open-consul/agent/xds/rbac.go
R.B. Boyer 35c4efd220
connect: support defining intentions using layer 7 criteria (#8839)
Extend Consul’s intentions model to allow for request-based access control enforcement for HTTP-like protocols in addition to the existing connection-based enforcement for unspecified protocols (e.g. tcp).
2020-10-06 17:09:13 -05:00

698 lines
21 KiB
Go
Raw Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters

This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.

package xds
import (
"fmt"
"sort"
"strings"
envoylistener "github.com/envoyproxy/go-control-plane/envoy/api/v2/listener"
envoyroute "github.com/envoyproxy/go-control-plane/envoy/api/v2/route"
envoyhttprbac "github.com/envoyproxy/go-control-plane/envoy/config/filter/http/rbac/v2"
envoyhttp "github.com/envoyproxy/go-control-plane/envoy/config/filter/network/http_connection_manager/v2"
envoynetrbac "github.com/envoyproxy/go-control-plane/envoy/config/filter/network/rbac/v2"
envoyrbac "github.com/envoyproxy/go-control-plane/envoy/config/rbac/v2"
envoymatcher "github.com/envoyproxy/go-control-plane/envoy/type/matcher"
"github.com/hashicorp/consul/agent/structs"
)
func makeRBACNetworkFilter(intentions structs.Intentions, intentionDefaultAllow bool) (*envoylistener.Filter, error) {
rules, err := makeRBACRules(intentions, intentionDefaultAllow, false)
if err != nil {
return nil, err
}
cfg := &envoynetrbac.RBAC{
StatPrefix: "connect_authz",
Rules: rules,
}
return makeFilter("envoy.filters.network.rbac", cfg, false)
}
func makeRBACHTTPFilter(intentions structs.Intentions, intentionDefaultAllow bool) (*envoyhttp.HttpFilter, error) {
rules, err := makeRBACRules(intentions, intentionDefaultAllow, true)
if err != nil {
return nil, err
}
cfg := &envoyhttprbac.RBAC{
Rules: rules,
}
return makeEnvoyHTTPFilter("envoy.filters.http.rbac", cfg)
}
func intentionListToIntermediateRBACForm(intentions structs.Intentions, isHTTP bool) []*rbacIntention {
sort.Sort(structs.IntentionPrecedenceSorter(intentions))
// Omit any lower-precedence intentions that share the same source.
intentions = removeSameSourceIntentions(intentions)
rbacIxns := make([]*rbacIntention, 0, len(intentions))
for _, ixn := range intentions {
rixn := intentionToIntermediateRBACForm(ixn, isHTTP)
rbacIxns = append(rbacIxns, rixn)
}
return rbacIxns
}
func removeSourcePrecedence(rbacIxns []*rbacIntention, intentionDefaultAction intentionAction) []*rbacIntention {
if len(rbacIxns) == 0 {
return nil
}
// Remove source precedence:
//
// First walk backwards and add each intention to all subsequent statements
// (via AND NOT $x).
//
// If it is L4 and has the same action as the default intention action then
// mark the rule itself for erasure.
numRetained := 0
for i := len(rbacIxns) - 1; i >= 0; i-- {
for j := i + 1; j < len(rbacIxns); j++ {
if rbacIxns[j].Skip {
continue
}
// [i] is the intention candidate that we are distributing
// [j] is the thing to maybe NOT [i] from
if ixnSourceMatches(rbacIxns[i].Source, rbacIxns[j].Source) {
rbacIxns[j].NotSources = append(rbacIxns[j].NotSources, rbacIxns[i].Source)
}
}
if rbacIxns[i].Action == intentionDefaultAction {
// Lower precedence intentions that match the default intention
// action are skipped, since they're handled by the default
// catch-all.
rbacIxns[i].Skip = true // mark for deletion
} else {
numRetained++
}
}
// At this point precedence doesn't matter for the source element.
// Remove skipped intentions and also compute the final Principals for each
// intention.
out := make([]*rbacIntention, 0, numRetained)
for _, rixn := range rbacIxns {
if rixn.Skip {
continue
}
rixn.ComputedPrincipal = rixn.FlattenPrincipal()
out = append(out, rixn)
}
return out
}
func removeIntentionPrecedence(rbacIxns []*rbacIntention, intentionDefaultAction intentionAction) []*rbacIntention {
// Remove source precedence. After this completes precedence doesn't matter
// between any two intentions.
rbacIxns = removeSourcePrecedence(rbacIxns, intentionDefaultAction)
for _, rbacIxn := range rbacIxns {
// Remove permission precedence. After this completes precedence
// doesn't matter between any two permissions on this intention.
rbacIxn.Permissions = removePermissionPrecedence(rbacIxn.Permissions, intentionDefaultAction)
}
return rbacIxns
}
func removePermissionPrecedence(perms []*rbacPermission, intentionDefaultAction intentionAction) []*rbacPermission {
if len(perms) == 0 {
return nil
}
// First walk backwards and add each permission to all subsequent
// statements (via AND NOT $x).
//
// If it has the same action as the default intention action then mark the
// permission itself for erasure.
numRetained := 0
for i := len(perms) - 1; i >= 0; i-- {
for j := i + 1; j < len(perms); j++ {
if perms[j].Skip {
continue
}
// [i] is the permission candidate that we are distributing
// [j] is the thing to maybe NOT [i] from
perms[j].NotPerms = append(
perms[j].NotPerms,
perms[i].Perm,
)
}
if perms[i].Action == intentionDefaultAction {
// Lower precedence permissions that match the default intention
// action are skipped, since they're handled by the default
// catch-all.
perms[i].Skip = true // mark for deletion
} else {
numRetained++
}
}
// Remove skipped permissions and also compute the final Permissions for each item.
out := make([]*rbacPermission, 0, numRetained)
for _, perm := range perms {
if perm.Skip {
continue
}
perm.ComputedPermission = perm.Flatten()
out = append(out, perm)
}
return out
}
func intentionToIntermediateRBACForm(ixn *structs.Intention, isHTTP bool) *rbacIntention {
rixn := &rbacIntention{
Source: ixn.SourceServiceName(),
Precedence: ixn.Precedence,
}
if len(ixn.Permissions) > 0 {
if isHTTP {
rixn.Action = intentionActionLayer7
rixn.Permissions = make([]*rbacPermission, 0, len(ixn.Permissions))
for _, perm := range ixn.Permissions {
rixn.Permissions = append(rixn.Permissions, &rbacPermission{
Definition: perm,
Action: intentionActionFromString(perm.Action),
Perm: convertPermission(perm),
})
}
} else {
// In case L7 intentions slip through to here, treat them as deny intentions.
rixn.Action = intentionActionDeny
}
} else {
rixn.Action = intentionActionFromString(ixn.Action)
}
return rixn
}
type intentionAction int
const (
intentionActionDeny intentionAction = iota
intentionActionAllow
intentionActionLayer7
)
func intentionActionFromBool(v bool) intentionAction {
if v {
return intentionActionAllow
} else {
return intentionActionDeny
}
}
func intentionActionFromString(s structs.IntentionAction) intentionAction {
if s == structs.IntentionActionAllow {
return intentionActionAllow
}
return intentionActionDeny
}
type rbacIntention struct {
Source structs.ServiceName
NotSources []structs.ServiceName
Action intentionAction
Permissions []*rbacPermission
Precedence int
// Skip is field used to indicate that this intention can be deleted in the
// final pass. Items marked as true should generally not escape the method
// that marked them.
Skip bool
ComputedPrincipal *envoyrbac.Principal
}
func (r *rbacIntention) FlattenPrincipal() *envoyrbac.Principal {
r.NotSources = simplifyNotSourceSlice(r.NotSources)
if len(r.NotSources) == 0 {
return idPrincipal(r.Source)
}
andIDs := make([]*envoyrbac.Principal, 0, len(r.NotSources)+1)
andIDs = append(andIDs, idPrincipal(r.Source))
for _, src := range r.NotSources {
andIDs = append(andIDs, notPrincipal(
idPrincipal(src),
))
}
return andPrincipals(andIDs)
}
type rbacPermission struct {
Definition *structs.IntentionPermission
Action intentionAction
Perm *envoyrbac.Permission
NotPerms []*envoyrbac.Permission
// Skip is field used to indicate that this permission can be deleted in
// the final pass. Items marked as true should generally not escape the
// method that marked them.
Skip bool
ComputedPermission *envoyrbac.Permission
}
func (p *rbacPermission) Flatten() *envoyrbac.Permission {
if len(p.NotPerms) == 0 {
return p.Perm
}
parts := make([]*envoyrbac.Permission, 0, len(p.NotPerms)+1)
parts = append(parts, p.Perm)
for _, notPerm := range p.NotPerms {
parts = append(parts, notPermission(notPerm))
}
return andPermissions(parts)
}
func simplifyNotSourceSlice(notSources []structs.ServiceName) []structs.ServiceName {
if len(notSources) <= 1 {
return notSources
}
// Collapse NotSources elements together if any element is a subset of
// another.
// Sort, keeping the least wildcarded elements first.
sort.SliceStable(notSources, func(i, j int) bool {
return countWild(notSources[i]) < countWild(notSources[j])
})
keep := make([]structs.ServiceName, 0, len(notSources))
for i := 0; i < len(notSources); i++ {
si := notSources[i]
remove := false
for j := i + 1; j < len(notSources); j++ {
sj := notSources[j]
if ixnSourceMatches(si, sj) {
remove = true
break
}
}
if !remove {
keep = append(keep, si)
}
}
return keep
}
// makeRBACRules translates Consul intentions into RBAC Policies for Envoy.
//
// Consul lets you define up to 9 different kinds of intentions that apply at
// different levels of precedence (this is limited to 4 if not using Consul
// Enterprise). Each intention in this flat list (sorted by precedence) can either
// be an allow rule or a deny rule. Heres a concrete example of this at work:
//
// intern/trusted-app => billing/payment-svc : ALLOW (prec=9)
// intern/* => billing/payment-svc : DENY (prec=8)
// */* => billing/payment-svc : ALLOW (prec=7)
// ::: ACL default policy ::: : DENY (prec=N/A)
//
// In contrast, Envoy lets you either configure a filter to be based on an
// allow-list or a deny-list based on the action attribute of the RBAC rules
// struct.
//
// On the surface it would seem that the configuration model of Consul
// intentions is incompatible with that of Envoys RBAC engine. For any given
// destination service Consuls model requires evaluating a list of rules and
// short circuiting later rules once an earlier rule matches. After a rule is
// found to match then we decide if it is allow/deny. Envoy on the other hand
// requires the rules to express all conditions to allow access or all conditions
// to deny access.
//
// Despite the surface incompatibility it is possible to marry these two
// models. For clarity Ill rewrite the earlier example intentions in an
// abbreviated form:
//
// A : ALLOW
// B : DENY
// C : ALLOW
// <default> : DENY
//
// 1. Given that the overall intention default is set to deny, we start by
// choosing to build an allow-list in Envoy (this is also the variant that I find
// easier to think about).
// 2. Next we traverse the list in precedence order (top down) and any DENY
// intentions are combined with later intentions using logical operations.
// 3. Now that all of the intentions result in the same action (allow) we have
// successfully removed precedence and we can express this in as a set of Envoy
// RBAC policies.
//
// After this the earlier A/B/C/default list becomes:
//
// A : ALLOW
// C AND NOT(B) : ALLOW
// <default> : DENY
//
// Which really is just an allow-list of [A, C AND NOT(B)]
func makeRBACRules(intentions structs.Intentions, intentionDefaultAllow bool, isHTTP bool) (*envoyrbac.RBAC, error) {
// Note that we DON'T explicitly validate the trust-domain matches ours.
//
// For now we don't validate the trust domain of the _destination_ at all.
// The RBAC policies below ignore the trust domain and it's implicit that
// the request is for the correct cluster. We might want to reconsider this
// later but plumbing in additional machinery to check the clusterID here
// is not really necessary for now unless the Envoys are badly configured.
// Our threat model _requires_ correctly configured and well behaved
// proxies given that they have ACLs to fetch certs and so can do whatever
// they want including not authorizing traffic at all or routing it do a
// different service than they auth'd against.
// TODO(banks,rb): Implement revocation list checking?
// First build up just the basic principal matches.
rbacIxns := intentionListToIntermediateRBACForm(intentions, isHTTP)
// Normalize: if we are in default-deny then all intentions must be allows and vice versa
intentionDefaultAction := intentionActionFromBool(intentionDefaultAllow)
var rbacAction envoyrbac.RBAC_Action
if intentionDefaultAllow {
// The RBAC policies deny access to principals. The rest is allowed.
// This is block-list style access control.
rbacAction = envoyrbac.RBAC_DENY
} else {
// The RBAC policies grant access to principals. The rest is denied.
// This is safe-list style access control. This is the default type.
rbacAction = envoyrbac.RBAC_ALLOW
}
// Remove source and permissions precedence.
rbacIxns = removeIntentionPrecedence(rbacIxns, intentionDefaultAction)
// For L4: we should generate one big Policy listing all Principals
// For L7: we should generate one Policy per Principal and list all of the Permissions
rbac := &envoyrbac.RBAC{
Action: rbacAction,
Policies: make(map[string]*envoyrbac.Policy),
}
var principalsL4 []*envoyrbac.Principal
for i, rbacIxn := range rbacIxns {
if len(rbacIxn.Permissions) > 0 {
if !isHTTP {
panic("invalid state: L7 permissions present for TCP service")
}
// For L7: we should generate one Policy per Principal and list all of the Permissions
policy := &envoyrbac.Policy{
Principals: []*envoyrbac.Principal{rbacIxn.ComputedPrincipal},
Permissions: make([]*envoyrbac.Permission, 0, len(rbacIxn.Permissions)),
}
for _, perm := range rbacIxn.Permissions {
policy.Permissions = append(policy.Permissions, perm.ComputedPermission)
}
rbac.Policies[fmt.Sprintf("consul-intentions-layer7-%d", i)] = policy
} else {
// For L4: we should generate one big Policy listing all Principals
principalsL4 = append(principalsL4, rbacIxn.ComputedPrincipal)
}
}
if len(principalsL4) > 0 {
rbac.Policies["consul-intentions-layer4"] = &envoyrbac.Policy{
Principals: principalsL4,
Permissions: []*envoyrbac.Permission{anyPermission()},
}
}
if len(rbac.Policies) == 0 {
rbac.Policies = nil
}
return rbac, nil
}
func removeSameSourceIntentions(intentions structs.Intentions) structs.Intentions {
if len(intentions) < 2 {
return intentions
}
var (
out = make(structs.Intentions, 0, len(intentions))
changed = false
seenSource = make(map[structs.ServiceName]struct{})
)
for _, ixn := range intentions {
sn := ixn.SourceServiceName()
if _, ok := seenSource[sn]; ok {
// A higher precedence intention already used this exact source
// definition with a different destination.
changed = true
continue
}
seenSource[sn] = struct{}{}
out = append(out, ixn)
}
if !changed {
return intentions
}
return out
}
// ixnSourceMatches deterines if the 'tester' service name is matched by the
// 'against' service name via wildcard rules.
//
// For instance:
// - (web, api) => false, because these have no wildcards
// - (web, *) => true, because "all services" includes "web"
// - (default/web, default/*) => true, because "all services in the default NS" includes "default/web"
// - (default/*, */*) => true, "any service in any NS" includes "all services in the default NS"
func ixnSourceMatches(tester, against structs.ServiceName) bool {
// We assume that we can't have the same intention twice before arriving
// here.
numWildTester := countWild(tester)
numWildAgainst := countWild(against)
if numWildTester == numWildAgainst {
return false
} else if numWildTester > numWildAgainst {
return false
}
matchesNS := tester.NamespaceOrDefault() == against.NamespaceOrDefault() || against.NamespaceOrDefault() == structs.WildcardSpecifier
matchesName := tester.Name == against.Name || against.Name == structs.WildcardSpecifier
return matchesNS && matchesName
}
// countWild counts the number of wildcard values in the given namespace and name.
func countWild(src structs.ServiceName) int {
// If NS is wildcard, it must be 2 since wildcards only follow exact
if src.NamespaceOrDefault() == structs.WildcardSpecifier {
return 2
}
// Same reasoning as above, a wildcard can only follow an exact value
// and an exact value cannot follow a wildcard, so if name is a wildcard
// we must have exactly one.
if src.Name == structs.WildcardSpecifier {
return 1
}
return 0
}
func andPrincipals(ids []*envoyrbac.Principal) *envoyrbac.Principal {
return &envoyrbac.Principal{
Identifier: &envoyrbac.Principal_AndIds{
AndIds: &envoyrbac.Principal_Set{
Ids: ids,
},
},
}
}
func notPrincipal(id *envoyrbac.Principal) *envoyrbac.Principal {
return &envoyrbac.Principal{
Identifier: &envoyrbac.Principal_NotId{
NotId: id,
},
}
}
func idPrincipal(src structs.ServiceName) *envoyrbac.Principal {
pattern := makeSpiffePattern(src.NamespaceOrDefault(), src.Name)
return &envoyrbac.Principal{
Identifier: &envoyrbac.Principal_Authenticated_{
Authenticated: &envoyrbac.Principal_Authenticated{
PrincipalName: &envoymatcher.StringMatcher{
MatchPattern: &envoymatcher.StringMatcher_SafeRegex{
SafeRegex: makeEnvoyRegexMatch(pattern),
},
},
},
},
}
}
func makeSpiffePattern(sourceNS, sourceName string) string {
const (
anyPath = `[^/]+`
spiffeTemplate = `^spiffe://%s/ns/%s/dc/%s/svc/%s$`
)
switch {
case sourceNS != structs.WildcardSpecifier && sourceName != structs.WildcardSpecifier:
return fmt.Sprintf(spiffeTemplate, anyPath, sourceNS, anyPath, sourceName)
case sourceNS != structs.WildcardSpecifier && sourceName == structs.WildcardSpecifier:
return fmt.Sprintf(spiffeTemplate, anyPath, sourceNS, anyPath, anyPath)
case sourceNS == structs.WildcardSpecifier && sourceName == structs.WildcardSpecifier:
return fmt.Sprintf(spiffeTemplate, anyPath, anyPath, anyPath, anyPath)
default:
panic(fmt.Sprintf("not possible to have a wildcarded namespace %q but an exact service %q", sourceNS, sourceName))
}
}
func anyPermission() *envoyrbac.Permission {
return &envoyrbac.Permission{
Rule: &envoyrbac.Permission_Any{Any: true},
}
}
func convertPermission(perm *structs.IntentionPermission) *envoyrbac.Permission {
// NOTE: this does not do anything with perm.Action
if perm.HTTP == nil {
return anyPermission()
}
var parts []*envoyrbac.Permission
switch {
case perm.HTTP.PathExact != "":
parts = append(parts, &envoyrbac.Permission{
Rule: &envoyrbac.Permission_UrlPath{
UrlPath: &envoymatcher.PathMatcher{
Rule: &envoymatcher.PathMatcher_Path{
Path: &envoymatcher.StringMatcher{
MatchPattern: &envoymatcher.StringMatcher_Exact{
Exact: perm.HTTP.PathExact,
},
},
},
},
},
})
case perm.HTTP.PathPrefix != "":
parts = append(parts, &envoyrbac.Permission{
Rule: &envoyrbac.Permission_UrlPath{
UrlPath: &envoymatcher.PathMatcher{
Rule: &envoymatcher.PathMatcher_Path{
Path: &envoymatcher.StringMatcher{
MatchPattern: &envoymatcher.StringMatcher_Prefix{
Prefix: perm.HTTP.PathPrefix,
},
},
},
},
},
})
case perm.HTTP.PathRegex != "":
parts = append(parts, &envoyrbac.Permission{
Rule: &envoyrbac.Permission_UrlPath{
UrlPath: &envoymatcher.PathMatcher{
Rule: &envoymatcher.PathMatcher_Path{
Path: &envoymatcher.StringMatcher{
MatchPattern: &envoymatcher.StringMatcher_SafeRegex{
SafeRegex: makeEnvoyRegexMatch(perm.HTTP.PathRegex),
},
},
},
},
},
})
}
for _, hdr := range perm.HTTP.Header {
eh := &envoyroute.HeaderMatcher{
Name: hdr.Name,
}
switch {
case hdr.Exact != "":
eh.HeaderMatchSpecifier = &envoyroute.HeaderMatcher_ExactMatch{
ExactMatch: hdr.Exact,
}
case hdr.Regex != "":
eh.HeaderMatchSpecifier = &envoyroute.HeaderMatcher_SafeRegexMatch{
SafeRegexMatch: makeEnvoyRegexMatch(hdr.Regex),
}
case hdr.Prefix != "":
eh.HeaderMatchSpecifier = &envoyroute.HeaderMatcher_PrefixMatch{
PrefixMatch: hdr.Prefix,
}
case hdr.Suffix != "":
eh.HeaderMatchSpecifier = &envoyroute.HeaderMatcher_SuffixMatch{
SuffixMatch: hdr.Suffix,
}
case hdr.Present:
eh.HeaderMatchSpecifier = &envoyroute.HeaderMatcher_PresentMatch{
PresentMatch: true,
}
default:
continue // skip this impossible situation
}
if hdr.Invert {
eh.InvertMatch = true
}
parts = append(parts, &envoyrbac.Permission{
Rule: &envoyrbac.Permission_Header{
Header: eh,
},
})
}
if len(perm.HTTP.Methods) > 0 {
methodHeaderRegex := strings.Join(perm.HTTP.Methods, "|")
eh := &envoyroute.HeaderMatcher{
Name: ":method",
HeaderMatchSpecifier: &envoyroute.HeaderMatcher_SafeRegexMatch{
SafeRegexMatch: makeEnvoyRegexMatch(methodHeaderRegex),
},
}
parts = append(parts, &envoyrbac.Permission{
Rule: &envoyrbac.Permission_Header{
Header: eh,
},
})
}
// NOTE: if for some reason we errantly allow a permission to be defined
// with a body of "http{}" then we'll end up treating that like "ANY" here.
return andPermissions(parts)
}
func notPermission(perm *envoyrbac.Permission) *envoyrbac.Permission {
return &envoyrbac.Permission{
Rule: &envoyrbac.Permission_NotRule{NotRule: perm},
}
}
func andPermissions(perms []*envoyrbac.Permission) *envoyrbac.Permission {
switch len(perms) {
case 0:
return anyPermission()
case 1:
return perms[0]
default:
return &envoyrbac.Permission{
Rule: &envoyrbac.Permission_AndRules{
AndRules: &envoyrbac.Permission_Set{
Rules: perms,
},
},
}
}
}