Commit graph

11 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Chris S. Kim 0910c41d95
Revise possible states for a peering. (#13661)
These changes are primarily for Consul's UI, where we want to be more
specific about the state a peering is in.

- The "initial" state was renamed to pending, and no longer applies to
  peerings being established from a peering token.

- Upon request to establish a peering from a peering token, peerings
  will be set as "establishing". This will help distinguish between the
  two roles: the cluster that generates the peering token and the
  cluster that establishes the peering.

- When marked for deletion, peering state will be set to "deleting".
  This way the UI determines the deletion via the state rather than the
  "DeletedAt" field.

Co-authored-by: freddygv <freddy@hashicorp.com>
2022-07-04 10:47:58 -04:00
alex 90577810cc
peering: add imported/exported counts to peering (#13644)
Signed-off-by: acpana <8968914+acpana@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Chris S. Kim <ckim@hashicorp.com>
2022-06-29 14:07:30 -07:00
alex a8ae8de20e
peering: reconcile/ hint active state for list (#13619)
Signed-off-by: acpana <8968914+acpana@users.noreply.github.com>
2022-06-29 09:43:50 -07:00
freddygv a5283e4361 Add leader routine to clean up peerings
Once a peering is marked for deletion a new leader routine will now
clean up all imported resources and then the peering itself.

A lot of the logic was grabbed from the namespace/partitions deferred
deletions but with a handful of simplifications:
- The rate limiting is not configurable.

- Deleting imported nodes/services/checks is done by deleting nodes with
  the Txn API. The services and checks are deleted as a side-effect.

- There is no "round rate limiter" like with namespaces and partitions.
  This is because peerings are purely local, and deleting a peering in
  the datacenter does not depend on deleting data from other DCs like
  with WAN-federated namespaces. All rate limiting is handled by the
  Raft rate limiter.
2022-06-14 15:36:50 -06:00
freddygv f92724087f Fixup api test 2022-06-13 12:20:22 -06:00
R.B. Boyer 33b497e7c9
peering: rename initiate to establish in the context of the APIs (#13419) 2022-06-10 11:10:46 -05:00
R.B. Boyer dae47101fa
api: ensure peering API endpoints do not use protobufs (#13204)
I noticed that the JSON api endpoints for peerings json encodes protobufs directly, rather than converting them into their `api` package equivalents before marshal/unmarshaling them.

I updated this and used `mog` to do the annoying part in the middle. 

Other changes:
- the status enum was converted into the friendlier string form of the enum for readability with tools like `curl`
- some of the `api` library functions were slightly modified to match other similar endpoints in UX (cc: @ndhanushkodi )
- peeringRead returns `nil` if not found
- partitions are NOT inferred from the agent's partition (matching 1.11-style logic)
2022-05-25 13:43:35 -05:00
Evan Culver 7de052dfbe
peering: fix panic in test (#13069) 2022-05-13 10:13:02 -07:00
FFMMM 76a6647700
expose meta tags for peering (#12964) 2022-05-09 13:47:37 -07:00
FFMMM 5a6d1cad4e
api: add PeeeringList, polish (#12934) 2022-05-05 14:15:42 -07:00
FFMMM 4cd68b4534
[sync oss] api: add peering api module (#12911) 2022-05-02 11:49:05 -07:00