46 lines
2.5 KiB
Plaintext
46 lines
2.5 KiB
Plaintext
---
|
|
layout: docs
|
|
page_title: 'Consul vs. Chef, Puppet, etc.'
|
|
description: >-
|
|
It is not uncommon to find people using Chef, Puppet, and other configuration
|
|
management tools to build service discovery mechanisms. This is usually done
|
|
by querying global state to construct configuration files on each node during
|
|
a periodic convergence run.
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
# Consul vs. Chef, Puppet, etc.
|
|
|
|
It is not uncommon to find people using Chef, Puppet, and other configuration
|
|
management tools to build service discovery mechanisms. This is usually
|
|
done by querying global state to construct configuration files on each
|
|
node during a periodic convergence run.
|
|
|
|
Unfortunately, this approach has
|
|
a number of pitfalls. The configuration information is static
|
|
and cannot update any more frequently than convergence runs. Generally this
|
|
is on the interval of many minutes or hours. Additionally, there is no
|
|
mechanism to incorporate the system state in the configuration: nodes which
|
|
are unhealthy may receive traffic exacerbating issues further. Using this
|
|
approach also makes supporting multiple datacenters challenging as a central
|
|
group of servers must manage all datacenters.
|
|
|
|
Consul is designed specifically as a service discovery tool. As such,
|
|
it is much more dynamic and responsive to the state of the cluster. Nodes
|
|
can register and deregister the services they provide, enabling dependent
|
|
applications and services to rapidly discover all providers. By using the
|
|
integrated health checking, Consul can route traffic away from unhealthy
|
|
nodes, allowing systems and services to gracefully recover. Static configuration
|
|
that may be provided by configuration management tools can be moved into the
|
|
dynamic key/value store. This allows application configuration to be updated
|
|
without a slow convergence run. Lastly, because each datacenter runs independently,
|
|
supporting multiple datacenters is no different than a single datacenter.
|
|
|
|
That said, Consul is not a replacement for configuration management tools.
|
|
These tools are still critical to set up applications, including Consul itself.
|
|
Static provisioning is best managed by existing tools while dynamic state and
|
|
discovery is better managed by Consul. The separation of configuration management
|
|
and cluster management also has a number of advantageous side effects: Chef recipes
|
|
and Puppet manifests become simpler without global state, periodic runs are no longer
|
|
required for service or configuration changes, and the infrastructure can become
|
|
immutable since config management runs require no global state.
|