Health of a terminating gateway instance changes
- Generate an event for creating/destroying this instance of the terminating gateway,
duplicate it for each affected service
Co-Authored-By: Kyle Havlovitz <kylehav@gmail.com>
Previously a snapshot created as part of a resumse-stream request could have incorrectly
cached the newSnapshotToFollow event. This would cause clients to error because they
received an unexpected framing event.
This fixes an issue where leaf certificates issued in primary
datacenters using Vault as a Connect CA would be reissued very
frequently (every ~20 seconds) because the logic meant to detect root
rotation was errantly triggering.
The hash of the rootCA was being compared against a hash of the
intermediateCA and always failing. This doesn't apply to the Consul
built-in CA provider because there is no intermediate in use in the
primary DC.
This is reminiscent of #6513
registerSchema creates some indirection which is not necessary in this
case. newDBSchema can call each of the tables.
Enterprise tables can be added from the existing withEnterpriseSchema
shim.
This way we only have to wait for the serf barrier to pass once before
we can make use of federation state APIs Without this patch every
restart needs to re-compute the change.
Deleting from memdb inside an interation can cause a panic from Iterator.Next. This
case is technically safe (for now) because the iterator is using the root radix tree
not a modified one.
However this could break at any time if someone adds an insert or delete to the coordinates table
before this place in the function.
It also sets a bad example, because generally deletes in an interator are not safe. So this
commit uses the pattern we have in other places to move the deletes out of the iteration.
After fixing that bug I uncovered a couple more:
Fix an issue where we might try to cross sign a cert when we never had a valid root.
Fix a potential issue where reconfiguring the CA could cause either the Vault or AWS PCA CA providers to delete resources that are still required by the new incarnation of the CA.
Using withEnterpriseSchema() we can apply any enterprise schema changes
with a single shim, removing the need to duplicate all of the table
definitions.
Also move all the catalog schemas to a new file to shrink catalog.go a bit.
I believe this commit also fixes a bug. Previously RPCMaxConnsPerClient was not being re-read from the RuntimeConfig, so passing it to Server.ReloadConfig was never changing the value.
Also improve the test runtime by not doing a lot of unnecessary work.
* Fix bug in usage metrics that caused a negative count to occur
There were a couple of instances were usage metrics would do the wrong
thing and result in incorrect counts, causing the count to attempt to
decrement below zero and return an error. The usage metrics did not
account for various places where a single transaction could
delete/update/add multiple service instances at once.
We also remove the error when attempting to decrement below zero, and
instead just make sure we do not accidentally underflow the unsigned
integer. This is a more graceful failure than returning an error and not
allowing a transaction to commit.
* Add changelog
These types are used as values (not pointers) in other structs. Using a pointer receiver causes
problems when the value is printed. fmt will not call the String method if it is passed a value
and the String method has a pointer receiver. By using a value receiver the correct string is printed.
Also remove some unused methods.
This way we only have to wait for the serf barrier to pass once before
we can upgrade to v2 acls. Without this patch every restart needs to
re-compute the change, and potentially if a stray older node joins after
a migration it might regress back to v1 mode which would be problematic.
This can happen when one other node in the cluster such as a client is unable to communicate with the leader server and sees it as failed. When that happens its failing status eventually gets propagated to the other servers in the cluster and eventually this can result in RPCs returning “No cluster leader” error.
That error is misleading and unhelpful for determing the root cause of the issue as its not raft stability but rather and client -> server networking issue. Therefore this commit will add a new error that will be returned in that case to differentiate between the two cases.
