This PR mainly adds partition to our HTTP adapter. Additionally and perhaps most importantly, we've also taken the opportunity to move our 'conditional namespaces' deeper into the app.
The reason for doing this was, we like that namespaces should be thought of as required instead of conditional, 'special' things and would like the same thinking to be applied to partitions.
Now, instead of using code throughout the app throughout the adapters to add/remove namespaces or partitions depending on whether they are enabled or not. As a UI engineer you just pretend that namespaces and partitions are always enabled, and we remove them for you deeper in the app, out of the way of you forgetting to treat these properties as a special case.
Notes:
Added a PartitionAbility while we were there (not used as yet)
Started to remove the CONSTANT variables we had just for property names. I prefer that our adapters are as readable and straightforwards as possible, it just looks like HTTP.
We'll probably remove our formatDatacenter method we use also at some point, it was mainly too make it look the same as our previous formatNspace, but now we don't have that, it instead now looks different!
We enable parsing of partition in the UIs URL, but this is feature flagged so still does nothing just yet.
All of the test changes were related to the fact that we were treating client.url as a function rather than a method, and now that we reference this in client.url (etc) it needs binding to client.
* Model layer changes to turn Node:ServiceInstances into hasMany
We tried to make something that feels a little like ember-data yet
not leave our approach of re-shaping the JSON directly from the
response.
1. We added transformHasManyResponse for re-shaping JSON for hasMany
relationships. we avoided the normalize word as ember-data serialize
methods usually return something JSON:API shaped and we distinctly don't
want to do that. Transform was the best word we could think of.
2. The integration tests across all of our models here feel very much
like those types of tests that aren't really testing much, or assert
too much to an extent that they get in the way rather than be of any
use. I'd very much like to move a lot of this to unit tests. Currently
most of the fingerprinting functionality is unit tested and these
integration tests were originally to give confidence that IDs and
related properties were being added correctly.
3. We've added a hasMany relationship, but not the corresponding
belongsTo - yet at least. We don't require the belongsTo right now, and
if we do we can add it later.
* Integrate ServiceInstance search bar for Node:ServiceInstances
* Hide Node.Meta when on the Node:ServiceINstance page
We use a little string replace hack here for a human-like label, this is
soon to be replaced with proper i10n replacement
* Always ensure that a Namespace is set, and add comment explaining
* ui: Add the most basic workspace root in /ui
* We already have a LICENSE file in the repository root
* Change directory path in build scripts ui-v2 -> ui
* Make yarn install flags configurable from elsewhere
* Minimal workspace root makefile
* Call the new docker specific target
* Update yarn in the docker build image
* Reconfigure the netlify target and move to the higher makefile
* Move ui-v2 -> ui/packages/consul-ui
* Change repo root to refleect new folder structure
* Temporarily don't hoist consul-api-double
* Fixup CI configuration
* Fixup lint errors
* Fixup Netlify target
2020-10-21 15:23:16 +01:00
Renamed from ui-v2/app/utils/create-fingerprinter.js (Browse further)
John Cowen