Commit Graph

4 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
freddygv a288d0c388 Avoid deleting peerings marked as terminated.
When our peer deletes the peering it is locally marked as terminated.
This termination should kick off deleting all imported data, but should
not delete the peering object itself.

Keeping peerings marked as terminated acts as a signal that the action
took place.
2022-06-14 15:37:09 -06:00
freddygv a5283e4361 Add leader routine to clean up peerings
Once a peering is marked for deletion a new leader routine will now
clean up all imported resources and then the peering itself.

A lot of the logic was grabbed from the namespace/partitions deferred
deletions but with a handful of simplifications:
- The rate limiting is not configurable.

- Deleting imported nodes/services/checks is done by deleting nodes with
  the Txn API. The services and checks are deleted as a side-effect.

- There is no "round rate limiter" like with namespaces and partitions.
  This is because peerings are purely local, and deleting a peering in
  the datacenter does not depend on deleting data from other DCs like
  with WAN-federated namespaces. All rate limiting is handled by the
  Raft rate limiter.
2022-06-14 15:36:50 -06:00
freddygv dbcbf3978f Fixup stream tear-down steps.
1. Fix a bug where the peering leader routine would not track all active
   peerings in the "stored" reconciliation map. This could lead to
   tearing down streams where the token was generated, since the
   ConnectedStreams() method used for reconciliation returns all streams
   and not just the ones initiated by this leader routine.

2. Fix a race where stream contexts were being canceled before
   termination messages were being processed by a peer.

   Previously the leader routine would tear down streams by canceling
   their context right after the termination message was sent. This
   context cancelation could be propagated to the server side faster
   than the termination message. Now there is a change where the
   dialing peer uses CloseSend() to signal when no more messages will
   be sent. Eventually the server peer will read an EOF after receiving
   and processing the preceding termination message.

   Using CloseSend() is actually not enough to address the issue
   mentioned, since it doesn't wait for the server peer to finish
   processing messages. Because of this now the dialing peer also reads
   from the stream until an error signals that there are no more
   messages. Receiving an EOF from our peer indicates that they
   processed the termination message and have no additional work to do.

   Given that the stream is being closed, all the messages received by
   Recv are discarded. We only check for errors to avoid importing new
   data.
2022-06-13 12:10:42 -06:00
R.B. Boyer 809344a6f5
peering: initial sync (#12842)
- Add endpoints related to peering: read, list, generate token, initiate peering
- Update node/service/check table indexing to account for peers
- Foundational changes for pushing service updates to a peer
- Plumb peer name through Health.ServiceNodes path

see: ENT-1765, ENT-1280, ENT-1283, ENT-1283, ENT-1756, ENT-1739, ENT-1750, ENT-1679,
     ENT-1709, ENT-1704, ENT-1690, ENT-1689, ENT-1702, ENT-1701, ENT-1683, ENT-1663,
     ENT-1650, ENT-1678, ENT-1628, ENT-1658, ENT-1640, ENT-1637, ENT-1597, ENT-1634,
     ENT-1613, ENT-1616, ENT-1617, ENT-1591, ENT-1588, ENT-1596, ENT-1572, ENT-1555

Co-authored-by: R.B. Boyer <rb@hashicorp.com>
Co-authored-by: freddygv <freddy@hashicorp.com>
Co-authored-by: Chris S. Kim <ckim@hashicorp.com>
Co-authored-by: Evan Culver <eculver@hashicorp.com>
Co-authored-by: Nitya Dhanushkodi <nitya@hashicorp.com>
2022-04-21 17:34:40 -05:00