames(r.stop))
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Tests the reconciler handles filling the names of partially placed canaries
|
|
|
|
func TestReconciler_NewCanaries_FillNames(t *testing.T) {
|
|
|
|
job := mock.Job()
|
|
|
|
job.TaskGroups[0].Update = &structs.UpdateStrategy{
|
|
|
|
Canary: 4,
|
|
|
|
MaxParallel: 2,
|
|
|
|
HealthCheck: structs.UpdateStrategyHealthCheck_Checks,
|
|
|
|
MinHealthyTime: 10 * time.Second,
|
|
|
|
HealthyDeadline: 10 * time.Minute,
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Create an existing deployment that has placed some canaries
|
|
|
|
d := structs.NewDeployment(job)
|
2017-07-05 19:50:40 +00:00
|
|
|
s := &structs.DeploymentState{
|
2017-06-02 23:11:29 +00:00
|
|
|
Promoted: false,
|
|
|
|
DesiredTotal: 10,
|
|
|
|
DesiredCanaries: 4,
|
|
|
|
PlacedAllocs: 2,
|
|
|
|
}
|
2017-07-05 19:50:40 +00:00
|
|
|
d.TaskGroups[job.TaskGroups[0].Name] = s
|
2017-06-02 23:11:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Create 10 allocations from the old job
|
|
|
|
var allocs []*structs.Allocation
|
|
|
|
for i := 0; i < 10; i++ {
|
|
|
|
alloc := mock.Alloc()
|
|
|
|
alloc.Job = job
|
|
|
|
alloc.JobID = job.ID
|
2017-09-29 16:58:48 +00:00
|
|
|
alloc.NodeID = uuid.Generate()
|
2017-06-02 23:11:29 +00:00
|
|
|
alloc.Name = structs.AllocName(job.ID, job.TaskGroups[0].Name, uint(i))
|
|
|
|
alloc.TaskGroup = job.TaskGroups[0].Name
|
|
|
|
allocs = append(allocs, alloc)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Create canaries but pick names at the ends
|
|
|
|
for i := 0; i < 4; i += 3 {
|
|
|
|
// Create one canary
|
|
|
|
canary := mock.Alloc()
|
|
|
|
canary.Job = job
|
|
|
|
canary.JobID = job.ID
|
2017-09-29 16:58:48 +00:00
|
|
|
canary.NodeID = uuid.Generate()
|
2017-06-02 23:11:29 +00:00
|
|
|
canary.Name = structs.AllocName(job.ID, job.TaskGroups[0].Name, uint(i))
|
|
|
|
canary.TaskGroup = job.TaskGroups[0].Name
|
2017-07-05 19:50:40 +00:00
|
|
|
s.PlacedCanaries = append(s.PlacedCanaries, canary.ID)
|
2017-06-02 23:11:29 +00:00
|
|
|
canary.DeploymentID = d.ID
|
|
|
|
allocs = append(allocs, canary)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
reconciler := NewAllocReconciler(testLogger(), allocUpdateFnDestructive, false, job.ID, job, d, allocs, nil)
|
|
|
|
r := reconciler.Compute()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Assert the correct results
|
|
|
|
assertResults(t, r, &resultExpectation{
|
|
|
|
createDeployment: nil,
|
|
|
|
deploymentUpdates: nil,
|
|
|
|
place: 2,
|
|
|
|
inplace: 0,
|
|
|
|
stop: 0,
|
|
|
|
desiredTGUpdates: map[string]*structs.DesiredUpdates{
|
|
|
|
job.TaskGroups[0].Name: {
|
|
|
|
Canary: 2,
|
|
|
|
Ignore: 12,
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assertNamesHaveIndexes(t, intRange(1, 2), placeResultsToNames(r.place))
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Tests the reconciler handles canary promotion by unblocking max_parallel
|
|
|
|
func TestReconciler_PromoteCanaries_Unblock(t *testing.T) {
|
|
|
|
job := mock.Job()
|
|
|
|
job.TaskGroups[0].Update = canaryUpdate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Create an existing deployment that has placed some canaries and mark them
|
|
|
|
// promoted
|
|
|
|
d := structs.NewDeployment(job)
|
2017-07-05 19:50:40 +00:00
|
|
|
s := &structs.DeploymentState{
|
2017-06-02 23:11:29 +00:00
|
|
|
Promoted: true,
|
|
|
|
DesiredTotal: 10,
|
|
|
|
DesiredCanaries: 2,
|
|
|
|
PlacedAllocs: 2,
|
|
|
|
}
|
2017-07-05 19:50:40 +00:00
|
|
|
d.TaskGroups[job.TaskGroups[0].Name] = s
|
2017-06-02 23:11:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Create 10 allocations from the old job
|
|
|
|
var allocs []*structs.Allocation
|
|
|
|
for i := 0; i < 10; i++ {
|
|
|
|
alloc := mock.Alloc()
|
|
|
|
alloc.Job = job
|
|
|
|
alloc.JobID = job.ID
|
2017-09-29 16:58:48 +00:00
|
|
|
alloc.NodeID = uuid.Generate()
|
2017-06-02 23:11:29 +00:00
|
|
|
alloc.Name = structs.AllocName(job.ID, job.TaskGroups[0].Name, uint(i))
|
|
|
|
alloc.TaskGroup = job.TaskGroups[0].Name
|
|
|
|
allocs = append(allocs, alloc)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Create the canaries
|
|
|
|
handled := make(map[string]allocUpdateType)
|
|
|
|
for i := 0; i < 2; i++ {
|
|
|
|
// Create one canary
|
|
|
|
canary := mock.Alloc()
|
|
|
|
canary.Job = job
|
|
|
|
canary.JobID = job.ID
|
2017-09-29 16:58:48 +00:00
|
|
|
canary.NodeID = uuid.Generate()
|
2017-06-02 23:11:29 +00:00
|
|
|
canary.Name = structs.AllocName(job.ID, job.TaskGroups[0].Name, uint(i))
|
|
|
|
canary.TaskGroup = job.TaskGroups[0].Name
|
2017-07-05 19:50:40 +00:00
|
|
|
s.PlacedCanaries = append(s.PlacedCanaries, canary.ID)
|
2017-06-02 23:11:29 +00:00
|
|
|
canary.DeploymentID = d.ID
|
|
|
|
canary.DeploymentStatus = &structs.AllocDeploymentStatus{
|
|
|
|
Healthy: helper.BoolToPtr(true),
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
allocs = append(allocs, canary)
|
|
|
|
handled[canary.ID] = allocUpdateFnIgnore
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
mockUpdateFn := allocUpdateFnMock(handled, allocUpdateFnDestructive)
|
|
|
|
reconciler := NewAllocReconciler(testLogger(), mockUpdateFn, false, job.ID, job, d, allocs, nil)
|
|
|
|
r := reconciler.Compute()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Assert the correct results
|
|
|
|
assertResults(t, r, &resultExpectation{
|
|
|
|
createDeployment: nil,
|
|
|
|
deploymentUpdates: nil,
|
2017-07-15 23:31:33 +00:00
|
|
|
destructive: 2,
|
|
|
|
stop: 2,
|
2017-06-02 23:11:29 +00:00
|
|
|
desiredTGUpdates: map[string]*structs.DesiredUpdates{
|
|
|
|
job.TaskGroups[0].Name: {
|
|
|
|
Stop: 2,
|
|
|
|
DestructiveUpdate: 2,
|
|
|
|
Ignore: 8,
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
|
2017-07-06 16:55:39 +00:00
|
|
|
assertNoCanariesStopped(t, d, r.stop)
|
2017-07-15 23:31:33 +00:00
|
|
|
assertNamesHaveIndexes(t, intRange(2, 3), destructiveResultsToNames(r.destructiveUpdate))
|
|
|
|
assertNamesHaveIndexes(t, intRange(0, 1), stopResultsToNames(r.stop))
|
2017-06-02 23:11:29 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Tests the reconciler handles canary promotion when the canary count equals
|
|
|
|
// the total correctly
|
|
|
|
func TestReconciler_PromoteCanaries_CanariesEqualCount(t *testing.T) {
|
|
|
|
job := mock.Job()
|
|
|
|
job.TaskGroups[0].Update = canaryUpdate
|
|
|
|
job.TaskGroups[0].Count = 2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Create an existing deployment that has placed some canaries and mark them
|
|
|
|
// promoted
|
|
|
|
d := structs.NewDeployment(job)
|
2017-07-05 19:50:40 +00:00
|
|
|
s := &structs.DeploymentState{
|
2017-06-02 23:11:29 +00:00
|
|
|
Promoted: true,
|
|
|
|
DesiredTotal: 2,
|
|
|
|
DesiredCanaries: 2,
|
|
|
|
PlacedAllocs: 2,
|
|
|
|
}
|
2017-07-05 19:50:40 +00:00
|
|
|
d.TaskGroups[job.TaskGroups[0].Name] = s
|
2017-06-02 23:11:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Create 2 allocations from the old job
|
|
|
|
var allocs []*structs.Allocation
|
|
|
|
for i := 0; i < 2; i++ {
|
|
|
|
alloc := mock.Alloc()
|
|
|
|
alloc.Job = job
|
|
|
|
alloc.JobID = job.ID
|
2017-09-29 16:58:48 +00:00
|
|
|
alloc.NodeID = uuid.Generate()
|
2017-06-02 23:11:29 +00:00
|
|
|
alloc.Name = structs.AllocName(job.ID, job.TaskGroups[0].Name, uint(i))
|
|
|
|
alloc.TaskGroup = job.TaskGroups[0].Name
|
|
|
|
allocs = append(allocs, alloc)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Create the canaries
|
|
|
|
handled := make(map[string]allocUpdateType)
|
|
|
|
for i := 0; i < 2; i++ {
|
|
|
|
// Create one canary
|
|
|
|
canary := mock.Alloc()
|
|
|
|
canary.Job = job
|
|
|
|
canary.JobID = job.ID
|
2017-09-29 16:58:48 +00:00
|
|
|
canary.NodeID = uuid.Generate()
|
2017-06-02 23:11:29 +00:00
|
|
|
canary.Name = structs.AllocName(job.ID, job.TaskGroups[0].Name, uint(i))
|
|
|
|
canary.TaskGroup = job.TaskGroups[0].Name
|
2017-07-05 19:50:40 +00:00
|
|
|
s.PlacedCanaries = append(s.PlacedCanaries, canary.ID)
|
2017-06-02 23:11:29 +00:00
|
|
|
canary.DeploymentID = d.ID
|
|
|
|
canary.DeploymentStatus = &structs.AllocDeploymentStatus{
|
|
|
|
Healthy: helper.BoolToPtr(true),
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
allocs = append(allocs, canary)
|
|
|
|
handled[canary.ID] = allocUpdateFnIgnore
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
mockUpdateFn := allocUpdateFnMock(handled, allocUpdateFnDestructive)
|
|
|
|
reconciler := NewAllocReconciler(testLogger(), mockUpdateFn, false, job.ID, job, d, allocs, nil)
|
|
|
|
r := reconciler.Compute()
|
|
|
|
|
2017-07-06 15:39:16 +00:00
|
|
|
updates := []*structs.DeploymentStatusUpdate{
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
DeploymentID: d.ID,
|
|
|
|
Status: structs.DeploymentStatusSuccessful,
|
|
|
|
StatusDescription: structs.DeploymentStatusDescriptionSuccessful,
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2017-06-02 23:11:29 +00:00
|
|
|
// Assert the correct results
|
|
|
|
assertResults(t, r, &resultExpectation{
|
|
|
|
createDeployment: nil,
|
2017-07-06 15:39:16 +00:00
|
|
|
deploymentUpdates: updates,
|
2017-06-02 23:11:29 +00:00
|
|
|
place: 0,
|
|
|
|
inplace: 0,
|
|
|
|
stop: 2,
|
|
|
|
desiredTGUpdates: map[string]*structs.DesiredUpdates{
|
|
|
|
job.TaskGroups[0].Name: {
|
|
|
|
Stop: 2,
|
|
|
|
Ignore: 2,
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
|
2017-07-06 16:55:39 +00:00
|
|
|
assertNoCanariesStopped(t, d, r.stop)
|
2017-06-02 23:11:29 +00:00
|
|
|
assertNamesHaveIndexes(t, intRange(0, 1), stopResultsToNames(r.stop))
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Tests the reconciler checks the health of placed allocs to determine the
|
|
|
|
// limit
|
|
|
|
func TestReconciler_DeploymentLimit_HealthAccounting(t *testing.T) {
|
|
|
|
job := mock.Job()
|
|
|
|
job.TaskGroups[0].Update = noCanaryUpdate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
cases := []struct {
|
|
|
|
healthy int
|
|
|
|
}{
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
healthy: 0,
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
healthy: 1,
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
healthy: 2,
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
healthy: 3,
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
healthy: 4,
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for _, c := range cases {
|
|
|
|
t.Run(fmt.Sprintf("%d healthy", c.healthy), func(t *testing.T) {
|
|
|
|
// Create an existing deployment that has placed some canaries and mark them
|
|
|
|
// promoted
|
|
|
|
d := structs.NewDeployment(job)
|
|
|
|
d.TaskGroups[job.TaskGroups[0].Name] = &structs.DeploymentState{
|
|
|
|
Promoted: true,
|
|
|
|
DesiredTotal: 10,
|
|
|
|
PlacedAllocs: 4,
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Create 6 allocations from the old job
|
|
|
|
var allocs []*structs.Allocation
|
|
|
|
for i := 4; i < 10; i++ {
|
|
|
|
alloc := mock.Alloc()
|
|
|
|
alloc.Job = job
|
|
|
|
alloc.JobID = job.ID
|
2017-09-29 16:58:48 +00:00
|
|
|
alloc.NodeID = uuid.Generate()
|
2017-06-02 23:11:29 +00:00
|
|
|
alloc.Name = structs.AllocName(job.ID, job.TaskGroups[0].Name, uint(i))
|
|
|
|
alloc.TaskGroup = job.TaskGroups[0].Name
|
|
|
|
allocs = append(allocs, alloc)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Create the new allocs
|
|
|
|
handled := make(map[string]allocUpdateType)
|
|
|
|
for i := 0; i < 4; i++ {
|
|
|
|
new := mock.Alloc()
|
|
|
|
new.Job = job
|
|
|
|
new.JobID = job.ID
|
2017-09-29 16:58:48 +00:00
|
|
|
new.NodeID = uuid.Generate()
|
2017-06-02 23:11:29 +00:00
|
|
|
new.Name = structs.AllocName(job.ID, job.TaskGroups[0].Name, uint(i))
|
|
|
|
new.TaskGroup = job.TaskGroups[0].Name
|
|
|
|
new.DeploymentID = d.ID
|
|
|
|
if i < c.healthy {
|
|
|
|
new.DeploymentStatus = &structs.AllocDeploymentStatus{
|
|
|
|
Healthy: helper.BoolToPtr(true),
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
allocs = append(allocs, new)
|
|
|
|
handled[new.ID] = allocUpdateFnIgnore
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
mockUpdateFn := allocUpdateFnMock(handled, allocUpdateFnDestructive)
|
|
|
|
reconciler := NewAllocReconciler(testLogger(), mockUpdateFn, false, job.ID, job, d, allocs, nil)
|
|
|
|
r := reconciler.Compute()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Assert the correct results
|
|
|
|
assertResults(t, r, &resultExpectation{
|
|
|
|
createDeployment: nil,
|
|
|
|
deploymentUpdates: nil,
|
2017-07-15 23:31:33 +00:00
|
|
|
destructive: c.healthy,
|
2017-06-02 23:11:29 +00:00
|
|
|
desiredTGUpdates: map[string]*structs.DesiredUpdates{
|
|
|
|
job.TaskGroups[0].Name: {
|
|
|
|
DestructiveUpdate: uint64(c.healthy),
|
|
|
|
Ignore: uint64(10 - c.healthy),
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if c.healthy != 0 {
|
2017-07-15 23:31:33 +00:00
|
|
|
assertNamesHaveIndexes(t, intRange(4, 3+c.healthy), destructiveResultsToNames(r.destructiveUpdate))
|
2017-06-02 23:11:29 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Tests the reconciler handles an alloc on a tainted node during a rolling
|
|
|
|
// update
|
|
|
|
func TestReconciler_TaintedNode_RollingUpgrade(t *testing.T) {
|
|
|
|
job := mock.Job()
|
|
|
|
job.TaskGroups[0].Update = noCanaryUpdate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Create an existing deployment that has some placed allocs
|
|
|
|
d := structs.NewDeployment(job)
|
|
|
|
d.TaskGroups[job.TaskGroups[0].Name] = &structs.DeploymentState{
|
|
|
|
Promoted: true,
|
|
|
|
DesiredTotal: 10,
|
2017-07-15 23:31:33 +00:00
|
|
|
PlacedAllocs: 7,
|
2017-06-02 23:11:29 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2017-08-21 19:41:19 +00:00
|
|
|
// Create 2 allocations from the old job
|
2017-06-02 23:11:29 +00:00
|
|
|
var allocs []*structs.Allocation
|
2017-08-21 19:41:19 +00:00
|
|
|
for i := 8; i < 10; i++ {
|
2017-06-02 23:11:29 +00:00
|
|
|
alloc := mock.Alloc()
|
|
|
|
alloc.Job = job
|
|
|
|
alloc.JobID = job.ID
|
2017-09-29 16:58:48 +00:00
|
|
|
alloc.NodeID = uuid.Generate()
|
2017-06-02 23:11:29 +00:00
|
|
|
alloc.Name = structs.AllocName(job.ID, job.TaskGroups[0].Name, uint(i))
|
|
|
|
alloc.TaskGroup = job.TaskGroups[0].Name
|
|
|
|
allocs = append(allocs, alloc)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Create the healthy replacements
|
|
|
|
handled := make(map[string]allocUpdateType)
|
2017-08-21 19:41:19 +00:00
|
|
|
for i := 0; i < 8; i++ {
|
2017-06-02 23:11:29 +00:00
|
|
|
new := mock.Alloc()
|
|
|
|
new.Job = job
|
|
|
|
new.JobID = job.ID
|
2017-09-29 16:58:48 +00:00
|
|
|
new.NodeID = uuid.Generate()
|
2017-06-02 23:11:29 +00:00
|
|
|
new.Name = structs.AllocName(job.ID, job.TaskGroups[0].Name, uint(i))
|
|
|
|
new.TaskGroup = job.TaskGroups[0].Name
|
|
|
|
new.DeploymentID = d.ID
|
|
|
|
new.DeploymentStatus = &structs.AllocDeploymentStatus{
|
|
|
|
Healthy: helper.BoolToPtr(true),
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
allocs = append(allocs, new)
|
|
|
|
handled[new.ID] = allocUpdateFnIgnore
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Build a map of tainted nodes
|
2017-07-07 18:42:51 +00:00
|
|
|
tainted := make(map[string]*structs.Node, 3)
|
|
|
|
for i := 0; i < 3; i++ {
|
2017-06-02 23:11:29 +00:00
|
|
|
n := mock.Node()
|
2017-08-21 19:41:19 +00:00
|
|
|
n.ID = allocs[2+i].NodeID
|
2017-06-02 23:11:29 +00:00
|
|
|
if i == 0 {
|
|
|
|
n.Status = structs.NodeStatusDown
|
|
|
|
} else {
|
|
|
|
n.Drain = true
|
2018-02-23 01:38:44 +00:00
|
|
|
allocs[2+i].DesiredTransition.Migrate = helper.BoolToPtr(true)
|
2017-06-02 23:11:29 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
tainted[n.ID] = n
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
mockUpdateFn := allocUpdateFnMock(handled, allocUpdateFnDestructive)
|
|
|
|
reconciler := NewAllocReconciler(testLogger(), mockUpdateFn, false, job.ID, job, d, allocs, tainted)
|
|
|
|
r := reconciler.Compute()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Assert the correct results
|
|
|
|
assertResults(t, r, &resultExpectation{
|
|
|
|
createDeployment: nil,
|
|
|
|
deploymentUpdates: nil,
|
2018-03-12 20:44:33 +00:00
|
|
|
place: 3,
|
2017-08-21 19:41:19 +00:00
|
|
|
destructive: 2,
|
2018-03-12 20:44:33 +00:00
|
|
|
stop: 3,
|
2017-06-02 23:11:29 +00:00
|
|
|
desiredTGUpdates: map[string]*structs.DesiredUpdates{
|
|
|
|
job.TaskGroups[0].Name: {
|
|
|
|
Place: 1, // Place the lost
|
|
|
|
Stop: 1, // Stop the lost
|
2018-03-12 20:44:33 +00:00
|
|
|
Migrate: 2, // Migrate the tainted
|
2017-08-21 19:41:19 +00:00
|
|
|
DestructiveUpdate: 2,
|
2018-03-12 20:44:33 +00:00
|
|
|
Ignore: 5,
|
2017-06-02 23:11:29 +00:00
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
|
2017-08-21 19:41:19 +00:00
|
|
|
assertNamesHaveIndexes(t, intRange(8, 9), destructiveResultsToNames(r.destructiveUpdate))
|
2018-03-12 20:44:33 +00:00
|
|
|
assertNamesHaveIndexes(t, intRange(0, 2), placeResultsToNames(r.place))
|
|
|
|
assertNamesHaveIndexes(t, intRange(0, 2), stopResultsToNames(r.stop))
|
2017-06-02 23:11:29 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2017-08-04 00:42:14 +00:00
|
|
|
// Tests the reconciler handles a failed deployment and only replaces lost
|
|
|
|
// deployments
|
|
|
|
func TestReconciler_FailedDeployment_PlacementLost(t *testing.T) {
|
2017-06-02 23:11:29 +00:00
|
|
|
job := mock.Job()
|
|
|
|
job.TaskGroups[0].Update = noCanaryUpdate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Create an existing failed deployment that has some placed allocs
|
|
|
|
d := structs.NewDeployment(job)
|
|
|
|
d.Status = structs.DeploymentStatusFailed
|
|
|
|
d.TaskGroups[job.TaskGroups[0].Name] = &structs.DeploymentState{
|
|
|
|
Promoted: true,
|
|
|
|
DesiredTotal: 10,
|
|
|
|
PlacedAllocs: 4,
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Create 6 allocations from the old job
|
|
|
|
var allocs []*structs.Allocation
|
|
|
|
for i := 4; i < 10; i++ {
|
|
|
|
alloc := mock.Alloc()
|
|
|
|
alloc.Job = job
|
|
|
|
alloc.JobID = job.ID
|
2017-09-29 16:58:48 +00:00
|
|
|
alloc.NodeID = uuid.Generate()
|
2017-06-02 23:11:29 +00:00
|
|
|
alloc.Name = structs.AllocName(job.ID, job.TaskGroups[0].Name, uint(i))
|
|
|
|
alloc.TaskGroup = job.TaskGroups[0].Name
|
|
|
|
allocs = append(allocs, alloc)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Create the healthy replacements
|
|
|
|
handled := make(map[string]allocUpdateType)
|
|
|
|
for i := 0; i < 4; i++ {
|
|
|
|
new := mock.Alloc()
|
|
|
|
new.Job = job
|
|
|
|
new.JobID = job.ID
|
2017-09-29 16:58:48 +00:00
|
|
|
new.NodeID = uuid.Generate()
|
2017-06-02 23:11:29 +00:00
|
|
|
new.Name = structs.AllocName(job.ID, job.TaskGroups[0].Name, uint(i))
|
|
|
|
new.TaskGroup = job.TaskGroups[0].Name
|
|
|
|
new.DeploymentID = d.ID
|
|
|
|
new.DeploymentStatus = &structs.AllocDeploymentStatus{
|
|
|
|
Healthy: helper.BoolToPtr(true),
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
allocs = append(allocs, new)
|
|
|
|
handled[new.ID] = allocUpdateFnIgnore
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Build a map of tainted nodes
|
|
|
|
tainted := make(map[string]*structs.Node, 2)
|
|
|
|
for i := 0; i < 2; i++ {
|
|
|
|
n := mock.Node()
|
|
|
|
n.ID = allocs[6+i].NodeID
|
|
|
|
if i == 0 {
|
|
|
|
n.Status = structs.NodeStatusDown
|
|
|
|
} else {
|
|
|
|
n.Drain = true
|
2018-02-23 01:38:44 +00:00
|
|
|
allocs[6+i].DesiredTransition.Migrate = helper.BoolToPtr(true)
|
2017-06-02 23:11:29 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
tainted[n.ID] = n
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
mockUpdateFn := allocUpdateFnMock(handled, allocUpdateFnDestructive)
|
|
|
|
reconciler := NewAllocReconciler(testLogger(), mockUpdateFn, false, job.ID, job, d, allocs, tainted)
|
|
|
|
r := reconciler.Compute()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Assert the correct results
|
|
|
|
assertResults(t, r, &resultExpectation{
|
|
|
|
createDeployment: nil,
|
|
|
|
deploymentUpdates: nil,
|
2017-08-04 00:42:14 +00:00
|
|
|
place: 1, // Only replace the lost node
|
2017-06-02 23:11:29 +00:00
|
|
|
inplace: 0,
|
|
|
|
stop: 2,
|
|
|
|
desiredTGUpdates: map[string]*structs.DesiredUpdates{
|
|
|
|
job.TaskGroups[0].Name: {
|
2017-08-04 00:42:14 +00:00
|
|
|
Place: 1,
|
2017-06-02 23:11:29 +00:00
|
|
|
Stop: 2,
|
|
|
|
Ignore: 8,
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
|
2017-08-04 00:42:14 +00:00
|
|
|
assertNamesHaveIndexes(t, intRange(0, 0), placeResultsToNames(r.place))
|
2017-06-02 23:11:29 +00:00
|
|
|
assertNamesHaveIndexes(t, intRange(0, 1), stopResultsToNames(r.stop))
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Tests the reconciler handles a run after a deployment is complete
|
|
|
|
// successfully.
|
|
|
|
func TestReconciler_CompleteDeployment(t *testing.T) {
|
|
|
|
job := mock.Job()
|
|
|
|
job.TaskGroups[0].Update = canaryUpdate
|
|
|
|
|
2017-07-05 19:50:40 +00:00
|
|
|
d := structs.NewDeployment(job)
|
|
|
|
d.Status = structs.DeploymentStatusSuccessful
|
|
|
|
d.TaskGroups[job.TaskGroups[0].Name] = &structs.DeploymentState{
|
|
|
|
Promoted: true,
|
|
|
|
DesiredTotal: 10,
|
|
|
|
DesiredCanaries: 2,
|
|
|
|
PlacedAllocs: 10,
|
|
|
|
HealthyAllocs: 10,
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2017-06-02 23:11:29 +00:00
|
|
|
// Create allocations from the old job
|
|
|
|
var allocs []*structs.Allocation
|
|
|
|
for i := 0; i < 10; i++ {
|
|
|
|
alloc := mock.Alloc()
|
|
|
|
alloc.Job = job
|
|
|
|
alloc.JobID = job.ID
|
2017-09-29 16:58:48 +00:00
|
|
|
alloc.NodeID = uuid.Generate()
|
2017-06-02 23:11:29 +00:00
|
|
|
alloc.Name = structs.AllocName(job.ID, job.TaskGroups[0].Name, uint(i))
|
|
|
|
alloc.TaskGroup = job.TaskGroups[0].Name
|
2017-07-05 19:50:40 +00:00
|
|
|
alloc.DeploymentID = d.ID
|
|
|
|
alloc.DeploymentStatus = &structs.AllocDeploymentStatus{
|
|
|
|
Healthy: helper.BoolToPtr(true),
|
2017-06-02 23:11:29 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
allocs = append(allocs, alloc)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2017-07-06 15:39:16 +00:00
|
|
|
reconciler := NewAllocReconciler(testLogger(), allocUpdateFnIgnore, false, job.ID, job, d, allocs, nil)
|
2017-06-02 23:11:29 +00:00
|
|
|
r := reconciler.Compute()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Assert the correct results
|
|
|
|
assertResults(t, r, &resultExpectation{
|
|
|
|
createDeployment: nil,
|
|
|
|
deploymentUpdates: nil,
|
|
|
|
place: 0,
|
|
|
|
inplace: 0,
|
|
|
|
stop: 0,
|
|
|
|
desiredTGUpdates: map[string]*structs.DesiredUpdates{
|
|
|
|
job.TaskGroups[0].Name: {
|
|
|
|
Ignore: 10,
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
}
|
2017-07-05 19:50:40 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Test that a failed deployment cancels non-promoted canaries
|
|
|
|
func TestReconciler_FailedDeployment_CancelCanaries(t *testing.T) {
|
|
|
|
// Create a job with two task groups
|
|
|
|
job := mock.Job()
|
|
|
|
job.TaskGroups[0].Update = canaryUpdate
|
|
|
|
job.TaskGroups = append(job.TaskGroups, job.TaskGroups[0].Copy())
|
|
|
|
job.TaskGroups[1].Name = "two"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Create an existing failed deployment that has promoted one task group
|
|
|
|
d := structs.NewDeployment(job)
|
|
|
|
d.Status = structs.DeploymentStatusFailed
|
|
|
|
s0 := &structs.DeploymentState{
|
|
|
|
Promoted: true,
|
|
|
|
DesiredTotal: 10,
|
|
|
|
DesiredCanaries: 2,
|
|
|
|
PlacedAllocs: 4,
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
s1 := &structs.DeploymentState{
|
|
|
|
Promoted: false,
|
|
|
|
DesiredTotal: 10,
|
|
|
|
DesiredCanaries: 2,
|
|
|
|
PlacedAllocs: 2,
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
d.TaskGroups[job.TaskGroups[0].Name] = s0
|
|
|
|
d.TaskGroups[job.TaskGroups[1].Name] = s1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Create 6 allocations from the old job
|
|
|
|
var allocs []*structs.Allocation
|
|
|
|
handled := make(map[string]allocUpdateType)
|
|
|
|
for _, group := range []int{0, 1} {
|
|
|
|
replacements := 4
|
|
|
|
state := s0
|
|
|
|
if group == 1 {
|
|
|
|
replacements = 2
|
|
|
|
state = s1
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Create the healthy replacements
|
|
|
|
for i := 0; i < replacements; i++ {
|
|
|
|
new := mock.Alloc()
|
|
|
|
new.Job = job
|
|
|
|
new.JobID = job.ID
|
2017-09-29 16:58:48 +00:00
|
|
|
new.NodeID = uuid.Generate()
|
2017-07-05 19:50:40 +00:00
|
|
|
new.Name = structs.AllocName(job.ID, job.TaskGroups[group].Name, uint(i))
|
|
|
|
new.TaskGroup = job.TaskGroups[group].Name
|
|
|
|
new.DeploymentID = d.ID
|
|
|
|
new.DeploymentStatus = &structs.AllocDeploymentStatus{
|
|
|
|
Healthy: helper.BoolToPtr(true),
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
allocs = append(allocs, new)
|
|
|
|
handled[new.ID] = allocUpdateFnIgnore
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Add the alloc to the canary list
|
|
|
|
if i < 2 {
|
|
|
|
state.PlacedCanaries = append(state.PlacedCanaries, new.ID)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
for i := replacements; i < 10; i++ {
|
|
|
|
alloc := mock.Alloc()
|
|
|
|
alloc.Job = job
|
|
|
|
alloc.JobID = job.ID
|
2017-09-29 16:58:48 +00:00
|
|
|
alloc.NodeID = uuid.Generate()
|
2017-07-05 19:50:40 +00:00
|
|
|
alloc.Name = structs.AllocName(job.ID, job.TaskGroups[group].Name, uint(i))
|
|
|
|
alloc.TaskGroup = job.TaskGroups[group].Name
|
|
|
|
allocs = append(allocs, alloc)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
mockUpdateFn := allocUpdateFnMock(handled, allocUpdateFnDestructive)
|
|
|
|
reconciler := NewAllocReconciler(testLogger(), mockUpdateFn, false, job.ID, job, d, allocs, nil)
|
|
|
|
r := reconciler.Compute()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Assert the correct results
|
|
|
|
assertResults(t, r, &resultExpectation{
|
|
|
|
createDeployment: nil,
|
|
|
|
deploymentUpdates: nil,
|
|
|
|
place: 0,
|
|
|
|
inplace: 0,
|
|
|
|
stop: 2,
|
|
|
|
desiredTGUpdates: map[string]*structs.DesiredUpdates{
|
|
|
|
job.TaskGroups[0].Name: {
|
|
|
|
Ignore: 10,
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
job.TaskGroups[1].Name: {
|
|
|
|
Stop: 2,
|
|
|
|
Ignore: 8,
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assertNamesHaveIndexes(t, intRange(0, 1), stopResultsToNames(r.stop))
|
|
|
|
}
|
2017-07-05 19:55:51 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2017-07-06 02:46:57 +00:00
|
|
|
// Test that a failed deployment and updated job works
|
|
|
|
func TestReconciler_FailedDeployment_NewJob(t *testing.T) {
|
|
|
|
job := mock.Job()
|
|
|
|
job.TaskGroups[0].Update = noCanaryUpdate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Create an existing failed deployment that has some placed allocs
|
|
|
|
d := structs.NewDeployment(job)
|
|
|
|
d.Status = structs.DeploymentStatusFailed
|
|
|
|
d.TaskGroups[job.TaskGroups[0].Name] = &structs.DeploymentState{
|
|
|
|
Promoted: true,
|
|
|
|
DesiredTotal: 10,
|
|
|
|
PlacedAllocs: 4,
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Create 6 allocations from the old job
|
|
|
|
var allocs []*structs.Allocation
|
|
|
|
for i := 4; i < 10; i++ {
|
|
|
|
alloc := mock.Alloc()
|
|
|
|
alloc.Job = job
|
|
|
|
alloc.JobID = job.ID
|
2017-09-29 16:58:48 +00:00
|
|
|
alloc.NodeID = uuid.Generate()
|
2017-07-06 02:46:57 +00:00
|
|
|
alloc.Name = structs.AllocName(job.ID, job.TaskGroups[0].Name, uint(i))
|
|
|
|
alloc.TaskGroup = job.TaskGroups[0].Name
|
|
|
|
allocs = append(allocs, alloc)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Create the healthy replacements
|
|
|
|
for i := 0; i < 4; i++ {
|
|
|
|
new := mock.Alloc()
|
|
|
|
new.Job = job
|
|
|
|
new.JobID = job.ID
|
2017-09-29 16:58:48 +00:00
|
|
|
new.NodeID = uuid.Generate()
|
2017-07-06 02:46:57 +00:00
|
|
|
new.Name = structs.AllocName(job.ID, job.TaskGroups[0].Name, uint(i))
|
|
|
|
new.TaskGroup = job.TaskGroups[0].Name
|
|
|
|
new.DeploymentID = d.ID
|
|
|
|
new.DeploymentStatus = &structs.AllocDeploymentStatus{
|
|
|
|
Healthy: helper.BoolToPtr(true),
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
allocs = append(allocs, new)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Up the job version
|
|
|
|
jobNew := job.Copy()
|
2017-07-07 02:55:58 +00:00
|
|
|
jobNew.Version += 100
|
2017-07-06 02:46:57 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
reconciler := NewAllocReconciler(testLogger(), allocUpdateFnDestructive, false, job.ID, jobNew, d, allocs, nil)
|
|
|
|
r := reconciler.Compute()
|
|
|
|
|
2017-07-07 02:55:58 +00:00
|
|
|
dnew := structs.NewDeployment(jobNew)
|
2017-07-06 02:46:57 +00:00
|
|
|
dnew.TaskGroups[job.TaskGroups[0].Name] = &structs.DeploymentState{
|
|
|
|
DesiredTotal: 10,
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Assert the correct results
|
|
|
|
assertResults(t, r, &resultExpectation{
|
|
|
|
createDeployment: dnew,
|
|
|
|
deploymentUpdates: nil,
|
2017-07-15 23:31:33 +00:00
|
|
|
destructive: 4,
|
2017-07-06 02:46:57 +00:00
|
|
|
desiredTGUpdates: map[string]*structs.DesiredUpdates{
|
|
|
|
job.TaskGroups[0].Name: {
|
|
|
|
DestructiveUpdate: 4,
|
|
|
|
Ignore: 6,
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
|
2017-07-15 23:31:33 +00:00
|
|
|
assertNamesHaveIndexes(t, intRange(0, 3), destructiveResultsToNames(r.destructiveUpdate))
|
2017-07-06 02:46:57 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
2017-07-06 15:39:16 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Tests the reconciler marks a deployment as complete
|
|
|
|
func TestReconciler_MarkDeploymentComplete(t *testing.T) {
|
|
|
|
job := mock.Job()
|
|
|
|
job.TaskGroups[0].Update = noCanaryUpdate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
d := structs.NewDeployment(job)
|
|
|
|
d.TaskGroups[job.TaskGroups[0].Name] = &structs.DeploymentState{
|
|
|
|
Promoted: true,
|
|
|
|
DesiredTotal: 10,
|
|
|
|
PlacedAllocs: 10,
|
|
|
|
HealthyAllocs: 10,
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Create allocations from the old job
|
|
|
|
var allocs []*structs.Allocation
|
|
|
|
for i := 0; i < 10; i++ {
|
|
|
|
alloc := mock.Alloc()
|
|
|
|
alloc.Job = job
|
|
|
|
alloc.JobID = job.ID
|
2017-09-29 16:58:48 +00:00
|
|
|
alloc.NodeID = uuid.Generate()
|
2017-07-06 15:39:16 +00:00
|
|
|
alloc.Name = structs.AllocName(job.ID, job.TaskGroups[0].Name, uint(i))
|
|
|
|
alloc.TaskGroup = job.TaskGroups[0].Name
|
|
|
|
alloc.DeploymentID = d.ID
|
|
|
|
alloc.DeploymentStatus = &structs.AllocDeploymentStatus{
|
|
|
|
Healthy: helper.BoolToPtr(true),
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
allocs = append(allocs, alloc)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
reconciler := NewAllocReconciler(testLogger(), allocUpdateFnIgnore, false, job.ID, job, d, allocs, nil)
|
|
|
|
r := reconciler.Compute()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
updates := []*structs.DeploymentStatusUpdate{
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
DeploymentID: d.ID,
|
|
|
|
Status: structs.DeploymentStatusSuccessful,
|
|
|
|
StatusDescription: structs.DeploymentStatusDescriptionSuccessful,
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Assert the correct results
|
|
|
|
assertResults(t, r, &resultExpectation{
|
|
|
|
createDeployment: nil,
|
|
|
|
deploymentUpdates: updates,
|
|
|
|
place: 0,
|
|
|
|
inplace: 0,
|
|
|
|
stop: 0,
|
|
|
|
desiredTGUpdates: map[string]*structs.DesiredUpdates{
|
|
|
|
job.TaskGroups[0].Name: {
|
|
|
|
Ignore: 10,
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
}
|
2017-07-07 18:42:51 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2017-07-19 18:08:45 +00:00
|
|
|
// Tests the reconciler handles changing a job such that a deployment is created
|
|
|
|
// while doing a scale up but as the second eval.
|
|
|
|
func TestReconciler_JobChange_ScaleUp_SecondEval(t *testing.T) {
|
|
|
|
// Scale the job up to 15
|
|
|
|
job := mock.Job()
|
|
|
|
job.TaskGroups[0].Update = noCanaryUpdate
|
|
|
|
job.TaskGroups[0].Count = 30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Create a deployment that is paused and has placed some canaries
|
|
|
|
d := structs.NewDeployment(job)
|
|
|
|
d.TaskGroups[job.TaskGroups[0].Name] = &structs.DeploymentState{
|
|
|
|
Promoted: false,
|
|
|
|
DesiredTotal: 30,
|
|
|
|
PlacedAllocs: 20,
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Create 10 allocations from the old job
|
|
|
|
var allocs []*structs.Allocation
|
|
|
|
for i := 0; i < 10; i++ {
|
|
|
|
alloc := mock.Alloc()
|
|
|
|
alloc.Job = job
|
|
|
|
alloc.JobID = job.ID
|
2017-09-29 16:58:48 +00:00
|
|
|
alloc.NodeID = uuid.Generate()
|
2017-07-19 18:08:45 +00:00
|
|
|
alloc.Name = structs.AllocName(job.ID, job.TaskGroups[0].Name, uint(i))
|
|
|
|
alloc.TaskGroup = job.TaskGroups[0].Name
|
|
|
|
allocs = append(allocs, alloc)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Create 20 from new job
|
|
|
|
handled := make(map[string]allocUpdateType)
|
|
|
|
for i := 10; i < 30; i++ {
|
|
|
|
alloc := mock.Alloc()
|
|
|
|
alloc.Job = job
|
|
|
|
alloc.JobID = job.ID
|
|
|
|
alloc.DeploymentID = d.ID
|
2017-09-29 16:58:48 +00:00
|
|
|
alloc.NodeID = uuid.Generate()
|
2017-07-19 18:08:45 +00:00
|
|
|
alloc.Name = structs.AllocName(job.ID, job.TaskGroups[0].Name, uint(i))
|
|
|
|
alloc.TaskGroup = job.TaskGroups[0].Name
|
|
|
|
allocs = append(allocs, alloc)
|
|
|
|
handled[alloc.ID] = allocUpdateFnIgnore
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
mockUpdateFn := allocUpdateFnMock(handled, allocUpdateFnDestructive)
|
|
|
|
reconciler := NewAllocReconciler(testLogger(), mockUpdateFn, false, job.ID, job, d, allocs, nil)
|
|
|
|
r := reconciler.Compute()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Assert the correct results
|
|
|
|
assertResults(t, r, &resultExpectation{
|
|
|
|
createDeployment: nil,
|
|
|
|
deploymentUpdates: nil,
|
|
|
|
desiredTGUpdates: map[string]*structs.DesiredUpdates{
|
|
|
|
job.TaskGroups[0].Name: {
|
2017-08-07 21:13:05 +00:00
|
|
|
// All should be ignored because nothing has been marked as
|
2017-07-19 18:08:45 +00:00
|
|
|
// healthy.
|
|
|
|
Ignore: 30,
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
}
|
2017-08-21 19:41:19 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Tests the reconciler doesn't stop allocations when doing a rolling upgrade
|
|
|
|
// where the count of the old job allocs is < desired count.
|
|
|
|
func TestReconciler_RollingUpgrade_MissingAllocs(t *testing.T) {
|
|
|
|
job := mock.Job()
|
|
|
|
job.TaskGroups[0].Update = noCanaryUpdate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Create 7 allocations from the old job
|
|
|
|
var allocs []*structs.Allocation
|
|
|
|
for i := 0; i < 7; i++ {
|
|
|
|
alloc := mock.Alloc()
|
|
|
|
alloc.Job = job
|
|
|
|
alloc.JobID = job.ID
|
2017-09-29 16:58:48 +00:00
|
|
|
alloc.NodeID = uuid.Generate()
|
2017-08-21 19:41:19 +00:00
|
|
|
alloc.Name = structs.AllocName(job.ID, job.TaskGroups[0].Name, uint(i))
|
|
|
|
alloc.TaskGroup = job.TaskGroups[0].Name
|
|
|
|
allocs = append(allocs, alloc)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
reconciler := NewAllocReconciler(testLogger(), allocUpdateFnDestructive, false, job.ID, job, nil, allocs, nil)
|
|
|
|
r := reconciler.Compute()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
d := structs.NewDeployment(job)
|
|
|
|
d.TaskGroups[job.TaskGroups[0].Name] = &structs.DeploymentState{
|
|
|
|
DesiredTotal: 10,
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Assert the correct results
|
|
|
|
assertResults(t, r, &resultExpectation{
|
|
|
|
createDeployment: d,
|
|
|
|
deploymentUpdates: nil,
|
|
|
|
place: 3,
|
|
|
|
destructive: 1,
|
|
|
|
desiredTGUpdates: map[string]*structs.DesiredUpdates{
|
|
|
|
job.TaskGroups[0].Name: {
|
|
|
|
Place: 3,
|
|
|
|
DestructiveUpdate: 1,
|
|
|
|
Ignore: 6,
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assertNamesHaveIndexes(t, intRange(7, 9), placeResultsToNames(r.place))
|
|
|
|
assertNamesHaveIndexes(t, intRange(0, 0), destructiveResultsToNames(r.destructiveUpdate))
|
|
|
|
}
|
2017-10-12 23:29:07 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Tests that the reconciler handles rerunning a batch job in the case that the
|
|
|
|
// allocations are from an older instance of the job.
|
|
|
|
func TestReconciler_Batch_Rerun(t *testing.T) {
|
|
|
|
job := mock.Job()
|
|
|
|
job.Type = structs.JobTypeBatch
|
|
|
|
job.TaskGroups[0].Update = nil
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Create 10 allocations from the old job and have them be complete
|
|
|
|
var allocs []*structs.Allocation
|
|
|
|
for i := 0; i < 10; i++ {
|
|
|
|
alloc := mock.Alloc()
|
|
|
|
alloc.Job = job
|
|
|
|
alloc.JobID = job.ID
|
|
|
|
alloc.NodeID = uuid.Generate()
|
|
|
|
alloc.Name = structs.AllocName(job.ID, job.TaskGroups[0].Name, uint(i))
|
|
|
|
alloc.TaskGroup = job.TaskGroups[0].Name
|
|
|
|
alloc.ClientStatus = structs.AllocClientStatusComplete
|
|
|
|
alloc.DesiredStatus = structs.AllocDesiredStatusStop
|
|
|
|
allocs = append(allocs, alloc)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Create a copy of the job that is "new"
|
|
|
|
job2 := job.Copy()
|
|
|
|
job2.CreateIndex++
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
reconciler := NewAllocReconciler(testLogger(), allocUpdateFnIgnore, true, job2.ID, job2, nil, allocs, nil)
|
|
|
|
r := reconciler.Compute()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Assert the correct results
|
|
|
|
assertResults(t, r, &resultExpectation{
|
|
|
|
createDeployment: nil,
|
|
|
|
deploymentUpdates: nil,
|
|
|
|
place: 10,
|
|
|
|
destructive: 0,
|
|
|
|
desiredTGUpdates: map[string]*structs.DesiredUpdates{
|
|
|
|
job.TaskGroups[0].Name: {
|
|
|
|
Place: 10,
|
|
|
|
DestructiveUpdate: 0,
|
|
|
|
Ignore: 10,
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assertNamesHaveIndexes(t, intRange(0, 9), placeResultsToNames(r.place))
|
|
|
|
}
|
2018-01-19 17:58:59 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Test that a failed deployment will not result in rescheduling failed allocations
|
|
|
|
func TestReconciler_FailedDeployment_DontReschedule(t *testing.T) {
|
|
|
|
job := mock.Job()
|
|
|
|
job.TaskGroups[0].Update = noCanaryUpdate
|
|
|
|
|
2018-03-02 00:23:44 +00:00
|
|
|
tgName := job.TaskGroups[0].Name
|
|
|
|
now := time.Now()
|
2018-01-19 17:58:59 +00:00
|
|
|
// Create an existing failed deployment that has some placed allocs
|
|
|
|
d := structs.NewDeployment(job)
|
|
|
|
d.Status = structs.DeploymentStatusFailed
|
|
|
|
d.TaskGroups[job.TaskGroups[0].Name] = &structs.DeploymentState{
|
|
|
|
Promoted: true,
|
|
|
|
DesiredTotal: 5,
|
|
|
|
PlacedAllocs: 4,
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Create 4 allocations and mark two as failed
|
|
|
|
var allocs []*structs.Allocation
|
|
|
|
for i := 0; i < 4; i++ {
|
|
|
|
alloc := mock.Alloc()
|
|
|
|
alloc.Job = job
|
|
|
|
alloc.JobID = job.ID
|
|
|
|
alloc.NodeID = uuid.Generate()
|
|
|
|
alloc.Name = structs.AllocName(job.ID, job.TaskGroups[0].Name, uint(i))
|
|
|
|
alloc.TaskGroup = job.TaskGroups[0].Name
|
|
|
|
allocs = append(allocs, alloc)
|
|
|
|
}
|
2018-03-02 00:23:44 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
//create some allocations that are reschedulable now
|
2018-01-19 17:58:59 +00:00
|
|
|
allocs[2].ClientStatus = structs.AllocClientStatusFailed
|
2018-03-02 00:23:44 +00:00
|
|
|
allocs[2].TaskStates = map[string]*structs.TaskState{tgName: {State: "start",
|
|
|
|
StartedAt: now.Add(-1 * time.Hour),
|
|
|
|
FinishedAt: now.Add(-10 * time.Second)}}
|
|
|
|
|
2018-01-19 17:58:59 +00:00
|
|
|
allocs[3].ClientStatus = structs.AllocClientStatusFailed
|
2018-03-02 00:23:44 +00:00
|
|
|
allocs[3].TaskStates = map[string]*structs.TaskState{tgName: {State: "start",
|
|
|
|
StartedAt: now.Add(-1 * time.Hour),
|
|
|
|
FinishedAt: now.Add(-10 * time.Second)}}
|
2018-01-19 17:58:59 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
reconciler := NewAllocReconciler(testLogger(), allocUpdateFnDestructive, false, job.ID, job, d, allocs, nil)
|
|
|
|
r := reconciler.Compute()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Assert that no rescheduled placements were created
|
|
|
|
assertResults(t, r, &resultExpectation{
|
|
|
|
place: 0,
|
|
|
|
createDeployment: nil,
|
|
|
|
deploymentUpdates: nil,
|
|
|
|
desiredTGUpdates: map[string]*structs.DesiredUpdates{
|
|
|
|
job.TaskGroups[0].Name: {
|
|
|
|
Ignore: 2,
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
}
|
2018-02-02 23:22:37 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Test that a running deployment with failed allocs will not result in rescheduling failed allocations
|
|
|
|
func TestReconciler_DeploymentWithFailedAllocs_DontReschedule(t *testing.T) {
|
|
|
|
job := mock.Job()
|
|
|
|
job.TaskGroups[0].Update = noCanaryUpdate
|
2018-03-02 00:23:44 +00:00
|
|
|
tgName := job.TaskGroups[0].Name
|
|
|
|
now := time.Now()
|
2018-02-02 23:22:37 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Mock deployment with failed allocs, but deployment watcher hasn't marked it as failed yet
|
|
|
|
d := structs.NewDeployment(job)
|
|
|
|
d.Status = structs.DeploymentStatusRunning
|
|
|
|
d.TaskGroups[job.TaskGroups[0].Name] = &structs.DeploymentState{
|
|
|
|
Promoted: false,
|
|
|
|
DesiredTotal: 5,
|
|
|
|
PlacedAllocs: 4,
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Create 4 allocations and mark two as failed
|
|
|
|
var allocs []*structs.Allocation
|
|
|
|
for i := 0; i < 4; i++ {
|
|
|
|
alloc := mock.Alloc()
|
|
|
|
alloc.Job = job
|
|
|
|
alloc.JobID = job.ID
|
|
|
|
alloc.NodeID = uuid.Generate()
|
|
|
|
alloc.Name = structs.AllocName(job.ID, job.TaskGroups[0].Name, uint(i))
|
|
|
|
alloc.TaskGroup = job.TaskGroups[0].Name
|
|
|
|
alloc.DeploymentID = d.ID
|
|
|
|
allocs = append(allocs, alloc)
|
|
|
|
}
|
2018-03-02 00:23:44 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Create allocs that are reschedulable now
|
2018-02-02 23:22:37 +00:00
|
|
|
allocs[2].ClientStatus = structs.AllocClientStatusFailed
|
2018-03-02 00:23:44 +00:00
|
|
|
allocs[2].TaskStates = map[string]*structs.TaskState{tgName: {State: "start",
|
|
|
|
StartedAt: now.Add(-1 * time.Hour),
|
|
|
|
FinishedAt: now.Add(-10 * time.Second)}}
|
|
|
|
|
2018-02-02 23:22:37 +00:00
|
|
|
allocs[3].ClientStatus = structs.AllocClientStatusFailed
|
2018-03-02 00:23:44 +00:00
|
|
|
allocs[3].TaskStates = map[string]*structs.TaskState{tgName: {State: "start",
|
|
|
|
StartedAt: now.Add(-1 * time.Hour),
|
|
|
|
FinishedAt: now.Add(-10 * time.Second)}}
|
2018-02-02 23:22:37 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
reconciler := NewAllocReconciler(testLogger(), allocUpdateFnDestructive, false, job.ID, job, d, allocs, nil)
|
|
|
|
r := reconciler.Compute()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Assert that no rescheduled placements were created
|
|
|
|
assertResults(t, r, &resultExpectation{
|
|
|
|
place: 0,
|
|
|
|
createDeployment: nil,
|
|
|
|
deploymentUpdates: nil,
|
|
|
|
desiredTGUpdates: map[string]*structs.DesiredUpdates{
|
|
|
|
job.TaskGroups[0].Name: {
|
|
|
|
Ignore: 2,
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
}
|