before:
$ go test ./agent/consul -run TestLeader_ReapOrLeftMember_IgnoreSelf
ok github.com/hashicorp/consul/agent/consul 21.147s
after:
$ go test ./agent/consul -run TestLeader_ReapOrLeftMember_IgnoreSelf
ok github.com/hashicorp/consul/agent/consul 5.402s
Starting from and extending the mechanism introduced in #12110 we can specially handle the 3 main special Consul RPC endpoints that react to many config entries in a single blocking query in Connect:
- `DiscoveryChain.Get`
- `ConfigEntry.ResolveServiceConfig`
- `Intentions.Match`
All of these will internally watch for many config entries, and at least one of those will likely be not found in any given query. Because these are blends of multiple reads the exact solution from #12110 isn't perfectly aligned, but we can tweak the approach slightly and regain the utility of that mechanism.
### No Config Entries Found
In this case, despite looking for many config entries none may be found at all. Unlike #12110 in this scenario we do not return an empty reply to the caller, but instead synthesize a struct from default values to return. This can be handled nearly identically to #12110 with the first 1-2 replies being non-empty payloads followed by the standard spurious wakeup suppression mechanism from #12110.
### No Change Since Last Wakeup
Once a blocking query loop on the server has completed and slept at least once, there is a further optimization we can make here to detect if any of the config entries that were present at specific versions for the prior execution of the loop are identical for the loop we just woke up for. In that scenario we can return a slightly different internal sentinel error and basically externally handle it similar to #12110.
This would mean that even if 20 discovery chain read RPC handling goroutines wakeup due to the creation of an unrelated config entry, the only ones that will terminate and reply with a blob of data are those that genuinely have new data to report.
### Extra Endpoints
Since this pattern is pretty reusable, other key config-entry-adjacent endpoints used by `agent/proxycfg` also were updated:
- `ConfigEntry.List`
- `Internal.IntentionUpstreams` (tproxy)
Many places in consul already treated node names case insensitively.
The state store indexes already do it, but there are a few places that
did a direct byte comparison which have now been corrected.
One place of particular consideration is ensureCheckIfNodeMatches
which is executed during snapshot restore (among other places). If a
node check used a slightly different casing than the casing of the node
during register then the snapshot restore here would deterministically
fail. This has been fixed.
Primary approach:
git grep -i "node.*[!=]=.*node" -- ':!*_test.go' ':!docs'
git grep -i '\[[^]]*member[^]]*\]
git grep -i '\[[^]]*\(member\|name\|node\)[^]]*\]' -- ':!*_test.go' ':!website' ':!ui' ':!agent/proxycfg/testing.go:' ':!*.md'
There are some cross-config-entry relationships that are enforced during
"graph validation" at persistence time that are required to be
maintained. This means that config entries may form a digraph at times.
Config entry replication procedes in a particular sorted order by kind
and name.
Occasionally there are some fixups to these digraphs that end up
replicating in the wrong order and replicating the leaves
(ingress-gateway) before the roots (service-defaults) leading to
replication halting due to a graph validation error related to things
like mismatched service protocol requirements.
This PR changes replication to give each computed change (upsert/delete)
a fair shot at being applied before deciding to terminate that round of
replication in error. In the case where we've simply tried to do the
operations in the wrong order at least ONE of the outstanding requests
will complete in the right order, leading the subsequent round to have
fewer operations to do, with a smaller likelihood of graph validation
errors.
This does not address all scenarios, but for scenarios where the edits
are being applied in the wrong order this should avoid replication
halting.
Fixes#9319
The scenario that is NOT ADDRESSED by this PR is as follows:
1. create: service-defaults: name=new-web, protocol=http
2. create: service-defaults: name=old-web, protocol=http
3. create: service-resolver: name=old-web, redirect-to=new-web
4. delete: service-resolver: name=old-web
5. update: service-defaults: name=old-web, protocol=grpc
6. update: service-defaults: name=new-web, protocol=grpc
7. create: service-resolver: name=old-web, redirect-to=new-web
If you shutdown dc2 just before (4) and turn it back on after (7)
replication is impossible as there is no single edit you can make to
make forward progress.
Otherwise when the query times out we might incorrectly send a value for
the reply, when we should send an empty reply.
Also document errNotFound and how to handle the result in that case.
By using the query results as state.
Blocking queries are efficient when the query matches some results,
because the ModifyIndex of those results, returned as queryMeta.Mindex,
will never change unless the items themselves change.
Blocking queries for non-existent items are not efficient because the
queryMeta.Index can (and often does) change when other entities are
written.
This commit reduces the churn of these queries by using a different
comparison for "has changed". Instead of using the modified index, we
use the existence of the results. If the previous result was "not found"
and the new result is still "not found", we know we can ignore the
modified index and continue to block.
This is done by setting the minQueryIndex to the returned
queryMeta.Index, which prevents the query from returning before a state
change is observed.
This test shows how blocking queries are not efficient when the query
returns no results. The test fails with 100+ calls instead of the
expected 2.
This test is still a bit flaky because it depends on the timing of the
writes. It can sometimes return 3 calls.
A future commit should fix this and make blocking queries even more
optimal for not-found results.
Follow the Go convention of accepting a small interface that documents
the methods used by the function.
Clarify the rules for implementing a query function passed to
blockingQuery.
This will both save on unnecessary raft operations as well as
unnecessarily incrementing the raft modify index of config entries
subject to no-op updates.
This commit syncs ENT changes to the OSS repo.
Original commit details in ENT:
```
commit 569d25f7f4578981c3801e6e067295668210f748
Author: FFMMM <FFMMM@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Thu Feb 10 10:23:33 2022 -0800
Vendor fork net rpc (#1538)
* replace net/rpc w consul-net-rpc/net/rpc
Signed-off-by: FFMMM <FFMMM@users.noreply.github.com>
* replace msgpackrpc and go-msgpack with fork from mono repo
Signed-off-by: FFMMM <FFMMM@users.noreply.github.com>
* gofmt all files touched
Signed-off-by: FFMMM <FFMMM@users.noreply.github.com>
```
Signed-off-by: FFMMM <FFMMM@users.noreply.github.com>
* First phase of refactoring PermissionDeniedError
Add extended type PermissionDeniedByACLError that captures information
about the accessor, particular permission type and the object and name
of the thing being checked.
It may be worth folding the test and error return into a single helper
function, that can happen at a later date.
Signed-off-by: Mark Anderson <manderson@hashicorp.com>
Due to timing, a transparent proxy could have two upstreams to dial
directly with the same address.
For example:
- The orders service can dial upstreams shipping and payment directly.
- An instance of shipping at address 10.0.0.1 is deregistered.
- Payments is scaled up and scheduled to have address 10.0.0.1.
- The orders service receives the event for the new payments instance
before seeing the deregistration for the shipping instance. At this
point two upstreams have the same passthrough address and Envoy will
reject the listener configuration.
To disambiguate this commit considers the Raft index when storing
passthrough addresses. In the example above, 10.0.0.1 would only be
associated with the newer payments service instance.
This commit makes two changes to the validation.
Previously we would call this validation in GenerateRoot, which happens
both on initialization (when a follower becomes leader), and when a
configuration is updated. We only want to do this validation during
config update so the logic was moved to the UpdateConfiguration
function.
Previously we would compare the config values against the actual cert.
This caused problems when the cert was created manually in Vault (not
created by Consul). Now we compare the new config against the previous
config. Using a already created CA cert should never error now.
Adding the key bit and types to the config should only error when
the previous values were not the defaults.
These two tests require debug logging enabled, because they look for log lines.
Also switched to testify assertions because the previous errors were not clear.
This test found a bug in the secondary. We were appending the root cert
to the PEM, but that cert was already appended. This was failing
validation in Vault here:
https://github.com/hashicorp/vault/blob/sdk/v0.3.0/sdk/helper/certutil/types.go#L329
Previously this worked because self signed certs have the same
SubjectKeyID and AuthorityKeyID. So having the same self-signed cert
repeated doesn't fail that check.
However with an intermediate that is not self-signed, those values are
different, and so we fail the check. A test I added in a previous commit
should show that this continues to work with self-signed root certs as
well.
This is safer than embedding two interface because there are a number of
places where we check the concrete type. If we check the concrete type
on the top-level interface it will fail. So instead expose the
ACLIdentity from a method.
This change allows us to remove one of the last remaining duplicate
resolve token methods (Server.ResolveToken).
With this change we are down to only 2, where the second one also
handles setting the default EnterpriseMeta from the token.
Daniel Nephin