* Include secret type when building resources from config snapshot
* First pass at generating envoy secrets from api-gateway snapshot
* Update comments for xDS update order
* Add secret type + corresponding golden files to existing tests
* Initialize test helpers for testing api-gateway resource generation
* Generate golden files for new api-gateway xDS resource test
* Support ADS for TLS certificates on api-gateway
* Configure TLS on api-gateway listeners
* Inline TLS cert code
* update tests
* Add SNI support so we can have multiple certificates
* Remove commented out section from helper
* regen deep-copy
* Add tcp tls test
---------
Co-authored-by: Nathan Coleman <nathan.coleman@hashicorp.com>
* Simple API Gateway e2e test for tcp routes
* Drop DNSSans since we don't front the Gateway with a leaf cert
* WIP listener tests for api-gateway
* Return early if no routes
* Add back in leaf cert to testing
* Fix merge conflicts
* Re-add kind to setup
* Fix iteration over listener upstreams
* New tcp listener test
* Add tests for API Gateway with TCP and HTTP routes
* Move zero-route check back
* Drop generateIngressDNSSANs
* Check for chains not routes
---------
Co-authored-by: Andrew Stucki <andrew.stucki@hashicorp.com>
* draft
* expose internal admin port and add proxy test
* update tests
* move comment
* add failure case, fix lint issues
* cleanup
* handle error
* revert changes to service interface
* address review comments
* fix merge conflict
* merge the tests so cluster is created once
* fix other test
* [API Gateway] Add integration test for conflicted TCP listeners
* [API Gateway] Update simple test to leverage intentions and multiple listeners
* Fix broken unit test
* [API Gateway] Add integration test for HTTP routes
* [API Gateway] Add integration test for conflicted TCP listeners
* [API Gateway] Update simple test to leverage intentions and multiple listeners
* Fix broken unit test
* PR suggestions
Prior to this commit, secondary datacenters could not be initialized
as peering acceptors if ACLs were enabled. This is due to the fact that
internal server-to-server API calls would fail because the management
token was not generated. This PR makes it so that both primary and
secondary datacenters generate their own management token whenever
a leader is elected in their respective clusters.
1. Upgraded agent can inherit the persisted token and join the cluster
2. Agent token prior to upgrade is still valid after upgrade
3. Enable ACL in the agent configuration
* rate limit test
* Have tests for the 3 modes
* added assertions for logs and metrics
* add comments to test sections
* add check for rate limit exceeded text in log assertion section.
* fix linting error
* updating test to use KV get and put. move log assertion tolast.
* Adding logging for blocking messages in enforcing mode. refactoring tests.
* modified test description
* formatting
* Apply suggestions from code review
Co-authored-by: Dan Upton <daniel@floppy.co>
* Update test/integration/consul-container/test/ratelimit/ratelimit_test.go
Co-authored-by: Dhia Ayachi <dhia@hashicorp.com>
* expand log checking so that it ensures both logs are they when they are supposed to be and not there when they are not expected to be.
* add retry on test
* Warn once when rate limit exceed regardless of enforcing vs permissive.
* Update test/integration/consul-container/test/ratelimit/ratelimit_test.go
Co-authored-by: Dan Upton <daniel@floppy.co>
Co-authored-by: Dan Upton <daniel@floppy.co>
Co-authored-by: Dhia Ayachi <dhia@hashicorp.com>
- remove dep on consul main module
- use 'consul tls' subcommands instead of tlsutil
- use direct json config construction instead of agent/config structs
- merge libcluster and libagent packages together
- more widely use BuildContext
- get the OSS/ENT runner stuff working properly
- reduce some flakiness
- fix some correctness related to http/https API
* Protobuf Modernization
Remove direct usage of golang/protobuf in favor of google.golang.org/protobuf
Marshallers (protobuf and json) needed some changes to account for different APIs.
Moved to using the google.golang.org/protobuf/types/known/* for the well known types including replacing some custom Struct manipulation with whats available in the structpb well known type package.
This also updates our devtools script to install protoc-gen-go from the right location so that files it generates conform to the correct interfaces.
* Fix go-mod-tidy make target to work on all modules
* Refactoring the peering integ test to accommodate coming changes of other upgrade scenarios.
- Add a utils package under test that contains methods to set up various test scenarios.
- Deduplication: have a single CreatingPeeringClusterAndSetup replace
CreatingAcceptingClusterAndSetup and CreateDialingClusterAndSetup.
- Separate peering cluster creation and server registration.
* Apply suggestions from code review
Co-authored-by: Dan Stough <dan.stough@hashicorp.com>
Adds automation for generating the map of `gRPC Method Name → Rate Limit Type`
used by the middleware introduced in #15550, and will ensure we don't forget
to add new endpoints.
Engineers must annotate their RPCs in the proto file like so:
```
rpc Foo(FooRequest) returns (FooResponse) {
option (consul.internal.ratelimit.spec) = {
operation_type: READ,
};
}
```
When they run `make proto` a protoc plugin `protoc-gen-consul-rate-limit` will
be installed that writes rate-limit specs as a JSON array to a file called
`.ratelimit.tmp` (one per protobuf package/directory).
After running Buf, `make proto` will execute a post-process script that will
ingest all of the `.ratelimit.tmp` files and generate a Go file containing the
mappings in the `agent/grpc-middleware` package. In the enterprise repository,
it will write an additional file with the enterprise-only endpoints.
If an engineer forgets to add the annotation to a new RPC, the plugin will
return an error like so:
```
RPC Foo is missing rate-limit specification, fix it with:
import "proto-public/annotations/ratelimit/ratelimit.proto";
service Bar {
rpc Foo(...) returns (...) {
option (hashicorp.consul.internal.ratelimit.spec) = {
operation_type: OPERATION_READ | OPERATION_WRITE | OPERATION_EXEMPT,
};
}
}
```
In the future, this annotation can be extended to support rate-limit
category (e.g. KV vs Catalog) and to determine the retry policy.
Anita Akaeze