Commit graph

19 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
freddygv a21e5799f7 Use internal server certificate for peering TLS
A previous commit introduced an internally-managed server certificate
to use for peering-related purposes.

Now the peering token has been updated to match that behavior:
- The server name matches the structure of the server cert
- The CA PEMs correspond to the Connect CA

Note that if Conect is disabled, and by extension the Connect CA, we
fall back to the previous behavior of returning the manually configured
certs and local server SNI.

Several tests were updated to use the gRPC TLS port since they enable
Connect by default. This means that the peering token will embed the
Connect CA, and the dialer will expect a TLS listener.
2022-10-07 09:05:32 -06:00
Eric Haberkorn 5fd1e6daea
Add exported services event to cluster peering replication. (#14797) 2022-09-29 15:37:19 -04:00
DanStough b37a2ba889 feat(peering): validate server name conflicts on establish 2022-09-14 11:37:30 -04:00
Matt Keeler 795e5830c6
Implement/Utilize secrets for Peering Replication Stream (#13977) 2022-08-01 10:33:18 -04:00
Chris S. Kim 1f8ae56951
Preserve PeeringState on upsert (#13666)
Fixes a bug where if the generate token is called twice, the second call upserts the zero-value (undefined) of PeeringState.
2022-07-25 14:37:56 -04:00
Nitya Dhanushkodi cbafabde16
update generate token endpoint to take external addresses (#13844)
Update generate token endpoint (rpc, http, and api module)

If ServerExternalAddresses are set, it will override any addresses gotten from the "consul" service, and be used in the token instead, and dialed by the dialer. This allows for setting up a load balancer for example, in front of the consul servers.
2022-07-21 14:56:11 -07:00
R.B. Boyer 5b801db24b
peering: move peer replication to the external gRPC port (#13698)
Peer replication is intended to be between separate Consul installs and
effectively should be considered "external". This PR moves the peer
stream replication bidirectional RPC endpoint to the external gRPC
server and ensures that things continue to function.
2022-07-08 12:01:13 -05:00
Chris S. Kim 0910c41d95
Revise possible states for a peering. (#13661)
These changes are primarily for Consul's UI, where we want to be more
specific about the state a peering is in.

- The "initial" state was renamed to pending, and no longer applies to
  peerings being established from a peering token.

- Upon request to establish a peering from a peering token, peerings
  will be set as "establishing". This will help distinguish between the
  two roles: the cluster that generates the peering token and the
  cluster that establishes the peering.

- When marked for deletion, peering state will be set to "deleting".
  This way the UI determines the deletion via the state rather than the
  "DeletedAt" field.

Co-authored-by: freddygv <freddy@hashicorp.com>
2022-07-04 10:47:58 -04:00
alex 90577810cc
peering: add imported/exported counts to peering (#13644)
Signed-off-by: acpana <8968914+acpana@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Chris S. Kim <ckim@hashicorp.com>
2022-06-29 14:07:30 -07:00
freddygv a288d0c388 Avoid deleting peerings marked as terminated.
When our peer deletes the peering it is locally marked as terminated.
This termination should kick off deleting all imported data, but should
not delete the peering object itself.

Keeping peerings marked as terminated acts as a signal that the action
took place.
2022-06-14 15:37:09 -06:00
freddygv a5283e4361 Add leader routine to clean up peerings
Once a peering is marked for deletion a new leader routine will now
clean up all imported resources and then the peering itself.

A lot of the logic was grabbed from the namespace/partitions deferred
deletions but with a handful of simplifications:
- The rate limiting is not configurable.

- Deleting imported nodes/services/checks is done by deleting nodes with
  the Txn API. The services and checks are deleted as a side-effect.

- There is no "round rate limiter" like with namespaces and partitions.
  This is because peerings are purely local, and deleting a peering in
  the datacenter does not depend on deleting data from other DCs like
  with WAN-federated namespaces. All rate limiting is handled by the
  Raft rate limiter.
2022-06-14 15:36:50 -06:00
freddygv 6d368b5eed Update peering state and RPC for deferred deletion
When deleting a peering we do not want to delete the peering and all
imported data in a single operation, since deleting a large amount of
data at once could overload Consul.

Instead we defer deletion of peerings so that:

1. When a peering deletion request is received via gRPC the peering is
   marked for deletion by setting the DeletedAt field.

2. A leader routine will monitor for peerings that are marked for
   deletion and kick off a throttled deletion of all imported resources
   before deleting the peering itself.

This commit mostly addresses point #1 by modifying the peering service
to mark peerings for deletion. Another key change is to add a
PeeringListDeleted state store function which can return all peerings
marked for deletion. This function is what will be watched by the
deferred deletion leader routine.
2022-06-13 12:10:32 -06:00
R.B. Boyer 33b497e7c9
peering: rename initiate to establish in the context of the APIs (#13419) 2022-06-10 11:10:46 -05:00
R.B. Boyer dae47101fa
api: ensure peering API endpoints do not use protobufs (#13204)
I noticed that the JSON api endpoints for peerings json encodes protobufs directly, rather than converting them into their `api` package equivalents before marshal/unmarshaling them.

I updated this and used `mog` to do the annoying part in the middle. 

Other changes:
- the status enum was converted into the friendlier string form of the enum for readability with tools like `curl`
- some of the `api` library functions were slightly modified to match other similar endpoints in UX (cc: @ndhanushkodi )
- peeringRead returns `nil` if not found
- partitions are NOT inferred from the agent's partition (matching 1.11-style logic)
2022-05-25 13:43:35 -05:00
FFMMM ea083062d2
add err msg on PeeringRead not found (#12986)
Signed-off-by: FFMMM <FFMMM@users.noreply.github.com>

Co-authored-by: Freddy <freddygv@users.noreply.github.com>
2022-05-09 15:22:42 -07:00
FFMMM 76a6647700
expose meta tags for peering (#12964) 2022-05-09 13:47:37 -07:00
FFMMM 5a6d1cad4e
api: add PeeeringList, polish (#12934) 2022-05-05 14:15:42 -07:00
FFMMM 4cd68b4534
[sync oss] api: add peering api module (#12911) 2022-05-02 11:49:05 -07:00
R.B. Boyer 809344a6f5
peering: initial sync (#12842)
- Add endpoints related to peering: read, list, generate token, initiate peering
- Update node/service/check table indexing to account for peers
- Foundational changes for pushing service updates to a peer
- Plumb peer name through Health.ServiceNodes path

see: ENT-1765, ENT-1280, ENT-1283, ENT-1283, ENT-1756, ENT-1739, ENT-1750, ENT-1679,
     ENT-1709, ENT-1704, ENT-1690, ENT-1689, ENT-1702, ENT-1701, ENT-1683, ENT-1663,
     ENT-1650, ENT-1678, ENT-1628, ENT-1658, ENT-1640, ENT-1637, ENT-1597, ENT-1634,
     ENT-1613, ENT-1616, ENT-1617, ENT-1591, ENT-1588, ENT-1596, ENT-1572, ENT-1555

Co-authored-by: R.B. Boyer <rb@hashicorp.com>
Co-authored-by: freddygv <freddy@hashicorp.com>
Co-authored-by: Chris S. Kim <ckim@hashicorp.com>
Co-authored-by: Evan Culver <eculver@hashicorp.com>
Co-authored-by: Nitya Dhanushkodi <nitya@hashicorp.com>
2022-04-21 17:34:40 -05:00