* ca: move provider creation into CAManager
This further decouples the CAManager from Server. It reduces the interface between them and
removes the need for the SetLogger method on providers.
* ca: move SignCertificate to CAManager
To reduce the scope of Server, and keep all the CA logic together
* ca: move SignCertificate to the file where it is used
* auto-config: move autoConfigBackend impl off of Server
Most of these methods are used exclusively for the AutoConfig RPC
endpoint. This PR uses a pattern that we've used in other places as an
incremental step to reducing the scope of Server.
* fix linter issues
* check error when `raftApplyMsgpack`
* ca: move SignCertificate to CAManager
To reduce the scope of Server, and keep all the CA logic together
* check expiry date of the intermediate before using it to sign a leaf
* fix typo in comment
Co-authored-by: Kyle Havlovitz <kylehav@gmail.com>
* Fix test name
* do not check cert start date
* wrap error to mention it is the intermediate expired
* Fix failing test
* update comment
Co-authored-by: Daniel Nephin <dnephin@hashicorp.com>
* use shim to avoid sleep in test
* add root cert validation
* remove duplicate code
* Revert "fix linter issues"
This reverts commit 6356302b54f06c8f2dee8e59740409d49e84ef24.
* fix import issue
* gofmt leader_connect_ca
* add changelog entry
* update error message
Co-authored-by: Freddy <freddygv@users.noreply.github.com>
* fix error message in test
Co-authored-by: Daniel Nephin <dnephin@hashicorp.com>
Co-authored-by: Kyle Havlovitz <kylehav@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Freddy <freddygv@users.noreply.github.com>
Most of these methods are used exclusively for the AutoConfig RPC
endpoint. This PR uses a pattern that we've used in other places as an
incremental step to reducing the scope of Server.
raftApply was removed so ApplyCARequest needs to handle all the possible operations
Also set the providerShim to use the mock provider.
other changes are small test improvements that were necessary to debug the failures.
and small refactor to getCAProvider so that GoLand is less confused about what it is doing.
Previously it was reporting that the for condition was always true, which was not the case.
After moving ca.ConsulProviderStateDelegate into the interface we now
have the ApplyCARequest method which does the same thing. Use this more
specific method instead of raftApply.
This field was documented as enabling TLS for outgoing RPC, but that was not the case.
All this field did was set the use_tls serf tag.
Instead of setting this field in a place far from where it is used, move the logic to where
the serf tag is set, so that the code is much more obvious.
tlsutil.Config already presents an excellent structure for this
configuration. Copying the runtime config fields to agent/consul.Config
makes code harder to trace, and provides no advantage.
Instead of copying the fields around, use the tlsutil.Config struct
directly instead.
This is one small step in removing the many layers of duplicate
configuration.
* add intermediate ca metric routine
* add Gauge config for intermediate cert
* Stop metrics routine when stopping leader
* add changelog entry
* updage changelog
Co-authored-by: Daniel Nephin <dnephin@hashicorp.com>
* use variables instead of a map
* go imports sort
* Add metrics for primary and secondary ca
* start metrics routine in the right DC
* add telemetry documentation
* update docs
* extract expiry fetching in a func
* merge metrics for primary and secondary into signing ca metric
Co-authored-by: Daniel Nephin <dnephin@hashicorp.com>
The default namespace, and the tokens default namespace (or its origin namespace) is slightly more complicated than other things we deal with in the UI, there's plenty of info/docs on this that I've added in this PR.
Previously:
When a namespace was not specified in the URL, we used to default to the default namespace. When you logged in using a token we automatically forward you the namespace URL that your token originates from, so you are then using the namespace for your token by default. You can of course then edit the URL to remove the namespace portion, or perhaps revisit the UI at the root path with you token already set. In these latter cases we would show you information from the default namespace. So if you had no namespace segment/portion in the URL, we would assume default, perform actions against the default namespace and highlight the default namespace in the namespace selector menu. If you wanted to perform actions in your tokens origin namespace you would have to manually select it from the namespace selector menu.
This PR:
Now, when you have no namespace segment/portion in the URL, we use the token's origin namespace instead (and if you don't have a token, we then use the default namespace like it was previously)
Notes/thoughts:
I originally thought we were showing an incorrectly selected namespace in the namespace selector, but it also matched up with what we were doing with the API, so it was in fact correct. The issue was more that we weren't selecting the origin namespace of the token for the user when a namespace segment was omitted from the URL. Seeing as we automatically forward you to the tokens origin namespace when you log in, and we were correctly showing the namespace we were acting on when you had no namespace segment in the URL (in the previous case default), I'm not entirely sure how much of an issue this actually was.
This characteristic of namespace+token+namespace is a little weird and its easy to miss a subtlety or two so I tried to add some documentation in here for future me/someone else (including some in depth code comment around one of the API endpoints where this is very subtle and very hard to miss). I'm not the greatest at words, so would be great to get some edits there if it doesn't seem clear to folks.
The fact that we used to save your previous datacenter and namespace into local storage for reasons also meant the interaction here was slightly more complicated than it needed to be, so whilst we were here we rejigged things slightly to satisfy said reasons still but not use local storage (we try and grab the info from higher up). A lot of the related code here is from before we had our Routlets which I think could probably make all of this a lot less complicated, but I didn't want to do a wholesale replacement in this PR, we can save that for a separate PR on its own at some point.
Dhia Ayachi