2200cde988
From an engineers perspective, whenever specifying colors from now on we should use the form: ``` color: rgb(var(--tone-red-500)); ``` Please note: - Use rgb. This lets us do this like rgb(var(--tone-red-500) / 10%) so we can use a 10% opacity red-500 if we ever need to whilst still making use of our color tokens. - Use --tone-colorName-000 (so the prefix tone). Previously we could use a mix of --gray-500: $gray-500 (note the left hand CSS prop and right hand SASS var) for the things we need to theme currently. As we no longer use SASS we can't do --gray-500: --gray-500, so we now do --tone-gray-500: --gray-500. Just for clarity after that, whenever specifying a color anywhere, use rgb and --tone. There is only one reason where you might not use tone, and that is if you never want a color to be affected by a theme (for example a background shadow probably always should use --black) There are a 2 or 3 left for the code editor, plus our custom-query values
27 lines
594 B
SCSS
27 lines
594 B
SCSS
%table th,
|
|
%table td {
|
|
border-bottom: var(--decor-border-100);
|
|
}
|
|
%table th {
|
|
border-color: rgb(var(--tone-gray-300));
|
|
}
|
|
%table td {
|
|
border-color: rgb(var(--tone-gray-200));
|
|
color: rgb(var(--tone-gray-500));
|
|
}
|
|
%table th,
|
|
%table td strong {
|
|
color: rgb(var(--tone-gray-600));
|
|
}
|
|
/* TODO: Add to native selector `tbody th` - will involve moving all
|
|
* current th's to `thead th` and changing the templates
|
|
* at whichpoint we can probably remove the %table a selector from here
|
|
*/
|
|
%table a,
|
|
%tbody-th {
|
|
color: rgb(var(--tone-gray-900));
|
|
}
|
|
%table td:first-child {
|
|
@extend %tbody-th;
|
|
}
|