4012 lines
108 KiB
Go
4012 lines
108 KiB
Go
package consul
|
|
|
|
import (
|
|
"fmt"
|
|
"os"
|
|
"reflect"
|
|
"strings"
|
|
"sync/atomic"
|
|
"testing"
|
|
"time"
|
|
|
|
"github.com/hashicorp/consul/acl"
|
|
"github.com/hashicorp/consul/agent/structs"
|
|
"github.com/hashicorp/consul/api"
|
|
"github.com/hashicorp/consul/sdk/testutil"
|
|
"github.com/hashicorp/consul/sdk/testutil/retry"
|
|
"github.com/mitchellh/copystructure"
|
|
"github.com/stretchr/testify/assert"
|
|
"github.com/stretchr/testify/require"
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
var testACLPolicy = `
|
|
key "" {
|
|
policy = "deny"
|
|
}
|
|
key "foo/" {
|
|
policy = "write"
|
|
}
|
|
`
|
|
|
|
var testACLPolicyNew = `
|
|
key_prefix "" {
|
|
policy = "deny"
|
|
}
|
|
key_prefix "foo/" {
|
|
policy = "write"
|
|
}
|
|
`
|
|
|
|
type asyncResolutionResult struct {
|
|
authz acl.Authorizer
|
|
err error
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func verifyAuthorizerChain(t *testing.T, expected acl.Authorizer, actual acl.Authorizer) {
|
|
expectedChainAuthz, ok := expected.(*acl.ChainedAuthorizer)
|
|
require.True(t, ok, "expected Authorizer is not a ChainedAuthorizer")
|
|
actualChainAuthz, ok := actual.(*acl.ChainedAuthorizer)
|
|
require.True(t, ok, "actual Authorizer is not a ChainedAuthorizer")
|
|
|
|
expectedChain := expectedChainAuthz.AuthorizerChain()
|
|
actualChain := actualChainAuthz.AuthorizerChain()
|
|
|
|
require.Equal(t, len(expectedChain), len(actualChain), "ChainedAuthorizers have different length chains")
|
|
for idx, expectedAuthz := range expectedChain {
|
|
actualAuthz := actualChain[idx]
|
|
|
|
// pointer equality - because we want to verify authorizer reuse
|
|
require.True(t, expectedAuthz == actualAuthz, "Authorizer pointers are not equal")
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func resolveTokenAsync(r *ACLResolver, token string, ch chan *asyncResolutionResult) {
|
|
authz, err := r.ResolveToken(token)
|
|
ch <- &asyncResolutionResult{authz: authz, err: err}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func testIdentityForToken(token string) (bool, structs.ACLIdentity, error) {
|
|
switch token {
|
|
case "missing-policy":
|
|
return true, &structs.ACLToken{
|
|
AccessorID: "435a75af-1763-4980-89f4-f0951dda53b4",
|
|
SecretID: "b1b6be70-ed2e-4c80-8495-bdb3db110b1e",
|
|
Policies: []structs.ACLTokenPolicyLink{
|
|
{
|
|
ID: "not-found",
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
ID: "acl-ro",
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
}, nil
|
|
case "missing-role":
|
|
return true, &structs.ACLToken{
|
|
AccessorID: "435a75af-1763-4980-89f4-f0951dda53b4",
|
|
SecretID: "b1b6be70-ed2e-4c80-8495-bdb3db110b1e",
|
|
Roles: []structs.ACLTokenRoleLink{
|
|
{
|
|
ID: "not-found",
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
ID: "acl-ro",
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
}, nil
|
|
case "missing-policy-on-role":
|
|
return true, &structs.ACLToken{
|
|
AccessorID: "435a75af-1763-4980-89f4-f0951dda53b4",
|
|
SecretID: "b1b6be70-ed2e-4c80-8495-bdb3db110b1e",
|
|
Roles: []structs.ACLTokenRoleLink{
|
|
{
|
|
ID: "missing-policy",
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
}, nil
|
|
case "legacy-management":
|
|
return true, &structs.ACLToken{
|
|
AccessorID: "d109a033-99d1-47e2-a711-d6593373a973",
|
|
SecretID: "415cd1e1-1493-4fb4-827d-d762ed9cfe7c",
|
|
Type: structs.ACLTokenTypeManagement,
|
|
}, nil
|
|
case "legacy-client":
|
|
return true, &structs.ACLToken{
|
|
AccessorID: "b7375838-b104-4a25-b457-329d939bf257",
|
|
SecretID: "03f49328-c23c-4b26-92a2-3b898332400d",
|
|
Type: structs.ACLTokenTypeClient,
|
|
Rules: `service "" { policy = "read" }`,
|
|
}, nil
|
|
case "found":
|
|
return true, &structs.ACLToken{
|
|
AccessorID: "5f57c1f6-6a89-4186-9445-531b316e01df",
|
|
SecretID: "a1a54629-5050-4d17-8a4e-560d2423f835",
|
|
Policies: []structs.ACLTokenPolicyLink{
|
|
{
|
|
ID: "node-wr",
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
ID: "dc2-key-wr",
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
}, nil
|
|
case "found-role":
|
|
// This should be permission-wise identical to "found", except it
|
|
// gets it's policies indirectly by way of a Role.
|
|
return true, &structs.ACLToken{
|
|
AccessorID: "5f57c1f6-6a89-4186-9445-531b316e01df",
|
|
SecretID: "a1a54629-5050-4d17-8a4e-560d2423f835",
|
|
Roles: []structs.ACLTokenRoleLink{
|
|
{
|
|
ID: "found",
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
}, nil
|
|
case "found-policy-and-role":
|
|
return true, &structs.ACLToken{
|
|
AccessorID: "5f57c1f6-6a89-4186-9445-531b316e01df",
|
|
SecretID: "a1a54629-5050-4d17-8a4e-560d2423f835",
|
|
Policies: []structs.ACLTokenPolicyLink{
|
|
{
|
|
ID: "node-wr",
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
ID: "dc2-key-wr",
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
Roles: []structs.ACLTokenRoleLink{
|
|
{
|
|
ID: "service-ro",
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
}, nil
|
|
case "found-synthetic-policy-1":
|
|
return true, &structs.ACLToken{
|
|
AccessorID: "f6c5a5fb-4da4-422b-9abf-2c942813fc71",
|
|
SecretID: "55cb7d69-2bea-42c3-a68f-2a1443d2abbc",
|
|
ServiceIdentities: []*structs.ACLServiceIdentity{
|
|
{
|
|
ServiceName: "service1",
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
}, nil
|
|
case "found-synthetic-policy-2":
|
|
return true, &structs.ACLToken{
|
|
AccessorID: "7c87dfad-be37-446e-8305-299585677cb5",
|
|
SecretID: "dfca9676-ac80-453a-837b-4c0cf923473c",
|
|
ServiceIdentities: []*structs.ACLServiceIdentity{
|
|
{
|
|
ServiceName: "service2",
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
}, nil
|
|
case "found-synthetic-policy-3":
|
|
return true, &structs.ACLToken{
|
|
AccessorID: "bebccc92-3987-489d-84c2-ffd00d93ef93",
|
|
SecretID: "de70f2e2-69d9-4e88-9815-f91c03c6bcb1",
|
|
NodeIdentities: []*structs.ACLNodeIdentity{
|
|
{
|
|
NodeName: "test-node1",
|
|
Datacenter: "dc1",
|
|
},
|
|
// as the resolver is in dc1 this identity should be ignored
|
|
{
|
|
NodeName: "test-node-dc2",
|
|
Datacenter: "dc2",
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
}, nil
|
|
case "found-synthetic-policy-4":
|
|
return true, &structs.ACLToken{
|
|
AccessorID: "359b9927-25fd-46b9-bd14-3470f848ec65",
|
|
SecretID: "83c4d500-847d-49f7-8c08-0483f6b4156e",
|
|
NodeIdentities: []*structs.ACLNodeIdentity{
|
|
{
|
|
NodeName: "test-node2",
|
|
Datacenter: "dc1",
|
|
},
|
|
// as the resolver is in dc1 this identity should be ignored
|
|
{
|
|
NodeName: "test-node-dc2",
|
|
Datacenter: "dc2",
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
}, nil
|
|
case "found-role-node-identity":
|
|
return true, &structs.ACLToken{
|
|
AccessorID: "f3f47a09-de29-4c57-8f54-b65a9be79641",
|
|
SecretID: "e96aca00-5951-4b97-b0e5-5816f42dfb93",
|
|
Roles: []structs.ACLTokenRoleLink{
|
|
{
|
|
ID: "node-identity",
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
}, nil
|
|
case "acl-ro":
|
|
return true, &structs.ACLToken{
|
|
AccessorID: "435a75af-1763-4980-89f4-f0951dda53b4",
|
|
SecretID: "b1b6be70-ed2e-4c80-8495-bdb3db110b1e",
|
|
Policies: []structs.ACLTokenPolicyLink{
|
|
{
|
|
ID: "acl-ro",
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
}, nil
|
|
case "acl-wr":
|
|
return true, &structs.ACLToken{
|
|
AccessorID: "435a75af-1763-4980-89f4-f0951dda53b4",
|
|
SecretID: "b1b6be70-ed2e-4c80-8495-bdb3db110b1e",
|
|
Policies: []structs.ACLTokenPolicyLink{
|
|
{
|
|
ID: "acl-wr",
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
}, nil
|
|
case "racey-unmodified":
|
|
return true, &structs.ACLToken{
|
|
AccessorID: "5f57c1f6-6a89-4186-9445-531b316e01df",
|
|
SecretID: "a1a54629-5050-4d17-8a4e-560d2423f835",
|
|
Policies: []structs.ACLTokenPolicyLink{
|
|
{
|
|
ID: "node-wr",
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
ID: "acl-wr",
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
}, nil
|
|
case "racey-modified":
|
|
return true, &structs.ACLToken{
|
|
AccessorID: "5f57c1f6-6a89-4186-9445-531b316e01df",
|
|
SecretID: "a1a54629-5050-4d17-8a4e-560d2423f835",
|
|
Policies: []structs.ACLTokenPolicyLink{
|
|
{
|
|
ID: "node-wr",
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
}, nil
|
|
case "concurrent-resolve":
|
|
return true, &structs.ACLToken{
|
|
AccessorID: "5f57c1f6-6a89-4186-9445-531b316e01df",
|
|
SecretID: "a1a54629-5050-4d17-8a4e-560d2423f835",
|
|
Policies: []structs.ACLTokenPolicyLink{
|
|
{
|
|
ID: "node-wr",
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
ID: "acl-wr",
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
}, nil
|
|
case anonymousToken:
|
|
return true, &structs.ACLToken{
|
|
AccessorID: "00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000002",
|
|
SecretID: anonymousToken,
|
|
Policies: []structs.ACLTokenPolicyLink{
|
|
{
|
|
ID: "node-wr",
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
}, nil
|
|
default:
|
|
return testIdentityForTokenEnterprise(token)
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func testPolicyForID(policyID string) (bool, *structs.ACLPolicy, error) {
|
|
switch policyID {
|
|
case "acl-ro":
|
|
return true, &structs.ACLPolicy{
|
|
ID: "acl-ro",
|
|
Name: "acl-ro",
|
|
Description: "acl-ro",
|
|
Rules: `acl = "read"`,
|
|
Syntax: acl.SyntaxCurrent,
|
|
RaftIndex: structs.RaftIndex{CreateIndex: 1, ModifyIndex: 2},
|
|
}, nil
|
|
case "acl-wr":
|
|
return true, &structs.ACLPolicy{
|
|
ID: "acl-wr",
|
|
Name: "acl-wr",
|
|
Description: "acl-wr",
|
|
Rules: `acl = "write"`,
|
|
Syntax: acl.SyntaxCurrent,
|
|
RaftIndex: structs.RaftIndex{CreateIndex: 1, ModifyIndex: 2},
|
|
}, nil
|
|
case "service-ro":
|
|
return true, &structs.ACLPolicy{
|
|
ID: "service-ro",
|
|
Name: "service-ro",
|
|
Description: "service-ro",
|
|
Rules: `service_prefix "" { policy = "read" }`,
|
|
Syntax: acl.SyntaxCurrent,
|
|
RaftIndex: structs.RaftIndex{CreateIndex: 1, ModifyIndex: 2},
|
|
}, nil
|
|
case "service-wr":
|
|
return true, &structs.ACLPolicy{
|
|
ID: "service-wr",
|
|
Name: "service-wr",
|
|
Description: "service-wr",
|
|
Rules: `service_prefix "" { policy = "write" }`,
|
|
Syntax: acl.SyntaxCurrent,
|
|
RaftIndex: structs.RaftIndex{CreateIndex: 1, ModifyIndex: 2},
|
|
}, nil
|
|
case "node-wr":
|
|
return true, &structs.ACLPolicy{
|
|
ID: "node-wr",
|
|
Name: "node-wr",
|
|
Description: "node-wr",
|
|
Rules: `node_prefix "" { policy = "write"}`,
|
|
Syntax: acl.SyntaxCurrent,
|
|
Datacenters: []string{"dc1"},
|
|
RaftIndex: structs.RaftIndex{CreateIndex: 1, ModifyIndex: 2},
|
|
}, nil
|
|
case "dc2-key-wr":
|
|
return true, &structs.ACLPolicy{
|
|
ID: "dc2-key-wr",
|
|
Name: "dc2-key-wr",
|
|
Description: "dc2-key-wr",
|
|
Rules: `key_prefix "" { policy = "write"}`,
|
|
Syntax: acl.SyntaxCurrent,
|
|
Datacenters: []string{"dc2"},
|
|
RaftIndex: structs.RaftIndex{CreateIndex: 1, ModifyIndex: 2},
|
|
}, nil
|
|
default:
|
|
return testPolicyForIDEnterprise(policyID)
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func testRoleForID(roleID string) (bool, *structs.ACLRole, error) {
|
|
switch roleID {
|
|
case "service-ro":
|
|
return true, &structs.ACLRole{
|
|
ID: "service-ro",
|
|
Name: "service-ro",
|
|
Description: "service-ro",
|
|
Policies: []structs.ACLRolePolicyLink{
|
|
{
|
|
ID: "service-ro",
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
RaftIndex: structs.RaftIndex{CreateIndex: 1, ModifyIndex: 2},
|
|
}, nil
|
|
case "service-wr":
|
|
return true, &structs.ACLRole{
|
|
ID: "service-wr",
|
|
Name: "service-wr",
|
|
Description: "service-wr",
|
|
Policies: []structs.ACLRolePolicyLink{
|
|
{
|
|
ID: "service-wr",
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
RaftIndex: structs.RaftIndex{CreateIndex: 1, ModifyIndex: 2},
|
|
}, nil
|
|
case "missing-policy":
|
|
return true, &structs.ACLRole{
|
|
ID: "missing-policy",
|
|
Name: "missing-policy",
|
|
Description: "missing-policy",
|
|
Policies: []structs.ACLRolePolicyLink{
|
|
{
|
|
ID: "not-found",
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
ID: "acl-ro",
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
RaftIndex: structs.RaftIndex{CreateIndex: 1, ModifyIndex: 2},
|
|
}, nil
|
|
case "found":
|
|
return true, &structs.ACLRole{
|
|
ID: "found",
|
|
Name: "found",
|
|
Description: "found",
|
|
Policies: []structs.ACLRolePolicyLink{
|
|
{
|
|
ID: "node-wr",
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
ID: "dc2-key-wr",
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
}, nil
|
|
case "acl-ro":
|
|
return true, &structs.ACLRole{
|
|
ID: "acl-ro",
|
|
Name: "acl-ro",
|
|
Description: "acl-ro",
|
|
Policies: []structs.ACLRolePolicyLink{
|
|
{
|
|
ID: "acl-ro",
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
}, nil
|
|
case "acl-wr":
|
|
return true, &structs.ACLRole{
|
|
ID: "acl-rw",
|
|
Name: "acl-rw",
|
|
Description: "acl-rw",
|
|
Policies: []structs.ACLRolePolicyLink{
|
|
{
|
|
ID: "acl-wr",
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
}, nil
|
|
case "racey-unmodified":
|
|
return true, &structs.ACLRole{
|
|
ID: "racey-unmodified",
|
|
Name: "racey-unmodified",
|
|
Description: "racey-unmodified",
|
|
Policies: []structs.ACLRolePolicyLink{
|
|
{
|
|
ID: "node-wr",
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
ID: "acl-wr",
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
}, nil
|
|
case "racey-modified":
|
|
return true, &structs.ACLRole{
|
|
ID: "racey-modified",
|
|
Name: "racey-modified",
|
|
Description: "racey-modified",
|
|
Policies: []structs.ACLRolePolicyLink{
|
|
{
|
|
ID: "node-wr",
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
}, nil
|
|
case "concurrent-resolve-1":
|
|
return true, &structs.ACLRole{
|
|
ID: "concurrent-resolve-1",
|
|
Name: "concurrent-resolve-1",
|
|
Description: "concurrent-resolve-1",
|
|
Policies: []structs.ACLRolePolicyLink{
|
|
{
|
|
ID: "node-wr",
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
ID: "acl-wr",
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
}, nil
|
|
case "concurrent-resolve-2":
|
|
return true, &structs.ACLRole{
|
|
ID: "concurrent-resolve-2",
|
|
Name: "concurrent-resolve-2",
|
|
Description: "concurrent-resolve-2",
|
|
Policies: []structs.ACLRolePolicyLink{
|
|
{
|
|
ID: "node-wr",
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
ID: "acl-wr",
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
}, nil
|
|
case "node-identity":
|
|
return true, &structs.ACLRole{
|
|
ID: "node-identity",
|
|
Name: "node-identity",
|
|
Description: "node-identity",
|
|
NodeIdentities: []*structs.ACLNodeIdentity{
|
|
{
|
|
NodeName: "test-node",
|
|
Datacenter: "dc1",
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
NodeName: "test-node-dc2",
|
|
Datacenter: "dc2",
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
}, nil
|
|
default:
|
|
return testRoleForIDEnterprise(roleID)
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// ACLResolverTestDelegate is used to test
|
|
// the ACLResolver without running Agents
|
|
type ACLResolverTestDelegate struct {
|
|
// enabled is no longer part of the delegate. It is still here as a field on
|
|
// the fake delegate because many tests use this field to enable ACLs. This field
|
|
// is now used to set ACLResolverConfig.Config.ACLsEnabled.
|
|
enabled bool
|
|
datacenter string
|
|
legacy bool
|
|
localTokens bool
|
|
localPolicies bool
|
|
localRoles bool
|
|
getPolicyFn func(*structs.ACLPolicyResolveLegacyRequest, *structs.ACLPolicyResolveLegacyResponse) error
|
|
tokenReadFn func(*structs.ACLTokenGetRequest, *structs.ACLTokenResponse) error
|
|
policyResolveFn func(*structs.ACLPolicyBatchGetRequest, *structs.ACLPolicyBatchResponse) error
|
|
roleResolveFn func(*structs.ACLRoleBatchGetRequest, *structs.ACLRoleBatchResponse) error
|
|
|
|
localTokenResolutions int32
|
|
remoteTokenResolutions int32
|
|
localPolicyResolutions int32
|
|
remotePolicyResolutions int32
|
|
localRoleResolutions int32
|
|
remoteRoleResolutions int32
|
|
remoteLegacyResolutions int32
|
|
|
|
// state for the optional default resolver function defaultTokenReadFn
|
|
tokenCached bool
|
|
// state for the optional default resolver function defaultPolicyResolveFn
|
|
policyCached bool
|
|
// state for the optional default resolver function defaultRoleResolveFn
|
|
roleCached bool
|
|
|
|
EnterpriseACLResolverTestDelegate
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func (d *ACLResolverTestDelegate) Reset() {
|
|
d.tokenCached = false
|
|
d.policyCached = false
|
|
d.roleCached = false
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
var errRPC = fmt.Errorf("Induced RPC Error")
|
|
|
|
func (d *ACLResolverTestDelegate) defaultTokenReadFn(errAfterCached error) func(*structs.ACLTokenGetRequest, *structs.ACLTokenResponse) error {
|
|
return func(args *structs.ACLTokenGetRequest, reply *structs.ACLTokenResponse) error {
|
|
if !d.tokenCached {
|
|
err := d.plainTokenReadFn(args, reply)
|
|
d.tokenCached = true
|
|
return err
|
|
}
|
|
return errAfterCached
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func (d *ACLResolverTestDelegate) plainTokenReadFn(args *structs.ACLTokenGetRequest, reply *structs.ACLTokenResponse) error {
|
|
_, token, err := testIdentityForToken(args.TokenID)
|
|
if token != nil {
|
|
reply.Token = token.(*structs.ACLToken)
|
|
}
|
|
return err
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func (d *ACLResolverTestDelegate) defaultPolicyResolveFn(errAfterCached error) func(*structs.ACLPolicyBatchGetRequest, *structs.ACLPolicyBatchResponse) error {
|
|
return func(args *structs.ACLPolicyBatchGetRequest, reply *structs.ACLPolicyBatchResponse) error {
|
|
if !d.policyCached {
|
|
err := d.plainPolicyResolveFn(args, reply)
|
|
d.policyCached = true
|
|
return err
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return errAfterCached
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func (d *ACLResolverTestDelegate) plainPolicyResolveFn(args *structs.ACLPolicyBatchGetRequest, reply *structs.ACLPolicyBatchResponse) error {
|
|
// TODO: if we were being super correct about it, we'd verify the token first
|
|
// TODO: and possibly return a not-found or permission-denied here
|
|
|
|
for _, policyID := range args.PolicyIDs {
|
|
_, policy, _ := testPolicyForID(policyID)
|
|
if policy != nil {
|
|
reply.Policies = append(reply.Policies, policy)
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return nil
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func (d *ACLResolverTestDelegate) defaultRoleResolveFn(errAfterCached error) func(*structs.ACLRoleBatchGetRequest, *structs.ACLRoleBatchResponse) error {
|
|
return func(args *structs.ACLRoleBatchGetRequest, reply *structs.ACLRoleBatchResponse) error {
|
|
if !d.roleCached {
|
|
err := d.plainRoleResolveFn(args, reply)
|
|
d.roleCached = true
|
|
return err
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return errAfterCached
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// plainRoleResolveFn tries to follow the normal logic of ACL.RoleResolve using
|
|
// the test fixtures.
|
|
func (d *ACLResolverTestDelegate) plainRoleResolveFn(args *structs.ACLRoleBatchGetRequest, reply *structs.ACLRoleBatchResponse) error {
|
|
// TODO: if we were being super correct about it, we'd verify the token first
|
|
// TODO: and possibly return a not-found or permission-denied here
|
|
|
|
for _, roleID := range args.RoleIDs {
|
|
_, role, _ := testRoleForID(roleID)
|
|
if role != nil {
|
|
reply.Roles = append(reply.Roles, role)
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return nil
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func (d *ACLResolverTestDelegate) ACLDatacenter(legacy bool) string {
|
|
return d.datacenter
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func (d *ACLResolverTestDelegate) UseLegacyACLs() bool {
|
|
return d.legacy
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func (d *ACLResolverTestDelegate) ResolveIdentityFromToken(token string) (bool, structs.ACLIdentity, error) {
|
|
if !d.localTokens {
|
|
return false, nil, nil
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
atomic.AddInt32(&d.localTokenResolutions, 1)
|
|
return testIdentityForToken(token)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func (d *ACLResolverTestDelegate) ResolvePolicyFromID(policyID string) (bool, *structs.ACLPolicy, error) {
|
|
if !d.localPolicies {
|
|
return false, nil, nil
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
atomic.AddInt32(&d.localPolicyResolutions, 1)
|
|
return testPolicyForID(policyID)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func (d *ACLResolverTestDelegate) ResolveRoleFromID(roleID string) (bool, *structs.ACLRole, error) {
|
|
if !d.localRoles {
|
|
return false, nil, nil
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
atomic.AddInt32(&d.localRoleResolutions, 1)
|
|
return testRoleForID(roleID)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func (d *ACLResolverTestDelegate) RPC(method string, args interface{}, reply interface{}) error {
|
|
switch method {
|
|
case "ACL.GetPolicy":
|
|
atomic.AddInt32(&d.remoteLegacyResolutions, 1)
|
|
if d.getPolicyFn != nil {
|
|
return d.getPolicyFn(args.(*structs.ACLPolicyResolveLegacyRequest), reply.(*structs.ACLPolicyResolveLegacyResponse))
|
|
}
|
|
panic("Bad Test Implementation: should provide a getPolicyFn to the ACLResolverTestDelegate")
|
|
case "ACL.TokenRead":
|
|
atomic.AddInt32(&d.remoteTokenResolutions, 1)
|
|
if d.tokenReadFn != nil {
|
|
return d.tokenReadFn(args.(*structs.ACLTokenGetRequest), reply.(*structs.ACLTokenResponse))
|
|
}
|
|
panic("Bad Test Implementation: should provide a tokenReadFn to the ACLResolverTestDelegate")
|
|
case "ACL.PolicyResolve":
|
|
atomic.AddInt32(&d.remotePolicyResolutions, 1)
|
|
if d.policyResolveFn != nil {
|
|
return d.policyResolveFn(args.(*structs.ACLPolicyBatchGetRequest), reply.(*structs.ACLPolicyBatchResponse))
|
|
}
|
|
panic("Bad Test Implementation: should provide a policyResolveFn to the ACLResolverTestDelegate")
|
|
case "ACL.RoleResolve":
|
|
atomic.AddInt32(&d.remoteRoleResolutions, 1)
|
|
if d.roleResolveFn != nil {
|
|
return d.roleResolveFn(args.(*structs.ACLRoleBatchGetRequest), reply.(*structs.ACLRoleBatchResponse))
|
|
}
|
|
panic("Bad Test Implementation: should provide a roleResolveFn to the ACLResolverTestDelegate")
|
|
}
|
|
if handled, err := d.EnterpriseACLResolverTestDelegate.RPC(method, args, reply); handled {
|
|
return err
|
|
}
|
|
panic("Bad Test Implementation: Was the ACLResolver updated to use new RPC methods")
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func newTestACLResolver(t *testing.T, delegate *ACLResolverTestDelegate, cb func(*ACLResolverConfig)) *ACLResolver {
|
|
config := DefaultConfig()
|
|
config.ACLDefaultPolicy = "deny"
|
|
config.ACLDownPolicy = "extend-cache"
|
|
config.ACLsEnabled = delegate.enabled
|
|
rconf := &ACLResolverConfig{
|
|
Config: config,
|
|
Logger: testutil.Logger(t),
|
|
CacheConfig: &structs.ACLCachesConfig{
|
|
Identities: 4,
|
|
Policies: 4,
|
|
ParsedPolicies: 4,
|
|
Authorizers: 4,
|
|
Roles: 4,
|
|
},
|
|
AutoDisable: true,
|
|
Delegate: delegate,
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if cb != nil {
|
|
cb(rconf)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
resolver, err := NewACLResolver(rconf)
|
|
require.NoError(t, err)
|
|
return resolver
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func TestACLResolver_Disabled(t *testing.T) {
|
|
t.Parallel()
|
|
|
|
delegate := &ACLResolverTestDelegate{
|
|
enabled: false,
|
|
datacenter: "dc1",
|
|
legacy: false,
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
r := newTestACLResolver(t, delegate, nil)
|
|
|
|
authz, err := r.ResolveToken("does not exist")
|
|
require.Nil(t, authz)
|
|
require.Nil(t, err)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func TestACLResolver_ResolveRootACL(t *testing.T) {
|
|
t.Parallel()
|
|
delegate := &ACLResolverTestDelegate{
|
|
enabled: true,
|
|
datacenter: "dc1",
|
|
legacy: false,
|
|
}
|
|
r := newTestACLResolver(t, delegate, nil)
|
|
|
|
t.Run("Allow", func(t *testing.T) {
|
|
authz, err := r.ResolveToken("allow")
|
|
require.Nil(t, authz)
|
|
require.Error(t, err)
|
|
require.True(t, acl.IsErrRootDenied(err))
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
t.Run("Deny", func(t *testing.T) {
|
|
authz, err := r.ResolveToken("deny")
|
|
require.Nil(t, authz)
|
|
require.Error(t, err)
|
|
require.True(t, acl.IsErrRootDenied(err))
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
t.Run("Manage", func(t *testing.T) {
|
|
authz, err := r.ResolveToken("manage")
|
|
require.Nil(t, authz)
|
|
require.Error(t, err)
|
|
require.True(t, acl.IsErrRootDenied(err))
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func TestACLResolver_DownPolicy(t *testing.T) {
|
|
t.Parallel()
|
|
|
|
requireIdentityCached := func(t *testing.T, r *ACLResolver, id string, present bool, msg string) {
|
|
t.Helper()
|
|
|
|
cacheVal := r.cache.GetIdentity(id)
|
|
require.NotNil(t, cacheVal)
|
|
if present {
|
|
require.NotNil(t, cacheVal.Identity, msg)
|
|
} else {
|
|
require.Nil(t, cacheVal.Identity, msg)
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
requirePolicyCached := func(t *testing.T, r *ACLResolver, policyID string, present bool, msg string) {
|
|
t.Helper()
|
|
|
|
cacheVal := r.cache.GetPolicy(policyID)
|
|
require.NotNil(t, cacheVal)
|
|
if present {
|
|
require.NotNil(t, cacheVal.Policy, msg)
|
|
} else {
|
|
require.Nil(t, cacheVal.Policy, msg)
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
t.Run("Deny", func(t *testing.T) {
|
|
t.Parallel()
|
|
delegate := &ACLResolverTestDelegate{
|
|
enabled: true,
|
|
datacenter: "dc1",
|
|
legacy: false,
|
|
localTokens: false,
|
|
localPolicies: true,
|
|
localRoles: true,
|
|
tokenReadFn: func(*structs.ACLTokenGetRequest, *structs.ACLTokenResponse) error {
|
|
return errRPC
|
|
},
|
|
}
|
|
r := newTestACLResolver(t, delegate, func(config *ACLResolverConfig) {
|
|
config.Config.ACLDownPolicy = "deny"
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
authz, err := r.ResolveToken("foo")
|
|
require.NoError(t, err)
|
|
require.NotNil(t, authz)
|
|
require.Equal(t, authz, acl.DenyAll())
|
|
|
|
requireIdentityCached(t, r, tokenSecretCacheID("foo"), false, "not present")
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
t.Run("Allow", func(t *testing.T) {
|
|
t.Parallel()
|
|
delegate := &ACLResolverTestDelegate{
|
|
enabled: true,
|
|
datacenter: "dc1",
|
|
legacy: false,
|
|
localTokens: false,
|
|
localPolicies: true,
|
|
localRoles: true,
|
|
tokenReadFn: func(*structs.ACLTokenGetRequest, *structs.ACLTokenResponse) error {
|
|
return errRPC
|
|
},
|
|
}
|
|
r := newTestACLResolver(t, delegate, func(config *ACLResolverConfig) {
|
|
config.Config.ACLDownPolicy = "allow"
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
authz, err := r.ResolveToken("foo")
|
|
require.NoError(t, err)
|
|
require.NotNil(t, authz)
|
|
require.Equal(t, authz, acl.AllowAll())
|
|
|
|
requireIdentityCached(t, r, tokenSecretCacheID("foo"), false, "not present")
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
t.Run("Expired-Policy", func(t *testing.T) {
|
|
t.Parallel()
|
|
delegate := &ACLResolverTestDelegate{
|
|
enabled: true,
|
|
datacenter: "dc1",
|
|
legacy: false,
|
|
localTokens: true,
|
|
localPolicies: false,
|
|
localRoles: false,
|
|
}
|
|
delegate.policyResolveFn = delegate.defaultPolicyResolveFn(errRPC)
|
|
|
|
r := newTestACLResolver(t, delegate, func(config *ACLResolverConfig) {
|
|
config.Config.ACLDownPolicy = "deny"
|
|
config.Config.ACLPolicyTTL = 0
|
|
config.Config.ACLRoleTTL = 0
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
authz, err := r.ResolveToken("found")
|
|
require.NoError(t, err)
|
|
require.NotNil(t, authz)
|
|
require.Equal(t, acl.Allow, authz.NodeWrite("foo", nil))
|
|
|
|
requirePolicyCached(t, r, "node-wr", true, "cached") // from "found" token
|
|
requirePolicyCached(t, r, "dc2-key-wr", true, "cached") // from "found" token
|
|
|
|
// policy cache expired - so we will fail to resolve that policy and use the default policy only
|
|
authz2, err := r.ResolveToken("found")
|
|
require.NoError(t, err)
|
|
require.NotNil(t, authz2)
|
|
require.NotEqual(t, authz, authz2)
|
|
require.Equal(t, acl.Deny, authz2.NodeWrite("foo", nil))
|
|
|
|
requirePolicyCached(t, r, "node-wr", false, "expired") // from "found" token
|
|
requirePolicyCached(t, r, "dc2-key-wr", false, "expired") // from "found" token
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
t.Run("Expired-Role", func(t *testing.T) {
|
|
t.Parallel()
|
|
delegate := &ACLResolverTestDelegate{
|
|
enabled: true,
|
|
datacenter: "dc1",
|
|
legacy: false,
|
|
localTokens: true,
|
|
localPolicies: false,
|
|
localRoles: false,
|
|
}
|
|
delegate.policyResolveFn = delegate.defaultPolicyResolveFn(errRPC)
|
|
delegate.roleResolveFn = delegate.defaultRoleResolveFn(errRPC)
|
|
|
|
r := newTestACLResolver(t, delegate, func(config *ACLResolverConfig) {
|
|
config.Config.ACLDownPolicy = "deny"
|
|
config.Config.ACLPolicyTTL = 0
|
|
config.Config.ACLRoleTTL = 0
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
authz, err := r.ResolveToken("found-role")
|
|
require.NoError(t, err)
|
|
require.NotNil(t, authz)
|
|
require.Equal(t, acl.Allow, authz.NodeWrite("foo", nil))
|
|
|
|
// role cache expired - so we will fail to resolve that role and use the default policy only
|
|
authz2, err := r.ResolveToken("found-role")
|
|
require.NoError(t, err)
|
|
require.NotNil(t, authz2)
|
|
require.False(t, authz == authz2)
|
|
require.Equal(t, acl.Deny, authz2.NodeWrite("foo", nil))
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
t.Run("Extend-Cache-Policy", func(t *testing.T) {
|
|
t.Parallel()
|
|
delegate := &ACLResolverTestDelegate{
|
|
enabled: true,
|
|
datacenter: "dc1",
|
|
legacy: false,
|
|
localTokens: false,
|
|
localPolicies: true,
|
|
localRoles: true,
|
|
}
|
|
delegate.tokenReadFn = delegate.defaultTokenReadFn(errRPC)
|
|
|
|
r := newTestACLResolver(t, delegate, func(config *ACLResolverConfig) {
|
|
config.Config.ACLDownPolicy = "extend-cache"
|
|
config.Config.ACLTokenTTL = 0
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
authz, err := r.ResolveToken("found")
|
|
require.NoError(t, err)
|
|
require.NotNil(t, authz)
|
|
require.Equal(t, acl.Allow, authz.NodeWrite("foo", nil))
|
|
|
|
requireIdentityCached(t, r, tokenSecretCacheID("found"), true, "cached")
|
|
|
|
authz2, err := r.ResolveToken("found")
|
|
require.NoError(t, err)
|
|
require.NotNil(t, authz2)
|
|
verifyAuthorizerChain(t, authz, authz2)
|
|
require.Equal(t, acl.Allow, authz2.NodeWrite("foo", nil))
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
t.Run("Extend-Cache-Role", func(t *testing.T) {
|
|
t.Parallel()
|
|
delegate := &ACLResolverTestDelegate{
|
|
enabled: true,
|
|
datacenter: "dc1",
|
|
legacy: false,
|
|
localTokens: false,
|
|
localPolicies: true,
|
|
localRoles: true,
|
|
}
|
|
delegate.tokenReadFn = delegate.defaultTokenReadFn(errRPC)
|
|
|
|
r := newTestACLResolver(t, delegate, func(config *ACLResolverConfig) {
|
|
config.Config.ACLDownPolicy = "extend-cache"
|
|
config.Config.ACLTokenTTL = 0
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
authz, err := r.ResolveToken("found-role")
|
|
require.NoError(t, err)
|
|
require.NotNil(t, authz)
|
|
require.Equal(t, acl.Allow, authz.NodeWrite("foo", nil))
|
|
|
|
requireIdentityCached(t, r, tokenSecretCacheID("found-role"), true, "still cached")
|
|
|
|
authz2, err := r.ResolveToken("found-role")
|
|
require.NoError(t, err)
|
|
require.NotNil(t, authz2)
|
|
// testing pointer equality - these will be the same object because it is cached.
|
|
verifyAuthorizerChain(t, authz, authz2)
|
|
require.Equal(t, acl.Allow, authz2.NodeWrite("foo", nil))
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
t.Run("Extend-Cache-Expired-Policy", func(t *testing.T) {
|
|
t.Parallel()
|
|
delegate := &ACLResolverTestDelegate{
|
|
enabled: true,
|
|
datacenter: "dc1",
|
|
legacy: false,
|
|
localTokens: true,
|
|
localPolicies: false,
|
|
localRoles: false,
|
|
}
|
|
delegate.policyResolveFn = delegate.defaultPolicyResolveFn(errRPC)
|
|
|
|
r := newTestACLResolver(t, delegate, func(config *ACLResolverConfig) {
|
|
config.Config.ACLDownPolicy = "extend-cache"
|
|
config.Config.ACLPolicyTTL = 0
|
|
config.Config.ACLRoleTTL = 0
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
authz, err := r.ResolveToken("found")
|
|
require.NoError(t, err)
|
|
require.NotNil(t, authz)
|
|
require.Equal(t, acl.Allow, authz.NodeWrite("foo", nil))
|
|
|
|
requirePolicyCached(t, r, "node-wr", true, "cached") // from "found" token
|
|
requirePolicyCached(t, r, "dc2-key-wr", true, "cached") // from "found" token
|
|
|
|
// Will just use the policy cache
|
|
authz2, err := r.ResolveToken("found")
|
|
require.NoError(t, err)
|
|
require.NotNil(t, authz2)
|
|
verifyAuthorizerChain(t, authz, authz2)
|
|
require.Equal(t, acl.Allow, authz.NodeWrite("foo", nil))
|
|
|
|
requirePolicyCached(t, r, "node-wr", true, "still cached") // from "found" token
|
|
requirePolicyCached(t, r, "dc2-key-wr", true, "still cached") // from "found" token
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
t.Run("Extend-Cache-Expired-Role", func(t *testing.T) {
|
|
t.Parallel()
|
|
delegate := &ACLResolverTestDelegate{
|
|
enabled: true,
|
|
datacenter: "dc1",
|
|
legacy: false,
|
|
localTokens: true,
|
|
localPolicies: false,
|
|
localRoles: false,
|
|
}
|
|
delegate.policyResolveFn = delegate.defaultPolicyResolveFn(errRPC)
|
|
delegate.roleResolveFn = delegate.defaultRoleResolveFn(errRPC)
|
|
|
|
r := newTestACLResolver(t, delegate, func(config *ACLResolverConfig) {
|
|
config.Config.ACLDownPolicy = "extend-cache"
|
|
config.Config.ACLPolicyTTL = 0
|
|
config.Config.ACLRoleTTL = 0
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
authz, err := r.ResolveToken("found-role")
|
|
require.NoError(t, err)
|
|
require.NotNil(t, authz)
|
|
require.Equal(t, acl.Allow, authz.NodeWrite("foo", nil))
|
|
|
|
// Will just use the policy cache
|
|
authz2, err := r.ResolveToken("found-role")
|
|
require.NoError(t, err)
|
|
require.NotNil(t, authz2)
|
|
verifyAuthorizerChain(t, authz, authz2)
|
|
|
|
require.Equal(t, acl.Allow, authz.NodeWrite("foo", nil))
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
t.Run("Async-Cache-Expired-Policy", func(t *testing.T) {
|
|
t.Parallel()
|
|
delegate := &ACLResolverTestDelegate{
|
|
enabled: true,
|
|
datacenter: "dc1",
|
|
legacy: false,
|
|
localTokens: true,
|
|
localPolicies: false,
|
|
localRoles: false,
|
|
}
|
|
// We don't need to return acl.ErrNotFound here but we could. The ACLResolver will search for any
|
|
// policies not in the response and emit an ACL not found for any not-found within the result set.
|
|
delegate.policyResolveFn = delegate.defaultPolicyResolveFn(nil)
|
|
|
|
r := newTestACLResolver(t, delegate, func(config *ACLResolverConfig) {
|
|
config.Config.ACLDownPolicy = "async-cache"
|
|
config.Config.ACLPolicyTTL = 0
|
|
config.Config.ACLRoleTTL = 0
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
authz, err := r.ResolveToken("found")
|
|
require.NoError(t, err)
|
|
require.NotNil(t, authz)
|
|
require.Equal(t, acl.Allow, authz.NodeWrite("foo", nil))
|
|
|
|
requirePolicyCached(t, r, "node-wr", true, "cached") // from "found" token
|
|
requirePolicyCached(t, r, "dc2-key-wr", true, "cached") // from "found" token
|
|
|
|
// The identity should have been cached so this should still be valid
|
|
authz2, err := r.ResolveToken("found")
|
|
require.NoError(t, err)
|
|
require.NotNil(t, authz2)
|
|
// testing pointer equality - these will be the same object because it is cached.
|
|
verifyAuthorizerChain(t, authz, authz2)
|
|
require.Equal(t, acl.Allow, authz.NodeWrite("foo", nil))
|
|
|
|
// the go routine spawned will eventually return with a authz that doesn't have the policy
|
|
retry.Run(t, func(t *retry.R) {
|
|
authz3, err := r.ResolveToken("found")
|
|
assert.NoError(t, err)
|
|
assert.NotNil(t, authz3)
|
|
assert.Equal(t, acl.Deny, authz3.NodeWrite("foo", nil))
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
requirePolicyCached(t, r, "node-wr", false, "no longer cached") // from "found" token
|
|
requirePolicyCached(t, r, "dc2-key-wr", false, "no longer cached") // from "found" token
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
t.Run("Async-Cache-Expired-Role", func(t *testing.T) {
|
|
t.Parallel()
|
|
delegate := &ACLResolverTestDelegate{
|
|
enabled: true,
|
|
datacenter: "dc1",
|
|
legacy: false,
|
|
localTokens: true,
|
|
localPolicies: false,
|
|
localRoles: false,
|
|
}
|
|
// We don't need to return acl.ErrNotFound here but we could. The ACLResolver will search for any
|
|
// policies not in the response and emit an ACL not found for any not-found within the result set.
|
|
delegate.policyResolveFn = delegate.defaultPolicyResolveFn(nil)
|
|
delegate.roleResolveFn = delegate.defaultRoleResolveFn(nil)
|
|
|
|
r := newTestACLResolver(t, delegate, func(config *ACLResolverConfig) {
|
|
config.Config.ACLDownPolicy = "async-cache"
|
|
config.Config.ACLPolicyTTL = 0
|
|
config.Config.ACLRoleTTL = 0
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
authz, err := r.ResolveToken("found-role")
|
|
require.NoError(t, err)
|
|
require.NotNil(t, authz)
|
|
require.Equal(t, acl.Allow, authz.NodeWrite("foo", nil))
|
|
|
|
// The identity should have been cached so this should still be valid
|
|
authz2, err := r.ResolveToken("found-role")
|
|
require.NoError(t, err)
|
|
require.NotNil(t, authz2)
|
|
// testing pointer equality - these will be the same object because it is cached.
|
|
verifyAuthorizerChain(t, authz, authz2)
|
|
require.Equal(t, acl.Allow, authz.NodeWrite("foo", nil))
|
|
|
|
// the go routine spawned will eventually return with a authz that doesn't have the policy
|
|
retry.Run(t, func(t *retry.R) {
|
|
authz3, err := r.ResolveToken("found-role")
|
|
assert.NoError(t, err)
|
|
assert.NotNil(t, authz3)
|
|
assert.Equal(t, acl.Deny, authz3.NodeWrite("foo", nil))
|
|
})
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
t.Run("Extend-Cache-Client-Policy", func(t *testing.T) {
|
|
t.Parallel()
|
|
delegate := &ACLResolverTestDelegate{
|
|
enabled: true,
|
|
datacenter: "dc1",
|
|
legacy: false,
|
|
localTokens: false,
|
|
localPolicies: false,
|
|
localRoles: false,
|
|
}
|
|
delegate.tokenReadFn = delegate.defaultTokenReadFn(errRPC)
|
|
delegate.policyResolveFn = delegate.defaultPolicyResolveFn(errRPC)
|
|
|
|
r := newTestACLResolver(t, delegate, func(config *ACLResolverConfig) {
|
|
config.Config.ACLDownPolicy = "extend-cache"
|
|
config.Config.ACLTokenTTL = 0
|
|
config.Config.ACLPolicyTTL = 0
|
|
config.Config.ACLRoleTTL = 0
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
authz, err := r.ResolveToken("found")
|
|
require.NoError(t, err)
|
|
require.NotNil(t, authz)
|
|
require.Equal(t, acl.Allow, authz.NodeWrite("foo", nil))
|
|
|
|
requirePolicyCached(t, r, "node-wr", true, "cached") // from "found" token
|
|
requirePolicyCached(t, r, "dc2-key-wr", true, "cached") // from "found" token
|
|
|
|
authz2, err := r.ResolveToken("found")
|
|
require.NoError(t, err)
|
|
require.NotNil(t, authz2)
|
|
// testing pointer equality - these will be the same object because it is cached.
|
|
verifyAuthorizerChain(t, authz, authz2)
|
|
require.Equal(t, acl.Allow, authz2.NodeWrite("foo", nil))
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
t.Run("Extend-Cache-Client-Role", func(t *testing.T) {
|
|
t.Parallel()
|
|
delegate := &ACLResolverTestDelegate{
|
|
enabled: true,
|
|
datacenter: "dc1",
|
|
legacy: false,
|
|
localTokens: false,
|
|
localPolicies: false,
|
|
localRoles: false,
|
|
}
|
|
delegate.tokenReadFn = delegate.defaultTokenReadFn(errRPC)
|
|
delegate.policyResolveFn = delegate.defaultPolicyResolveFn(errRPC)
|
|
delegate.roleResolveFn = delegate.defaultRoleResolveFn(errRPC)
|
|
|
|
r := newTestACLResolver(t, delegate, func(config *ACLResolverConfig) {
|
|
config.Config.ACLDownPolicy = "extend-cache"
|
|
config.Config.ACLTokenTTL = 0
|
|
config.Config.ACLPolicyTTL = 0
|
|
config.Config.ACLRoleTTL = 0
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
authz, err := r.ResolveToken("found-role")
|
|
require.NoError(t, err)
|
|
require.NotNil(t, authz)
|
|
require.Equal(t, acl.Allow, authz.NodeWrite("foo", nil))
|
|
|
|
requirePolicyCached(t, r, "node-wr", true, "still cached") // from "found" token
|
|
requirePolicyCached(t, r, "dc2-key-wr", true, "still cached") // from "found" token
|
|
|
|
authz2, err := r.ResolveToken("found-role")
|
|
require.NoError(t, err)
|
|
require.NotNil(t, authz2)
|
|
// testing pointer equality - these will be the same object because it is cached.
|
|
verifyAuthorizerChain(t, authz, authz2)
|
|
require.Equal(t, acl.Allow, authz2.NodeWrite("foo", nil))
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
t.Run("Async-Cache", func(t *testing.T) {
|
|
t.Parallel()
|
|
delegate := &ACLResolverTestDelegate{
|
|
enabled: true,
|
|
datacenter: "dc1",
|
|
legacy: false,
|
|
localTokens: false,
|
|
localPolicies: true,
|
|
localRoles: true,
|
|
}
|
|
delegate.tokenReadFn = delegate.defaultTokenReadFn(acl.ErrNotFound)
|
|
|
|
r := newTestACLResolver(t, delegate, func(config *ACLResolverConfig) {
|
|
config.Config.ACLDownPolicy = "async-cache"
|
|
config.Config.ACLTokenTTL = 0
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
authz, err := r.ResolveToken("found")
|
|
require.NoError(t, err)
|
|
require.NotNil(t, authz)
|
|
require.Equal(t, acl.Allow, authz.NodeWrite("foo", nil))
|
|
|
|
requireIdentityCached(t, r, tokenSecretCacheID("found"), true, "cached")
|
|
|
|
// The identity should have been cached so this should still be valid
|
|
authz2, err := r.ResolveToken("found")
|
|
require.NoError(t, err)
|
|
require.NotNil(t, authz2)
|
|
verifyAuthorizerChain(t, authz, authz2)
|
|
require.Equal(t, acl.Allow, authz2.NodeWrite("foo", nil))
|
|
|
|
// the go routine spawned will eventually return and this will be a not found error
|
|
retry.Run(t, func(t *retry.R) {
|
|
authz3, err := r.ResolveToken("found")
|
|
assert.Error(t, err)
|
|
assert.True(t, acl.IsErrNotFound(err))
|
|
assert.Nil(t, authz3)
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
requireIdentityCached(t, r, tokenSecretCacheID("found"), false, "no longer cached")
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
t.Run("PolicyResolve-TokenNotFound", func(t *testing.T) {
|
|
t.Parallel()
|
|
|
|
_, rawToken, _ := testIdentityForToken("found")
|
|
foundToken := rawToken.(*structs.ACLToken)
|
|
secretID := foundToken.SecretID
|
|
|
|
tokenResolved := false
|
|
policyResolved := false
|
|
delegate := &ACLResolverTestDelegate{
|
|
enabled: true,
|
|
datacenter: "dc1",
|
|
legacy: false,
|
|
localTokens: false,
|
|
localPolicies: false,
|
|
tokenReadFn: func(args *structs.ACLTokenGetRequest, reply *structs.ACLTokenResponse) error {
|
|
if !tokenResolved {
|
|
reply.Token = foundToken
|
|
tokenResolved = true
|
|
return nil
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return fmt.Errorf("Not Supposed to be Invoked again")
|
|
},
|
|
policyResolveFn: func(args *structs.ACLPolicyBatchGetRequest, reply *structs.ACLPolicyBatchResponse) error {
|
|
if !policyResolved {
|
|
for _, policyID := range args.PolicyIDs {
|
|
_, policy, _ := testPolicyForID(policyID)
|
|
if policy != nil {
|
|
reply.Policies = append(reply.Policies, policy)
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
policyResolved = true
|
|
return nil
|
|
}
|
|
return acl.ErrNotFound // test condition
|
|
},
|
|
}
|
|
r := newTestACLResolver(t, delegate, func(config *ACLResolverConfig) {
|
|
config.Config.ACLDownPolicy = "extend-cache"
|
|
config.Config.ACLTokenTTL = 0
|
|
config.Config.ACLPolicyTTL = 0
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
// Prime the standard caches.
|
|
authz, err := r.ResolveToken(secretID)
|
|
require.NoError(t, err)
|
|
require.NotNil(t, authz)
|
|
require.Equal(t, acl.Allow, authz.NodeWrite("foo", nil))
|
|
|
|
// Verify that the caches are setup properly.
|
|
requireIdentityCached(t, r, tokenSecretCacheID(secretID), true, "cached")
|
|
requirePolicyCached(t, r, "node-wr", true, "cached") // from "found" token
|
|
requirePolicyCached(t, r, "dc2-key-wr", true, "cached") // from "found" token
|
|
|
|
// Nuke 1 policy from the cache so that we force a policy resolve
|
|
// during token resolve.
|
|
r.cache.RemovePolicy("dc2-key-wr")
|
|
|
|
_, err = r.ResolveToken(secretID)
|
|
require.True(t, acl.IsErrNotFound(err))
|
|
|
|
requireIdentityCached(t, r, tokenSecretCacheID(secretID), false, "identity not found cached")
|
|
requirePolicyCached(t, r, "node-wr", true, "still cached")
|
|
require.Nil(t, r.cache.GetPolicy("dc2-key-wr"), "not stored at all")
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
t.Run("PolicyResolve-PermissionDenied", func(t *testing.T) {
|
|
t.Parallel()
|
|
|
|
_, rawToken, _ := testIdentityForToken("found")
|
|
foundToken := rawToken.(*structs.ACLToken)
|
|
secretID := foundToken.SecretID
|
|
|
|
policyResolved := false
|
|
delegate := &ACLResolverTestDelegate{
|
|
enabled: true,
|
|
datacenter: "dc1",
|
|
legacy: false,
|
|
localTokens: false,
|
|
localPolicies: false,
|
|
tokenReadFn: func(args *structs.ACLTokenGetRequest, reply *structs.ACLTokenResponse) error {
|
|
// no limit
|
|
reply.Token = foundToken
|
|
return nil
|
|
},
|
|
policyResolveFn: func(args *structs.ACLPolicyBatchGetRequest, reply *structs.ACLPolicyBatchResponse) error {
|
|
if !policyResolved {
|
|
for _, policyID := range args.PolicyIDs {
|
|
_, policy, _ := testPolicyForID(policyID)
|
|
if policy != nil {
|
|
reply.Policies = append(reply.Policies, policy)
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
policyResolved = true
|
|
return nil
|
|
}
|
|
return acl.ErrPermissionDenied // test condition
|
|
},
|
|
}
|
|
r := newTestACLResolver(t, delegate, func(config *ACLResolverConfig) {
|
|
config.Config.ACLDownPolicy = "extend-cache"
|
|
config.Config.ACLTokenTTL = 0
|
|
config.Config.ACLPolicyTTL = 0
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
// Prime the standard caches.
|
|
authz, err := r.ResolveToken(secretID)
|
|
require.NoError(t, err)
|
|
require.NotNil(t, authz)
|
|
require.Equal(t, acl.Allow, authz.NodeWrite("foo", nil))
|
|
|
|
// Verify that the caches are setup properly.
|
|
requireIdentityCached(t, r, tokenSecretCacheID(secretID), true, "cached")
|
|
requirePolicyCached(t, r, "node-wr", true, "cached") // from "found" token
|
|
requirePolicyCached(t, r, "dc2-key-wr", true, "cached") // from "found" token
|
|
|
|
// Nuke 1 policy from the cache so that we force a policy resolve
|
|
// during token resolve.
|
|
r.cache.RemovePolicy("dc2-key-wr")
|
|
|
|
_, err = r.ResolveToken(secretID)
|
|
require.True(t, acl.IsErrPermissionDenied(err))
|
|
|
|
require.Nil(t, r.cache.GetIdentity(tokenSecretCacheID(secretID)), "identity not stored at all")
|
|
requirePolicyCached(t, r, "node-wr", true, "still cached")
|
|
require.Nil(t, r.cache.GetPolicy("dc2-key-wr"), "not stored at all")
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func TestACLResolver_DatacenterScoping(t *testing.T) {
|
|
t.Parallel()
|
|
t.Run("dc1", func(t *testing.T) {
|
|
delegate := &ACLResolverTestDelegate{
|
|
enabled: true,
|
|
datacenter: "dc1",
|
|
legacy: false,
|
|
localTokens: true,
|
|
localPolicies: true,
|
|
localRoles: true,
|
|
// No need to provide any of the RPC callbacks
|
|
}
|
|
r := newTestACLResolver(t, delegate, nil)
|
|
|
|
authz, err := r.ResolveToken("found")
|
|
require.NotNil(t, authz)
|
|
require.NoError(t, err)
|
|
require.Equal(t, acl.Deny, authz.ACLRead(nil))
|
|
require.Equal(t, acl.Allow, authz.NodeWrite("foo", nil))
|
|
require.Equal(t, acl.Deny, authz.KeyWrite("foo", nil))
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
t.Run("dc2", func(t *testing.T) {
|
|
delegate := &ACLResolverTestDelegate{
|
|
enabled: true,
|
|
datacenter: "dc2",
|
|
legacy: false,
|
|
localTokens: true,
|
|
localPolicies: true,
|
|
localRoles: true,
|
|
// No need to provide any of the RPC callbacks
|
|
}
|
|
r := newTestACLResolver(t, delegate, func(config *ACLResolverConfig) {
|
|
config.Config.Datacenter = "dc2"
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
authz, err := r.ResolveToken("found")
|
|
require.NotNil(t, authz)
|
|
require.NoError(t, err)
|
|
require.Equal(t, acl.Deny, authz.ACLRead(nil))
|
|
require.Equal(t, acl.Deny, authz.NodeWrite("foo", nil))
|
|
require.Equal(t, acl.Allow, authz.KeyWrite("foo", nil))
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// TODO(rb): replicate this sort of test but for roles
|
|
func TestACLResolver_Client(t *testing.T) {
|
|
t.Parallel()
|
|
|
|
t.Run("Racey-Token-Mod-Policy-Resolve", func(t *testing.T) {
|
|
t.Parallel()
|
|
var tokenReads int32
|
|
var policyResolves int32
|
|
modified := false
|
|
deleted := false
|
|
delegate := &ACLResolverTestDelegate{
|
|
enabled: true,
|
|
datacenter: "dc1",
|
|
legacy: false,
|
|
localTokens: false,
|
|
localPolicies: false,
|
|
tokenReadFn: func(args *structs.ACLTokenGetRequest, reply *structs.ACLTokenResponse) error {
|
|
atomic.AddInt32(&tokenReads, 1)
|
|
if deleted {
|
|
return acl.ErrNotFound
|
|
} else if modified {
|
|
_, token, _ := testIdentityForToken("racey-modified")
|
|
reply.Token = token.(*structs.ACLToken)
|
|
} else {
|
|
_, token, _ := testIdentityForToken("racey-unmodified")
|
|
reply.Token = token.(*structs.ACLToken)
|
|
}
|
|
return nil
|
|
},
|
|
policyResolveFn: func(args *structs.ACLPolicyBatchGetRequest, reply *structs.ACLPolicyBatchResponse) error {
|
|
atomic.AddInt32(&policyResolves, 1)
|
|
if deleted {
|
|
return acl.ErrNotFound
|
|
} else if !modified {
|
|
modified = true
|
|
return acl.ErrPermissionDenied
|
|
} else {
|
|
deleted = true
|
|
for _, policyID := range args.PolicyIDs {
|
|
_, policy, _ := testPolicyForID(policyID)
|
|
if policy != nil {
|
|
reply.Policies = append(reply.Policies, policy)
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
modified = true
|
|
return nil
|
|
}
|
|
},
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
r := newTestACLResolver(t, delegate, func(config *ACLResolverConfig) {
|
|
config.Config.ACLTokenTTL = 600 * time.Second
|
|
config.Config.ACLPolicyTTL = 30 * time.Millisecond
|
|
config.Config.ACLRoleTTL = 30 * time.Millisecond
|
|
config.Config.ACLDownPolicy = "extend-cache"
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
// resolves the token
|
|
// gets a permission denied resolving the policies - token updated
|
|
// invalidates the token
|
|
// refetches the token
|
|
// fetches the policies from the modified token
|
|
// creates the authorizers
|
|
//
|
|
// Must use the token secret here in order for the cached identity
|
|
// to be removed properly. Many other tests just resolve some other
|
|
// random name and it wont matter but this one cannot.
|
|
authz, err := r.ResolveToken("a1a54629-5050-4d17-8a4e-560d2423f835")
|
|
require.NoError(t, err)
|
|
require.NotNil(t, authz)
|
|
require.Equal(t, acl.Allow, authz.NodeWrite("foo", nil))
|
|
require.Equal(t, acl.Deny, authz.ACLRead(nil))
|
|
require.True(t, modified)
|
|
require.True(t, deleted)
|
|
require.Equal(t, int32(2), tokenReads)
|
|
require.Equal(t, int32(2), policyResolves)
|
|
|
|
// sleep long enough for the policy cache to expire
|
|
time.Sleep(50 * time.Millisecond)
|
|
|
|
// this round the identity will be resolved from the cache
|
|
// then the policy will be resolved but resolution will return ACL not found
|
|
// resolution will stop with the not found error (even though we still have the
|
|
// policies within the cache)
|
|
authz, err = r.ResolveToken("a1a54629-5050-4d17-8a4e-560d2423f835")
|
|
require.EqualError(t, err, acl.ErrNotFound.Error())
|
|
require.Nil(t, authz)
|
|
|
|
require.True(t, modified)
|
|
require.True(t, deleted)
|
|
require.Equal(t, tokenReads, int32(2))
|
|
require.Equal(t, policyResolves, int32(3))
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
t.Run("Resolve-Identity", func(t *testing.T) {
|
|
t.Parallel()
|
|
|
|
delegate := &ACLResolverTestDelegate{
|
|
enabled: true,
|
|
datacenter: "dc1",
|
|
legacy: false,
|
|
localTokens: false,
|
|
localPolicies: false,
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
delegate.tokenReadFn = delegate.plainTokenReadFn
|
|
delegate.policyResolveFn = delegate.plainPolicyResolveFn
|
|
delegate.roleResolveFn = delegate.plainRoleResolveFn
|
|
|
|
r := newTestACLResolver(t, delegate, nil)
|
|
|
|
ident, err := r.ResolveTokenToIdentity("found-policy-and-role")
|
|
require.NoError(t, err)
|
|
require.NotNil(t, ident)
|
|
require.Equal(t, "5f57c1f6-6a89-4186-9445-531b316e01df", ident.ID())
|
|
require.EqualValues(t, 0, delegate.localTokenResolutions)
|
|
require.EqualValues(t, 1, delegate.remoteTokenResolutions)
|
|
require.EqualValues(t, 0, delegate.localPolicyResolutions)
|
|
require.EqualValues(t, 0, delegate.remotePolicyResolutions)
|
|
require.EqualValues(t, 0, delegate.localRoleResolutions)
|
|
require.EqualValues(t, 0, delegate.remoteRoleResolutions)
|
|
require.EqualValues(t, 0, delegate.remoteLegacyResolutions)
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
t.Run("Resolve-Identity-Legacy", func(t *testing.T) {
|
|
t.Parallel()
|
|
|
|
delegate := &ACLResolverTestDelegate{
|
|
enabled: true,
|
|
datacenter: "dc1",
|
|
legacy: true,
|
|
localTokens: false,
|
|
localPolicies: false,
|
|
getPolicyFn: func(args *structs.ACLPolicyResolveLegacyRequest, reply *structs.ACLPolicyResolveLegacyResponse) error {
|
|
reply.Parent = "deny"
|
|
reply.TTL = 30
|
|
reply.ETag = "nothing"
|
|
reply.Policy = &acl.Policy{
|
|
ID: "not-needed",
|
|
PolicyRules: acl.PolicyRules{
|
|
Nodes: []*acl.NodeRule{
|
|
{
|
|
Name: "foo",
|
|
Policy: acl.PolicyWrite,
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
}
|
|
return nil
|
|
},
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
r := newTestACLResolver(t, delegate, nil)
|
|
|
|
ident, err := r.ResolveTokenToIdentity("found-policy-and-role")
|
|
require.NoError(t, err)
|
|
require.NotNil(t, ident)
|
|
require.Equal(t, "legacy-token", ident.ID())
|
|
require.EqualValues(t, 0, delegate.localTokenResolutions)
|
|
require.EqualValues(t, 0, delegate.remoteTokenResolutions)
|
|
require.EqualValues(t, 0, delegate.localPolicyResolutions)
|
|
require.EqualValues(t, 0, delegate.remotePolicyResolutions)
|
|
require.EqualValues(t, 0, delegate.localRoleResolutions)
|
|
require.EqualValues(t, 0, delegate.remoteRoleResolutions)
|
|
require.EqualValues(t, 1, delegate.remoteLegacyResolutions)
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
t.Run("Concurrent-Token-Resolve", func(t *testing.T) {
|
|
t.Parallel()
|
|
|
|
var tokenReads int32
|
|
var policyResolves int32
|
|
readyCh := make(chan struct{})
|
|
|
|
delegate := &ACLResolverTestDelegate{
|
|
enabled: true,
|
|
datacenter: "dc1",
|
|
legacy: false,
|
|
localTokens: false,
|
|
localPolicies: false,
|
|
tokenReadFn: func(args *structs.ACLTokenGetRequest, reply *structs.ACLTokenResponse) error {
|
|
atomic.AddInt32(&tokenReads, 1)
|
|
|
|
switch args.TokenID {
|
|
case "a1a54629-5050-4d17-8a4e-560d2423f835":
|
|
_, token, _ := testIdentityForToken("concurrent-resolve")
|
|
reply.Token = token.(*structs.ACLToken)
|
|
default:
|
|
return acl.ErrNotFound
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
select {
|
|
case <-readyCh:
|
|
}
|
|
time.Sleep(100 * time.Millisecond)
|
|
return nil
|
|
},
|
|
policyResolveFn: func(args *structs.ACLPolicyBatchGetRequest, reply *structs.ACLPolicyBatchResponse) error {
|
|
atomic.AddInt32(&policyResolves, 1)
|
|
|
|
for _, policyID := range args.PolicyIDs {
|
|
_, policy, _ := testPolicyForID(policyID)
|
|
if policy != nil {
|
|
reply.Policies = append(reply.Policies, policy)
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
return nil
|
|
},
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
r := newTestACLResolver(t, delegate, func(config *ACLResolverConfig) {
|
|
// effectively disable caching - so the only way we end up with 1 token read is if they were
|
|
// being resolved concurrently
|
|
config.Config.ACLTokenTTL = 0 * time.Second
|
|
config.Config.ACLPolicyTTL = 30 * time.Second
|
|
config.Config.ACLRoleTTL = 30 * time.Second
|
|
config.Config.ACLDownPolicy = "extend-cache"
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
ch1 := make(chan *asyncResolutionResult)
|
|
ch2 := make(chan *asyncResolutionResult)
|
|
go resolveTokenAsync(r, "a1a54629-5050-4d17-8a4e-560d2423f835", ch1)
|
|
go resolveTokenAsync(r, "a1a54629-5050-4d17-8a4e-560d2423f835", ch2)
|
|
close(readyCh)
|
|
|
|
res1 := <-ch1
|
|
res2 := <-ch2
|
|
require.NoError(t, res1.err)
|
|
require.NoError(t, res2.err)
|
|
require.Equal(t, res1.authz, res2.authz)
|
|
require.Equal(t, int32(1), tokenReads)
|
|
require.Equal(t, int32(1), policyResolves)
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func TestACLResolver_Client_TokensPoliciesAndRoles(t *testing.T) {
|
|
t.Parallel()
|
|
delegate := &ACLResolverTestDelegate{
|
|
enabled: true,
|
|
datacenter: "dc1",
|
|
legacy: false,
|
|
localTokens: false,
|
|
localPolicies: false,
|
|
localRoles: false,
|
|
}
|
|
delegate.tokenReadFn = delegate.plainTokenReadFn
|
|
delegate.policyResolveFn = delegate.plainPolicyResolveFn
|
|
delegate.roleResolveFn = delegate.plainRoleResolveFn
|
|
|
|
testACLResolver_variousTokens(t, delegate)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func TestACLResolver_LocalTokensPoliciesAndRoles(t *testing.T) {
|
|
t.Parallel()
|
|
delegate := &ACLResolverTestDelegate{
|
|
enabled: true,
|
|
datacenter: "dc1",
|
|
legacy: false,
|
|
localTokens: true,
|
|
localPolicies: true,
|
|
localRoles: true,
|
|
// No need to provide any of the RPC callbacks
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
testACLResolver_variousTokens(t, delegate)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func TestACLResolver_LocalPoliciesAndRoles(t *testing.T) {
|
|
t.Parallel()
|
|
|
|
delegate := &ACLResolverTestDelegate{
|
|
enabled: true,
|
|
datacenter: "dc1",
|
|
legacy: false,
|
|
localTokens: false,
|
|
localPolicies: true,
|
|
localRoles: true,
|
|
}
|
|
delegate.tokenReadFn = delegate.plainTokenReadFn
|
|
|
|
testACLResolver_variousTokens(t, delegate)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func testACLResolver_variousTokens(t *testing.T, delegate *ACLResolverTestDelegate) {
|
|
t.Helper()
|
|
r := newTestACLResolver(t, delegate, func(config *ACLResolverConfig) {
|
|
config.Config.ACLTokenTTL = 600 * time.Second
|
|
config.Config.ACLPolicyTTL = 30 * time.Millisecond
|
|
config.Config.ACLRoleTTL = 30 * time.Millisecond
|
|
config.Config.ACLDownPolicy = "extend-cache"
|
|
})
|
|
reset := func() {
|
|
// prevent subtest bleedover
|
|
r.cache.Purge()
|
|
delegate.Reset()
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
runTwiceAndReset := func(name string, f func(t *testing.T)) {
|
|
t.Helper()
|
|
defer reset() // reset the stateful resolve AND blow away the cache
|
|
|
|
t.Run(name+" (no-cache)", f)
|
|
delegate.Reset() // allow the stateful resolve functions to reset
|
|
t.Run(name+" (cached)", f)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
runTwiceAndReset("Missing Identity", func(t *testing.T) {
|
|
authz, err := r.ResolveToken("doesn't exist")
|
|
require.Nil(t, authz)
|
|
require.Error(t, err)
|
|
require.True(t, acl.IsErrNotFound(err))
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
runTwiceAndReset("Missing Policy", func(t *testing.T) {
|
|
authz, err := r.ResolveToken("missing-policy")
|
|
require.NoError(t, err)
|
|
require.NotNil(t, authz)
|
|
require.Equal(t, acl.Allow, authz.ACLRead(nil))
|
|
require.Equal(t, acl.Deny, authz.NodeWrite("foo", nil))
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
runTwiceAndReset("Missing Role", func(t *testing.T) {
|
|
authz, err := r.ResolveToken("missing-role")
|
|
require.NoError(t, err)
|
|
require.NotNil(t, authz)
|
|
require.Equal(t, acl.Allow, authz.ACLRead(nil))
|
|
require.Equal(t, acl.Deny, authz.NodeWrite("foo", nil))
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
runTwiceAndReset("Missing Policy on Role", func(t *testing.T) {
|
|
authz, err := r.ResolveToken("missing-policy-on-role")
|
|
require.NoError(t, err)
|
|
require.NotNil(t, authz)
|
|
require.Equal(t, acl.Allow, authz.ACLRead(nil))
|
|
require.Equal(t, acl.Deny, authz.NodeWrite("foo", nil))
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
runTwiceAndReset("Normal with Policy", func(t *testing.T) {
|
|
authz, err := r.ResolveToken("found")
|
|
require.NotNil(t, authz)
|
|
require.NoError(t, err)
|
|
require.Equal(t, acl.Deny, authz.ACLRead(nil))
|
|
require.Equal(t, acl.Allow, authz.NodeWrite("foo", nil))
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
runTwiceAndReset("Normal with Role", func(t *testing.T) {
|
|
authz, err := r.ResolveToken("found-role")
|
|
require.NotNil(t, authz)
|
|
require.NoError(t, err)
|
|
require.Equal(t, acl.Deny, authz.ACLRead(nil))
|
|
require.Equal(t, acl.Allow, authz.NodeWrite("foo", nil))
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
runTwiceAndReset("Normal with Policy and Role", func(t *testing.T) {
|
|
authz, err := r.ResolveToken("found-policy-and-role")
|
|
require.NotNil(t, authz)
|
|
require.NoError(t, err)
|
|
require.Equal(t, acl.Deny, authz.ACLRead(nil))
|
|
require.Equal(t, acl.Allow, authz.NodeWrite("foo", nil))
|
|
require.Equal(t, acl.Allow, authz.ServiceRead("bar", nil))
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
runTwiceAndReset("Role With Node Identity", func(t *testing.T) {
|
|
authz, err := r.ResolveToken("found-role-node-identity")
|
|
require.NoError(t, err)
|
|
require.NotNil(t, authz)
|
|
require.Equal(t, acl.Allow, authz.NodeWrite("test-node", nil))
|
|
require.Equal(t, acl.Deny, authz.NodeWrite("test-node-dc2", nil))
|
|
require.Equal(t, acl.Allow, authz.ServiceRead("something", nil))
|
|
require.Equal(t, acl.Deny, authz.ServiceWrite("something", nil))
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
runTwiceAndReset("Synthetic Policies Independently Cache", func(t *testing.T) {
|
|
// We resolve these tokens in the same cache session
|
|
// to verify that the keys for caching synthetic policies don't bleed
|
|
// over between each other.
|
|
{
|
|
authz, err := r.ResolveToken("found-synthetic-policy-1")
|
|
require.NotNil(t, authz)
|
|
require.NoError(t, err)
|
|
// spot check some random perms
|
|
require.Equal(t, acl.Deny, authz.ACLRead(nil))
|
|
require.Equal(t, acl.Deny, authz.NodeWrite("foo", nil))
|
|
// ensure we didn't bleed over to the other synthetic policy
|
|
require.Equal(t, acl.Deny, authz.ServiceWrite("service2", nil))
|
|
// check our own synthetic policy
|
|
require.Equal(t, acl.Allow, authz.ServiceWrite("service1", nil))
|
|
require.Equal(t, acl.Allow, authz.ServiceRead("literally-anything", nil))
|
|
require.Equal(t, acl.Allow, authz.NodeRead("any-node", nil))
|
|
}
|
|
{
|
|
authz, err := r.ResolveToken("found-synthetic-policy-2")
|
|
require.NotNil(t, authz)
|
|
require.NoError(t, err)
|
|
// spot check some random perms
|
|
require.Equal(t, acl.Deny, authz.ACLRead(nil))
|
|
require.Equal(t, acl.Deny, authz.NodeWrite("foo", nil))
|
|
// ensure we didn't bleed over to the other synthetic policy
|
|
require.Equal(t, acl.Deny, authz.ServiceWrite("service1", nil))
|
|
// check our own synthetic policy
|
|
require.Equal(t, acl.Allow, authz.ServiceWrite("service2", nil))
|
|
require.Equal(t, acl.Allow, authz.ServiceRead("literally-anything", nil))
|
|
require.Equal(t, acl.Allow, authz.NodeRead("any-node", nil))
|
|
}
|
|
{
|
|
authz, err := r.ResolveToken("found-synthetic-policy-3")
|
|
require.NoError(t, err)
|
|
require.NotNil(t, authz)
|
|
|
|
// spot check some random perms
|
|
require.Equal(t, acl.Deny, authz.ACLRead(nil))
|
|
require.Equal(t, acl.Deny, authz.NodeWrite("foo", nil))
|
|
// ensure we didn't bleed over to the other synthetic policy
|
|
require.Equal(t, acl.Deny, authz.NodeWrite("test-node2", nil))
|
|
// check our own synthetic policy
|
|
require.Equal(t, acl.Allow, authz.ServiceRead("literally-anything", nil))
|
|
require.Equal(t, acl.Allow, authz.NodeWrite("test-node1", nil))
|
|
// ensure node identity for other DC is ignored
|
|
require.Equal(t, acl.Deny, authz.NodeWrite("test-node-dc2", nil))
|
|
}
|
|
{
|
|
authz, err := r.ResolveToken("found-synthetic-policy-4")
|
|
require.NoError(t, err)
|
|
require.NotNil(t, authz)
|
|
|
|
// spot check some random perms
|
|
require.Equal(t, acl.Deny, authz.ACLRead(nil))
|
|
require.Equal(t, acl.Deny, authz.NodeWrite("foo", nil))
|
|
// ensure we didn't bleed over to the other synthetic policy
|
|
require.Equal(t, acl.Deny, authz.NodeWrite("test-node1", nil))
|
|
// check our own synthetic policy
|
|
require.Equal(t, acl.Allow, authz.ServiceRead("literally-anything", nil))
|
|
require.Equal(t, acl.Allow, authz.NodeWrite("test-node2", nil))
|
|
// ensure node identity for other DC is ignored
|
|
require.Equal(t, acl.Deny, authz.NodeWrite("test-node-dc2", nil))
|
|
}
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
runTwiceAndReset("Anonymous", func(t *testing.T) {
|
|
authz, err := r.ResolveToken("")
|
|
require.NotNil(t, authz)
|
|
require.NoError(t, err)
|
|
require.Equal(t, acl.Deny, authz.ACLRead(nil))
|
|
require.Equal(t, acl.Allow, authz.NodeWrite("foo", nil))
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
runTwiceAndReset("legacy-management", func(t *testing.T) {
|
|
authz, err := r.ResolveToken("legacy-management")
|
|
require.NotNil(t, authz)
|
|
require.NoError(t, err)
|
|
require.Equal(t, acl.Allow, authz.ACLWrite(nil))
|
|
require.Equal(t, acl.Allow, authz.KeyRead("foo", nil))
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
runTwiceAndReset("legacy-client", func(t *testing.T) {
|
|
authz, err := r.ResolveToken("legacy-client")
|
|
require.NoError(t, err)
|
|
require.NotNil(t, authz)
|
|
require.Equal(t, acl.Deny, authz.OperatorRead(nil))
|
|
require.Equal(t, acl.Allow, authz.ServiceRead("foo", nil))
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func TestACLResolver_Legacy(t *testing.T) {
|
|
t.Parallel()
|
|
|
|
t.Run("Cached", func(t *testing.T) {
|
|
t.Parallel()
|
|
cached := false
|
|
delegate := &ACLResolverTestDelegate{
|
|
enabled: true,
|
|
datacenter: "dc1",
|
|
legacy: true,
|
|
localTokens: false,
|
|
localPolicies: false,
|
|
getPolicyFn: func(args *structs.ACLPolicyResolveLegacyRequest, reply *structs.ACLPolicyResolveLegacyResponse) error {
|
|
if !cached {
|
|
reply.Parent = "deny"
|
|
reply.TTL = 30
|
|
reply.ETag = "nothing"
|
|
reply.Policy = &acl.Policy{
|
|
ID: "not-needed",
|
|
PolicyRules: acl.PolicyRules{
|
|
Nodes: []*acl.NodeRule{
|
|
{
|
|
Name: "foo",
|
|
Policy: acl.PolicyWrite,
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
}
|
|
cached = true
|
|
return nil
|
|
}
|
|
return errRPC
|
|
},
|
|
}
|
|
r := newTestACLResolver(t, delegate, nil)
|
|
|
|
authz, err := r.ResolveToken("foo")
|
|
require.NoError(t, err)
|
|
require.NotNil(t, authz)
|
|
// there is a bit of translation that happens
|
|
require.Equal(t, acl.Allow, authz.NodeWrite("foo", nil))
|
|
require.Equal(t, acl.Allow, authz.NodeWrite("foo/bar", nil))
|
|
require.Equal(t, acl.Deny, authz.NodeWrite("fo", nil))
|
|
|
|
// this should be from the cache
|
|
authz, err = r.ResolveToken("foo")
|
|
require.NoError(t, err)
|
|
require.NotNil(t, authz)
|
|
// there is a bit of translation that happens
|
|
require.Equal(t, acl.Allow, authz.NodeWrite("foo", nil))
|
|
require.Equal(t, acl.Allow, authz.NodeWrite("foo/bar", nil))
|
|
require.Equal(t, acl.Deny, authz.NodeWrite("fo", nil))
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
t.Run("Cache-Expiry-Extend", func(t *testing.T) {
|
|
t.Parallel()
|
|
cached := false
|
|
delegate := &ACLResolverTestDelegate{
|
|
enabled: true,
|
|
datacenter: "dc1",
|
|
legacy: true,
|
|
localTokens: false,
|
|
localPolicies: false,
|
|
getPolicyFn: func(args *structs.ACLPolicyResolveLegacyRequest, reply *structs.ACLPolicyResolveLegacyResponse) error {
|
|
if !cached {
|
|
reply.Parent = "deny"
|
|
reply.TTL = 0
|
|
reply.ETag = "nothing"
|
|
reply.Policy = &acl.Policy{
|
|
ID: "not-needed",
|
|
PolicyRules: acl.PolicyRules{
|
|
Nodes: []*acl.NodeRule{
|
|
{
|
|
Name: "foo",
|
|
Policy: acl.PolicyWrite,
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
}
|
|
cached = true
|
|
return nil
|
|
}
|
|
return errRPC
|
|
},
|
|
}
|
|
r := newTestACLResolver(t, delegate, func(config *ACLResolverConfig) {
|
|
config.Config.ACLTokenTTL = 0
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
authz, err := r.ResolveToken("foo")
|
|
require.NoError(t, err)
|
|
require.NotNil(t, authz)
|
|
// there is a bit of translation that happens
|
|
require.Equal(t, acl.Allow, authz.NodeWrite("foo", nil))
|
|
require.Equal(t, acl.Allow, authz.NodeWrite("foo/bar", nil))
|
|
require.Equal(t, acl.Deny, authz.NodeWrite("fo", nil))
|
|
|
|
// this should be from the cache
|
|
authz, err = r.ResolveToken("foo")
|
|
require.NoError(t, err)
|
|
require.NotNil(t, authz)
|
|
// there is a bit of translation that happens
|
|
require.Equal(t, acl.Allow, authz.NodeWrite("foo", nil))
|
|
require.Equal(t, acl.Allow, authz.NodeWrite("foo/bar", nil))
|
|
require.Equal(t, acl.Deny, authz.NodeWrite("fo", nil))
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
t.Run("Cache-Expiry-Allow", func(t *testing.T) {
|
|
t.Parallel()
|
|
cached := false
|
|
delegate := &ACLResolverTestDelegate{
|
|
enabled: true,
|
|
datacenter: "dc1",
|
|
legacy: true,
|
|
localTokens: false,
|
|
localPolicies: false,
|
|
getPolicyFn: func(args *structs.ACLPolicyResolveLegacyRequest, reply *structs.ACLPolicyResolveLegacyResponse) error {
|
|
if !cached {
|
|
reply.Parent = "deny"
|
|
reply.TTL = 0
|
|
reply.ETag = "nothing"
|
|
reply.Policy = &acl.Policy{
|
|
ID: "not-needed",
|
|
PolicyRules: acl.PolicyRules{
|
|
Nodes: []*acl.NodeRule{
|
|
{
|
|
Name: "foo",
|
|
Policy: acl.PolicyWrite,
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
}
|
|
cached = true
|
|
return nil
|
|
}
|
|
return errRPC
|
|
},
|
|
}
|
|
r := newTestACLResolver(t, delegate, func(config *ACLResolverConfig) {
|
|
config.Config.ACLDownPolicy = "allow"
|
|
config.Config.ACLTokenTTL = 0
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
authz, err := r.ResolveToken("foo")
|
|
require.NoError(t, err)
|
|
require.NotNil(t, authz)
|
|
// there is a bit of translation that happens
|
|
require.Equal(t, acl.Allow, authz.NodeWrite("foo", nil))
|
|
require.Equal(t, acl.Allow, authz.NodeWrite("foo/bar", nil))
|
|
require.Equal(t, acl.Deny, authz.NodeWrite("fo", nil))
|
|
|
|
// this should be from the cache
|
|
authz, err = r.ResolveToken("foo")
|
|
require.NoError(t, err)
|
|
require.NotNil(t, authz)
|
|
// there is a bit of translation that happens
|
|
require.Equal(t, acl.Allow, authz.NodeWrite("foo", nil))
|
|
require.Equal(t, acl.Allow, authz.NodeWrite("foo/bar", nil))
|
|
require.Equal(t, acl.Allow, authz.NodeWrite("fo", nil))
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
t.Run("Cache-Expiry-Deny", func(t *testing.T) {
|
|
t.Parallel()
|
|
cached := false
|
|
delegate := &ACLResolverTestDelegate{
|
|
enabled: true,
|
|
datacenter: "dc1",
|
|
legacy: true,
|
|
localTokens: false,
|
|
localPolicies: false,
|
|
getPolicyFn: func(args *structs.ACLPolicyResolveLegacyRequest, reply *structs.ACLPolicyResolveLegacyResponse) error {
|
|
if !cached {
|
|
reply.Parent = "deny"
|
|
reply.TTL = 0
|
|
reply.ETag = "nothing"
|
|
reply.Policy = &acl.Policy{
|
|
ID: "not-needed",
|
|
PolicyRules: acl.PolicyRules{
|
|
Nodes: []*acl.NodeRule{
|
|
{
|
|
Name: "foo",
|
|
Policy: acl.PolicyWrite,
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
}
|
|
cached = true
|
|
return nil
|
|
}
|
|
return errRPC
|
|
},
|
|
}
|
|
r := newTestACLResolver(t, delegate, func(config *ACLResolverConfig) {
|
|
config.Config.ACLDownPolicy = "deny"
|
|
config.Config.ACLTokenTTL = 0
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
authz, err := r.ResolveToken("foo")
|
|
require.NoError(t, err)
|
|
require.NotNil(t, authz)
|
|
// there is a bit of translation that happens
|
|
require.Equal(t, acl.Allow, authz.NodeWrite("foo", nil))
|
|
require.Equal(t, acl.Allow, authz.NodeWrite("foo/bar", nil))
|
|
require.Equal(t, acl.Deny, authz.NodeWrite("fo", nil))
|
|
|
|
// this should be from the cache
|
|
authz, err = r.ResolveToken("foo")
|
|
require.NoError(t, err)
|
|
require.NotNil(t, authz)
|
|
// there is a bit of translation that happens
|
|
require.Equal(t, acl.Deny, authz.NodeWrite("foo", nil))
|
|
require.Equal(t, acl.Deny, authz.NodeWrite("foo/bar", nil))
|
|
require.Equal(t, acl.Deny, authz.NodeWrite("fo", nil))
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
t.Run("Cache-Expiry-Async-Cache", func(t *testing.T) {
|
|
t.Parallel()
|
|
cached := false
|
|
delegate := &ACLResolverTestDelegate{
|
|
enabled: true,
|
|
datacenter: "dc1",
|
|
legacy: true,
|
|
localTokens: false,
|
|
localPolicies: false,
|
|
getPolicyFn: func(args *structs.ACLPolicyResolveLegacyRequest, reply *structs.ACLPolicyResolveLegacyResponse) error {
|
|
if !cached {
|
|
reply.Parent = "deny"
|
|
reply.TTL = 0
|
|
reply.ETag = "nothing"
|
|
reply.Policy = &acl.Policy{
|
|
ID: "not-needed",
|
|
PolicyRules: acl.PolicyRules{
|
|
Nodes: []*acl.NodeRule{
|
|
{
|
|
Name: "foo",
|
|
Policy: acl.PolicyWrite,
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
}
|
|
cached = true
|
|
return nil
|
|
}
|
|
return acl.ErrNotFound
|
|
},
|
|
}
|
|
r := newTestACLResolver(t, delegate, func(config *ACLResolverConfig) {
|
|
config.Config.ACLDownPolicy = "async-cache"
|
|
config.Config.ACLTokenTTL = 0
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
authz, err := r.ResolveToken("foo")
|
|
require.NoError(t, err)
|
|
require.NotNil(t, authz)
|
|
// there is a bit of translation that happens
|
|
require.Equal(t, acl.Allow, authz.NodeWrite("foo", nil))
|
|
require.Equal(t, acl.Allow, authz.NodeWrite("foo/bar", nil))
|
|
require.Equal(t, acl.Deny, authz.NodeWrite("fo", nil))
|
|
|
|
// delivered from the cache
|
|
authz2, err := r.ResolveToken("foo")
|
|
require.NoError(t, err)
|
|
require.NotNil(t, authz)
|
|
require.True(t, authz == authz2)
|
|
|
|
// the go routine spawned will eventually return and this will be a not found error
|
|
retry.Run(t, func(t *retry.R) {
|
|
authz3, err := r.ResolveToken("foo")
|
|
assert.Error(t, err)
|
|
assert.True(t, acl.IsErrNotFound(err))
|
|
assert.Nil(t, authz3)
|
|
})
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
func TestACL_Replication(t *testing.T) {
|
|
t.Parallel()
|
|
aclExtendPolicies := []string{"extend-cache", "async-cache"} //"async-cache"
|
|
|
|
for _, aclDownPolicy := range aclExtendPolicies {
|
|
dir1, s1 := testServerWithConfig(t, func(c *Config) {
|
|
c.ACLDatacenter = "dc1"
|
|
c.ACLMasterToken = "root"
|
|
})
|
|
defer os.RemoveAll(dir1)
|
|
defer s1.Shutdown()
|
|
client := rpcClient(t, s1)
|
|
defer client.Close()
|
|
|
|
dir2, s2 := testServerWithConfig(t, func(c *Config) {
|
|
c.Datacenter = "dc2"
|
|
c.ACLDatacenter = "dc1"
|
|
c.ACLDefaultPolicy = "deny"
|
|
c.ACLDownPolicy = aclDownPolicy
|
|
c.ACLTokenReplication = true
|
|
c.ACLReplicationRate = 100
|
|
c.ACLReplicationBurst = 100
|
|
c.ACLReplicationApplyLimit = 1000000
|
|
})
|
|
s2.tokens.UpdateReplicationToken("root")
|
|
defer os.RemoveAll(dir2)
|
|
defer s2.Shutdown()
|
|
|
|
dir3, s3 := testServerWithConfig(t, func(c *Config) {
|
|
c.Datacenter = "dc3"
|
|
c.ACLDatacenter = "dc1"
|
|
c.ACLDownPolicy = "deny"
|
|
c.ACLTokenReplication = true
|
|
c.ACLReplicationRate = 100
|
|
c.ACLReplicationBurst = 100
|
|
c.ACLReplicationApplyLimit = 1000000
|
|
})
|
|
s3.tokens.UpdateReplicationToken("root")
|
|
defer os.RemoveAll(dir3)
|
|
defer s3.Shutdown()
|
|
|
|
// Try to join.
|
|
joinWAN(t, s2, s1)
|
|
joinWAN(t, s3, s1)
|
|
testrpc.WaitForLeader(t, s1.RPC, "dc1")
|
|
testrpc.WaitForLeader(t, s1.RPC, "dc2")
|
|
testrpc.WaitForLeader(t, s1.RPC, "dc3")
|
|
|
|
// Create a new token.
|
|
arg := structs.ACLRequest{
|
|
Datacenter: "dc1",
|
|
Op: structs.ACLSet,
|
|
ACL: structs.ACL{
|
|
Name: "User token",
|
|
Type: structs.ACLTokenTypeClient,
|
|
Rules: testACLPolicy,
|
|
},
|
|
WriteRequest: structs.WriteRequest{Token: "root"},
|
|
}
|
|
var id string
|
|
if err := s1.RPC("ACL.Apply", &arg, &id); err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatalf("err: %v", err)
|
|
}
|
|
// Wait for replication to occur.
|
|
retry.Run(t, func(r *retry.R) {
|
|
_, acl, err := s2.fsm.State().ACLTokenGetBySecret(nil, id)
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
r.Fatal(err)
|
|
}
|
|
if acl == nil {
|
|
r.Fatal(nil)
|
|
}
|
|
_, acl, err = s3.fsm.State().ACLTokenGetBySecret(nil, id)
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
r.Fatal(err)
|
|
}
|
|
if acl == nil {
|
|
r.Fatal(nil)
|
|
}
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
// Kill the ACL datacenter.
|
|
s1.Shutdown()
|
|
|
|
// Token should resolve on s2, which has replication + extend-cache.
|
|
acl, err := s2.ResolveToken(id)
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatalf("err: %v", err)
|
|
}
|
|
if acl == nil {
|
|
t.Fatalf("missing acl")
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Check the policy
|
|
if acl.KeyRead("bar") {
|
|
t.Fatalf("unexpected read")
|
|
}
|
|
if !acl.KeyRead("foo/test") {
|
|
t.Fatalf("unexpected failed read")
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Although s3 has replication, and we verified that the ACL is there,
|
|
// it can not be used because of the down policy.
|
|
acl, err = s3.ResolveToken(id)
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatalf("err: %v", err)
|
|
}
|
|
if acl == nil {
|
|
t.Fatalf("missing acl")
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Check the policy.
|
|
if acl.KeyRead("bar") {
|
|
t.Fatalf("unexpected read")
|
|
}
|
|
if acl.KeyRead("foo/test") {
|
|
t.Fatalf("unexpected read")
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func TestACL_MultiDC_Found(t *testing.T) {
|
|
t.Parallel()
|
|
dir1, s1 := testServerWithConfig(t, func(c *Config) {
|
|
c.ACLDatacenter = "dc1"
|
|
c.ACLMasterToken = "root"
|
|
})
|
|
defer os.RemoveAll(dir1)
|
|
defer s1.Shutdown()
|
|
client := rpcClient(t, s1)
|
|
defer client.Close()
|
|
|
|
dir2, s2 := testServerWithConfig(t, func(c *Config) {
|
|
c.Datacenter = "dc2"
|
|
c.ACLDatacenter = "dc1" // Enable ACLs!
|
|
})
|
|
defer os.RemoveAll(dir2)
|
|
defer s2.Shutdown()
|
|
|
|
// Try to join
|
|
joinWAN(t, s2, s1)
|
|
|
|
testrpc.WaitForLeader(t, s1.RPC, "dc1")
|
|
testrpc.WaitForLeader(t, s1.RPC, "dc2")
|
|
|
|
// Create a new token
|
|
arg := structs.ACLRequest{
|
|
Datacenter: "dc1",
|
|
Op: structs.ACLSet,
|
|
ACL: structs.ACL{
|
|
Name: "User token",
|
|
Type: structs.ACLTokenTypeClient,
|
|
Rules: testACLPolicy,
|
|
},
|
|
WriteRequest: structs.WriteRequest{Token: "root"},
|
|
}
|
|
var id string
|
|
if err := s1.RPC("ACL.Apply", &arg, &id); err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatalf("err: %v", err)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Token should resolve
|
|
acl, err := s2.ResolveToken(id)
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatalf("err: %v", err)
|
|
}
|
|
if acl == nil {
|
|
t.Fatalf("missing acl")
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Check the policy
|
|
if acl.KeyRead("bar") {
|
|
t.Fatalf("unexpected read")
|
|
}
|
|
if !acl.KeyRead("foo/test") {
|
|
t.Fatalf("unexpected failed read")
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
func TestACL_filterHealthChecks(t *testing.T) {
|
|
t.Parallel()
|
|
// Create some health checks.
|
|
fill := func() structs.HealthChecks {
|
|
return structs.HealthChecks{
|
|
&structs.HealthCheck{
|
|
Node: "node1",
|
|
CheckID: "check1",
|
|
ServiceName: "foo",
|
|
},
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
hc := fill()
|
|
filt := newACLFilter(acl.DenyAll(), nil)
|
|
filt.filterHealthChecks(&hc)
|
|
if len(hc) != 0 {
|
|
t.Fatalf("bad: %#v", hc)
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Allowed to see the service but not the node.
|
|
policy, err := acl.NewPolicyFromSource("", 0, `
|
|
service "foo" {
|
|
policy = "read"
|
|
}
|
|
`, acl.SyntaxLegacy, nil, nil)
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatalf("err %v", err)
|
|
}
|
|
perms, err := acl.NewPolicyAuthorizerWithDefaults(acl.DenyAll(), []*acl.Policy{policy}, nil)
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatalf("err: %v", err)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
hc := fill()
|
|
filt := newACLFilter(perms, nil)
|
|
filt.filterHealthChecks(&hc)
|
|
if len(hc) != 0 {
|
|
t.Fatalf("bad: %#v", hc)
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Chain on access to the node.
|
|
policy, err = acl.NewPolicyFromSource("", 0, `
|
|
node "node1" {
|
|
policy = "read"
|
|
}
|
|
`, acl.SyntaxLegacy, nil, nil)
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatalf("err %v", err)
|
|
}
|
|
perms, err = acl.NewPolicyAuthorizerWithDefaults(perms, []*acl.Policy{policy}, nil)
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatalf("err: %v", err)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Now it should go through.
|
|
{
|
|
hc := fill()
|
|
filt := newACLFilter(perms, nil)
|
|
filt.filterHealthChecks(&hc)
|
|
if len(hc) != 1 {
|
|
t.Fatalf("bad: %#v", hc)
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func TestACL_filterIntentions(t *testing.T) {
|
|
t.Parallel()
|
|
assert := assert.New(t)
|
|
|
|
fill := func() structs.Intentions {
|
|
return structs.Intentions{
|
|
&structs.Intention{
|
|
ID: "f004177f-2c28-83b7-4229-eacc25fe55d1",
|
|
DestinationName: "bar",
|
|
},
|
|
&structs.Intention{
|
|
ID: "f004177f-2c28-83b7-4229-eacc25fe55d2",
|
|
DestinationName: "foo",
|
|
},
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Try permissive filtering.
|
|
{
|
|
ixns := fill()
|
|
filt := newACLFilter(acl.AllowAll(), nil)
|
|
filt.filterIntentions(&ixns)
|
|
assert.Len(ixns, 2)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Try restrictive filtering.
|
|
{
|
|
ixns := fill()
|
|
filt := newACLFilter(acl.DenyAll(), nil)
|
|
filt.filterIntentions(&ixns)
|
|
assert.Len(ixns, 0)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Policy to see one
|
|
policy, err := acl.NewPolicyFromSource("", 0, `
|
|
service "foo" {
|
|
policy = "read"
|
|
}
|
|
`, acl.SyntaxLegacy, nil, nil)
|
|
assert.Nil(err)
|
|
perms, err := acl.NewPolicyAuthorizerWithDefaults(acl.DenyAll(), []*acl.Policy{policy}, nil)
|
|
assert.Nil(err)
|
|
|
|
// Filter
|
|
{
|
|
ixns := fill()
|
|
filt := newACLFilter(perms, nil)
|
|
filt.filterIntentions(&ixns)
|
|
assert.Len(ixns, 1)
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func TestACL_filterServices(t *testing.T) {
|
|
t.Parallel()
|
|
// Create some services
|
|
services := structs.Services{
|
|
"service1": []string{},
|
|
"service2": []string{},
|
|
"consul": []string{},
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Try permissive filtering.
|
|
filt := newACLFilter(acl.AllowAll(), nil)
|
|
filt.filterServices(services, nil)
|
|
if len(services) != 3 {
|
|
t.Fatalf("bad: %#v", services)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Try restrictive filtering.
|
|
filt = newACLFilter(acl.DenyAll(), nil)
|
|
filt.filterServices(services, nil)
|
|
if len(services) != 0 {
|
|
t.Fatalf("bad: %#v", services)
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func TestACL_filterServiceNodes(t *testing.T) {
|
|
t.Parallel()
|
|
// Create some service nodes.
|
|
fill := func() structs.ServiceNodes {
|
|
return structs.ServiceNodes{
|
|
&structs.ServiceNode{
|
|
Node: "node1",
|
|
ServiceName: "foo",
|
|
},
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Try permissive filtering.
|
|
{
|
|
nodes := fill()
|
|
filt := newACLFilter(acl.AllowAll(), nil)
|
|
filt.filterServiceNodes(&nodes)
|
|
if len(nodes) != 1 {
|
|
t.Fatalf("bad: %#v", nodes)
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Try restrictive filtering.
|
|
{
|
|
nodes := fill()
|
|
filt := newACLFilter(acl.DenyAll(), nil)
|
|
filt.filterServiceNodes(&nodes)
|
|
if len(nodes) != 0 {
|
|
t.Fatalf("bad: %#v", nodes)
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Allowed to see the service but not the node.
|
|
policy, err := acl.NewPolicyFromSource("", 0, `
|
|
service "foo" {
|
|
policy = "read"
|
|
}
|
|
`, acl.SyntaxLegacy, nil, nil)
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatalf("err %v", err)
|
|
}
|
|
perms, err := acl.NewPolicyAuthorizerWithDefaults(acl.DenyAll(), []*acl.Policy{policy}, nil)
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatalf("err: %v", err)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// But with version 8 the node will block it.
|
|
{
|
|
nodes := fill()
|
|
filt := newACLFilter(perms, nil)
|
|
filt.filterServiceNodes(&nodes)
|
|
if len(nodes) != 0 {
|
|
t.Fatalf("bad: %#v", nodes)
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Chain on access to the node.
|
|
policy, err = acl.NewPolicyFromSource("", 0, `
|
|
node "node1" {
|
|
policy = "read"
|
|
}
|
|
`, acl.SyntaxLegacy, nil, nil)
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatalf("err %v", err)
|
|
}
|
|
perms, err = acl.NewPolicyAuthorizerWithDefaults(perms, []*acl.Policy{policy}, nil)
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatalf("err: %v", err)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Now it should go through.
|
|
{
|
|
nodes := fill()
|
|
filt := newACLFilter(perms, nil)
|
|
filt.filterServiceNodes(&nodes)
|
|
if len(nodes) != 1 {
|
|
t.Fatalf("bad: %#v", nodes)
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func TestACL_filterNodeServices(t *testing.T) {
|
|
t.Parallel()
|
|
// Create some node services.
|
|
fill := func() *structs.NodeServices {
|
|
return &structs.NodeServices{
|
|
Node: &structs.Node{
|
|
Node: "node1",
|
|
},
|
|
Services: map[string]*structs.NodeService{
|
|
"foo": {
|
|
ID: "foo",
|
|
Service: "foo",
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Try nil, which is a possible input.
|
|
{
|
|
var services *structs.NodeServices
|
|
filt := newACLFilter(acl.AllowAll(), nil)
|
|
filt.filterNodeServices(&services)
|
|
if services != nil {
|
|
t.Fatalf("bad: %#v", services)
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Try permissive filtering.
|
|
{
|
|
services := fill()
|
|
filt := newACLFilter(acl.AllowAll(), nil)
|
|
filt.filterNodeServices(&services)
|
|
if len(services.Services) != 1 {
|
|
t.Fatalf("bad: %#v", services.Services)
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Try restrictive filtering.
|
|
{
|
|
services := fill()
|
|
filt := newACLFilter(acl.DenyAll(), nil)
|
|
filt.filterNodeServices(&services)
|
|
if services != nil {
|
|
t.Fatalf("bad: %#v", *services)
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Allowed to see the service but not the node.
|
|
policy, err := acl.NewPolicyFromSource("", 0, `
|
|
service "foo" {
|
|
policy = "read"
|
|
}
|
|
`, acl.SyntaxLegacy, nil, nil)
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatalf("err %v", err)
|
|
}
|
|
perms, err := acl.NewPolicyAuthorizerWithDefaults(acl.DenyAll(), []*acl.Policy{policy}, nil)
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatalf("err: %v", err)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Node will block it.
|
|
{
|
|
services := fill()
|
|
filt := newACLFilter(perms, nil)
|
|
filt.filterNodeServices(&services)
|
|
if services != nil {
|
|
t.Fatalf("bad: %#v", services)
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Chain on access to the node.
|
|
policy, err = acl.NewPolicyFromSource("", 0, `
|
|
node "node1" {
|
|
policy = "read"
|
|
}
|
|
`, acl.SyntaxLegacy, nil, nil)
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatalf("err %v", err)
|
|
}
|
|
perms, err = acl.NewPolicyAuthorizerWithDefaults(perms, []*acl.Policy{policy}, nil)
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatalf("err: %v", err)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Now it should go through.
|
|
{
|
|
services := fill()
|
|
filt := newACLFilter(perms, nil)
|
|
filt.filterNodeServices(&services)
|
|
if len((*services).Services) != 1 {
|
|
t.Fatalf("bad: %#v", (*services).Services)
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func TestACL_filterCheckServiceNodes(t *testing.T) {
|
|
t.Parallel()
|
|
// Create some nodes.
|
|
fill := func() structs.CheckServiceNodes {
|
|
return structs.CheckServiceNodes{
|
|
structs.CheckServiceNode{
|
|
Node: &structs.Node{
|
|
Node: "node1",
|
|
},
|
|
Service: &structs.NodeService{
|
|
ID: "foo",
|
|
Service: "foo",
|
|
},
|
|
Checks: structs.HealthChecks{
|
|
&structs.HealthCheck{
|
|
Node: "node1",
|
|
CheckID: "check1",
|
|
ServiceName: "foo",
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Try permissive filtering.
|
|
{
|
|
nodes := fill()
|
|
filt := newACLFilter(acl.AllowAll(), nil)
|
|
filt.filterCheckServiceNodes(&nodes)
|
|
if len(nodes) != 1 {
|
|
t.Fatalf("bad: %#v", nodes)
|
|
}
|
|
if len(nodes[0].Checks) != 1 {
|
|
t.Fatalf("bad: %#v", nodes[0].Checks)
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Try restrictive filtering.
|
|
{
|
|
nodes := fill()
|
|
filt := newACLFilter(acl.DenyAll(), nil)
|
|
filt.filterCheckServiceNodes(&nodes)
|
|
if len(nodes) != 0 {
|
|
t.Fatalf("bad: %#v", nodes)
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Allowed to see the service but not the node.
|
|
policy, err := acl.NewPolicyFromSource("", 0, `
|
|
service "foo" {
|
|
policy = "read"
|
|
}
|
|
`, acl.SyntaxLegacy, nil, nil)
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatalf("err %v", err)
|
|
}
|
|
perms, err := acl.NewPolicyAuthorizerWithDefaults(acl.DenyAll(), []*acl.Policy{policy}, nil)
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatalf("err: %v", err)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
nodes := fill()
|
|
filt := newACLFilter(perms, nil)
|
|
filt.filterCheckServiceNodes(&nodes)
|
|
if len(nodes) != 0 {
|
|
t.Fatalf("bad: %#v", nodes)
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Chain on access to the node.
|
|
policy, err = acl.NewPolicyFromSource("", 0, `
|
|
node "node1" {
|
|
policy = "read"
|
|
}
|
|
`, acl.SyntaxLegacy, nil, nil)
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatalf("err %v", err)
|
|
}
|
|
perms, err = acl.NewPolicyAuthorizerWithDefaults(perms, []*acl.Policy{policy}, nil)
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatalf("err: %v", err)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Now it should go through.
|
|
{
|
|
nodes := fill()
|
|
filt := newACLFilter(perms, nil)
|
|
filt.filterCheckServiceNodes(&nodes)
|
|
if len(nodes) != 1 {
|
|
t.Fatalf("bad: %#v", nodes)
|
|
}
|
|
if len(nodes[0].Checks) != 1 {
|
|
t.Fatalf("bad: %#v", nodes[0].Checks)
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func TestACL_filterServiceTopology(t *testing.T) {
|
|
t.Parallel()
|
|
// Create some nodes.
|
|
fill := func() structs.ServiceTopology {
|
|
return structs.ServiceTopology{
|
|
Upstreams: structs.CheckServiceNodes{
|
|
structs.CheckServiceNode{
|
|
Node: &structs.Node{
|
|
Node: "node1",
|
|
},
|
|
Service: &structs.NodeService{
|
|
ID: "foo",
|
|
Service: "foo",
|
|
},
|
|
Checks: structs.HealthChecks{
|
|
&structs.HealthCheck{
|
|
Node: "node1",
|
|
CheckID: "check1",
|
|
ServiceName: "foo",
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
Downstreams: structs.CheckServiceNodes{
|
|
structs.CheckServiceNode{
|
|
Node: &structs.Node{
|
|
Node: "node2",
|
|
},
|
|
Service: &structs.NodeService{
|
|
ID: "bar",
|
|
Service: "bar",
|
|
},
|
|
Checks: structs.HealthChecks{
|
|
&structs.HealthCheck{
|
|
Node: "node2",
|
|
CheckID: "check1",
|
|
ServiceName: "bar",
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
original := fill()
|
|
|
|
t.Run("allow all without permissions", func(t *testing.T) {
|
|
topo := fill()
|
|
f := newACLFilter(acl.AllowAll(), nil)
|
|
|
|
filtered := f.filterServiceTopology(&topo)
|
|
if filtered {
|
|
t.Fatalf("should not have been filtered")
|
|
}
|
|
assert.Equal(t, original, topo)
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
t.Run("deny all without permissions", func(t *testing.T) {
|
|
topo := fill()
|
|
f := newACLFilter(acl.DenyAll(), nil)
|
|
|
|
filtered := f.filterServiceTopology(&topo)
|
|
if !filtered {
|
|
t.Fatalf("should have been marked as filtered")
|
|
}
|
|
assert.Len(t, topo.Upstreams, 0)
|
|
assert.Len(t, topo.Upstreams, 0)
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
t.Run("only upstream permissions", func(t *testing.T) {
|
|
rules := `
|
|
node "node1" {
|
|
policy = "read"
|
|
}
|
|
service "foo" {
|
|
policy = "read"
|
|
}`
|
|
policy, err := acl.NewPolicyFromSource("", 0, rules, acl.SyntaxLegacy, nil, nil)
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatalf("err %v", err)
|
|
}
|
|
perms, err := acl.NewPolicyAuthorizerWithDefaults(acl.DenyAll(), []*acl.Policy{policy}, nil)
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatalf("err: %v", err)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
topo := fill()
|
|
f := newACLFilter(perms, nil)
|
|
|
|
filtered := f.filterServiceTopology(&topo)
|
|
if !filtered {
|
|
t.Fatalf("should have been marked as filtered")
|
|
}
|
|
assert.Equal(t, original.Upstreams, topo.Upstreams)
|
|
assert.Len(t, topo.Downstreams, 0)
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
t.Run("only downstream permissions", func(t *testing.T) {
|
|
rules := `
|
|
node "node2" {
|
|
policy = "read"
|
|
}
|
|
service "bar" {
|
|
policy = "read"
|
|
}`
|
|
policy, err := acl.NewPolicyFromSource("", 0, rules, acl.SyntaxLegacy, nil, nil)
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatalf("err %v", err)
|
|
}
|
|
perms, err := acl.NewPolicyAuthorizerWithDefaults(acl.DenyAll(), []*acl.Policy{policy}, nil)
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatalf("err: %v", err)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
topo := fill()
|
|
f := newACLFilter(perms, nil)
|
|
|
|
filtered := f.filterServiceTopology(&topo)
|
|
if !filtered {
|
|
t.Fatalf("should have been marked as filtered")
|
|
}
|
|
assert.Equal(t, original.Downstreams, topo.Downstreams)
|
|
assert.Len(t, topo.Upstreams, 0)
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
t.Run("upstream and downstream permissions", func(t *testing.T) {
|
|
rules := `
|
|
node "node1" {
|
|
policy = "read"
|
|
}
|
|
service "foo" {
|
|
policy = "read"
|
|
}
|
|
node "node2" {
|
|
policy = "read"
|
|
}
|
|
service "bar" {
|
|
policy = "read"
|
|
}`
|
|
policy, err := acl.NewPolicyFromSource("", 0, rules, acl.SyntaxLegacy, nil, nil)
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatalf("err %v", err)
|
|
}
|
|
perms, err := acl.NewPolicyAuthorizerWithDefaults(acl.DenyAll(), []*acl.Policy{policy}, nil)
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatalf("err: %v", err)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
topo := fill()
|
|
f := newACLFilter(perms, nil)
|
|
|
|
filtered := f.filterServiceTopology(&topo)
|
|
if filtered {
|
|
t.Fatalf("should not have been filtered")
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
original := fill()
|
|
assert.Equal(t, original, topo)
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func TestACL_filterCoordinates(t *testing.T) {
|
|
t.Parallel()
|
|
// Create some coordinates.
|
|
coords := structs.Coordinates{
|
|
&structs.Coordinate{
|
|
Node: "node1",
|
|
Coord: generateRandomCoordinate(),
|
|
},
|
|
&structs.Coordinate{
|
|
Node: "node2",
|
|
Coord: generateRandomCoordinate(),
|
|
},
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Try permissive filtering.
|
|
filt := newACLFilter(acl.AllowAll(), nil)
|
|
filt.filterCoordinates(&coords)
|
|
if len(coords) != 2 {
|
|
t.Fatalf("bad: %#v", coords)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Try restrictive filtering
|
|
filt = newACLFilter(acl.DenyAll(), nil)
|
|
filt.filterCoordinates(&coords)
|
|
if len(coords) != 0 {
|
|
t.Fatalf("bad: %#v", coords)
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func TestACL_filterSessions(t *testing.T) {
|
|
t.Parallel()
|
|
// Create a session list.
|
|
sessions := structs.Sessions{
|
|
&structs.Session{
|
|
Node: "foo",
|
|
},
|
|
&structs.Session{
|
|
Node: "bar",
|
|
},
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Try permissive filtering.
|
|
filt := newACLFilter(acl.AllowAll(), nil)
|
|
filt.filterSessions(&sessions)
|
|
if len(sessions) != 2 {
|
|
t.Fatalf("bad: %#v", sessions)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Try restrictive filtering
|
|
filt = newACLFilter(acl.DenyAll(), nil)
|
|
filt.filterSessions(&sessions)
|
|
if len(sessions) != 0 {
|
|
t.Fatalf("bad: %#v", sessions)
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func TestACL_filterNodeDump(t *testing.T) {
|
|
t.Parallel()
|
|
// Create a node dump.
|
|
fill := func() structs.NodeDump {
|
|
return structs.NodeDump{
|
|
&structs.NodeInfo{
|
|
Node: "node1",
|
|
Services: []*structs.NodeService{
|
|
{
|
|
ID: "foo",
|
|
Service: "foo",
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
Checks: []*structs.HealthCheck{
|
|
{
|
|
Node: "node1",
|
|
CheckID: "check1",
|
|
ServiceName: "foo",
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Try permissive filtering.
|
|
{
|
|
dump := fill()
|
|
filt := newACLFilter(acl.AllowAll(), nil)
|
|
filt.filterNodeDump(&dump)
|
|
if len(dump) != 1 {
|
|
t.Fatalf("bad: %#v", dump)
|
|
}
|
|
if len(dump[0].Services) != 1 {
|
|
t.Fatalf("bad: %#v", dump[0].Services)
|
|
}
|
|
if len(dump[0].Checks) != 1 {
|
|
t.Fatalf("bad: %#v", dump[0].Checks)
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Try restrictive filtering.
|
|
{
|
|
dump := fill()
|
|
filt := newACLFilter(acl.DenyAll(), nil)
|
|
filt.filterNodeDump(&dump)
|
|
if len(dump) != 0 {
|
|
t.Fatalf("bad: %#v", dump)
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Allowed to see the service but not the node.
|
|
policy, err := acl.NewPolicyFromSource("", 0, `
|
|
service "foo" {
|
|
policy = "read"
|
|
}
|
|
`, acl.SyntaxLegacy, nil, nil)
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatalf("err %v", err)
|
|
}
|
|
perms, err := acl.NewPolicyAuthorizerWithDefaults(acl.DenyAll(), []*acl.Policy{policy}, nil)
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatalf("err: %v", err)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// But the node will block it.
|
|
{
|
|
dump := fill()
|
|
filt := newACLFilter(perms, nil)
|
|
filt.filterNodeDump(&dump)
|
|
if len(dump) != 0 {
|
|
t.Fatalf("bad: %#v", dump)
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Chain on access to the node.
|
|
policy, err = acl.NewPolicyFromSource("", 0, `
|
|
node "node1" {
|
|
policy = "read"
|
|
}
|
|
`, acl.SyntaxLegacy, nil, nil)
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatalf("err %v", err)
|
|
}
|
|
perms, err = acl.NewPolicyAuthorizerWithDefaults(perms, []*acl.Policy{policy}, nil)
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatalf("err: %v", err)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Now it should go through.
|
|
{
|
|
dump := fill()
|
|
filt := newACLFilter(perms, nil)
|
|
filt.filterNodeDump(&dump)
|
|
if len(dump) != 1 {
|
|
t.Fatalf("bad: %#v", dump)
|
|
}
|
|
if len(dump[0].Services) != 1 {
|
|
t.Fatalf("bad: %#v", dump[0].Services)
|
|
}
|
|
if len(dump[0].Checks) != 1 {
|
|
t.Fatalf("bad: %#v", dump[0].Checks)
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func TestACL_filterNodes(t *testing.T) {
|
|
t.Parallel()
|
|
// Create a nodes list.
|
|
nodes := structs.Nodes{
|
|
&structs.Node{
|
|
Node: "foo",
|
|
},
|
|
&structs.Node{
|
|
Node: "bar",
|
|
},
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Try permissive filtering.
|
|
filt := newACLFilter(acl.AllowAll(), nil)
|
|
filt.filterNodes(&nodes)
|
|
if len(nodes) != 2 {
|
|
t.Fatalf("bad: %#v", nodes)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Try restrictive filtering
|
|
filt = newACLFilter(acl.DenyAll(), nil)
|
|
filt.filterNodes(&nodes)
|
|
if len(nodes) != 0 {
|
|
t.Fatalf("bad: %#v", nodes)
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func TestACL_filterDatacenterCheckServiceNodes(t *testing.T) {
|
|
t.Parallel()
|
|
// Create some data.
|
|
fixture := map[string]structs.CheckServiceNodes{
|
|
"dc1": []structs.CheckServiceNode{
|
|
newTestMeshGatewayNode(
|
|
"dc1", "gateway1a", "1.2.3.4", 5555, map[string]string{structs.MetaWANFederationKey: "1"}, api.HealthPassing,
|
|
),
|
|
newTestMeshGatewayNode(
|
|
"dc1", "gateway2a", "4.3.2.1", 9999, map[string]string{structs.MetaWANFederationKey: "1"}, api.HealthPassing,
|
|
),
|
|
},
|
|
"dc2": []structs.CheckServiceNode{
|
|
newTestMeshGatewayNode(
|
|
"dc2", "gateway1b", "5.6.7.8", 9999, map[string]string{structs.MetaWANFederationKey: "1"}, api.HealthPassing,
|
|
),
|
|
newTestMeshGatewayNode(
|
|
"dc2", "gateway2b", "8.7.6.5", 1111, map[string]string{structs.MetaWANFederationKey: "1"}, api.HealthPassing,
|
|
),
|
|
},
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
fill := func(t *testing.T) map[string]structs.CheckServiceNodes {
|
|
t.Helper()
|
|
dup, err := copystructure.Copy(fixture)
|
|
require.NoError(t, err)
|
|
return dup.(map[string]structs.CheckServiceNodes)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Try permissive filtering.
|
|
{
|
|
dcNodes := fill(t)
|
|
filt := newACLFilter(acl.AllowAll(), nil)
|
|
filt.filterDatacenterCheckServiceNodes(&dcNodes)
|
|
require.Len(t, dcNodes, 2)
|
|
require.Equal(t, fill(t), dcNodes)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Try restrictive filtering.
|
|
{
|
|
dcNodes := fill(t)
|
|
filt := newACLFilter(acl.DenyAll(), nil)
|
|
filt.filterDatacenterCheckServiceNodes(&dcNodes)
|
|
require.Len(t, dcNodes, 0)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
var (
|
|
policy *acl.Policy
|
|
err error
|
|
perms acl.Authorizer
|
|
)
|
|
// Allowed to see the service but not the node.
|
|
policy, err = acl.NewPolicyFromSource("", 0, `
|
|
service_prefix "" { policy = "read" }
|
|
`, acl.SyntaxCurrent, nil, nil)
|
|
require.NoError(t, err)
|
|
perms, err = acl.NewPolicyAuthorizerWithDefaults(acl.DenyAll(), []*acl.Policy{policy}, nil)
|
|
require.NoError(t, err)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
dcNodes := fill(t)
|
|
filt := newACLFilter(perms, nil)
|
|
filt.filterDatacenterCheckServiceNodes(&dcNodes)
|
|
require.Len(t, dcNodes, 0)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Allowed to see the node but not the service.
|
|
policy, err = acl.NewPolicyFromSource("", 0, `
|
|
node_prefix "" { policy = "read" }
|
|
`, acl.SyntaxCurrent, nil, nil)
|
|
require.NoError(t, err)
|
|
perms, err = acl.NewPolicyAuthorizerWithDefaults(acl.DenyAll(), []*acl.Policy{policy}, nil)
|
|
require.NoError(t, err)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
dcNodes := fill(t)
|
|
filt := newACLFilter(perms, nil)
|
|
filt.filterDatacenterCheckServiceNodes(&dcNodes)
|
|
require.Len(t, dcNodes, 0)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Allowed to see the service AND the node
|
|
policy, err = acl.NewPolicyFromSource("", 0, `
|
|
service_prefix "" { policy = "read" }
|
|
node_prefix "" { policy = "read" }
|
|
`, acl.SyntaxCurrent, nil, nil)
|
|
require.NoError(t, err)
|
|
_, err = acl.NewPolicyAuthorizerWithDefaults(acl.DenyAll(), []*acl.Policy{policy}, nil)
|
|
require.NoError(t, err)
|
|
|
|
// Now it should go through.
|
|
{
|
|
dcNodes := fill(t)
|
|
filt := newACLFilter(acl.AllowAll(), nil)
|
|
filt.filterDatacenterCheckServiceNodes(&dcNodes)
|
|
require.Len(t, dcNodes, 2)
|
|
require.Equal(t, fill(t), dcNodes)
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func TestACL_redactPreparedQueryTokens(t *testing.T) {
|
|
t.Parallel()
|
|
query := &structs.PreparedQuery{
|
|
ID: "f004177f-2c28-83b7-4229-eacc25fe55d1",
|
|
Token: "root",
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
expected := &structs.PreparedQuery{
|
|
ID: "f004177f-2c28-83b7-4229-eacc25fe55d1",
|
|
Token: "root",
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Try permissive filtering with a management token. This will allow the
|
|
// embedded token to be seen.
|
|
filt := newACLFilter(acl.ManageAll(), nil)
|
|
filt.redactPreparedQueryTokens(&query)
|
|
if !reflect.DeepEqual(query, expected) {
|
|
t.Fatalf("bad: %#v", &query)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Hang on to the entry with a token, which needs to survive the next
|
|
// operation.
|
|
original := query
|
|
|
|
// Now try permissive filtering with a client token, which should cause
|
|
// the embedded token to get redacted.
|
|
filt = newACLFilter(acl.AllowAll(), nil)
|
|
filt.redactPreparedQueryTokens(&query)
|
|
expected.Token = redactedToken
|
|
if !reflect.DeepEqual(query, expected) {
|
|
t.Fatalf("bad: %#v", *query)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Make sure that the original object didn't lose its token.
|
|
if original.Token != "root" {
|
|
t.Fatalf("bad token: %s", original.Token)
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func TestACL_redactTokenSecret(t *testing.T) {
|
|
t.Parallel()
|
|
delegate := &ACLResolverTestDelegate{
|
|
enabled: true,
|
|
datacenter: "dc1",
|
|
legacy: false,
|
|
localTokens: true,
|
|
localPolicies: true,
|
|
// No need to provide any of the RPC callbacks
|
|
}
|
|
r := newTestACLResolver(t, delegate, nil)
|
|
|
|
token := &structs.ACLToken{
|
|
AccessorID: "6a5e25b3-28f2-4085-9012-c3fb754314d1",
|
|
SecretID: "6a5e25b3-28f2-4085-9012-c3fb754314d1",
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
err := r.filterACL("acl-wr", &token)
|
|
require.NoError(t, err)
|
|
require.Equal(t, "6a5e25b3-28f2-4085-9012-c3fb754314d1", token.SecretID)
|
|
|
|
err = r.filterACL("acl-ro", &token)
|
|
require.NoError(t, err)
|
|
require.Equal(t, redactedToken, token.SecretID)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func TestACL_redactTokenSecrets(t *testing.T) {
|
|
t.Parallel()
|
|
delegate := &ACLResolverTestDelegate{
|
|
enabled: true,
|
|
datacenter: "dc1",
|
|
legacy: false,
|
|
localTokens: true,
|
|
localPolicies: true,
|
|
// No need to provide any of the RPC callbacks
|
|
}
|
|
r := newTestACLResolver(t, delegate, nil)
|
|
|
|
tokens := structs.ACLTokens{
|
|
&structs.ACLToken{
|
|
AccessorID: "6a5e25b3-28f2-4085-9012-c3fb754314d1",
|
|
SecretID: "6a5e25b3-28f2-4085-9012-c3fb754314d1",
|
|
},
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
err := r.filterACL("acl-wr", &tokens)
|
|
require.NoError(t, err)
|
|
require.Equal(t, "6a5e25b3-28f2-4085-9012-c3fb754314d1", tokens[0].SecretID)
|
|
|
|
err = r.filterACL("acl-ro", &tokens)
|
|
require.NoError(t, err)
|
|
require.Equal(t, redactedToken, tokens[0].SecretID)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func TestACL_filterPreparedQueries(t *testing.T) {
|
|
t.Parallel()
|
|
queries := structs.PreparedQueries{
|
|
&structs.PreparedQuery{
|
|
ID: "f004177f-2c28-83b7-4229-eacc25fe55d1",
|
|
},
|
|
&structs.PreparedQuery{
|
|
ID: "f004177f-2c28-83b7-4229-eacc25fe55d2",
|
|
Name: "query-with-no-token",
|
|
},
|
|
&structs.PreparedQuery{
|
|
ID: "f004177f-2c28-83b7-4229-eacc25fe55d3",
|
|
Name: "query-with-a-token",
|
|
Token: "root",
|
|
},
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
expected := structs.PreparedQueries{
|
|
&structs.PreparedQuery{
|
|
ID: "f004177f-2c28-83b7-4229-eacc25fe55d1",
|
|
},
|
|
&structs.PreparedQuery{
|
|
ID: "f004177f-2c28-83b7-4229-eacc25fe55d2",
|
|
Name: "query-with-no-token",
|
|
},
|
|
&structs.PreparedQuery{
|
|
ID: "f004177f-2c28-83b7-4229-eacc25fe55d3",
|
|
Name: "query-with-a-token",
|
|
Token: "root",
|
|
},
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Try permissive filtering with a management token. This will allow the
|
|
// embedded token to be seen.
|
|
filt := newACLFilter(acl.ManageAll(), nil)
|
|
filt.filterPreparedQueries(&queries)
|
|
if !reflect.DeepEqual(queries, expected) {
|
|
t.Fatalf("bad: %#v", queries)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Hang on to the entry with a token, which needs to survive the next
|
|
// operation.
|
|
original := queries[2]
|
|
|
|
// Now try permissive filtering with a client token, which should cause
|
|
// the embedded token to get redacted, and the query with no name to get
|
|
// filtered out.
|
|
filt = newACLFilter(acl.AllowAll(), nil)
|
|
filt.filterPreparedQueries(&queries)
|
|
expected[2].Token = redactedToken
|
|
expected = append(structs.PreparedQueries{}, expected[1], expected[2])
|
|
if !reflect.DeepEqual(queries, expected) {
|
|
t.Fatalf("bad: %#v", queries)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Make sure that the original object didn't lose its token.
|
|
if original.Token != "root" {
|
|
t.Fatalf("bad token: %s", original.Token)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Now try restrictive filtering.
|
|
filt = newACLFilter(acl.DenyAll(), nil)
|
|
filt.filterPreparedQueries(&queries)
|
|
if len(queries) != 0 {
|
|
t.Fatalf("bad: %#v", queries)
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func TestACL_unhandledFilterType(t *testing.T) {
|
|
t.Parallel()
|
|
defer func(t *testing.T) {
|
|
if recover() == nil {
|
|
t.Fatalf("should panic")
|
|
}
|
|
}(t)
|
|
|
|
// Create the server
|
|
dir, token, srv, client := testACLFilterServer(t)
|
|
defer os.RemoveAll(dir)
|
|
defer srv.Shutdown()
|
|
defer client.Close()
|
|
|
|
// Pass an unhandled type into the ACL filter.
|
|
srv.filterACL(token, &structs.HealthCheck{})
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func TestACL_vetRegisterWithACL(t *testing.T) {
|
|
t.Parallel()
|
|
args := &structs.RegisterRequest{
|
|
Node: "nope",
|
|
Address: "127.0.0.1",
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// With a nil ACL, the update should be allowed.
|
|
if err := vetRegisterWithACL(nil, args, nil); err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatalf("err: %v", err)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Create a basic node policy.
|
|
policy, err := acl.NewPolicyFromSource("", 0, `
|
|
node "node" {
|
|
policy = "write"
|
|
}
|
|
`, acl.SyntaxLegacy, nil, nil)
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatalf("err %v", err)
|
|
}
|
|
perms, err := acl.NewPolicyAuthorizerWithDefaults(acl.DenyAll(), []*acl.Policy{policy}, nil)
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatalf("err: %v", err)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// With that policy, the update should now be blocked for node reasons.
|
|
err = vetRegisterWithACL(perms, args, nil)
|
|
if !acl.IsErrPermissionDenied(err) {
|
|
t.Fatalf("bad: %v", err)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Now use a permitted node name.
|
|
args.Node = "node"
|
|
if err := vetRegisterWithACL(perms, args, nil); err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatalf("err: %v", err)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Build some node info that matches what we have now.
|
|
ns := &structs.NodeServices{
|
|
Node: &structs.Node{
|
|
Node: "node",
|
|
Address: "127.0.0.1",
|
|
},
|
|
Services: make(map[string]*structs.NodeService),
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Try to register a service, which should be blocked.
|
|
args.Service = &structs.NodeService{
|
|
Service: "service",
|
|
ID: "my-id",
|
|
}
|
|
err = vetRegisterWithACL(perms, args, ns)
|
|
if !acl.IsErrPermissionDenied(err) {
|
|
t.Fatalf("bad: %v", err)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Chain on a basic service policy.
|
|
policy, err = acl.NewPolicyFromSource("", 0, `
|
|
service "service" {
|
|
policy = "write"
|
|
}
|
|
`, acl.SyntaxLegacy, nil, nil)
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatalf("err %v", err)
|
|
}
|
|
perms, err = acl.NewPolicyAuthorizerWithDefaults(perms, []*acl.Policy{policy}, nil)
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatalf("err: %v", err)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// With the service ACL, the update should go through.
|
|
if err := vetRegisterWithACL(perms, args, ns); err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatalf("err: %v", err)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Add an existing service that they are clobbering and aren't allowed
|
|
// to write to.
|
|
ns.Services["my-id"] = &structs.NodeService{
|
|
Service: "other",
|
|
ID: "my-id",
|
|
}
|
|
err = vetRegisterWithACL(perms, args, ns)
|
|
if !acl.IsErrPermissionDenied(err) {
|
|
t.Fatalf("bad: %v", err)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Chain on a policy that allows them to write to the other service.
|
|
policy, err = acl.NewPolicyFromSource("", 0, `
|
|
service "other" {
|
|
policy = "write"
|
|
}
|
|
`, acl.SyntaxLegacy, nil, nil)
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatalf("err %v", err)
|
|
}
|
|
perms, err = acl.NewPolicyAuthorizerWithDefaults(perms, []*acl.Policy{policy}, nil)
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatalf("err: %v", err)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Now it should go through.
|
|
if err := vetRegisterWithACL(perms, args, ns); err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatalf("err: %v", err)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Try creating the node and the service at once by having no existing
|
|
// node record. This should be ok since we have node and service
|
|
// permissions.
|
|
if err := vetRegisterWithACL(perms, args, nil); err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatalf("err: %v", err)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Add a node-level check to the member, which should be rejected.
|
|
args.Check = &structs.HealthCheck{
|
|
Node: "node",
|
|
}
|
|
err = vetRegisterWithACL(perms, args, ns)
|
|
if err == nil || !strings.Contains(err.Error(), "check member must be nil") {
|
|
t.Fatalf("bad: %v", err)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Move the check into the slice, but give a bad node name.
|
|
args.Check.Node = "nope"
|
|
args.Checks = append(args.Checks, args.Check)
|
|
args.Check = nil
|
|
err = vetRegisterWithACL(perms, args, ns)
|
|
if err == nil || !strings.Contains(err.Error(), "doesn't match register request node") {
|
|
t.Fatalf("bad: %v", err)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Fix the node name, which should now go through.
|
|
args.Checks[0].Node = "node"
|
|
if err := vetRegisterWithACL(perms, args, ns); err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatalf("err: %v", err)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Add a service-level check.
|
|
args.Checks = append(args.Checks, &structs.HealthCheck{
|
|
Node: "node",
|
|
ServiceID: "my-id",
|
|
})
|
|
if err := vetRegisterWithACL(perms, args, ns); err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatalf("err: %v", err)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Try creating everything at once. This should be ok since we have all
|
|
// the permissions we need. It also makes sure that we can register a
|
|
// new node, service, and associated checks.
|
|
if err := vetRegisterWithACL(perms, args, nil); err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatalf("err: %v", err)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Nil out the service registration, which'll skip the special case
|
|
// and force us to look at the ns data (it will look like we are
|
|
// writing to the "other" service which also has "my-id").
|
|
args.Service = nil
|
|
if err := vetRegisterWithACL(perms, args, ns); err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatalf("err: %v", err)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Chain on a policy that forbids them to write to the other service.
|
|
policy, err = acl.NewPolicyFromSource("", 0, `
|
|
service "other" {
|
|
policy = "deny"
|
|
}
|
|
`, acl.SyntaxLegacy, nil, nil)
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatalf("err %v", err)
|
|
}
|
|
perms, err = acl.NewPolicyAuthorizerWithDefaults(perms, []*acl.Policy{policy}, nil)
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatalf("err: %v", err)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// This should get rejected.
|
|
err = vetRegisterWithACL(perms, args, ns)
|
|
if !acl.IsErrPermissionDenied(err) {
|
|
t.Fatalf("bad: %v", err)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Change the existing service data to point to a service name they
|
|
// car write to. This should go through.
|
|
ns.Services["my-id"] = &structs.NodeService{
|
|
Service: "service",
|
|
ID: "my-id",
|
|
}
|
|
if err := vetRegisterWithACL(perms, args, ns); err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatalf("err: %v", err)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Chain on a policy that forbids them to write to the node.
|
|
policy, err = acl.NewPolicyFromSource("", 0, `
|
|
node "node" {
|
|
policy = "deny"
|
|
}
|
|
`, acl.SyntaxLegacy, nil, nil)
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatalf("err %v", err)
|
|
}
|
|
perms, err = acl.NewPolicyAuthorizerWithDefaults(perms, []*acl.Policy{policy}, nil)
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatalf("err: %v", err)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// This should get rejected because there's a node-level check in here.
|
|
err = vetRegisterWithACL(perms, args, ns)
|
|
if !acl.IsErrPermissionDenied(err) {
|
|
t.Fatalf("bad: %v", err)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Change the node-level check into a service check, and then it should
|
|
// go through.
|
|
args.Checks[0].ServiceID = "my-id"
|
|
if err := vetRegisterWithACL(perms, args, ns); err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatalf("err: %v", err)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Finally, attempt to update the node part of the data and make sure
|
|
// that gets rejected since they no longer have permissions.
|
|
args.Address = "127.0.0.2"
|
|
err = vetRegisterWithACL(perms, args, ns)
|
|
if !acl.IsErrPermissionDenied(err) {
|
|
t.Fatalf("bad: %v", err)
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func TestACL_vetDeregisterWithACL(t *testing.T) {
|
|
t.Parallel()
|
|
args := &structs.DeregisterRequest{
|
|
Node: "nope",
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// With a nil ACL, the update should be allowed.
|
|
if err := vetDeregisterWithACL(nil, args, nil, nil); err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatalf("err: %v", err)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Create a basic node policy.
|
|
policy, err := acl.NewPolicyFromSource("", 0, `
|
|
node "node" {
|
|
policy = "write"
|
|
}
|
|
`, acl.SyntaxLegacy, nil, nil)
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatalf("err %v", err)
|
|
}
|
|
nodePerms, err := acl.NewPolicyAuthorizerWithDefaults(acl.DenyAll(), []*acl.Policy{policy}, nil)
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatalf("err: %v", err)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
policy, err = acl.NewPolicyFromSource("", 0, `
|
|
service "my-service" {
|
|
policy = "write"
|
|
}
|
|
`, acl.SyntaxLegacy, nil, nil)
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatalf("err %v", err)
|
|
}
|
|
servicePerms, err := acl.NewPolicyAuthorizerWithDefaults(acl.DenyAll(), []*acl.Policy{policy}, nil)
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatalf("err: %v", err)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
for _, args := range []struct {
|
|
DeregisterRequest structs.DeregisterRequest
|
|
Service *structs.NodeService
|
|
Check *structs.HealthCheck
|
|
Perms acl.Authorizer
|
|
Expected bool
|
|
Name string
|
|
}{
|
|
{
|
|
DeregisterRequest: structs.DeregisterRequest{
|
|
Node: "nope",
|
|
},
|
|
Perms: nodePerms,
|
|
Expected: false,
|
|
Name: "no right on node",
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
DeregisterRequest: structs.DeregisterRequest{
|
|
Node: "nope",
|
|
},
|
|
Perms: servicePerms,
|
|
Expected: false,
|
|
Name: "right on service but node dergister request",
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
DeregisterRequest: structs.DeregisterRequest{
|
|
Node: "nope",
|
|
ServiceID: "my-service-id",
|
|
},
|
|
Service: &structs.NodeService{
|
|
Service: "my-service",
|
|
},
|
|
Perms: nodePerms,
|
|
Expected: false,
|
|
Name: "no rights on node nor service",
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
DeregisterRequest: structs.DeregisterRequest{
|
|
Node: "nope",
|
|
ServiceID: "my-service-id",
|
|
},
|
|
Service: &structs.NodeService{
|
|
Service: "my-service",
|
|
},
|
|
Perms: servicePerms,
|
|
Expected: true,
|
|
Name: "no rights on node but rights on service",
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
DeregisterRequest: structs.DeregisterRequest{
|
|
Node: "nope",
|
|
ServiceID: "my-service-id",
|
|
CheckID: "my-check",
|
|
},
|
|
Service: &structs.NodeService{
|
|
Service: "my-service",
|
|
},
|
|
Check: &structs.HealthCheck{
|
|
CheckID: "my-check",
|
|
},
|
|
Perms: nodePerms,
|
|
Expected: false,
|
|
Name: "no right on node nor service for check",
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
DeregisterRequest: structs.DeregisterRequest{
|
|
Node: "nope",
|
|
ServiceID: "my-service-id",
|
|
CheckID: "my-check",
|
|
},
|
|
Service: &structs.NodeService{
|
|
Service: "my-service",
|
|
},
|
|
Check: &structs.HealthCheck{
|
|
CheckID: "my-check",
|
|
},
|
|
Perms: servicePerms,
|
|
Expected: true,
|
|
Name: "no rights on node but rights on service for check",
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
DeregisterRequest: structs.DeregisterRequest{
|
|
Node: "nope",
|
|
CheckID: "my-check",
|
|
},
|
|
Check: &structs.HealthCheck{
|
|
CheckID: "my-check",
|
|
},
|
|
Perms: nodePerms,
|
|
Expected: false,
|
|
Name: "no right on node for node check",
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
DeregisterRequest: structs.DeregisterRequest{
|
|
Node: "nope",
|
|
CheckID: "my-check",
|
|
},
|
|
Check: &structs.HealthCheck{
|
|
CheckID: "my-check",
|
|
},
|
|
Perms: servicePerms,
|
|
Expected: false,
|
|
Name: "rights on service but no right on node for node check",
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
DeregisterRequest: structs.DeregisterRequest{
|
|
Node: "node",
|
|
},
|
|
Perms: nodePerms,
|
|
Expected: true,
|
|
Name: "rights on node for node",
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
DeregisterRequest: structs.DeregisterRequest{
|
|
Node: "node",
|
|
},
|
|
Perms: servicePerms,
|
|
Expected: false,
|
|
Name: "rights on service but not on node for node",
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
DeregisterRequest: structs.DeregisterRequest{
|
|
Node: "node",
|
|
ServiceID: "my-service-id",
|
|
},
|
|
Service: &structs.NodeService{
|
|
Service: "my-service",
|
|
},
|
|
Perms: nodePerms,
|
|
Expected: true,
|
|
Name: "rights on node for service",
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
DeregisterRequest: structs.DeregisterRequest{
|
|
Node: "node",
|
|
ServiceID: "my-service-id",
|
|
},
|
|
Service: &structs.NodeService{
|
|
Service: "my-service",
|
|
},
|
|
Perms: servicePerms,
|
|
Expected: true,
|
|
Name: "rights on service for service",
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
DeregisterRequest: structs.DeregisterRequest{
|
|
Node: "node",
|
|
ServiceID: "my-service-id",
|
|
CheckID: "my-check",
|
|
},
|
|
Service: &structs.NodeService{
|
|
Service: "my-service",
|
|
},
|
|
Check: &structs.HealthCheck{
|
|
CheckID: "my-check",
|
|
},
|
|
Perms: nodePerms,
|
|
Expected: true,
|
|
Name: "right on node for check",
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
DeregisterRequest: structs.DeregisterRequest{
|
|
Node: "node",
|
|
ServiceID: "my-service-id",
|
|
CheckID: "my-check",
|
|
},
|
|
Service: &structs.NodeService{
|
|
Service: "my-service",
|
|
},
|
|
Check: &structs.HealthCheck{
|
|
CheckID: "my-check",
|
|
},
|
|
Perms: servicePerms,
|
|
Expected: true,
|
|
Name: "rights on service for check",
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
DeregisterRequest: structs.DeregisterRequest{
|
|
Node: "node",
|
|
CheckID: "my-check",
|
|
},
|
|
Check: &structs.HealthCheck{
|
|
CheckID: "my-check",
|
|
},
|
|
Perms: nodePerms,
|
|
Expected: true,
|
|
Name: "rights on node for check",
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
DeregisterRequest: structs.DeregisterRequest{
|
|
Node: "node",
|
|
CheckID: "my-check",
|
|
},
|
|
Check: &structs.HealthCheck{
|
|
CheckID: "my-check",
|
|
},
|
|
Perms: servicePerms,
|
|
Expected: false,
|
|
Name: "rights on service for node check",
|
|
},
|
|
} {
|
|
t.Run(args.Name, func(t *testing.T) {
|
|
err = vetDeregisterWithACL(args.Perms, &args.DeregisterRequest, args.Service, args.Check)
|
|
if !args.Expected {
|
|
if err == nil {
|
|
t.Errorf("expected error with %+v", args.DeregisterRequest)
|
|
}
|
|
if !acl.IsErrPermissionDenied(err) {
|
|
t.Errorf("expected permission denied error with %+v, instead got %+v", args.DeregisterRequest, err)
|
|
}
|
|
} else if err != nil {
|
|
t.Errorf("expected no error with %+v", args.DeregisterRequest)
|
|
}
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func TestDedupeServiceIdentities(t *testing.T) {
|
|
srvid := func(name string, datacenters ...string) *structs.ACLServiceIdentity {
|
|
return &structs.ACLServiceIdentity{
|
|
ServiceName: name,
|
|
Datacenters: datacenters,
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
tests := []struct {
|
|
name string
|
|
in []*structs.ACLServiceIdentity
|
|
expect []*structs.ACLServiceIdentity
|
|
}{
|
|
{
|
|
name: "empty",
|
|
in: nil,
|
|
expect: nil,
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
name: "one",
|
|
in: []*structs.ACLServiceIdentity{
|
|
srvid("foo"),
|
|
},
|
|
expect: []*structs.ACLServiceIdentity{
|
|
srvid("foo"),
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
name: "just names",
|
|
in: []*structs.ACLServiceIdentity{
|
|
srvid("fooZ"),
|
|
srvid("fooA"),
|
|
srvid("fooY"),
|
|
srvid("fooB"),
|
|
},
|
|
expect: []*structs.ACLServiceIdentity{
|
|
srvid("fooA"),
|
|
srvid("fooB"),
|
|
srvid("fooY"),
|
|
srvid("fooZ"),
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
name: "just names with dupes",
|
|
in: []*structs.ACLServiceIdentity{
|
|
srvid("fooZ"),
|
|
srvid("fooA"),
|
|
srvid("fooY"),
|
|
srvid("fooB"),
|
|
srvid("fooA"),
|
|
srvid("fooB"),
|
|
srvid("fooY"),
|
|
srvid("fooZ"),
|
|
},
|
|
expect: []*structs.ACLServiceIdentity{
|
|
srvid("fooA"),
|
|
srvid("fooB"),
|
|
srvid("fooY"),
|
|
srvid("fooZ"),
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
name: "names with dupes and datacenters",
|
|
in: []*structs.ACLServiceIdentity{
|
|
srvid("fooZ", "dc2", "dc4"),
|
|
srvid("fooA"),
|
|
srvid("fooY", "dc1"),
|
|
srvid("fooB"),
|
|
srvid("fooA", "dc9", "dc8"),
|
|
srvid("fooB"),
|
|
srvid("fooY", "dc1"),
|
|
srvid("fooZ", "dc3", "dc4"),
|
|
},
|
|
expect: []*structs.ACLServiceIdentity{
|
|
srvid("fooA"),
|
|
srvid("fooB"),
|
|
srvid("fooY", "dc1"),
|
|
srvid("fooZ", "dc2", "dc3", "dc4"),
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
}
|
|
for _, test := range tests {
|
|
t.Run(test.name, func(t *testing.T) {
|
|
got := dedupeServiceIdentities(test.in)
|
|
require.ElementsMatch(t, test.expect, got)
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
func TestACL_LocalToken(t *testing.T) {
|
|
t.Run("local token in same dc", func(t *testing.T) {
|
|
d := &ACLResolverTestDelegate{
|
|
datacenter: "dc1",
|
|
tokenReadFn: func(_ *structs.ACLTokenGetRequest, reply *structs.ACLTokenResponse) error {
|
|
reply.Token = &structs.ACLToken{Local: true}
|
|
// different dc
|
|
reply.SourceDatacenter = "dc1"
|
|
return nil
|
|
},
|
|
}
|
|
r := newTestACLResolver(t, d, nil)
|
|
_, err := r.fetchAndCacheIdentityFromToken("", nil)
|
|
require.NoError(t, err)
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
t.Run("non local token in remote dc", func(t *testing.T) {
|
|
d := &ACLResolverTestDelegate{
|
|
datacenter: "dc1",
|
|
tokenReadFn: func(_ *structs.ACLTokenGetRequest, reply *structs.ACLTokenResponse) error {
|
|
reply.Token = &structs.ACLToken{Local: false}
|
|
// different dc
|
|
reply.SourceDatacenter = "remote"
|
|
return nil
|
|
},
|
|
}
|
|
r := newTestACLResolver(t, d, nil)
|
|
_, err := r.fetchAndCacheIdentityFromToken("", nil)
|
|
require.NoError(t, err)
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
t.Run("local token in remote dc", func(t *testing.T) {
|
|
d := &ACLResolverTestDelegate{
|
|
datacenter: "dc1",
|
|
tokenReadFn: func(_ *structs.ACLTokenGetRequest, reply *structs.ACLTokenResponse) error {
|
|
reply.Token = &structs.ACLToken{Local: true}
|
|
// different dc
|
|
reply.SourceDatacenter = "remote"
|
|
return nil
|
|
},
|
|
}
|
|
r := newTestACLResolver(t, d, nil)
|
|
_, err := r.fetchAndCacheIdentityFromToken("", nil)
|
|
require.Equal(t, acl.PermissionDeniedError{Cause: "This is a local token in datacenter \"remote\""}, err)
|
|
})
|
|
}
|